But I'm suddenly confused what you're actually talking about
here: OpenSSH, OpenSSL, or RSAREF.
OpenSSH has never included crypto code, but it's useless without OpenSSL
which quite certainly does. OpenSSH no longer requires RSAREF to operate
(if you've got clients/servers willing to do DSA
speaking of which, I presume that OpenSSH 2.1 is being
merged into Internat by kindly overworked developer types
at the moment?
On Tue, May 16, 2000 at 10:06:09AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
Even so, moving SSH into the bindist would be one less thing that has to
be merged into Internat all
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
OK, if OpenSSL still contains crypto then "never mind"; I thought
OpenSSL used *only* RSA and it used it through the RSAstubs code,
making it "OK."
OpenSSL is a general-purpose cryptography toolkit which includes such
goodies as Blowfish, CAST,
On Wed, 17 May 2000, Mark Blackman wrote:
speaking of which, I presume that OpenSSH 2.1 is being
merged into Internat by kindly overworked developer types
at the moment?
I think Peter Wemm has already finished.
Kris
In God we Trust -- all others must submit an X.509 certificate.
Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Is it? I thought the RSAref code being pluggable gave it some
protection, or is merely "pluggability" also classified as crypto?
I do recall someone saying something to that
On Mon, May 15, 2000 at 09:54:52PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Even so, moving SSH into the bindist would be one less thing that has to
be merged into Internat all the time.
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
Err, well it still requires openssl, which I think is firmly rooted in the
crypto distribution as long as we have one.
Is it? I thought the RSAref code being pluggable gave it some
protection, or is merely "pluggability" also classified as
* No longer a dependency on RSA (and therefore rsaref for US folks): SSH2
can handle DSA keys which have no patent or usage restrictions. This means
we could now enable SSH2 out of the box in a crypto installation, with no
post-installation configuration requirements. We now have a truly free
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
I wonder if we even have to have it be part of the crypto distribution
in such an event. I always thought it would have been nice if it
could have come with the bindist, and if it doesn't have any "crypto"
dependencies or bits which explicitly
On Sun, 14 May 2000 22:52:11 MST, Kris Kennaway wrote:
* Kerberos support is also limited to SSH1.
Presumably this is still Heimdal Kerberos support, without MIT
interoperability?
Ciao,
Sheldon.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body
10 matches
Mail list logo
