Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Thu, 02 Nov 2000 22:15:45 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >I confirmed linux ls didn't cause panic, so the culprit should belong > >somewhere else. Hopefully phk will catch it for us. :) > > I hope I just did. Please report back if this has or hasn't solve > the problem. Just confirmed th

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Akinori MUSHA" writes: >At Thu, 02 Nov 2000 15:26:29 -0500, >Marcel Moolenaar wrote: >> >> Akinori MUSHA wrote: >> > >> > At Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:11:44 -0500 (EST), >> > Andrew Gallatin wrote: >> > > To clarify -- this is the native /bin/ls and NOT /compat/linux/b

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Thu, 02 Nov 2000 15:26:29 -0500, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > > > At Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:11:44 -0500 (EST), > > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > To clarify -- this is the native /bin/ls and NOT /compat/linux/bin/ls? > > > > Yes. > > How is linux_ustat involved if the pan

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
Akinori MUSHA wrote: > > At Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:11:44 -0500 (EST), > Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > To clarify -- this is the native /bin/ls and NOT /compat/linux/bin/ls? > > Yes. How is linux_ustat involved if the panic is caused by a native binary? -- Marcel Moolenaar mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Akinori MUSHA" writes: >At Fri, 03 Nov 2000 02:02:50 +0900, >I wrote: >> I'm 100% sure this change caused the panic because the stack trace >> showed it panicked at vfinddev() called from linux_ustat(). > >D'uh, I lied! Actually `ls /compat/linux/dev' panics at: v

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Thu, 2 Nov 2000 14:11:44 -0500 (EST), Andrew Gallatin wrote: > To clarify -- this is the native /bin/ls and NOT /compat/linux/bin/ls? Yes. > I don't suppose you could throw an older kernel on and show the output > of /bin/ls /compat/linux/dev ? Here is the output from the native /bin/ls on

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Akinori MUSHA writes: > At Fri, 03 Nov 2000 02:02:50 +0900, > I wrote: > > I'm 100% sure this change caused the panic because the stack trace > > showed it panicked at vfinddev() called from linux_ustat(). > > D'uh, I lied! Actually `ls /compat/linux/dev' panics at: vfinddev() > <-- adda

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Fri, 03 Nov 2000 02:02:50 +0900, I wrote: > I'm 100% sure this change caused the panic because the stack trace > showed it panicked at vfinddev() called from linux_ustat(). D'uh, I lied! Actually `ls /compat/linux/dev' panics at: vfinddev() <-- addaliasu() <-- ufs_vinit(). Seems I was 100% c

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Akinori MUSHA writes: > At Wed, 1 Nov 2000 22:08:26 -0800 (PST), > Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > marcel 2000/11/01 22:08:26 PST > > > > Modified files: > > sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c > > Log: > > Fix linux_ustat syscall. We only have cdevs now, so looking > > for

Re: cvs commit: src/sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c

2000-11-02 Thread Akinori MUSHA
At Wed, 1 Nov 2000 22:08:26 -0800 (PST), Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > marcel 2000/11/01 22:08:26 PST > > Modified files: > sys/compat/linux linux_stats.c > Log: > Fix linux_ustat syscall. We only have cdevs now, so looking > for a block device isn't that useful anymore. > >