It's a bit of a beast to compile, but the jdk13 port uses new.h in a
couple of C++ files (I could be more specific, but I don't have the source
extracted right now). Since that's now in the backward directory, I fixed
the compile errors by including instead. Everything else in that
port com
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 02:29:17PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:42:24PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > * (lots of ports) The new C++ compiler deprecated a lot of headers by
> > moving them to a different directory: this breaks a heck of a lot of
> > ports). IMO we
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:42:24PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> * (lots of ports) The new C++ compiler deprecated a lot of headers by
> moving them to a different directory: this breaks a heck of a lot of
> ports). IMO we should be searching this directory by default.
example port please.
On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, Dan Trainor wrote:
> What's going to happen to all these ports that still depend on file
> locations in the 4.5 release(s)? The reason I ask is that I see that
> now we're going to have to make two kinds of ports - one for 4.x and one
> for 5.x, or are header files and stuff
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems like ports committers are not able to keep up with the
> rate at which ports are being broken by -current changes:
Since I originally stated that I would work on fixing ports on alpha
and I have clearly failed to do so, I would like to point ou
In the last episode (Jun 04), Dan Trainor said:
> What's going to happen to all these ports that still depend on file
> locations in the 4.5 release(s)? The reason I ask is that I see that
> now we're going to have to make two kinds of ports - one for 4.x and
> one for 5.x, or are header files an
What's going to happen to all these ports that still depend on file
locations in the 4.5 release(s)? The reason I ask is that I see that
now we're going to have to make two kinds of ports - one for 4.x and one
for 5.x, or are header files and stuff like that stored as global
variables... or somet
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:42:24PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> * (lots of ports) The new C++ compiler deprecated a lot of headers by
> moving them to a different directory: this breaks a heck of a lot of
> ports). IMO we should be searching this directory by default.
I believe it is the i
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:17:14PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> How long does it take to build world + all ports, vs. just "world",
> if what you are doing is building everything, not caring about
> correcting ports dependencies? E.g. not serializing through the
> ports build farm process? Is
Terry, I have a high speed connection over here, so if its purely a
'typing' change sort of thing, if you want to tell me what needs to be
done to fix these, I can make the changes and submit patches (I can't
login to my FreeBSD account to make the commits myself ... my key went out
of date *sigh
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:54:32PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > But the error handling path of any program is not one of them; if
> > > you are optimizing something other than the success path, there is
> > > something fundamentally wrong with your program or problem st
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > But the error handling path of any program is not one of them; if
> > you are optimizing something other than the success path, there is
> > something fundamentally wrong with your program or problem statement.
>
> So how about you do more than the average person's part t
On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 04:21:24PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/bogosort-0.3.3.log
> >
> > Any program which declares sys_errlist for itself is wrong. In most
> > cases, the program should be using either strerror() or strerror_r(),
> > dependi
13 matches
Mail list logo
