On Tue, Dec 03, 2002 at 11:09:20AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 14:54:12 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>
> > Index: b.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/one-true-awk/b.c,v
> > retrieving revisio
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 14:54:12 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Index: b.c
> ===
> RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/contrib/one-true-awk/b.c,v
> retrieving revision 1.1.1.2
> diff -u -p -r1.1.1.2 b.c
David, this variant is nice enough. Pleas
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 02:27:53PM +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:38:38AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> > > bug that should b
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 14:27:53 +1100, Tim Robbins wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:38:38AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > > It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> > > bug that should be
On Wed, Nov 20, 2002 at 04:38:38AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> > bug that should be fixed before 5.0-RELEASE is out.
>
> I agree. There is no locale yet
On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 14:52:02 +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> It seems that this patch has never been committed. This is a critical
> bug that should be fixed before 5.0-RELEASE is out.
I agree. There is no locale yet and I never see that patch.
--
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/
msg4
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 05:58:08PM -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:44:12AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> > Next bad thing discovered about new awk just looking at sourse code: it
> > not support locale (collating in regexp ranges too, of course). We just
> > make great
On Thu, 1 Nov 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Although I admit the fallout has been somewhat painful, let's
> try to make do with it, if we disconnect the new awk I feel
> that we will keep repeating this cycle, basically each activation
> will see new problems requiring another disconnect. Let'
On 02-Nov-2001 (12:58:55/GMT) Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
>>> because `echo' nicely removes \n's from env vars when it prints them.
>> des@des ~% foo='bar
>> quote> baz'
>> des@des ~% echo $foo
>> bar
>> baz
>> des@des ~% /bin/echo $foo
>> bar
>> baz
> humm! what shell ($SHELL) are you using ?
Here
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> "David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > because `echo' nicely removes \n's from env vars when it prints them.
>
> des@des ~% foo='bar
> quote> baz'
> des@des ~% echo $foo
> bar
> baz
> des@des ~% /bin/echo $foo
> bar
> baz
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:44:12AM +0300, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> Next bad thing discovered about new awk just looking at sourse code: it
> not support locale (collating in regexp ranges too, of course). We just
> make great backward step switching to it.
I have a patch for that.
--
-- David
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:42:13 -0800, David O'Brien wrote:
> Mostly agreed. This has not been at all as smooth as I thought it would
> be. Before going down this path, I would like to see if the current
> state of the world isn't usable. I think (hope) all the nits are out
> now. #6 is def
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:42:18PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > Although I admit the fallout has been somewhat painful, let's
> > try to make do with it, if we disconnect the new awk I feel
> > that we will keep repeating this cycle, basically each activation
> > will see new problems requiring
On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 13:31:04 CST, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> Although I admit the fallout has been somewhat painful, let's
> try to make do with it, if we disconnect the new awk I feel
> that we will keep repeating this cycle, basically each activation
> will see new problems requiring another d
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 09:23:12PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> > No, awk should be fixed instead to conform POSIX specs, or switched back
> > to gawk.
>
> It's not a binary decision. What we should probably do is:
>
> 1) Disconnect bwk-awk from the build.
> 2) Connect gawk to the build.
> 3)
* Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011101 13:27] wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 01 Nov 2001 22:08:36 +0300, "Andrey A. Chernov" wrote:
>
> > No, awk should be fixed instead to conform POSIX specs, or switched back
> > to gawk.
>
> It's not a binary decision. What we should probably do is:
>
> 1) Dis
On Thu, Nov 01, 2001 at 11:04:13 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
>
> Circumvention is to use /boot/loader.old, if it was built with gawk, or
> somehow build a new "loader" after applying a patch that accomplishes
> what this one does:
> #
> -# Note! This script uses strftime() which is a gawk-ism,
This is a quick heads-up.
If you have built -CURRENT within the last couple of days, and if you try
to use that (recently-built -CURRENT) as the host system for building
-CURRENT, the 3 patches I posted last night do appear to get through
the build process, but the result is a system that does no
"David O'Brien" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> because `echo' nicely removes \n's from env vars when it prints them.
des@des ~% foo='bar
quote> baz'
des@des ~% echo $foo
bar
baz
des@des ~% /bin/echo $foo
bar
baz
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
>Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2001 08:34:16 -0800 (PST)
>From: David Wolfskill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>mkdep -f .depend -a-I/usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/include /usr/src/usr.bin/jot/jot.c
>cd /usr/src/usr.bin/jot; make _EXTRADEPEND
>echo jot: /usr/obj/usr/src/i386/usr/lib/libc.a >> .depend
>===> usr.bin/kdu
20 matches
Mail list logo
