On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 06:51:08PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "ALeine" writes:
> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> I gave up on journalling myself because IMO it complicates
> >> things a lot and the problem it solves is very very small.
> >
> >If only hardw
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:18:45PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
>
> >No matter what disk you take - writes never have been atomic.
> >The major difference I see is that you get a read error back in
> >the d
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 01:30:15AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Roland Dowdeswell wri
> tes:
>
> >Let's discuss a simple example and see how it works. Let's walk
> >through a user login, with /etc/passwd on GBDE and the filesystem
> >mounted with mtime.
>
> T
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:00:58PM +0100, Peter B wrote:
> >>
> >> Is it possible to program an "ordinary" (like Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3)) USB
> >> host controller into acting as an usb device instead? (just like scsi can).
> >>
> >> Idea:
> >> M$Win-Usb -> FreeBSD-USB#1 .. software .. FreeBSD
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 03:41:01PM +0100, Peter B wrote:
>
> Is it possible to program an "ordinary" (like Intel 82801CA/CAM (ICH3)) USB
> host controller into acting as an usb device instead? (just like scsi can).
>
> Idea:
> M$Win-Usb -> FreeBSD-USB#1 .. software .. FreeBSD-USB#2 -> Device
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 11:13:26AM -0800, Sam Leffler wrote:
> Bernd Walter wrote:
> >On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:42:50PM -0500, Kurt J. Lidl wrote:
> >
> >>On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:42:50PM -0500, Kurt J. Lidl wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 04:16:13PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:30:43AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> > > Just a question. Maybe it isn't true but to me it seems there
>
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 08:00:08PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:35:16PM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
> > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> &
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:36:52PM +0100, Søren Schmidt wrote:
>
> Seems I lost my lonely ATAPI CDROM with built in changer to the eternal
> HW scrapyards, let it rest in peace :)
>
> Finding a new one seems difficult so I thought I'd ask around how many
> still has one of these ?
>
> I ask be
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 09:30:43AM +0100, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> Just a question. Maybe it isn't true but to me it seems there
> is still this duality between ttyd and cuad serial devices.
>
> Why is that? I'm just asking because someone I was talking with
> about modems an comm programs
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:42:46PM +0300, Andrew L. Neporada wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2005 at 02:52:21PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> >
> > Chances are you don't have things configured quite correctly in the
> > bios. The interrupts aren't asserting proplerly.
>
> Interrupts 3,4,10,11 are rese
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 06:52:41AM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:
> On Friday 21 January 2005 00:51, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Milan Obuch wrote this message on Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 10:00 +0100:
> > >
> [skip]
> > > Great, could we cooperate?
> >
> > Sure, though Joerg Wunsch has been doing work w/ I2
On Thu, Jan 20, 2005 at 10:59:39AM +0100, Bram Van Steenlandt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been having some problems with the following:
> ex1: I have two scsi scanners and I use sane to scan all works well my
> two scanners are /dev/pass0 and /dev/pass1 however when one of them is
> turned of the devi
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 10:36:07PM -0800, Douglas Allen wrote:
> Hi hackers,
>
>I am interested in connecting my Linux machine to my windows XP machine.
Neither Linux nor Windows is FreeBSD, why do you ask in a FreeBSD
list?
>I was going to try the USB ports first. Now I've opened a
On Sun, Dec 19, 2004 at 08:07:20AM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-Dec-18 20:59:11 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 08:17:39PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >> My approach to this is to add a line similar to
> >> dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/de
On Sat, Dec 18, 2004 at 08:17:39PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sat, 2004-Dec-18 02:03:09 -0500, Gary Corcoran wrote:
> > I suppose it
> >is possible these errors may have shown up more than a week or
> >two ago, because my windows machines, reaching them via samba,
> >haven't shown any problem
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 09:50:05AM -0800, Paul Armstrong wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:05:28PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > > This is to provide compatibility whn working with multiple versions of
> > > Unix.
> > > I write many scripts in sh on Solaris, and find they just don't work on
> >
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 04:22:12PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
> Bernd Walter writes:
> >On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:30:05PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
> >If you already an interface driver atatched then ugen fails to attach
> >the whole device.
>
> well, i think that this
On Wed, Oct 06, 2004 at 03:30:05PM +0300, Niki Denev wrote:
>
> Hello everyone!,
>
> The last 1-2 days i've been trying to make some userspace OBEX utilities to
> work with a USB based Nokia GSM phone and doing this i discovered something
> that confuses me a little:
> The phone in question is
On Tue, Jul 06, 2004 at 10:53:23PM -0400, Greg Hormann wrote:
>
> I'm working to develop a communications program to control a piece of
> vendor supplied hardware. (They only provide a control program for
> Windows.) I think I'm close. The device uses a RS-232 -> RS-485 convert
> which I belive is
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 06:05:55PM +0400, Alex K wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> Bernd Walter wrote:
> > uplcom takes devices (or maybe interfaces) based on vendor/product ID.
> >
> > > What approach will you recommend?
> >
> > What is your problem?
> 2 d
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:04:44PM +0400, Alex K wrote:
>
> Hello, everyone!
>
> As far as I understand drivers for USB devices are selected and attached
> based on USB VendorID and ProductID match. Here I have situation where
> I have 2 diffrent USB devices (cables) which got same Vendor and Dev
On Fri, May 14, 2004 at 03:59:27AM +, mark wrote:
>
>
>
> I'm looking for a work around to this usb ethernet problem.
>
>
> With FreeBSD-5.2.1-p5, "device ehci" added to the default GENERIC kernel,
> the axe device works fine in USB 2.0 mode, when plugged in after boot
> (AFTER ehci driver
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 04:37:22PM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
> > But I don't understand the whole issue you have.
> > Just schedule a request and wait for the device to ack.
> > The Host controller does the polling for you as long as the request is
> > queued and the timeout value supplied with the re
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 05:36:47PM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
> > Igh - that sounds like a very bad device design then.
> > There would have been lots a ways to do in a clean way without
> > additional pipes - such as transfering 0 sized packets to trigger a
> > status inquiry or by adding status bytes
On Mon, May 03, 2004 at 06:48:14PM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
> > That is what I call a bad design.
> > You waste resources because the device designer did not take the
> > features he had available.
> Okay, I guess so. There are also other minor things that I don't understand
> why
> the device is imp
On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 10:38:42AM -0400, Rita Lin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing a USB driver for a device that does not have any interrupt. It only has
> Bulk-in and Bulk-out. A periodic polling status from default pipe is required to
> have a smooth data transfer. I used timeout() routine to
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 01:29:29PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Apr 2004 18:28, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > I am wondering if there is any way of telling if a given umass device is
> > > a floppy drive (or wants to look like one) - eg I have a USB FDD which
&
On Mon, Apr 19, 2004 at 10:47:48PM +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> A friend of mine handed me a USB flash key today that has 2 'partition' - one
> 1.44Mb chunk pretends to be a floppy drive and the rest is a normal umass
> device.
>
> I am wondering if there is any way of telling if a given umas
On Fri, Apr 09, 2004 at 02:01:56PM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> > Those cards are just what they are - cheap.
> > They have very small FIFOs and they don't use DMA.
> > IRQ sharing makes them even worse than traditional ISA stuff.
> > My advise for cost efficient and fast serials is getting USB
On Thu, Apr 08, 2004 at 12:34:43PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 03:36:02PM -0700, othermark wrote:
> : > I have a multi-port PCI card under puc and sio that has 4 19200
> : > con
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 09:32:11AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : I agree that it's bad to yank a device from under ugen automatically and
> : reattach it to a better match.
>
> I think it is good. Really. However, ugen should mark the device
> busy when it is opened, and mark it as unbusy as
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:46:32AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 07:44:34PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sam Lawrance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sun, 2004-03-28 at 20:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
> : > On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner L
On Mon, Mar 29, 2004 at 06:15:56AM -0800, jitendra pande wrote:
> Hi Toni,
>
> Thanks a lot for the information.
>
> My device is the one which supports control transfers only thus i understand that
> for a second device i need to use /dev/ugen1 and so on.
Yes - /dev/ugen? is the control endp
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 02:51:56AM -0800, jitendra pande wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have stuck with a problem with usb devices.
>
> In case of FreeBSD 4.8, whenever a new USB device is attached to the system, no
> device node is dynamically being created within the dev file system.
>
> This is in co
On Sun, Mar 28, 2004 at 01:31:03AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 04:55:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I'm working on getting devd(8) usable for usb devices.
>
> The part I'm not sure about is where you a
On Fri, Mar 26, 2004 at 10:27:39AM +1100, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> Hi,
>
> usbd's present behaviour when reading usbd.conf is to scan from top to
> bottom and use the first match.
>
> What if it was changed to use the last, most specific match? That is,
> the last match with the most of (product, ve
On Wed, Mar 17, 2004 at 02:43:57PM +0900, Katsushi Kobayashi wrote:
> If the device works with SBP-II protocol, I believe it will work on CAM
> framework as usual SCSI device.
umass(4) should work for USB as well.
> On 2004/03/17, at 14:39, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >Does anyone have any
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 04:29:04PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> Hi,
> My company uses RS485 to talk to various pieces of hardware, and currently to
> do this we have a hacked up copy of sio which talks to a conventional RS485
> card, while this works well it would be nicer to be able to use di
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:57:24PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 07:27:31AM +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >Currently I get the states via kern.cp_time, but this only allows
> >a granularity of a single second and I need something around 50-100ms.
>
>
Currently I get the states via kern.cp_time, but this only allows
a granularity of a single second and I need something around 50-100ms.
Application is a LED bargraph which doesn't have the intended effect
with just a single update per second.
--
B.Walter BWCThtt
I noticed with a self build serial driver that I'm not allowed
to put data into a tty that is not opened.
I had to learn this the hard way and would like to know if there are
other points that I'm not aware of.
Is there any good documentation about kernel tty programming available?
--
B.Walter
On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 07:09:18PM +0800, Ganbold wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Maybe this is off topic question. I'm looking for good tftp server in
> FreeBSD.
> I used default tftp server in FreeBSD and had some problems. It sometimes
> hangs without any response.
I think debugging info (e.g. tcpdump)
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 04:48:25PM -0400, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> note that this was pre-0.34, but since its still "under development",
> there is always the chance that this happens again ... a load of the
> system took 49hrs, I believe was mentioned ... how long to dump/reload the
> system once
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Stijn Hoop wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 03:26:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
> > > The kernel includes teh ichsmb driver to try access the SMBus
> > > for temperature reading reasons (yes I k
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 01:58:11AM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:50:59PM -0800 I heard the voice of
> Avleen Vig, and lo! it spake thus:
> >
> > While it is indeed true that most machines since 1997 will support this
> > CD format, please take in to account:
>
> And
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 11:04:37AM +0100, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
> For the device this means having to switch the ROM image with the RAM image
> which is impossible while running in the specific processor. Thus the
> processor tells it's core to map RAM into code-space and resets itself. Af
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 01:05:57PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
> after all my confusions, my problem was solved once netif was made
> executable.
It's always one of those inconspicuous details :)
--
B.Walter BWCThttp://www.bwct.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 05:34:05PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2004 17:08, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > I don't think it IS a dumb device, there is a USB spec called DFU which
> > > covers it and the hosts job is to do the reenumeration.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:44:46PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Wednesday 07 January 2004 16:35, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > Bad device - it would have been so easy add an single transitor to do
> > this automaticaly.
> > Nevertheless USB_UNCONFIG_NO can't help yo
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +1030, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2004 18:47, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > > When setting a USB device to configuration number USB_UNCONFIG_NO (i.e.
> > > 0), the device goes into an unconfigured state with an invalid
>
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 01:55:41PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
>
> while hunting down the problem that my diskless configuration is not
> starting the loopback interface i came about the following:
Mmmm - everythings OK for me:
[51]cicely14# ifconfig lo0
lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384
inet 127
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 12:43:20AM +, Jay Cornwall wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've just finished a patch to alleviate several panics in the ugen driver
> (related to devfs issues and setting a USB device's configuration to
> USB_UNCONFIG_NO). I'm about to submit to freebsd-current@, but I need to
> cl
On Fri, Dec 26, 2003 at 10:54:27AM -0800, Sean Welch wrote:
> That change seems to have done it!!
>
> I left in the extra PCI IDs I had added to pcisupport.c
> and pci_cfgreg.c -- looks like that helps get things
> going. I've got "options PCI_ENABLE_IO_MODES" in
> the kernel. I've also got "dev
On Sat, Dec 20, 2003 at 03:17:18PM -0500, David Gilbert wrote:
> >>>>> "Bernd" == Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Bernd> On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Bernd> wrote:
> >> Should device ehci be a
On Sun, Nov 23, 2003 at 08:50:45PM -0500, Michael E. Mercer wrote:
> Hello peoples,
>
> I posted this to questions with no reply, I was hoping
> someone here may be able to give some insight.
>
>
> Question: Should I be able to open /dev/ugen0 more than once?
>
> I am using FreeBSD 4.9-Stable,
ehci is more speed with less functionality.
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
> >
> > It is intentionally not in GENERIC.
>
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 03:10:10PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Should device ehci be a default in GENERIC, then?
It is intentionally not in GENERIC.
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> &g
On Fri, Nov 21, 2003 at 10:47:35AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I recently got a usb 2.0 hard drive to which I painfully wait for 1MB/s
> transfers. According to dmesg fbsd is only doing 1.0:
> usb0: on uhci0
> usb0: USB revision 1.0
> usb1: on uhci1
> usb1: USB revision 1.0
> usb2: on uh
On Sun, Oct 12, 2003 at 01:19:44PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
> > > Here's one the size of a credit card: <http://www.compulab.co.il/586core.htm&
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:06:18PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 04:17:37PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote:
> > Now, we are not far from that. I'm thinking of some CPU with TP Ethernet
> > and memory of size of an USB stick. Anyone knowing such or having
> > experience?
>
> Here'
On Sat, Oct 11, 2003 at 03:17:13PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> : > In the last episode
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 08:33:46PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said:
> > > buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK;
> > > buf.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARODD);
&
On Fri, Oct 10, 2003 at 01:26:33PM -0500, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Oct 10), Bernd Walter said:
> > buf.c_iflag |= IGNBRK;
> > buf.c_cflag &= ~(CSIZE | PARODD);
> > buf.c_cflag |= CS8 | CLOCAL | PARENB;
>
> Do you maybe want CS
void
opensio(char* devname) {
struct termios buf;
int val;
fd = open(devname, O_RDWR);
if (fd < 0) {
printf("open serial %s failed: %s\n",
devname, strerror(errno));
exit(1);
}
val = fcntl(
On Thu, Oct 09, 2003 at 07:37:42PM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> >You need to lock when reading if you insist on consistent data. Even a
> >simple read may be non-atomic (this should be the case for 64bit
> >operations on all our platfo
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> uint8_t foo;
>
> (guaranteeing that the data type itself is atomic). But if a writer sets
> foo as above and you read foo without locking, you might get a wrong
> value:
>
> mtx_lock(...)
> foo = 77;
>
>
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:11:12PM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Oct 2003, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> BW>On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:12:22PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> BW>> But I'm not talking about non-atomic reads. What I'm want to show is that
&
On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 12:12:22PM +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 11:51:06AM +0200, Harti Brandt wrote:
> +> You need to lock when reading if you insist on consistent data. Even a
> +> simple read may be non-atomic (this should be the case for 64bit
> +> operations on a
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:25:48AM +0200, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:36:29PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > You can't expect anything reliable from a device which is broken.
> > The kernel already warned you that something seems to be questiona
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 11:23:34PM +0200, Christoph P. Kukulies wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 10:15:08PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:21:28PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I have disabled the SIO on my ASUS P
On Fri, Oct 03, 2003 at 08:21:28PM +0200, C. Kukulies wrote:
>
>
> I have disabled the SIO on my ASUS P4SX board because I have a PCI modem
> card inserted. But the modem card or the sio on it doesn't seem to be detected
> by the kernel. Instead I see two sios (sio0 and sio1) which are flagged
>
On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 05:26:33AM +0200, Barry Bouwsma wrote:
> [Drop hostname part of IPv6-only address above to obtain IPv4-capable e-mail,
> or just drop me from the recipients and I'll catch up from the archives]
>
>
> Hallo Hackers, I suppose I should post this to -current as the code in
>
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:17:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 24-Sep-2003 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > You might want to make sure that you have an up to date stable. There
> > was a fix to the PCI bridge interrupt swizzle.
>
> Ah yes, that's true. However, it doesn't seem that his interrup
On Wed, Sep 24, 2003 at 06:32:42PM +0200, Barry Bouwsma wrote:
> [Drop hostname part of IPv6-only address above to obtain IPv4-capable e-mail,
> or just drop me from the recipients and I'll catch up from the archives]
>
>
> Hello every last one of you,
>
> First, before I spout off in the wrong
On Fri, Sep 19, 2003 at 11:11:39PM +0200, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
> --
> FreeBSD-5.1-CURRENT/alpha
>
> SYSTEM MEMORY INFORMATION:
> mem_wire: 32555008 ( 31MB) [ 12%] Wired: disabled for paging out
> mem_act
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 08:39:37PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> John Birrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:45:32PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : The SC520 has onboard support to control 3 flash chips.
> : The board I ha
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 06:37:10PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:52:57PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> : > In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Well, that would be a major pain on current since nexus is already
> >> finished attaching many
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:32:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >>
> >> On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 05:52:57PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Back to the original question:
> : How do I get the device_t from nexus?
>
> You don't. You are assign
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 07:27:42PM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : The host bridge is not available yet at probing time of the host bridge.
> : What we have is the host bridges paren
I need to add I2C support for a Elan520 based soekris system.
The system has the required GPIO pins and there is the iicbb driver
to handle generic bitbang code - just needing a simple layer driver to
enable, disable and read pins.
But unlike normal isa/pci hardware probing the existence of the GPI
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 06:03:38PM +1000, John Birrell wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:44:08AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes
> > :
> >
> > >I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the
> > >device_t parent to ne
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:45:43PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
> >On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
> >
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 03:34:01PM -0400, Eric Jacobs wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:00:13 +0200
> Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Back to the original question:
> > How do I get the device_t from nexus?
> > Is there a get_nexus() function
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 07:56:26AM -0700, Paulo Roberto wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am about to code my first kmod. I am trying to port an usb camera to
> FreeBSD, and since I am new at system development, I hope you don't
> mind helping me out. If this is not the correct list I should post,
> please po
On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 01:38:05PM +0200, Bernd Walter wrote:
> After adding you patch and some includes (,
> )
>
> [...]
> pci_open(1):mode 1 addr port (0x0cf8) is 0x
> pci_open(1a): mode1res=0x8000 (0x8000)
> pci_cfgcheck: device 0 [class=06]
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 04:32:43PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 03:48:22PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote:
> >> > However - I would still like to know why
> >>
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 08-Aug-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes
> >:
> >
> >>I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the
> >>device_t parent to nexus_pcib_is_host_bridge (in
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003 at 12:18:28PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bernd Walter writes:
> >I need to add I2C support for a Elan520 based soekris system.
> >The system has the required GPIO pins and there is the iicbb driver
> >to handle
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 12:04:21AM +0200, Daan Vreeken [PA4DAN] wrote:
> On Monday 21 July 2003 15:00, Bernd Walter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
> > > [I sent the same message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but since that list
> > >
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 09:18:42AM +0200, Marco Molteni wrote:
> [I sent the same message to [EMAIL PROTECTED], but since that list
> seems not very active, I am asking here too]
>
> Hi all,
>
> the subject says it all.
>
> I am considering using FreeBSD for a robotics project, and I am
> thinki
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:12:36AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> hi all,
> googling shows this not to be anything new, but ...
> it happend when we enabled tcp/nfs on our NetApp fileservers.
> so the question is:
> 1- is it serious - it doesn't seem so ...
> 2- can it be ignored?
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 12:37:10PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> [...]
> > have fun. the mindshare book is good. however, it took me a long
> > time to get a usb 'aha' moment and understand its twisty maze was
> > really a workable design obscured by standardese... I suspect it is a
> > problem
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 02:58:28PM -0400, Louis A. Mamakos wrote:
> I think the problem is that the USB hardware doesn't try to read data
> from the peripheral until the user-mode code does a read(2) system
> call. I had this problem with the ugen device. I would guess that
> the ucom/umodem devi
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 03:27:30PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:13:56PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> > > hi,
> > > while trying to port an application that works with tty to uplcom/ucom,
> > > (and it doesn't work :-), and looking at the kernel sources and
> > > try
On Wed, Jun 25, 2003 at 01:13:56PM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
> hi,
> while trying to port an application that works with tty to uplcom/ucom,
> (and it doesn't work :-), and looking at the kernel sources and
> trying to figure out USB, i think that select(2)/poll(2) will not work,
> correct?
101 - 200 of 360 matches
Mail list logo
