It seems j mckitrick wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 06:14:46PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> | Well, "work" is exactly the word to use, they work on *some* chipsets
> | with *some* drivers, but they have problems there as well. Remember
> | that most wintel boxes doesn't even use DMA...
>
> rea
On Wed, Aug 23, 2000 at 06:14:46PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
| Well, "work" is exactly the word to use, they work on *some* chipsets
| with *some* drivers, but they have problems there as well. Remember
| that most wintel boxes doesn't even use DMA...
really? why is that? and why include the
It seems Matthew Thyer wrote:
> Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > > ad4: 39082MB [79406/16/63] at ata2-master using UDMA33
> >
> > AHA! try swap that with a known good drive (ie non Maxtor/WD) if you can
>
> Are there plans to try to support this broken hardware ?
Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > ad4: 39082MB [79406/16/63] at ata2-master using UDMA33
>
> AHA! try swap that with a known good drive (ie non Maxtor/WD) if you can
Are there plans to try to support this broken hardware ?
Maxtor seem to be violating ATAPI standards
Try a Promise ATA/66 controller. I have no problems
with either
ad0: 29311MB [59554/16/63] at ata0-master using UDMA66
or
ad3: 29188MB [59303/16/63] at ata3-master using UDMA66
on a very heavy disk load using either a Promise ATA/66 or
the Intel 810(E)'s ATA/66 controller. As of three or f
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 07:44:57PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > ad4: 39082MB [79406/16/63] at ata2-master using UDMA33
>
> AHA! try swap that with a known good drive (ie non Maxtor/WD) if you can
Too bad... have to live with that now ;-)
--
Andreas Klemm
Songs from our band
It seems Andreas Klemm wrote:
>
> I bought a separate ATA PCI controller which is capable of ATA 66.
> But using an ATA-66 capable cable causes the system to hang during
> boot.
Strange..
> atapci0: at device 7.1 on pci0
> atapci0: Busmastering DMA not enabled
Funny, what have you done to dis
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 06:56:55PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Andreas Klemm wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > I can confirm, that for example the Tyan Titan Pro has chipsets
> > builtin that doesn't grok ATA66.
>
> Ehm, you mean because the
It seems Andreas Klemm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems j mckitrick wrote:
> > >
> > > A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> > > along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
> >
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 07:29:30PM +0200, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems j mckitrick wrote:
> >
> > A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> > along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
>
> ATA66 has been working for quite some t
On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 08:31:00AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000802 06:38] wrote:
> >
> > A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> > along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
>
> There's
It seems j mckitrick wrote:
>
> A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
ATA66 has been working for quite some time now. Beware that there are
some disks that claim to be able to do ATA66
* j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [000802 06:38] wrote:
>
> A friend of a friend asked me to find out how ATA66 support was coming
> along. Is it still necessary to disable DMA or PIO settings for it to work?
There's rumors of some "problem" chipsets, but afaik 66 has been working
for quite som
13 matches
Mail list logo
