Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-14 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jun-14, at 6:48 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 6/14/2016 5:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >>> The targets (at top-level) that META_MODE is applied to is a whitelist >>> now after r301887. So it's safe to always pass it when building from >>> the top-level. If it's an unsupported target it wi

Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-14 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 6/14/2016 5:13 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> The targets (at top-level) that META_MODE is applied to is a whitelist >> now after r301887. So it's safe to always pass it when building from >> the top-level. If it's an unsupported target it will internally disable >> META_MODE. > So WITH_META_MODE=

Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-14 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jun-14, at 9:25 AM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 6/13/2016 4:31 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> On 2016-Jun-13, at 3:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> >>> On 6/11/2016 7:28 PM, Mark Millard wrote: mergemaster [as an example] has code like: > # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | mo

Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-14 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 6/13/2016 4:31 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2016-Jun-13, at 3:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > >> On 6/11/2016 7:28 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >>> mergemaster [as an example] has code like: >>> # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | more >>> . . . MM_MAKE="make ${ARCHSTRING} -m ${SOURCEDIR

Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-13 Thread Mark Millard
On 2016-Jun-13, at 3:27 PM, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 6/11/2016 7:28 PM, Mark Millard wrote: >> mergemaster [as an example] has code like: >> >>> # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | more >> . . . >>> MM_MAKE="make ${ARCHSTRING} -m ${SOURCEDIR}/share/mk" >>>${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${DESTDIR

Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-13 Thread Bryan Drewery
On 6/11/2016 7:28 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > mergemaster [as an example] has code like: > >> # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | more > . . . >> MM_MAKE="make ${ARCHSTRING} -m ${SOURCEDIR}/share/mk" >> ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} distrib-dirs >/dev/null >> ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${TE

Re: mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-11 Thread Simon J. Gerraty
Mark Millard wrote: > > # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | more > . . . > > MM_MAKE="make ${ARCHSTRING} -m ${SOURCEDIR}/share/mk" > > ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} distrib-dirs >/dev/null > > ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${TEMPROOT} distrib-dirs >/dev/null && > > ${MM_MAKE} _obj SUBD

mergemaster internally using make [for example] vs. WITH_META_MODE?

2016-06-11 Thread Mark Millard
mergemaster [as an example] has code like: > # grep -i make /usr/sbin/mergemaster | more . . . > MM_MAKE="make ${ARCHSTRING} -m ${SOURCEDIR}/share/mk" > ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${DESTDIR} distrib-dirs >/dev/null > ${MM_MAKE} DESTDIR=${TEMPROOT} distrib-dirs >/dev/null && > ${MM_MAKE