Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-29 Thread Jamie Bowden
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Chris Costello wrote: :On Fri, Sep 24, 1999, Nate Williams wrote: : Unfortunately, as with all 'slick' products we've talked about, it still : requires a working X setup in order to run. You could do one as a CUI, : but doing it in Java would be just as hard as anything

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-28 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, "Andrew Reilly" wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 08:09:13AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 10:22:34AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: What I'd like is a little weekly crontab script that runs after my weekly ports cvsup, and tells me which of the

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-28 Thread Ben Rosengart
On Mon, 27 Sep 1999, Wes Peters wrote: Ben Rosengart wrote: Well, I for one would like a command that fetches a package without installing it. I don't see any option to pkg_add for that. See fetch(1). ;^) (Sorry, catching up after a weekend of the flu.) But pkg_add knows where

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-27 Thread Neil Blakey-Milner
On Mon 1999-09-27 (10:22), Andrew Reilly wrote: I've longed for a mechanism to keep the ports that I use as up-to-date as the rest of my FreeBSD system. Unfortunately, some ports I don't use very often, and so forget that they're there. Unfortunately (again), the port name-version_number

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-27 Thread Nik Clayton
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 10:22:34AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: What I'd like is a little weekly crontab script that runs after my weekly ports cvsup, and tells me which of the ports that I "subscribe to" has changed, so that I can think about rebuilding it. ports/sysutils/pkg_version. Then

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-27 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 08:09:13AM +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: On Mon, Sep 27, 1999 at 10:22:34AM +1000, Andrew Reilly wrote: What I'd like is a little weekly crontab script that runs after my weekly ports cvsup, and tells me which of the ports that I "subscribe to" has changed, so that I

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Gianmarco Giovannelli
At 26/09/99, you wrote: The second script is called "pkg_rm"; it can be used to delete packages like pkg_delete, but you can use arguments in the same way as for pkg_ls above (i.e. "pkg_rm lynx"). Think of it like pkg_info | grep | pkg_delete. It might more sense to implement these features in

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Erm, I must admit, I've never actually tried it or Debian Linux. It merely seemed reasonable humor-fodder. :) - Jordan On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 12:54:32PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and some enviromental variables.

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Daniel C. Sobral" wrote: That's because you are not a loser. Losers want plug-and-play. This pkg_get is plug and play, pkg_add isn't. It doesn't, for instance, automatically retrives a list of the packages available fromt he net and show them to you. I meant luser, of course. With this,

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Jos Backus
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 09:05:20AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: What about to extend the pkg_delete to use a syntax like : pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/netscape-communicator-4.61/ it can help so much everyone that can automagically complete file/path names with the shell :-) zsh users

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Kris Kirby
Wes Peters wrote: "Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: Boy, we're having fun asking you to rewrite your program. It's good training for you, though, this is what it's like to be a programmer in "The Real World". ;^) You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Stefan `Sec` Zehl
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 09:05:20AM +0200, Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: What about to extend the pkg_delete to use a syntax like : pkg_delete /var/db/pkg/netscape-communicator-4.61/ it can help so much everyone that can automagically complete file/path names with the shell :-) If you use

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Rajappa Iyer
Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Rajappa Iyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. It does a terrible job at tracking dependencies, IMHO. If you install packages A, B and C at the same time and A depends on C, it's not smart enough to install C first. pkg_order | tsort should do the

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Doug
Gianmarco Giovannelli wrote: At 26/09/99, you wrote: The second script is called "pkg_rm"; it can be used to delete packages like pkg_delete, but you can use arguments in the same way as for pkg_ls above (i.e. "pkg_rm lynx"). Think of it like pkg_info | grep | pkg_delete. It might more

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-26 Thread Andrew Reilly
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 01:52:36AM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: While we're talking about making package handling easier for newbies, I'd like to present two simple shell scripts that I wrote quite some time ago. Yeah, I know I could send-pr this, but I'm not sure if they're really worth it

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: Boy, we're having fun asking you to rewrite your program. It's good training for you, though, this is what it's like to be a programmer in "The Real World". ;^) You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive package selection menu

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Nik Clayton
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 06:08:15PM -0400, Rajappa Iyer wrote: 4. The number of times that I've had a random bug in the {pre|post}{install|remove} scripts essentially render the system unupgradeable is not funny. I have had to go and physically remove some files and edit the package

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread John Baldwin
On 25-Sep-99 Nik Clayton wrote: On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 06:08:15PM -0400, Rajappa Iyer wrote: 4. The number of times that I've had a random bug in the {pre|post}{install|remove} scripts essentially render the system unupgradeable is not funny. I have had to go and physically

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Jaakko Salomaa
Hi, I'm back and boy, this has became a long thread. Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and some enviromental variables. I don't see the huge benefit. That's because you are not a loser. Losers want plug-and-play. This pkg_get is plug and play, pkg_add

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Oliver Fromme
While we're talking about making package handling easier for newbies, I'd like to present two simple shell scripts that I wrote quite some time ago. Yeah, I know I could send-pr this, but I'm not sure if they're really worth it (if someone thinks they are, then I'll send-pr them). The first one

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Nik Clayton
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 12:32:16PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: Re-read the first para of his message: - I completely agree!! Debian's package manager is one of the most - infuriatingly buggy piece of software that I've ever used. He's complaining about Debian's stuff, not the Ports

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sun, 26 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: I don't see the huge benefit. That's because you are not a loser. Losers want plug-and-play. This pkg_get is plug and play, pkg_add isn't. It doesn't, for instance, automatically retrives a list of the packages available fromt he net and show

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Sat, 25 Sep 1999, Ben Rosengart wrote: Well, I for one would like a command that fetches a package without installing it. I don't see any option to pkg_add for that. Patches to do this would be trivial. It would have to be a flag you'd use with '-r' otherwise we'd have to call the program

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Chris Costello
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote: Patches to do this would be trivial. It would have to be a flag you'd use with '-r' otherwise we'd have to call the program 'fetch'. What about the graphical interface and Java versions? Any plans for that in pkg_install? -- |Chris Costello

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Chris Costello
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999, Nate Williams wrote: Unfortunately, as with all 'slick' products we've talked about, it still requires a working X setup in order to run. You could do one as a CUI, but doing it in Java would be just as hard as anything else at this point. :( There's nothing keeping

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-25 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Jaakko Salomaa wrote: Well, I wouldn't use the word 'loser'. A 'newbie' would be more I meant luser, actually. :-) politically correct. And what's wrong with it if it's easy to use? That depends on your definition of "easy". I can use pkg_add faster, not having to go through menus, thus I

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Jaakko Salomaa
On Thu, 23 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: I had the idea from Debian Linux's atp-get utility, which my friend praised a lot. The source tarball can be fetched from the following URL: http://www.saunalahti.fi/~jsalomaa/pkg_get.tar.gz This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: I had the idea from Debian Linux's atp-get utility, which my friend praised a lot. The source tarball can be fetched from the following URL: http://www.saunalahti.fi/~jsalomaa/pkg_get.tar.gz This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just one quick

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Jaakko Salomaa
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just one quick question though - why did you "roll your own" ftp I/O handling instead of simply using fetch(3) or ftpio(3)? Alas, it also seems to have a "default" ftp site. I don't think

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Daniel C. Sobral
Jaakko Salomaa wrote: It's designed to be easy to use, so it first checks -s parameter, then PKGSERVER environment variable, then the machine's toplevel domain. If the toplevel domain contains only two letters it attemps to use ftp.tld.freebsd.org, else it defaults to ftp.freebsd.org and

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Francis Jordan
Jaakko Salomaa wrote: On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote: This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just one quick question though - why did you "roll your own" ftp I/O handling instead of simply using fetch(3) or ftpio(3)? BTW, I'm now utilizing ftpio(3)

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jaakko Salomaa wrote: It's designed to be easy to use, so it first checks -s parameter, then PKGSERVER environment variable, then the machine's toplevel domain. If the toplevel domain contains only two letters it attemps to use ftp.tld.freebsd.org, else it defaults to

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Wes Peters
Jaakko Salomaa wrote: BTW, I'm now utilizing ftpio(3) instead of my own kludge, I'll probably send a new message to -hackers when the new version is ready. (I'm going to spend a few days somewhere else.) fetch(3) is a better choice because it allows http downloads too. Passing a URL is now

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Boy, we're having fun asking you to rewrite your program. It's good training for you, though, this is what it's like to be a programmer in "The Real World". ;^) You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive package selection menu yet! :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe:

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jaakko Salomaa wrote: And yes, I know what ports are. But fetching and installing packages is much faster than fetching the bigger source tarball and compiling it. And yes, I know about the remote fetching ability of pkg_add, but it is pretty poor in my opinion. I think

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Jamie Howard
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive package selection menu yet! :-) A friend of mine is working on an X/Java version of that. I have no idea how far he has gotten. I reviewed his notes, it looks like a great

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and some enviromental variables. In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we also intend to throw feature upon feature request onto his pile until Jaakko

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and some enviromental variables. In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we also intend to throw feature upon feature request onto his pile until Jaakko ends up reproducing the Debian package manager for us!

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Oliver Fromme
Daniel C. Sobral wrote in list.freebsd-hackers: Jaakko Salomaa wrote: It's designed to be easy to use, so it first checks -s parameter, then PKGSERVER environment variable, then the machine's toplevel domain. If the toplevel domain contains only two letters it attemps to use

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Rajappa Iyer
Chris Piazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 12:54:32PM -0700, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: Most of what you've shown can be accomplished with 'pkg_add -r' and some enviromental variables. In its current incarnation, that's pretty much true. However, we also intend

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Wes Peters
"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote: Boy, we're having fun asking you to rewrite your program. It's good training for you, though, this is what it's like to be a programmer in "The Real World". ;^) You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive package selection menu

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-24 Thread Nate Williams
You bet! And we haven't even gotten to the topic of the interactive package selection menu yet! :-) Let alone the Java-based GUI. In all seriousness, given the stability of the JDK on FreeBSD *plus* the ability to ship a FreeBSD with the JRE legally (although we don't ship anything at

A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-23 Thread Jaakko Salomaa
Hello, I have made this little program named pkg_get. It's decided to ease fetching and installing of FreeBSD (and why not Open- or NetBSD) binary packages, by making a database out of packages at a ftp server's packages directory. I had the idea from Debian Linux's atp-get utility, which my

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-23 Thread Jaakko Salomaa
On 23 Sep 1999, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: * % ** ./pkg_get -i gtk ** * Current server is the main distribution site, ftp.freebsd.org. * Do you want to use it? (Y/N) ** n ** : * Receiving glib-1.2.3.tgz (166214 bytes): 100% * 166214 bytes transferred in 21.9 seconds (7.40

Re: A new package fetching utility, pkg_get

1999-09-23 Thread Jordan K. Hubbard
I had the idea from Debian Linux's atp-get utility, which my friend praised a lot. The source tarball can be fetched from the following URL: http://www.saunalahti.fi/~jsalomaa/pkg_get.tar.gz This is quite interesting and I'm looking at it now. Just one quick question though - why did you