I've just been going through this stuff for the past week.
None of the things come with adequate documentation
so you need to rely heavily on mailing list support.
Thankfully a few people have been giving me
some assistance but looks like at least few days more
messing around will be involved
* Doug Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 01:01] wrote:
I've just been going through this stuff for the past week.
None of the things come with adequate documentation
so you need to rely heavily on mailing list support.
Thankfully a few people have been giving me
some assistance but looks like
Actually ppp shouldn't be that hard to set up as a vpn server.
exactly where to find config information suitable for a non-expert ??
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
Le 2001-04-26, Jesús Arnáiz écrivait :
I want to set VPN on my system, I see there is many programs created to do it.
Any advantages or disadvantages of using one or other?. What is better (is the first
time I set VPN on a UNIX system).?
If your requirements are not too complicated, you
Dear Thomas,
Any advantages or disadvantages of using one or other?.
What is better (is the first
time I set VPN on a UNIX system).?
If your requirements are not too complicated, you can use pipsecd
(from ports/net), which is an implementation of ipsec that requires
only very
* PETIT Sebastien [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 01:43] wrote:
Hi,
Is it the same limitation problem about the performance under mysql with a
lot of IO ?
Yes, basically most of the performance problems you're seeing on FreeBSD
should be because of the threads libraries, nothing else.
You might
Hi all,
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created.
Kris
Index: ar_io.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/bin/pax/ar_io.c,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14
On 25.04.2001 23:34:36 +, Dima Dorfman wrote:
OpenBSD's last(1) has a nice snapshot feature which allows one to get
a list of users logged in at a certain date and time. This is very
useful, e.g., for security auditing: you see a message in a log, and
want to know who could've caused it.
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:00:36PM +1000, Doug Young wrote:
There is a basic HOWTO on one application at
freebsddiary, but its quite dated now. The only other apps
I've been able to find are vtund poptop (both from ports)
Judging from feedback I received to a similar question, the
few
no vpn or sloop labels in my 4.1 system ... when were they introduced ??
- Original Message -
From: Brian Somers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Doug Young [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Alfred Perlstein [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jesús Arnáiz
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL
I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
I rewrote it in C because it was too slow. The C version produces
incorrect results when compiled with -O. Note that the log starts at
16:27.
The
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:23:49PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
I ran into this bug while analyzing a customer's logs to determine the
best time of day for an upgrade. The original script was in Perl, but
I rewrote it in C because it was too slow.
Could you provide the Perl script as
Anton Berezin wrote:
| Could you provide the Perl script as well?
That would be pointless. The issue is with the C ...
| I am quite sure it can be
| made to run faster. In fact, it is almost always possible in Perl to
| closely match the perfomance of a C program for this kind of
|
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Anton Berezin wrote:
| Could you provide the Perl script as well?
That would be pointless. The issue is with the C ...
I know that.
| I am quite sure it can be
| made to run faster. In fact, it is almost always possible in
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 09:44:36AM -0400, Jason Andresen wrote:
Er, isn't this the kind of problem the GCC folks are more likly to be
able to fix?
In general yes. But it doesn't hurt to double check here to make sure
you your ducks in row before going to the GCC lists. I see later in this
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created.
Sigh. They could have generalized this just a little and supported Bzip2
at the same time. Please let me know
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created.
Sigh. They could have generalized this just a little and supported Bzip2
at the same time. Please let me
Actually ppp shouldn't be that hard to set up as a vpn server.
exactly where to find config information suitable for a non-expert ??
/usr/share/examples/ppp - have a look at the vpn* and sloop* labels.
* Doug Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 04:59] wrote:
no vpn or sloop labels in
Our site, unixgamers.com will hopefully be launching soon. As I've
mentioned before, we will be giving full instructions on how to setup Linux
compatible games under BSD and any other Unix-like operating system. We
need contributors with experience on how to setup FreeBSD to run games via
Linux
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created.
Sigh. They could have generalized this
At 09:11 AM 04/26/2001, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Anton Berezin wrote:
| Could you provide the Perl script as well?
That would be pointless. The issue is with the C ...
I know that.
| I am quite sure it can be
| made to run faster. In
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created.
Sigh. They could have generalized
Dennis wrote:
At 09:11 AM 04/26/2001, you wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 11:00:15PM +1000, Greg Black wrote:
Nope. The real nonsense is what you say. Perl core is written in a
highly optimized C using very polished algorithms. As long as the Perl
script is written in such a way as to
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, you wrote:
I've just been going through this stuff for the past week.
None of the things come with adequate documentation
so you need to rely heavily on mailing list support.
Thankfully a few people have been giving me
some assistance but looks like at least few days
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 07:23:30PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1)
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 04:42:44PM +0100, Brian Somers wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:54:25AM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Please review the following code from OpenBSD; it adds -z and -Z
options to pax(1) to gzip(1) the archives created.
Sigh. They could have generalized this
* Doug Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010426 04:59] wrote:
no vpn or sloop labels in my 4.1 system ... when were they introduced ??
you can use cvsweb to read the most recent versions:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/share/examples/ppp
OK thanks Alfred. I wasn't aware of that as I
This is cool!
Now, is there a way to use MS_DUN VPN support to dial into such a private
network made with FreeBSD so that people can telecommute?
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, John J. Rushford Jr wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, you wrote:
I've just been going through this stuff for the past week.
None
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dennis writes:
Don't try to argue this ridiculous point on this list. You are badly
overmatched. You are so wrong that its not worthy of debate.
Which is presumably why you offered no arguments.
Actually, this is a fairly well-demonstrated result. Anything that
Hi!
I'm configuring a server able to do NAT and IP FILTERING (IPF).
What are the required options that I should set to the kernel?
I have this:
--
options IPFILTER
options IPFILTER_LOG
options IPFIREWALL
options IPDIVERT
---
but I'm not sure if IPFIREWALLING should be (I'm not going to use
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Lists Account
writes:
: Any suggestions?
Be patient.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:49:04PM -0700, Jeremiah Gowdy scribbled:
| I'd like to know if anyone's considering support for the new AMD
| Sledgehammer/Clawhammer/*hammer with x86-64 architecture. I know the new
| hammer cpus will run as _very_ fast x86-32 processors, and FreeBSD would run
|
On Wed, Apr 18, 2001 at 04:24:18PM +0200, Remy Nonnenmacher scribbled:
| On 17 Apr, Andrew Hesford wrote:
| On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 12:49:04PM -0700, Jeremiah Gowdy wrote:
| For sure. Look at how it's pretty more easy to use an ARM or MIPS core
| to handle gluelessly the PCI, SDRAM, Flash etc...
At 05:51 PM 04/26/2001, Peter Seebach wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dennis writes:
Don't try to argue this ridiculous point on this list. You are badly
overmatched. You are so wrong that its not worthy of debate.
Which is presumably why you offered no arguments.
Actually, this is a
:Hi!
:
:I'm configuring a server able to do NAT and IP FILTERING (IPF).
:
:What are the required options that I should set to the kernel?
:
:I have this:
:...
:Jesús Arnáiz
I think all you need is:
options IPFIREWALL
options IPDIVERT
I usually also have
I saw BSDIs retail product of FreeBSD in a local bookstore the other day,
and it became sadly clear why LINUX, although highly inferior, is so much
more widely used. Right next to Freebsd (priced at $129.95) was Mandrake
LINUX for $29.95.
What they dont seem to realize is that people who
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Dennis wrote:
What they dont seem to realize is that people who know its worth more than
linux also know they dont have to pay $129. for free software with fancy
packaging and paid support.
This is relevant to -hackers in what way?
greid
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 06:08:36PM -0500, Michael C . Wu wrote:
| and a bunch of ARMs for low-level I/O tasks. Back to imagination. (Take
| a look at 0.15um copper process FPGAs with embeded ARM at Altera, for
| example, and you will see why no one, in the futur, will never ever need
| a
At 08:12 PM 04/26/2001, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 07:03:47PM -0400, Dennis wrote:
I saw BSDIs retail product of FreeBSD in a local bookstore the other day,
and it became sadly clear why LINUX, although highly inferior, is so much
more widely used. Right next to Freebsd
At 08:24 PM 04/26/2001, George Reid wrote:
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Dennis wrote:
This is relevant to -hackers in what way?
well you copied hackers, so you either think so also or you are just an
ass. Learn to ignore things you dont care about, you'll live longer.
I either think so w.r.t
On Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Dennis wrote:
Your need to continuously criticize me no matter how trivial the subject is
very satisfying to me. Makes you look like even more of a loser than you are.
Actually, it's the first time I've replied to one of your troll posts
before. Seeing (from both current
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 08:00:35PM -0400, Dennis wrote:
At 08:12 PM 04/26/2001, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 07:03:47PM -0400, Dennis wrote:
I saw BSDIs retail product of FreeBSD in a local bookstore the other day,
and it became sadly clear why LINUX, although highly
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I saw BSDIs retail product of FreeBSD in a local bookstore the other day,
and it became sadly clear why LINUX, although highly inferior, is so much
more widely used.
Linux was much more widely used because the Jolitzes felt their i86
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 05:59:06PM -0500, Michael C . Wu wrote:
IIRC, KA-64 does not even have an emulator yet.
Are you making a distinction between emulator and simulator? Such that
SimNow! and VirtuHammer don't fall into what you are speaking of?
--
-- David ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
To
Michael C . Wu wrote:
With the branch prediction, cache tracing, and EPIC instructions,
you really want to use an ILP compiler. Without a compiler that
can decide on good ways to output binaries that run with all the IA-64
innovations^Wreinvention-of-the-wheels.
Anothing interesting point
IIRC, KA-64 does not even have an emulator yet. Rest assured that
there will be a lot of people in and out of this project interested
in supporting a KA-64 port of FreeBSD.
What's KA-64 ?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the
Dennis wrote:
At 08:12 PM 04/26/2001, David O'Brien wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 07:03:47PM -0400, Dennis wrote:
I saw BSDIs retail product of FreeBSD in a local bookstore the other day,
and it became sadly clear why LINUX, although highly inferior, is so much
more widely used.
Then again you could also download an iso of 4.3 for free, go to BSD Mall and
get a 4 CD set for 39.95 etc. The thing you pay for when you are buying these
box sets is usually the manual, some also include a certain amount of telephone
support etc. So while one may be 29.95 and the other another
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:07:47AM +0200, Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
Hi!
I'm configuring a server able to do NAT and IP FILTERING (IPF).
What are the required options that I should set to the kernel?
I have this:
--
options IPFILTER
options IPFILTER_LOG
options IPFIREWALL
options IPDIVERT
- Original Message -
From: Sergey Babkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael C . Wu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeremiah Gowdy [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 4:09 AM
Subject: Re: x86-64 Hammer and IA64 Itainium
Anothing interesting point is that the optimisation
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Pentchev writes:
: Yes, I had the same problem with my PCMCIA-PCI bridge. I solved it with
: the following patch, which adds a new option to pccardd: -S maxslot.
: Then, add -S 1 to pccardd_flags in your /etc/rc.conf, and you're all set.
On current, without
At 03:38 PM 4/25/01, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Sven Huster writes:
OT FYI:
Check the ISP1100 from Intel if you like
support for PIII up to 850
2GB RAM
2 x Intel Network onboard (includes pxe boot, possible
On Thu, Apr 26, 2001 at 02:02:40PM +0200, Lists Account wrote:
Hi All
Ok, the newcard stuff under version 5 picks up my bridge fine, and it
finds my wi0 (orinoco gold card) perfectly, this is all great and I was
rather ecstatic as I watched it boot and tell me all this...
However the
Hi everyone..
I have a PC in the boot of my car running Linux (yuck) to play mp3s.
I would love to use FreeBSD instead of Linux for many reasons.
The only thing stopping me using FreeBSD is the lack of a driver in the
style
implemented for Linux (provides a /dev/lcd that u just throw data
Hello All:
I'm in the process of configuring a cluster and noticed that 3COM
had recently purchased Alteon and was making a 3C996-T 10/100/1000 BaseT
cards. Can the Alteon Tigon drivers support this card?
After a bit of poking around, and discussion with 3Com's tech support,
they
55 matches
Mail list logo
