Re: unionfs and getcwd problem.

2002-03-27 Thread Vladimir B.
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 18:28, BOUWSMA Beery wrote: The only obvious `problem' is when a non-r00t user attempts to access the union-mounted fs when the shadow directories have not yet been created, and `permission denied' is returned for all directories that exist below, but not in

back trace of vm_object_reference bug

2002-03-27 Thread Apache Man
# gdb -k GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type show copying to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty

Re: kernel panic: vm_object_reference

2002-03-27 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 08:28:50AM +, Ceri wrote: Forcibly unmounting a file system that is in use will panic your system. It's not exactly a bug, it's just how it works. :) I don't agree. I know this is a little foolproof programming but I should return something like busy

Re: ports/36307: nmh port cuts off last part of sender domain

2002-03-27 Thread Matthias Buelow
Scott Blachowicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: (freebsd-hackers, please see comment about sys/utsname.h / SYS_NMLN below; you might ignore the nmh bug correspondence above.) OK...it looks like there's this zotnet/mts/mts.c file with a LocalName() function that calls various functions (uname(),

Re: ports/36307: nmh port cuts off last part of sender domain

2002-03-27 Thread Matthias Buelow
I wrote: printf(sysname: %s\nnodename: %s\nrelease: %s\nmachine: %s\n, u.sysname, u.nodename, u.release, u.version, u.machine); Actually here's an obvious bug in the quick test program, I just want to mention it, it doesn't effect anything in the rest of the mail, though.

problems with wine

2002-03-27 Thread Thomas Wrfl
Hi, I have a problem running a application with wine (native). Error message: 486 cpu or higher required. I have a amd k7. The linux version catches the cpu-type from /proc/cpuinfo. But Freebsd's /proc is diffrent from linux. So they set the values for cpu type fix ( i386 ). Which isn't a really

[PATCH] src/examples/cvsup/README

2002-03-27 Thread Marco Molteni
[BCCed to -stable] Hi all, I was used to stable-supfile used to track -stable and standard-supfile used to track -current. Since april 2001 this is no more the case, and standard-supfile tracks the branch it was originally pulled from. I don't want to go into a bikeshed painting contest, but

Re: ports/36307: nmh port cuts off last part of sender domain

2002-03-27 Thread Scott Blachowicz
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 03:44:32PM +0100, Matthias Buelow wrote: ... This is both a problem in nmh aswell as FreeBSD; nmh shouldn't rely on uname(3) for getting a full Internet hostname as nodename; FreeBSD should raise SYS_NMLN to provide enough place for an Internet hostname. ... My

Re: usb mass storage problems

2002-03-27 Thread Lars Eggert
Thomas Würfl wrote: I fixed the problem. I added following lines to /usr/src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_da.c (FreeBSD-4.5RELEASE): /* Below a list of quirks for USB devices supported by umass. */ /* + * Fujitsu Siemens Memorybird + */ + {T_DIRECT,

Adaptec NIC and Netfinity

2002-03-27 Thread Dave Brancato
Hello I am having some problems with an Adaptec 62044 network card (quad NIC), the first three interfaces initialize but then the last fails. I have compiled in the starfire driver with my kernel using the line: device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'') The hardware

Re: problems with wine

2002-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Thomas Würfl([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.27 16:48:40 +: Hi, I have a problem running a application with wine (native). Error message: 486 cpu or higher required. I have a amd k7. The linux version catches the cpu-type from /proc/cpuinfo. But Freebsd's /proc is diffrent from linux. So

Re: problems with wine

2002-03-27 Thread Julian Elischer
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: Thomas Würfl([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.27 16:48:40 +: Hi, I have a problem running a application with wine (native). Error message: 486 cpu or higher required. I have a amd k7. The linux version catches the cpu-type from

Re: problems with wine

2002-03-27 Thread Karsten W. Rohrbach
Julian Elischer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.27 11:43:50 +: [...my dumbass workaround deleted...] He said he was running native.. the cpu type is in `sysctl hw` The code shuold be altered on FreeBSD to look there. oops, you're prefectly right. i skipped the (native) when reading the

uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( -- -Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using 1970s technology, start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible

Re: problems with wine

2002-03-27 Thread Thomas Würfl
Am Mittwoch, 27. März 2002 21:18 schrieben Sie: Julian Elischer([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2002.03.27 11:43:50 +: [...my dumbass workaround deleted...] He said he was running native.. the cpu type is in `sysctl hw` The code shuold be altered on FreeBSD to look there. oops, you're

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( THat's an INVARIANTS thing, even without UMA... -- Terry To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020327 13:30] wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( THat's an INVARIANTS thing, even without UMA... /usr/src/sys/i386/conf % grep INVA BRIGHT options

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Terry Lambert
Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020327 13:30] wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( THat's an INVARIANTS thing, even without UMA... /usr/src/sys/i386/conf % grep INVA

Re: freebsd-hackers-digest V5 #429

2002-03-27 Thread Darryl Okahata
Chad Kline [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Olympus digital cameras (D-370) */ {T_DIRECT, SIP_MEDIA_REMOVABLE, OLYMPUS, D-*, *}, /*quirks*/ DA_Q_NO_6_BYTE usbdevs -v reports: Controller /dev/usb0: addr 1: self powered, config 1, OHCI

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( Oh! Thanks for pointing this out. Originally it could, but with the per cpu buckets it lost the ability to until the data was really freed. What I will do

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: * Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020327 13:30] wrote: Alfred Perlstein wrote: Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( THat's an INVARIANTS thing, even without UMA...

Re: freebsd-hackers-digest V5 #429

2002-03-27 Thread Thomas Würfl
1. I'm pretty sure that the string comparisons are case-sensitive. OLYMPUS does not match Olympus. I think he's right here. I have overseen this. For USB hard disks, at least (which may also apply to cameras), you also need to be running a pretty recent version of -STABLE; I'm pretty sure

Re: How to correctly detect POSIX 1003.1b features on FreeBSD?

2002-03-27 Thread BOUWSMA Beery
Moin, moin! %s wrote on %.3s, %lld Sep 1993 Anyway, when compiling this Linux program, which has lines [ ... ] linking fails... Don't compile on Linux? 8-) 8-) BINGO!!! Give that man a cigar. Once again it has been pointed out to me that my messages are hopelessly unclear. Let me

loop-aes (porting)

2002-03-27 Thread mininx
Hi! I'm looking for people helping to port loop-aes (www.sourceforge.net/projects/loop-aes) under FreeBSD. It is a type of crypted fs just like CFS. But since i had many problems with CFS (unsolved prolbems, and there was no answers for it from the writer and either from the mailing list) i

incorrect information in ata(4)?

2002-03-27 Thread void
% uname -a narcissus% uname -a FreeBSD example.com 4.5-STABLE FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #6: Mon Mar 18 12:08:59 EST 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/EXAMPLE i386 % man ata | grep -C atamodes To see the devices' current access modes, use the command line: sysctl hw.atamodes

Re: incorrect information in ata(4)?

2002-03-27 Thread Shu-yu Guo
On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 19:24, void wrote: % sysctl hw.atamodes sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.atamodes' Interesting, perhaps you should submit a PR and post this to the -doc list. -- c'est la sel fantasie ici pour toujours Shu-yu Guo [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Jeff Roberson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [020327 14:16] wrote: On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Can uma diagnose double free's? It doesn't seem to be able to under a GENERIC config. :( Oh! Thanks for pointing this out. Originally it could, but with the per cpu buckets it lost

Re: uma and double free detection?

2002-03-27 Thread Jeff Roberson
On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: Oh! Thanks for pointing this out. Originally it could, but with the per cpu buckets it lost the ability to until the data was really freed. What I will do is disable per cpu buckets if INVARIANTS is on. The reason for this is that you have

Re: incorrect information in ata(4)?

2002-03-27 Thread void
On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:32:26PM -0500, Shu-yu Guo wrote: On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 19:24, void wrote: % sysctl hw.atamodes sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.atamodes' Interesting, perhaps you should submit a PR and post this to the -doc list. Good ideas, I will do that. -- Ben An

Re: incorrect information in ata(4)?

2002-03-27 Thread David Turnbull
On Thu, 2002-03-28 at 12:42, void wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2002 at 07:32:26PM -0500, Shu-yu Guo wrote: On Wed, 2002-03-27 at 19:24, void wrote: % sysctl hw.atamodes sysctl: unknown oid 'hw.atamodes' Interesting, perhaps you should submit a PR and post this to the -doc

Timezone changes

2002-03-27 Thread David Turnbull
I've taken up the local cable TV network (optus, telstra) practice of using AEST and AEDT instead of just EST in Australia, so I edited /usr/src/share/zoneinfo/australasia to produce these timezones. # New South Wales # Rule NAMEFROMTO TYPEIN ON AT SAVE

Re: How to correctly detect POSIX 1003.1b features on FreeBSD?

2002-03-27 Thread Terry Lambert
BOUWSMA Beery wrote: Moin, moin! %s wrote on %.3s, %lld Sep 1993 Your mailer is misconfigured... o The mlockall() function takes a flags argument that is an inclusive OR of one of several manifest constants. So basically, if you test for the manifest constants

Fw: ? sysctl -a crashed the GENERIC kernel

2002-03-27 Thread Gautham Ganapathy
- Original Message - From: Gautham Ganapathy [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FreeBSD.org - Questions [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 9:06 AM Subject: ? sysctl -a crashed the GENERIC kernel Hi I installed FreeBSD 4.5 from the freebsdmall feb2002 cd.

Re: ? sysctl -a crashed the GENERIC kernel

2002-03-27 Thread Gautham Ganapathy
In the last episode (Mar 28), Gautham Ganapathy said: Fatal trap 12 : page fault while in kernel mode fault address= 0x6351ec0c fault code = supervisor read, page not found Is this repeatable, or did it only happen once? Unexplained trap 12 panics or signal 11

Re: ? sysctl -a crashed the GENERIC kernel

2002-03-27 Thread Dan Nelson
In the last episode (Mar 28), Gautham Ganapathy said: Fatal trap 12 : page fault while in kernel mode fault address= 0x6351ec0c fault code = supervisor read, page not found Is this repeatable, or did it only happen once? Unexplained trap 12 panics or signal 11 coredumps

Re: incorrect information in ata(4)?

2002-03-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: [EMAIL PROTECTED] David Turnbull [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: : I tried this too, and I get the same problem. : So I was poking around sysctls for fun and found this: : : kern.osrevision: 199506 : : I'm just wondering what that is all about? Shouldn't it be like 200203?