embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk? I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of course). Index: bsd.cpu.mk

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: [bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk? I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of course). Index

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: -87,17 +113,17 # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386 +. if ${CPUTYPE} == athlon +MACHINE_CPU = athlon 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: What do people think of this patch to embellish bsd.cpu.mk? I also changed pN to be the more canonical pentiumN (with pN aliases of course). Do we need PPC and Sparc flags? -- Steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Steve Kargl
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@ # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: @@ -87,17 +113,17 @@ # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if ${CPUTYPE} == k7 -MACHINE_CPU = k7 3dnow mmx k6 k5 i586 i486 i386

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread David O'Brien
[bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To:] On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: +if !defined(CPUTYPE) +CPUTUNE ?= ev56 +.endif CPUTYPE ?= ev4 What is this for? Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we strongly

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:17:40PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:46:32PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:33:09PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: -87,17 +113,17 # presence of a CPU feature. .if ${MACHINE_ARCH} == i386 -. if

Re: embellish of bsd.cpu.mk

2002-05-11 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 02:28:14PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: On Sat, May 11, 2002 at 01:43:10PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: +if !defined(CPUTYPE) +CPUTUNE ?= ev56 +.endif CPUTYPE ?= ev4 What is this for? Unlike i386, but catering to ev4 Alpha's; we strongly pessimize