Riccardo Torrini wrote:
I'm really sorry for creating that a mess, I started this thread
only because fdisk recognize _OTHER_ hidden partition and I would
like to add hidden FAT32 to that _existing_ list.
Why?
Specifically, partition type values have been reused often in the
past, and the
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Riccardo Torrini write
s:
I have 4 primary partitions and I use a boot manager (magic.com)
that install some black magic that hide unused partition, this
permit to have multiple 'other-OS' partition that don't know of
[ ... Partition ID changes ... ]
Nate Lawson wrote:
But as I said, this is rather marginal and I really don't feel
it should go in unless this xor-0x10 convention is more widespread.
partition magic does this too. isn't the correct failure mode just to
print the part. id in hex instead
At 3:46 PM -0800 12/1/02, Terry Lambert wrote:
[ ... Partition ID changes ... ]
But as I said, this is rather marginal and I really don't
feel it should go in unless this xor-0x10 convention is
more widespread.
partition magic does this too. isn't the correct failure mode
just to
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
My own opinion is that if I have explicitly hid a partition,
then freebsd should ignore it. There are times that I do this
specifically so *freebsd* will ignore it, and I don't want
freebsd trying to second-guess what I meant.
Exactly. If you wanted the dratted
On 01-Dec-2002 (23:46:00/GMT) Terry Lambert wrote:
WHY ARE WE NOT RESPECTING THE DECISION TO HIDE THE THINGS?
A user installed the software doing the hiding on purpose.
The software changed the ID hide it, on purpose.
Windows ignores these partitions -- on purpose.
I'm really sorry for
At 8:06 AM +0100 12/2/02, Riccardo Torrini wrote:
WHY ARE WE NOT RESPECTING THE DECISION TO HIDE THE THINGS?
A user installed the software doing the hiding on purpose.
The software changed the ID hide it, on purpose.
Windows ignores these partitions -- on purpose.
I'm really sorry for
In message p05200f26ba10b7cdec2f@[128.113.24.47], Garance A Drosihn writes:
This still sounds a little too definitive to me, as if we are
absolutely sure what that partition is. I think that's where
some of the debate came from. I (for one) wouldn't be quite so
jumpy about the idea, if we
Bruce Evans wrote:
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Riccardo Torrini write
As far as I know it use an EXOR 0x10 to hide/unhide but fdisk doesn't
recognize 0x0B/0x0C fat32 when hidden (0x1B/0x1C)
But as I said, this is rather marginal and I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Riccardo Torrini write
s:
I have 4 primary partitions and I use a boot manager (magic.com)
that install some black magic that hide unused partition, this
permit to have multiple 'other-OS' partition that don't know of
each other (but, obviously, FreeBSD can see and
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Riccardo Torrini write
s:
I have 4 primary partitions and I use a boot manager (magic.com)
that install some black magic that hide unused partition, this
permit to have multiple 'other-OS' partition that don't know
On 29-Nov-2002 (01:34:27/GMT) Bruce Evans wrote:
RT I have 4 primary partitions and I use a boot manager (magic.com)
[...]
RT As far as I know it use an EXOR 0x10 to hide/unhide but fdisk
RT doesn't recognize 0x0B/0x0C fat32 when hidden (0x1B/0x1C)
PHK I think this is very marginal use really...
12 matches
Mail list logo
