Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-25 Thread Bruce Evans
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:15:44PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > : On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > > : > You need a diff

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:15:44PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : > : On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700,

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 10:15:44PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > : On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > : > You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make su

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure : > you have the right version. : : I got the same problem with Xwra

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread David O'Brien
On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 08:46:45PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote: > You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure > you have the right version. I got the same problem with Xwrapper -- and it was compiled on this 5-CURRENT w/in the past 6 months. To Unsubscribe: send mail t

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : "M. Warner Losh" wrote: : > : > You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure : > you have the right version. : : Version of what? There are no freebsd 5 binaries on xfree86.org's

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread Doug Barton
"M. Warner Losh" wrote: > > You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure > you have the right version. Version of what? There are no freebsd 5 binaries on xfree86.org's website that I can see. I hope you're not saying that binary compatability is broken by desig

Re: New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread M. Warner Losh
You need a different version for -current than for -stable. Make sure you have the right version. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

New pam doesn't work with xdm 4.2

2002-02-24 Thread Doug Barton
I installed XFree86 version 4.2 in binary format from the xfree86.org website. I just upgraded my -current installation to today's latest bits, and now I can't log in with xdm. This is the output to the console (minus date/host info for readability): PAM unable to dlopen(/usr/lib/pam_uni