On Wed, Nov 03, 1999 at 11:40:39AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
The bug is on the server-side, not really the client side. Many people
have been bitten by this problem and it would be cool if someone submitted
a patch to fix it. I will get to it eventually but I'm kinda tied up
Well !! That's far more than the things I'm having trouble with!! I'm not
being able to make ONE asynchronous read. I've tried the aio functions with
file I/O and it worked fine, I've also tried the socket I/O with read() and
it worked fine too. But when I issue the read to the async queue an
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Alex Zepeda wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
A user program makes a system call with this string "cpu.system" to get
the current value of user/system/nice time etc.
How is this different from doing:
#
Hi- Yes- it was a fun though short lunch.
We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
fabrics. The emulex card is popular, but nobody's written a driver for it for
FreeBSD.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jonathan M. Bresler wrote:
Matt,
Thank you for lunch at
FWIW -- I think a reasonable goal of "getting stats out of the kernel" is
that pulling data out ought to run as fast as bcopy, and it would be nice
if you didn't have to drop into a syscall. Kind of an extreme position, I
guess, but if you have ever seen the rstatd on linux eat 12% of cpu to
Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
Well !! That's far more than the things I'm having trouble with!! I'm not
being able to make ONE asynchronous read. I've tried the aio functions with
file I/O and it worked fine, I've also tried the socket I/O with read() and
it worked fine too. But when I issue
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 02:53:51AM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
A user program makes a system call with this string "cpu.system" to get
the current value of user/system/nice time etc.
How is this different from doing:
# sysctl -a | grep load
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Johan Kruger wrote:
How can i use chat on the command line to enter a new password without
interaction with passwd .
For example , i want to use chat to reply on New password and Retype
password, something like this :
Why use chat when you can use pw(8)?
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
Moreover, since it was not being used in tools like vmstat and xosview,
I thought there must be a reason.
sysctl also seems to assume that it doesn't get called frequently. So
Original Message Follows
From: Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can add "counters" with sysctl. You can also add read/write
variables of any type.
You can add them dynamically at runtime? How do you know which counters are
available at a given time?
One thing that puzzles me; you say
It seems you're missing the src distribution. It should resolve your crt0.o
and your gnumalloc problems. ...I think.
Original Message Follows
From: Charles Randall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After an unsuccessful attempt at asking this on -questions...
I believe that I could work my way
Such an interface, for generic userland statistical gathering, need not be
[and thus should not be] implemented via a kernel-land system call.
bloat, bloat, bloat.
Chuck
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
Original Message Follows
From: Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You
On Fri, 5 Nov 1999, Daniel C. Sobral wrote:
Ricardo Bernardini wrote:
Well !! That's far more than the things I'm having trouble with!! I'm not
being able to make ONE asynchronous read. I've tried the aio functions with
file I/O and it worked fine, I've also tried the socket I/O with
As Matthew Jacob wrote ...
What does not help is that Emulex consider's their hardware / software
interface a trade secret. Meaning NDAs etc.
At least this is the last thing I heared.
Wilko
We support the Qlogic 2100/2200 cards currently for both private loop and
fabrics. The emulex card is
Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
the copyright was not so good. And in order to get the technical manuals that
describe the f/w interface you have to sign an NDA.
On Thu, 4
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Guy Middleton writes:
: I just installed PAO, and it now works fine. Thanks for everybody's help.
Looks like a good argument for removing the MAC address check in the
linksys probe code... What's MAC does PAO report for this card?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 12:44:34 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, don't laugh too hard, but so does Qlogic in a sense. I've just recently
had to remove their f/w from the NetBSD and FreeBSD CVS repositories because
the copyright was not so good. And in order to get the
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 04:10:08PM -0500, Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Guy Middleton writes:
: I just installed PAO, and it now works fine. Thanks for everybody's help.
Looks like a good argument for removing the MAC address check in the
linksys probe code... What's MAC
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Withrow
writes:
: When the card attaches it is called a Linksys and it runs with the ed driver,
: and gives me good performance on a 100Tx network.
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 1999 14:05:07 -0700
From: Warner Losh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The linksys support in
What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
I have is way too old, for example).
Any reason NetBSD and FreeBSD don't just
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
probably be removed from OpenBSD as soon as the tree unlocks post 2.6.
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:52:50PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
Moreover, since it was not being used in tools like vmstat and xosview,
I thought there must be a reason.
This patch adds a ``-x'' flag to ftpd, which instructs ftpd to obtain an
exclusive lock on files it commits to disk as a result of a store operation.
This way it becomes easy to tell whether a download has finished, in case the
file needs to be copied someplace else (as in my case). I used
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Charles Randall wrote:
After an unsuccessful attempt at asking this on -questions...
I believe that I could work my way through the problem below if I could
build a vanilla gcc 2.7.2.3 on FreeBSD 3.3-R.
Attempting to build a fresh 2.7.2.3,
1. configure
2.
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 13:57:24 -0800
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Because what I did was wrong. It should also be removed from OpenBSD.
I've had extensive discussions with Theo about this, and the f/w will
probably be removed from
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
Qlogic ISP users now have completely useless boards.
No, that's not correct either. Here's an editted copy of what I sent to
Well, it is.
=== f77doc
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77doc created for /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/f77do
c
cd /usr/src/gnu/lib/libgcc; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin/make -DWORLD -DNOINFO -
DNOMAN -DNOPIC -DNOPROFILE -DNOSHARED cleandepend; /usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/bin
/make -DWORLD -DNOINFO -DNOMAN -DNOPIC
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Guy Middleton writes:
: PAO says the address is 00:50:ba:a7:ff:95.
Which driver does PAO use for this card?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Jonathan M. Bresler" writes:
: if we remove the OUI check, then we are relying on the
: checksum alone. that sounds fine provided that other none
: Lninksys/dl10019c cards will fail the checksum.
:
: what do other nic cards have at those addresses
:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Roger Hardiman writes:
: #if defined (BSD)
: or #ifdef BSD
#include sys/param.h
BSD will be defined on BSD systems, for what it is worth.
However, these days
#ifndef linux
#endif
works just about as well and is often time more accurate in describing
what needs to
Original Message Follows
From: Mike Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can add "counters" with sysctl. You can also add read/write
variables of any type.
You can add them dynamically at runtime? How do you know which counters are
available at a given time?
The same way you do it
--vtzGhvizbBRQ85DL
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 12:52:50PM -0500, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Arun Sharma wrote:
I just looked at the sysctl implementation and there are some differences.
Moreover, since it was not being used in
Matthew Jacob wrote:
What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
I have is way too old, for example).
Any reason
Matthew Jacob wrote:
What gives? Why wasn't this committed to the NetBSD and FreeBSD trees,
too? I mean, it's not like the version in the NetBSD tree works anymore
since you removed the firmware (on-board firmware on most of the adapters
I have is way too old, for example).
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 06:30:01PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Sysctl is faster than kstat once you have performed the name-oid
lookup. There is basically nothing that kstat can do that sysctl can't
do better and faster, apart from lookup-by-name.
Can a loadable module, say a network driver
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 06:30:01PM -0800, Mike Smith wrote:
Sysctl is faster than kstat once you have performed the name-oid
lookup. There is basically nothing that kstat can do that sysctl can't
do better and faster, apart from lookup-by-name.
Can a loadable module, say a network
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Joe McGuckin wrote:
for some time now, I have been unable to get a clean compile of the 'current'
src tree.
1) Wrong forum
2) RTFMailingList
Sorry, but this is such an ignorance that you would have had to put -zero-
effort into tracking it down not to find the answer.
If
On Thu, Nov 04, 1999 at 05:48:36PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Jason Thorpe wrote:
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999 17:21:18 -0800 (PST)
Matthew Jacob [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...especially considering that a fair number of previously happy
Qlogic ISP users now have
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Mike Smith wrote:
Sysctl is faster than kstat once you have performed the name-oid
lookup. There is basically nothing that kstat can do that sysctl can't
do better and faster, apart from lookup-by-name.
Except for dynamic registration right?
--
| Matthew N. Dodd |
I am having trouble with a PCMCIA chipset
I have a ISA to PCMCIA adaptor, it is made by ActionTec model no. PC-250
www.actiontec.com
the chip on it has the following information on it;
D japan
DB6082
1992 DATABOOK
1992 FMI
FUJITSU 1992
9412 E57
the avalible I/O addresses are
200h 240h 280h
40 matches
Mail list logo
