On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 02:13:35PM -0800, Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
> There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the system - when
> things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick and tired with one of
> those things. The command is, as you could have guessed f
Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
[ ... plot to murder innocent xargs command ... ]
Please don't. I use this on a daily basis. It is a much faster
way to use find than "exec", since it doesn't require a billion
instances of "grep".
> As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs
* Brian F. Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 17:11] wrote:
> "Brandon D. Valentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> >
> > >* Jackie 'business-first' Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:19] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> As a replacement for the 'functionality
On 10-Dec-01 Brian F. Feldman wrote:
> "Brandon D. Valentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>>
>> >* Jackie 'business-first' Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:19]
>> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I
My, is it April 1st already? How quickly time flies! December feels
like it was just yesterday!
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
* Jordan Hubbard ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> My, is it April 1st already? How quickly time flies! December feels
> like it was just yesterday!
You can say that again... I missed my birthday and the new-years party
too. I'm such a geek...
:-)
Cheers,
Emiel
--
No man is an island, but some o
Either this is a troll, or it's an attempt at the very first layer 8 (between
chair and keyboard) exploit:
> Version #2 - for enterprise (ie. business) users, who are searching for their
>way in life (overwhelming majority) (local solution, still):
>
> find / -print0 | grep -v
"Brandon D. Valentine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> >* Jackie 'business-first' Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:19] wrote:
> >>
> >> As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
> >> implementing arbitrary length argum
On 10-Dec-01 Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
> There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the system -
> when
> things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick and tired with one of
> those things. The command is, as you could have guessed from the subject,
> xags(1)
On Mon, Dec 10, 2001 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Emiel Kollof wrote:
> * Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > ummm, what are my scripts that use it going to use instead?
> > it seems to work fine, and it's pretty much an expected
> > base utility. Removing it is going to cause quite a bit of co
If this isn't a troll, I don't know what is
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
> There are days when people get tired with the lagacy code in the
> system - when things of the past just have to go. Recently I got sick
> and tired with one of those things. The command is
* Julian Elischer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> ummm, what are my scripts that use it going to use instead?
> it seems to work fine, and it's pretty much an expected
> base utility. Removing it is going to cause quite a bit of confusion.
I have to concurr here. Who knows what's going to break when
ummm, what are my scripts that use it going to use instead?
it seems to work fine, and it's pretty much an expected
base utility. Removing it is going to cause quite a bit of confusion.
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Jackie 'business-first' Cook wrote:
> There are days when people get tired with the laga
On Mon, 10 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>* Jackie 'business-first' Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:19] wrote:
>>
>> As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
>> implementing arbitrary length argument list passing right in the operating
>> system.
>
>Nice pro
* Jackie 'business-first' Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011210 16:19] wrote:
>
> As a replacement for the 'functionality' present in xargs(1), I propose
> implementing arbitrary length argument list passing right in the operating
> system.
Nice proposal, where's the diff?
> Yours sincerly, Jackie '
15 matches
Mail list logo
