Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Peter Wemm wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > > Hm, sounds like UP got optimized out. > > > Gah! That would be a first. :( > > Well, until I can build a working kernel, I'll just assume that it's a > > feature. > FWIW, tur

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-27 Thread Philipp Mergenthaler
On Tue, Feb 26, 2002 at 09:29:51PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > FWIW, turning off PG_G see_ms to help. Change in pmap.c: > #if !defined(SMP) || defined(ENABLE_PG_G) > to: > #if /*!defined(SMP) ||*/ defined(ENABLE_PG_G) > and see how you go. This got me past atkbd0, but it is a very worrying > sign

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-27 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Mike Silbersack wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > >>Disabling PG_G allows it to work here again as well. Given the problems >>we're experiencing, backing out the pmap changes of the last two days >>seems like a good idea. >> >>Mike "Silby" Silbersack >> > > Well, I sorta

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > Disabling PG_G allows it to work here again as well. Given the problems > we're experiencing, backing out the pmap changes of the last two days > seems like a good idea. > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack Well, I sorta take that back. The box has been up

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > FWIW, turning off PG_G see_ms to help. Change in pmap.c: > #if !defined(SMP) || defined(ENABLE_PG_G) > to: > #if /*!defined(SMP) ||*/ defined(ENABLE_PG_G) > and see how you go. This got me past atkbd0, but it is a very worrying > sign. I now get a vnod

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Peter Wemm
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > > > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > >_ > > > Hm, sounds like UP got optimized out. > > > > Gah! That would be a first. :( > > Well, until I can build a working kernel, I'll just assume that it's a > feature. FWIW, turning off PG_G

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > > Hm, sounds like UP got optimized out. > > Gah! That would be a first. :( Well, until I can build a working kernel, I'll just assume that it's a feature. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Peter Wemm
Mike Silbersack wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:46:59 + (GMT) > > >From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > >Using ACPI doesn't help here either. Hmph. Can I get a kernel dump that > > >early in the boot process? The dumpon

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, David Wolfskill wrote: > >Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:46:59 + (GMT) > >From: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >Using ACPI doesn't help here either. Hmph. Can I get a kernel dump that > >early in the boot process? The dumpon manpage doesn't suggest a way as > >far

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote: > I reverted that change, and the double panic still occured. :| > > FWIW, you're correct in that I'm not using the acpi module. > > Mike "Silby" Silbersack Using ACPI doesn't help here either. Hmph. Can I get a kernel dump that early in the boot p

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Michael D. Harnois
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 17:38, Peter Wemm wrote: > You may like to try reverting this change: A great idea, but unfortunately, incorrect ... -- Michael D. Harnois bilocational bivocational Pastor, Redeemer Lutheran ChurchWashburn, Iowa 1L, UST School of Law

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
On Tue, 26 Feb 2002, Peter Wemm wrote: > Mike Silbersack wrote: > > I'm experiencing the same double panic on boot that PHK is now; are we the > > only ones, or is it just that nobody else has updated recently? > > If you are not using acpica, then you're probably using vm86 for pcibios > calls

RE: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Riccardo Torrini
On 26-Feb-2002 (17:27:19/GMT) Mike Silbersack wrote: > I'm experiencing the same double panic on boot that PHK is > now; are we the only ones, or is it just that nobody else > has updated recently? Mee too, just survied to 4 auto-reboot without messages... Trying with a boot -v I see a keyboard

Re: Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Peter Wemm
Mike Silbersack wrote: > I'm experiencing the same double panic on boot that PHK is now; are we the > only ones, or is it just that nobody else has updated recently? If you are not using acpica, then you're probably using vm86 for pcibios calls. I've been told that I've broken bios.c.. You may

Today's panic on boot problem

2002-02-26 Thread Mike Silbersack
I'm experiencing the same double panic on boot that PHK is now; are we the only ones, or is it just that nobody else has updated recently? Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message