Re: interesting: problem with nm?
In the last episode (Jun 27), Szilveszter Adam said: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:39PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: > > If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out > > by default like most other programs that deal with binaries. > > > > If a.out does not exist, then you will indeed see that. > > Thanks for the clarification, I expected it to print a version string > (because I was only interested in seeing that it does not die after > the pmap fix) but had to find out from the man page, that nm(1) uses > -V for that, while all other members of the binutils family opt for > -v. Oh well... Consistency in software design rocks. Since it's a gnu app, --version works also. -- Dan Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: interesting: problem with nm?
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:13:39PM -0700, Juli Mallett wrote: > If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out by default > like most other programs that deal with binaries. > > If a.out does not exist, then you will indeed see that. Thanks for the clarification, I expected it to print a version string (because I was only interested in seeing that it does not die after the pmap fix) but had to find out from the man page, that nm(1) uses -V for that, while all other members of the binutils family opt for -v. Oh well... Consistency in software design rocks. So, problem solved. Thanks to all who responded. -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szombathely Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: interesting: problem with nm?
I think it may be related.. I saw this when I was sufferning from the other problemm make sure you have the pmap fix and then re make buildworld/make installworld when running on a new kernel and see if it goes away. szia! On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > > It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix > > > (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.326). I believe that the pmap > > > bug was to blame for all of these issues but I need verification before > > > I have the comfort level necessary to do the MFC I intended to do. > > > > > > -Matt > > > Matthew Dillon > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > Everything works great with the fix. > > Which exposes another interesting problem. > > If I issue 'nm -v', it says: > > /usr/libexec/elf/nm: a.out: No such file or directory > > This system was last upgraded tonight, so has code from around 26th in > the userland. Kernel has been upgraded to code from this evening. > > Does anybody else see this? > > -- > Regards: > > Szilveszter ADAM > Szombathely Hungary > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: interesting: problem with nm?
* Szilveszter Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escriuréres > > Everything works great with the fix. > > Which exposes another interesting problem. > > If I issue 'nm -v', it says: > > /usr/libexec/elf/nm: a.out: No such file or directory If no file is specified for nm to operate on it operates on a.out by default like most other programs that deal with binaries. If a.out does not exist, then you will indeed see that. -- Juli Mallett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | FreeBSD: The Power To Serve Taking over the FreeBSD negaverse.| FreeBSD Negacore Team Will break world for fulltime employment. | finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Re: interesting: problem with nm?
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, Szilveszter Adam wrote: :On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: :> On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: :> > It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix :> > (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.326). I believe that the pmap :> > bug was to blame for all of these issues but I need verification before :> > I have the comfort level necessary to do the MFC I intended to do. :> > :> >-Matt :> >Matthew Dillon :> ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :> > :> > :> :> Everything works great with the fix. : :Which exposes another interesting problem. : :If I issue 'nm -v', it says: : :/usr/libexec/elf/nm: a.out: No such file or directory : :This system was last upgraded tonight, so has code from around 26th in :the userland. Kernel has been upgraded to code from this evening. : :Does anybody else see this? I have a userland from a week and a half ago (or so? :-/) with last night's kernel (with the pmap.c fix) and do not experience this issue. Cheers, -- Andrew R. Reiter [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
interesting: problem with nm?
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 08:05:21PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 10:28:00AM -0700, Matthew Dillon wrote: > > It would be great if you guys could re-test with the pmap fix > > (/usr/src/sys/i386/i386/pmap.c r1.326). I believe that the pmap > > bug was to blame for all of these issues but I need verification before > > I have the comfort level necessary to do the MFC I intended to do. > > > > -Matt > > Matthew Dillon > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > Everything works great with the fix. Which exposes another interesting problem. If I issue 'nm -v', it says: /usr/libexec/elf/nm: a.out: No such file or directory This system was last upgraded tonight, so has code from around 26th in the userland. Kernel has been upgraded to code from this evening. Does anybody else see this? -- Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Szombathely Hungary To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
