hines to avoid accidentally typing killall there.
2. Less polite: This is not FreeBSD's problem, go away. :)
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com/
for custom features of the touchpad?
I have a similar model on my Dell laptop and it works fine with moused
for basic features. It's old enough though that it doesn't have any
features that are not basic. :)
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence wit
t think that's what Kostik was proposing.
When you get this committed (in whatever form) send a note to
freebsd...@freebsd.org so that we can look at re-implementing
wait_for_pids with this. I think this is a very nice addition, thanks
for taking it on.
Doug
--
Imp
witch"
> needs to be done anyway, so why not upfront?
I disagree with your assertion that "the big switch needs to be done
anyway."
My personal preference would be to see first how many things will need
overrides (WARNS != 6) before deciding whether it's wo
nd commits that address separate
issues should be done separately anyway.
That said, I think that the style-compliance issue is a valid one, and
I personally would be in favor of that happening after the
8.0-release, FWIW.
hth,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet prese
ot running' which
arguably it should not do since that script is not for starting a
persistent service, it's just a 'run at boot' thing. In any case, if
you find what you think are bugs in rc.d related stuff feel free to
report them to freebsd...@freebsd.org.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
> Doug Barton napisa:
>> If you're developing your own app to display running processes
>> implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
>> question at hand.
>>
>> Doug
>>
> I totally disagree with yo
at output to some width)
> rather than to focus on functionality)?
If you're developing your own app to display running processes
implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
question at hand.
Doug
--
This .signature sani
nted out in the PR
that most users would be surprised if 'ps -ax | grep foo' suddenly
sprouted a lot more stuff that 'ps -ax' didn't have, and I agree. As a
matter of personal preference I find the current defaults to be just
lovely, and occasionally use -w or -ww if I need
As terribly clever as you all are, can you please restrict the
political commentary/humor/whatever to -chat?
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
> Doug, good day.
>
> Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:15:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> I came across this problem during a recent portmaster update. When
>> trying to strip off the * character using variable expansion in bin/sh
>> it doesn't wor
foo\
Should I go ahead and file a PR on this?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
var='foo\*'
echo "var before stripping: $var"
var=${var%\*}
echo "var after stripping: $var"
echo ''
var='foo\$'
echo "var before s
e)
Actually you're both wrong. :) If this were a FreeBSD question then
-questions would indeed have been the right list, but it's actually a BIND
question which means it belongs on bind-us...@isc.org.
Good luck,
Doug
___
freebsd-hackers
John Baldwin writes:
| On Thursday 23 July 2009 2:08:35 am Andre Albsmeier wrote:
| > On Wed, 22-Jul-2009 at 09:48:56 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| > > Andre Albsmeier writes:
| > > | On Sat, 18-Jul-2009 at 10:25:06 +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
| > > | > On 18 Jul 2009, at 09:1
John Hay wrote:
> Is it not possible to change the logic of -U a little. Only auto install
> if it is in mtree and has not changed. So if it has changed or is not in
> mtree, skip the auto install.
Apparently you didn't read the whole thread, but the answer is no.
Doug
--
T
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Doug Barton writes:
>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
>>> Great, now mergemaster blew away my ntp.conf and installed this one
>>> instead. Apparently, it thinks AUTO_UPGRADE means it's fine to
>>> overwrite an existing file with
Alexander Leidinger writes:
| Quoting Doug Ambrisko (from Thu, 2 Apr 2009
| 16:16:34 -0700 (PDT)):
|
| > This worked well for us so I think it is a good idea. Also some HW
| > watchdogs can be told to generate an NMI which can also produce a kernel
| > dump/ddb prompt. I've al
nto the IPMI event log in-case a disk or disk
I/O sub-system died.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
> > Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > > I assume, with "this" you mean my solution to the slow
> > > shell loop problem (not quoted above), not Yoshihiro Ota's
> > > awk proposal?
> >
> > I me
s ^f
>(i.e. it starts with an "f").
> - Print the 7th field of those matching lines.
Like I said, I haven't seen the files, but this looks good at first
blush. That said, the generation of the hash list file is just a drop
in the bucket. The real inefficienc
Agreed, when making changes like this you should always benchmark
them. I did a lot of that when working on portmaster 2.0 which is why
I have some familiarity with this issue.
> > awk -F "|" '
> > $2 ~ /^f/{required[$7]=$7; count++}
> > END{FS="[
Sheldon Givens wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> It occurs to me that FreeBSD ps lacks the ability to disable header.
Why is this necessary?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
discovered that the reason my suggested change "worked" was really an
unintended side effect. Your suggestion works great, so I've committed it.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing
LOBJDIR:=/usr/obj${.CURDIR}
.endif
However I would be happy with any solution that makes it work. It's
trivial to test with 'mergemaster -i -D -A arm'
Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 9 Dec 2008, at 23:54, Paul Wootton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pegasus Mc
Cleaft
Sent: 07 December 2008 12:17
To: Doug Rabson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with zfsboot loader if raidz
On 7 Dec 2008, at 03:19, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
Hello Hackers,
Recently and friend and I have been trying to get the new
gptzfsboot working
on our machines and ran into a interesting problem.
Initially I was building the world without the environment variable
LOADER_ZFS_SUPPORT=
On 20 Nov 2008, at 19:41, Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
"Pegasus Mc Cleaft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone,
I
On 11 Oct 2008, at 14:28, Danny Braniss wrote:
To Doug:
> ZFS boot is coming.
great! any time estimate?, just curious, no preasure :-)
Its part of pjd's current big ZFS patch which brings us more or less
up-to-date with Solaris. I'm not the best person to ask when t
On 11 Oct 2008, at 12:07, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 12:35:16PM +0200, Danny Braniss wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 08:42:49 -0700
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:29:52AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:41:11 -0700
Jeremy C
n addition to the web pages another good resource is to read through
the comments in /etc/rc.subr.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
#!/bin/sh
#
# PROVIDE: ntlmaps
# REQUIRE: LOGIN
# KEYWORD: shutdown
# Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf.local or /e
different UIs (see above).
2. At least one of those UIs should be functional over a standard
serial console.
3. It should be scriptable.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
ong ways.
The version of dialog we have in the system is prehistoric. The newer
version is a lot better in the POLA department, and $SOMEONE was
working on an update, but I don't know what happened to that effort.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized
lready. The good news is that on
the software level if you can do that for the second level and above
it's pretty easy to do it for TLDs. The more interesting problem there
is a lot of ancient software, web scripts, etc. with hard-coded rules
about how TLDs only have 3 characters
hth,
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Please note that BSD grep is not localized (and can't be per design)
and works only with standard C locale. It may not affect ports
system processing but shurely a
ready for a
wider audience. Of course, that's just my opinion.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
.
egrep -l "DEPORIGIN:($origin|$ro_opd)$" $pdb/*/+CONTENTS
Obviously this works in portmaster with the gnu grep, but if ro_opd is
unset with the bsd grep I get:
egrep: empty (sub)expression
If I set ro_opd to something, it works.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 20/03/2008, Doug Poland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>> * Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>>> Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does a
ture (i386) and OS version (6.3 --> 6.3 or 7.0 --> 7.0).
--
Regards,
Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Doug Barton wrote:
> Why don't you post that diff? Sounds like a good idea to me.
Oh, duh. Never mind. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
solver
for my home network is at 23M, with hardly any cache at all.
If I thought there was a good alternative resolver I'd recommend one,
but IMO BIND is it right now. There are a couple others in development
right now, but they are not yet ready for prime time (again, IMO).
hth,
Doug
--
IST_SUBDIR)
DIST_SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=${DIST_SUBDIR}/
.else
DIST_SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=
.endif
MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE=ftp://ftp5.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/${DIST_SUBDIR_OVERRIDE}
IMO it would be a lot more intuitive if the ports infrastructure did
exactly this for the user.
Doug
--
This .signature san
You could also create a release, burn it to CD, and install from scratch.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To
,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
27;cvs diff -u > ~/mytree.diff' and then wipe out what you had and
check it out again. Then you can apply your diff as needed.
You should also spend some time thoroughly reading the cvs man page.
It's a fairly complex system, and it's easy to accidentally add a knob
that
Yuri wrote:
I tried to make a backup copy of one DVD that I own and 'dvdbackup'
always fails at a particular point.
Would the dvds in question happen to be Sony movies? If so a web search
might be useful to you.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your
If you don't like the license, don't use the software.
If you want to complain/explain/debate about the license, find another
forum. This subject is not on topic for the FreeBSD mailing lists.
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your
ot; in
/dev/fuse[0-9]*) umount $mountpoint ; sleep 1 ;;
esac
done
sleep 1
kldunload $kmod
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailm
#x27;m more than a little interested in getting
fuse-ntfs set up here.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe,
ge!
>> Basically my program runs about twice as fast when I run two threads as
>> opposed to one - I cannot see doing any better than that!
>
> pure computation does not need kernel operations most of the time.. ie.
> multi-threading kernel wont help much ;)
It has an
very
common, but fortunately the answer is simple.
If you need any help with the DNS side of the equation feel free to
contact me directly.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
Running out of memory and having to continually swap things in and out
of ram degrades performance, yes. Page faults are simply how the
virtual memory subsystem gets things done, like pulling things out of
swap.
--Doug
On Nov 7, 2007 7:48 PM, binto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Btw
>
27; or 'top' to see if you might possibly benefit from
more ram by reducing paging.
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
this again for a while I'd update to 7.0 when it
is released.
The other alternative is to bribe someone who is local to do the
installation for you, which all things considered would probably be easier
all around.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your prote
On 10/17/07, Doug Clements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Can you also send the output of ps -auxl?
> >
> > Also - do you notice this performance drop when running something like
> > one of the network performance tools? I'd like to isolate the disk
> >
em to run when the machine is hung up. I type in the command, but it does
not run until the machine springs back to life. I'm not sure how this will
affect measurements.
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/sysctl-a
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/psauxl
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/systat-v
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
Anyone have any clue about what might be going on?
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
Anyone have any clue about what might be going on?
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:20 -0700, Jin Guojun wrote:
> By looking through _pthread_create() code and find it uses a magic
> cookie -- TLS -- created
> by rtld_allocate_tls(), and passed into kernel by sysarch() via
> _tcb_set() / _kcb_set().
>
> The information seems to be set by rtld (ld-elf.so
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Assuming that lack of an affirmative _enable variable is a constant, the
only way that a service can be started is with either onestart or
forcestart. The symmetry here would be to stop it the same way.
This may be symmetrical, but I
rests of
the majority of FreeBSD users.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ing at this from the other direction, what would be the benefit to
having plain stop act in the absence of an _enable variable for that
service?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.o
the better for you. We've given you
the code, do what you will with it.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubs
, for what that's
worth.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
em but I think that might have been a joke.
Systems that have IPMI version 2 are nice since that means they are
supposed to support Serial Over Lan (SOL) via the standard :-)
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
then do "make package", then +CONTENTS can be a bit messed up for the
> package. This is because the creation of other ports might disturb
> _LIB_RUN_DEPENDS and might put in some extra entries in +CONTENTS.
"Doctor, it hurts when I do THIS."
"Well, don&#
Alex Dupre wrote:
Doug Barton ha scritto:
Not disputing your answer, but I'm curious. Why would it cause
problems on some systems but not others? I haven't done anything with
my cflags ...
It depends on how much RAM + Swap do you have. I know people with 1.5Gb
that have such p
Alex Dupre wrote:
> Doug Barton wrote:
>>> (Over 2GBs of RAM + Swap being used). It does this consistently when it
>>> tries to compile xf86PciScan.c (hope thats the right file).
>> May not be the answer you want to hear, but I built all the xorg stuff
>> multip
times on -current systems both pre and post the gcc + symver
+ version bump eras, and didn't have the problems you're seeing. What
I don't have though is zfs, so that may be a place to look. One way to
check is if you're not doing it already, use an mfs /tmp and
7;s working. libkse
will be a lot harder IMHO. David's stuff in -current just works.
I routinely run 32bit thread stuff on 64bit hosts using the
libmap32.conf trick to switch from kse to libthr.
Thanks to David for making it work in -current.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=90863 for an interesting
related discussion.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hack
Steven Hartland wrote:
Given that it sounds like a potential workaround is to use the machines
IP instead of name until this is fixed, thanks for the info guys.
For as long as I can remember, it's been a Best Practice to have
entries for critical NFS servers in /etc/hosts.
en releases.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ch with the
latest HEAD, and run 'make universe' with the latest HEAD?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscr
o
ignore these ports (with no skeleton) is probably a good idea for the
long run anyway, so if anyone has an idea besides what I suggested
above, speak up. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
c. I don't
know of any communities where those attitudes are well supported, but
I do know that you won't get very far in this community that way.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
nsible person for the PR
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>> It's not documented, but the code is there in /etc/rc.subr:
>>
>> grep 'rc.conf\.d' /etc/rc.subr
>>if [ -f /etc/rc.conf.d/"$_name" ]; then
&
Lamont Granquist wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
>>> And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
>>> would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
>>
>> Good news for you, we already suppo
the overall rcorder at
boot time, so all you have to do is make a port of your project and
you're good to go.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/
config (and
> may be written by entirely different config management tools -- e.g.
> system config management vs. application deployment/management), and the
> /etc/periodic functionality is not flexible enough to cover all cases.
That's not a bad idea, but you'll have t
Vulpes Velox wrote:
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
> Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Vulpes Velox wrote:
>>> I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
>>> though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I
ded value to justify the pain of
the change.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
ly interested in boot-time issues, and this sounds like an
interesting problem.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe
7;t easily get a serial console
up and running, your earlier suggestion of putting the box back to the
last known good 5.x release is a good one. At least that can help rule
out hardware _failure_, as opposed to hardware-used-differently issues.
hth,
Doug
--
ess it via the web management
| console, I just can not get the kernel driver to work with it. Any help
| and/or references would be greatly appreciated.
Could you try it static in the kernel and then with and without ACPI
enabled?
Doug A.
___
freebsd-h
Mike Meyer wrote:
> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed:
>> Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
>>> Personally I think rm should do what you ask it to do - if you ask it
>>> to overwrite a file which has multiple links, well... though luck.
&
on where the pre-recent-patch
behavior (overwriting the actual file when using -P on a hard link) is
the expected outcome.
It's all well and good to say, "tough luck," but I don't think that's
what our users expect.
Doug
--
This
uggestions didn't make it through on
this message. Please feel free to post them for review and send the
URL to the list.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd
atch. If there are no objections I'll do it
myself if no one gets to it first.
In any case I think that this is a good addition to the code, and I'm
glad that this issue was raised.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
er? If so, the effect you saw might be due to file system
caching.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Yuan, Jue wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> Could I change the kernel version tag manually?
/sys/conf/newvers.sh
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
Niclas Zeising wrote:
> The periodic.conf in 7-CURRENT is still set to use the INDEX-6 ports
> index file, instead of INDEX-7 which is the default on 7-CURRENT. This
> should, I think, be changed.
Done. Next time please consider using send-pr for this type of thing.
Doug
--
the ipmi(4) driver. It gets the IPMI HW info via SMBIOS.
There is also and smbios driver as well.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
rtable
> (and thus preferable) way:
>
> cd /from; find -d . | cpio -dumpl /to
While I don't want to stifle anyone's creativity, I agree with Oliver (and
other posters) on this one. The Unix way of doing things is small programs
that do their jobs well, tied together to accomplish
John Von Essen wrote:
> Doug,
>
> Did some googling and I did find a connection between excessive
> CLOSED_WAITS, and hanging apache, and webbots. Some of the IP's I saw in
> my netstat were bots too. The problem has something to do with the bot
> no longer acceptin
aggressive spider went after sites on our systems. Restarting Apache
was usually all it took to set things right again.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freeb
esented would have value in other
areas if they were implemented, so at best I would deem your
characterization to be slanted. You may wish to consider if perhaps it is
not also inaccurate.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
__
Kip Macy writes:
| WOW THATS GREAT DOUG! \0/ - it didn't work for me.
This was with the last patched driver for vmware 2. I'm not sure if
it every made it into the port.
http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/changes
28 Jan 01 Version 0.99-1-0.22
Support for multi
Kip Macy writes:
| IIRC lack of per instance cdevs also limits Freebsd to one vmware instance.
Really? Don't tell my vmware multiple instances! I used to run 10 on
one FreeBSD host.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
gt;
> What (maybe not) causes troubles:
>
> okey# make clean
> ===> Cleaning for m4-1.4_1
> rm: /usr/ports/devel/m4/work: Directory not empty
> *** Error code 1
Try rebooting to single user mode and running 'fsck -y'. That may help.
Good luck,
Doug
--
201 - 300 of 1239 matches
Mail list logo
