On 1/30/15 6:16 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which chipset is it?
>
> Loading acpi_video causes a handful of interconnected pieces to shift
> (as IIRC at that point acpi_video also states that it wishes to take
> control of video setting, not just leave it all up to ACPI to drive
> itself.)
> I have a sort of "rough draft" of this. I've tested all the percentages
> (Ivy Bridge) and they do seem to correlate linearly (and to the
> intel_backlight userland program used by a lot of people). I haven't
> been able to test on any other hardware as I don't have it, and I don't
> know what ch
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Miguel Clara wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Alexandr Krivulya <
> shur...@shurik.kiev.ua> wrote:
>
>> 31.01.2015 10:30, Miguel Clara пишет:
>> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Elizabeth Myers <
>> elizab...@interlinked.me>
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> >> On
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 10:21 PM, Alexandr Krivulya
wrote:
> 31.01.2015 10:30, Miguel Clara пишет:
> > On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Elizabeth Myers <
> elizab...@interlinked.me>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 01/31/15 02:15, Miguel Clara wrote:
> >>> Working fine on a HP running current as I've noted
31.01.2015 10:30, Miguel Clara пишет:
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Elizabeth Myers
> wrote:
>
>> On 01/31/15 02:15, Miguel Clara wrote:
>>> Working fine on a HP running current as I've noted in the other thread
>>> as for the keys.
>>> This one (and most HP Pavillion models) use the Fn+F(2/3
On 01/30/15 17:16, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Which chipset is it?
Oh, I missed this, sorry. I have an Ivy Bridge chipset.
> Loading acpi_video causes a handful of interconnected pieces to shift
> (as IIRC at that point acpi_video also states that it wishes to take
> control of video setting,
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 8:19 AM, Elizabeth Myers
wrote:
> On 01/31/15 02:15, Miguel Clara wrote:
> > Working fine on a HP running current as I've noted in the other thread
> > as for the keys.
> > This one (and most HP Pavillion models) use the Fn+F(2/3) but the keys,
> > and my Acer (and I think
On 01/31/15 02:15, Miguel Clara wrote:
> Working fine on a HP running current as I've noted in the other thread
> as for the keys.
> This one (and most HP Pavillion models) use the Fn+F(2/3) but the keys,
> and my Acer (and I think not all are like this) use "Fn+<-/->"
If your keys work (as in, t
Working fine on a HP running current as I've noted in the other thread as
for the keys.
This one (and most HP Pavillion models) use the Fn+F(2/3) but the keys, and
my Acer (and I think not all are like this) use "Fn+<-/->"
Melhores Cumprimentos // Best Regards
---
On 30 January 2015 at 22:13, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> On 01/30/15 23:20, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> Do you have brightness buttons anywhere? What happens when you set it
>> through this API and then you use the backlight buttons?
>
>
> I do, but FreeBSD doesn't have the needed WMI doodads to interact
On 01/30/15 23:20, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Do you have brightness buttons anywhere? What happens when you set it
> through this API and then you use the backlight buttons?
I do, but FreeBSD doesn't have the needed WMI doodads to interact with
this, nor do I have the needed Dell laptop doodads in th
On 30 January 2015 at 20:19, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> On 01/30/15 17:25, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>> Would it make sense to have a generic 'backlight' driver framework
>> that we plug into? I wrote a backlight driver (well, 2, but both show
>> up as dev.backlight in sysctl) for powerpc, but if we wa
On 01/30/15 17:25, Justin Hibbits wrote:
> Would it make sense to have a generic 'backlight' driver framework
> that we plug into? I wrote a backlight driver (well, 2, but both show
> up as dev.backlight in sysctl) for powerpc, but if we want to have
> even more individual backlight drivers, I thi
On 01/30/15 19:31, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> So, this is one of the discussions that popped up in the linux side of
> things, that we will end up eventually pulling into freebsd when the
> i915 code is updated.
>
> The raw value is (a) different per setup, and (b) may be inverted to
> work correctly.
On 30 January 2015 at 17:01, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> On 01/30/15 17:45, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, January 30, 2015 04:45:45 PM Elizabeth Myers wrote:
>>> On 01/30/15 09:17, John Baldwin wrote:
Humm. If the code is going to live in the drm driver, then I would
start with hanging
On 01/30/15 17:45, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, January 30, 2015 04:45:45 PM Elizabeth Myers wrote:
>> On 01/30/15 09:17, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> Humm. If the code is going to live in the drm driver, then I would
>>> start with hanging a sysctl off of the drm device itself. (Each new-bus
>>>
On Friday, January 30, 2015 04:45:45 PM Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> On 01/30/15 09:17, John Baldwin wrote:
> > Humm. If the code is going to live in the drm driver, then I would
> > start with hanging a sysctl off of the drm device itself. (Each new-bus
> > device_t has a sysctl ctx you can get to h
Would it make sense to have a generic 'backlight' driver framework
that we plug into? I wrote a backlight driver (well, 2, but both show
up as dev.backlight in sysctl) for powerpc, but if we want to have
even more individual backlight drivers, I think it makes sense to make
them all look the same,
Hi,
Which chipset is it?
Loading acpi_video causes a handful of interconnected pieces to shift
(as IIRC at that point acpi_video also states that it wishes to take
control of video setting, not just leave it all up to ACPI to drive
itself.)
There's a bunch of discussion / code churn in the linux
On 01/30/15 09:17, John Baldwin wrote:
> Humm. If the code is going to live in the drm driver, then I would
> start with hanging a sysctl off of the drm device itself. (Each new-bus
> device_t has a sysctl ctx you can get to hang new nodes off of the
> device's node.)
I'm wondering if that's the
On 1/28/15 1:38 AM, Elizabeth Myers wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to add backlight support to the i915 driver in FreeBSD. It seems
> that two magic addresses are read and wrote from to change the backlight
> itself. It supports rather fine-level granularity all the way down to
> zero. Right now I use
21 matches
Mail list logo
