In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: wi1: timeout in wi_cmd 0x0002; event status 0x8000
: wi1: timeout in wi_cmd 0x; event status 0x8000
: wi1: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear.
: wi1: wi_cmd: busy bit won't clear.
:
PLEASE LOOK AT LISTING FOR CHINESE SEARCH ENGINE
I WILL CALL YOU TOMORROW
I THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA
CHECK OUT THE LISTINGS TO GET AN IDEA
http://www.chinawebs.com/comp/list_sub2.php?sub2_id=2234
3805jplU1-751hUDD6371IseJ3-902kkLq2629RQwh8-695VjQq8603TdUe9-692FENf2350IiBPl72
To Unsubscribe:
PLEASE LOOK AT LISTING FOR CHINESE SEARCH ENGINE
I WILL CALL YOU TOMORROW
I THINK THIS IS A GOOD IDEA
CHECK OUT THE LISTINGS TO GET AN IDEA
http://www.chinawebs.com/comp/list_sub2.php?sub2_id=2234
6560XRTp8-082omig6367HlQc2-510l28
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscri
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: I noticed that there are a couple of things in the pcic_isa.c and in the
: pcic.c resume() function which seem to have no equivalent in the
: pcic_pci.c; such as speaker/power setup:
:
: pcic_s
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> So after the first power cycle, can you reboot w/o a power cycle?
Rewired to make that possible.
Not getting very conclusive results; on some reboots (w/o power cycle) it
may take minutes before the Timeout's kick in - whereas on other reboots
it is
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: > So something in the cardbus_init() may be needed ?
:
: A full powercycle seems to change the situation; and does allow for the
: card(s) to work with just the csc/func calls.
I'm very confused now.
I noticed that there are a couple of things in the pcic_isa.c and in the
pcic.c resume() function which seem to have no equivalent in the
pcic_pci.c; such as speaker/power setup:
pcic_setb(&sc->slots[0], PCIC_MISC1, PCIC_MISC1_SPEAKER);
pcic_clrb(&sc->slots[0], PCIC_MISC2, PCIC_LP
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> Hmm - no cookie; worse than before.
I take that back.
> With the cardbus init -all was essentially functional as far as I could
> test; but in with the above the timeouts have returned - abeit in a
..
> So something in the cardbus_init() may
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> this is bogus. However, a less bogus version is:
>
> /*
>* Tell the chip to do its routing thing.
>*/
> sc->chip->func_intr_way(&sc->slots[0], sc->func_route);
> sc->chip->csc_intr_way(&sc->slots[0], sc->csc_route);
:
:You don't have anything to commit :-) mmap2 already exists in -CURRENT,
:it's only missing in -STABLE. So I'd think you probably don't have to
:worry about it.
:
:Ken
Ah, excellent. Then it only needs to go into -stable.
-Matt
To Unsubscri
Stefanos Kiakas wrote:
> Jean Milanez Melo wrote:
> > I run a number of jail enviroments in a public server, so, i would like to
> > limit the disk usage of each jail to, say, X GB. Lets think of a practical
> > issue. I have 40GB storage space, and what i want is to limit disk usage
> > to 5GB eac
Hello,
I believe it has been discussed on one of these lists before.
Create a file that is 5G and use vnconfig to define pseudo disk
device, create a new file system using newfs, then create the jail.
Stefanos
--- Forwarded Message
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2002 15:40:50 -0200
Hello,
I have a question concerning "struct sysctl_oid"s initial value for
oid_refcnt. Why is oid_refcnt set to 0 with the SYSCTL_OID macro
but to 1 if created with sysctl_add_oid()?
And another question: Is it guaranteed that all sysctls from a
modules "sysctl_set" (obtained with 'sysctls = (struc
2 things, first try using the latest version of winex. Second, try editing
/usr/compat/linux/usr/bin/winex (it's a shell script) so that #!/bin/sh
says #!/usr/compat/linux/bin/bash
I found that doing that solves a few problems for me, although I never had
the problem you're having.
Ken
On Thu, 2
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Dirk-Willem van Gulik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
:
: On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
:
: > On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
: >
: > > > This doesn't force the interrupt to be IRQ3, but rather tells the card
: > > >
Hello,
I run a number of jail enviroments in a public server, so, i would like to
limit the disk usage of each jail to, say, X GB. Lets think of a practical
issue. I have 40GB storage space, and what i want is to limit disk usage
to 5GB each jail.
This way i will be always sure that, say, if i ha
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
>
> > > This doesn't force the interrupt to be IRQ3, but rather tells the card
> > > to use INTA#. The probe line for wi card should say irq N where N is
>
> I may be mistaken - but it seems th
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
> > This doesn't force the interrupt to be IRQ3, but rather tells the card
> > to use INTA#. The probe line for wi card should say irq N where N is
I may be mistaken - but it seems that
pcic_pci_pd67xx_csc(struct pcic_slot *sp, enum pc
Woohoo! Congrats. Nice job. If other people could test this, this should
be committed. I'll have to have a quick look at the initialisation code
that has been added to see whether there is no problem with that, but
from the quick glance I just had, I don't think there is a prolbem in
there.
Nick
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Well, right now the following code is trying to force INTA#:
..
> sp->putb(sp, PCIC_INT_GEN, /* Assume INTA# */
> (sp->getb(sp, PCIC_INT_GEN) & 0xF0) | 3);
Which seems to cause the hang. Commenting this out will r
Bingo! :)
When I changed the bsqh initialisation, I get speed above 400 KB/s,
that makes me feel much better :)
I am sending a corrected patch as attachment.
Tomas
On Thu, 28 Nov 2002, Ian Dowse wrote:
> I had a quick look at the patch - one thing I noticed is that you
> are possibly not ini
Hi Poul-Henning,
Poul-Henning Kamp wrote on Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 08:58:09PM +0100:
[..]
> I think we can more or less conclude that something has trashed your
> memory.
>
> I'd suggest you try to run your program with ElectricFence or similar.
[..]
I found the problem. It seems to result in a se
On Wed, Nov 27, 2002 at 10:06:44PM -0500, Kenneth Culver wrote:
> What flags are you starting winex with? Also, you can't run the game as
> normal I'm assuming because FreeBSD doesn't have block devices. The game
> needs to be able to check the cdrom, in order to be able to run, and it
> expects to
23 matches
Mail list logo
