Re: FreeBSD 6.0 default pty/tty-limit (256) OFF!

2006-01-21 Thread Mikko Työläjärvi
Hi Antti, I need patch to raise FreeBSD 6.0 default pty/tty-limit (256) UP or OFF. In shell-production usage, that limit is ridiculous, there must be stop to this and put PTY-limits off! I changed my servers operating systems moment ago from Linux to FreeBSD thinking that FreeBSD could be more

Re: style(9) example :-)

2006-01-21 Thread PAF
> > On 2005-03-18 00:50, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Giorgos Keramidas: > >>On 2005-03-17 19:33, Roman Kurakin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>I was unable to refrain from posting this :-) > >>> > >>>int i;main(){for(;i["] >>>o, world!\n",'/'/'/'));}read(j,i,p){write(j/p+p,i---j,i/

Re: Call for FreeBSD Status Reports

2006-01-21 Thread Max Laier
All, On Friday 13 January 2006 20:19, I wrote: > no big news since 6.0, but in the background there are many interesting > projects: Just now the new malloc has hit current, we hear promising > numbers from the network performance crew, the first batch of security > advisories is out and I'm sure

Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ???

2006-01-21 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sun, Jan 22, 2006 at 08:09:56AM +1100 I heard the voice of Peter Jeremy, and lo! it spake thus: > > Given that a port's dependency tree can depend on the options it is > invoked with, it would be nicer if the dependency tree was generated > dynamically, rather than pulled out of the latest INDE

Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ???

2006-01-21 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Sat, 2006-Jan-21 14:30:57 -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 03:23:21PM -0500 I heard the voice of >Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:07:39AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >> > >> > This is something that may be easier to: >> > >> > 3)

Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ???

2006-01-21 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 03:23:21PM -0500 I heard the voice of Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:07:39AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > > > > This is something that may be easier to: > > > > 3) Implement in portupgrade or portmanager or some such higher-level >

Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ???

2006-01-21 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Sat, Jan 21, 2006 at 10:07:39AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > [ Cc trim a bit ] > > On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:53:11PM -0500 I heard the voice of > Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > In order to do better you either have to: > > This is something that may be easier to: > > 3)

Re: speed up port compiling using RAM (tmpfs) ???

2006-01-21 Thread Matthew D. Fuller
[ Cc trim a bit ] On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 08:53:11PM -0500 I heard the voice of Kris Kennaway, and lo! it spake thus: > > In order to do better you either have to: This is something that may be easier to: 3) Implement in portupgrade or portmanager or some such higher-level tool in a language