It was given about a year ago and is now out of date. XiG promised
to update their web site, but evidently this just hasn't happened
yet.
- Jordan
on Xinside site (www.xig.com) it says...
FreeBSD 3.x is not yet supported on the advice of some members of the FreeBSD
core team.
Why was
I sent an inquiry to Xinside about FreeBSD 3.x and the desktop X
server, and the reply was that 3.x will be supported by year's end in
version 5.1. The only issue the reply mentioned was aout vs. elf. The
replier also said that I could run the current version under 3.x using
compat22.
--Archit
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, jin biao wrote:
Could you tell me where is the code of the functions(sendto,
recvfrom,socket,bind...) located at FreeBSD source tree.
narcissus% pwd
/sys
narcissus% find . | xargs grep -a ^sendto
./kern/uipc_syscalls.c:sendto(p, uap)
narcissus%
Well, I know of at least someone who is using XiG on 3.2-STABLE. And he
says it works without a problem.
Nick
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
It was given about a year ago and is now out of date. XiG promised
to update their web site, but evidently this just hasn't happened
Hi,
My name is estee, i am new in Freebsd. Can anyone help me to solve this
problem? I want to add a new domain name in domain name server(freebsd),
how i do it? Thanks in advance, please help, this is urgent...
Warmest regards,
Estee
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My name is estee, i am new in Freebsd. Can anyone help me to solve this
problem? I want to add a new domain name in domain name server(freebsd),
how i do it? Thanks in advance, please help, this is urgent...
Well no doubt the FreeBSD box is running BIND...so the configuration
file for
Brian McGovern [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, when I start running data, I get silo overflows.
At which end? What else is the box getting SILO overflows doing? PIO
access to disks or network cards is good for disrupting interrupt
latencies. PLIP is virtually guaranteed to disrupt anything
Hi,
change to /sys/net/if.c which will print out
"xxN: promiscuous mode disabled" msg to match its
equiv. "xxN: promiscuous mode enabled" msg
works on all my interfaces even if tcpdump is run
multiple times etc. However it does not print out
the disabled msg for tun0 interface for some
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
+ log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
+ ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match
+ log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
+ ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
Yes, i've seen it suggested before alright..
So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
+ log(LOG_INFO, "%s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n",
+ ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
You're the second person other than me to
I think, the "disabled" messages output should be put under `if (verbose)'.
Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?)
about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps
we should wait until this has been decided.. ?
- Cillian
To Unsubscribe: send
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:55:45 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?)
about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps
we should wait until this has been decided.. ?
This has nothing to do with the boot messages,
A topic that Mark and I have been discussing a little, is the
algorithms that FreeBSD uses for generating initial TCP sequence
numbers - that being with reference to the predictability of
these numbers. (Work on this has been somewhere in Mark's
todo list for a while.)
This topic raises a few
Another question that comes in to this is - how good a tool is nmap
for evaluating the predictability of the sequence numbers we generate?
Ideally, I would like to do some improvements to our sequence number
generation.
Thoughts?
What is OpenBSD like in this regard ?
AFAIR it has
It is just as well that I did not know that - I am running it on 3.2, and
have run it on all the 3.0-series.
A word to the wise, if you want to run it on 3.2 install from the 3.1 CD
and then upgrade by source. When I installed straight from the 3.2 cd it
did not work because I needed to install
As Estee Goh wrote ...
Hi,
My name is estee, i am new in Freebsd. Can anyone help me to solve this
problem? I want to add a new domain name in domain name server(freebsd),
how i do it? Thanks in advance, please help, this is urgent...
Suggest you buy the book "DNS BIND" by Albitz
I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
partition (that is exportable) as
I sent an inquiry to Xinside about FreeBSD 3.x and the desktop X
server, and the reply was that 3.x will be supported by year's end in
version 5.1. The only issue the reply mentioned was aout vs. elf. The
replier also said that I could run the current version under 3.x using
compat22.
I am
Hi
As the subject says i'm waiting for suggestions how to make a stable box
very secure :)
I would like to know how to change login screen and make it difficult to
guess what operating system is running, etc.
TIA
_
Lauri
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Mark Huizer writes:
Hi there,
I had a look recently at the code for one of the kernel modules that VMWare
requires (driver-only.tar), and it looks like something that should be
portable to FreeBSD, although there is some messy stuff in it (assembly
that
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lauri Laupmaa wrote:
I would like to know how to change login screen and make it difficult to
guess what operating system is running, etc.
Change the "default" entry in /etc/gettytab.
On a 3.2-STABLEsustem (from the 19990812 snapshot), the default line looks
like:
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
This is the wrong place to put it - see the pam_radius module.
Hi, Rich:
Can you find a serial cable for me? I need to connect two PCs together
via RS232 ports.
Thanks.
--
Zhihui Zhang. Please visit http://www.freebsd.org
--
To Unsubscribe: send mail
I completely missed that radius was working with pam. A check of radius
related stuff in the man pages didn't show anything related to PAM, and
the pam.conf page doesn't show anything related to radius.
Should've checked the libs though.
Thanks.
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
I beg to differ. It's extremely easy to use pam_radius module. No
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I completely missed that radius was working with pam. A check of radius
related stuff in the man pages didn't show anything related to PAM, and
...they are on their way - check RELENG_3, i.e. STABLE.
Andrzej Bialecki
// [EMAIL PROTECTED] WebGiro
[ Caveat: I'm making this up as I go along ]
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:13:06PM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Steve Ames remarked
I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
Would my soul be
:I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
:performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
:
:Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
:
:Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
:partition (that is
I'll cc: hackers and see if this rings a bell for anyone :| ..
Andrew
Btw, can you explain why this happens?
$ partitionsize=256
$ sects=`/bin/expr $partitionsize '*' 64 '-' 1`
$ vnconfig -e -s labels -S $partitionsize"m" /dev/vn0
$ disklabel -w -r vn0 auto
disklabel:
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:12:48PM -0400, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Hi, Rich:
Can you find a serial cable for me? I need to connect two PCs together
via RS232 ports.
Aha! Remote Kernel Debugging aren't we?
Probably you did not intend this mail to go to the mailing list :)
Regards,
:I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
:performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
:
:Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
:
:Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
:partition (that is
Emm, I guess that answers my earlier question/mail:
Why?---
basil# uname -a
FreeBSD basil.dympna.com 3.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE #7: Thu Aug 19
23:59:50 CDT 1999
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/export/current/src/sys/compile/Basil-SMP
[Dual PPro-233's]
basil# cd /stripe
basil# df -k .
Filesystem
Christopher Seiwald writes:
But as I'm proposing a change to a fairly sensitive piece of code, I'd
like to keep the change as modest as possible.
How about this?
Index: qsort.c
===
RCS file:
:Emm, I guess that answers my earlier question/mail:
:
:Why?---
:
:/dev/vinum/stripe 1719751186511 15735200 1%/stripe
:basil# Bonnie -s 256
: ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
: -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
Hello there, so it seems that pthread_set_concurrency() has not been
implemented at least up to 3.2-stable. How could one ensure that their
threads in an application can be "equally" distributed to all the
processors in FreeBSD? Are there any documents on FreeBSD 3.*'s thread
support(both
: The reason is due to the way NFSv3 issues writes. NFSv3 issues a
: write but no longer assumes that the write has been synced to the
: server's disk as of when the reply comes back. Instead it keeps the
:..
:
:If you are looking for more optimizations, you can delay NFS write
I had sent this message to -stable about a month ago, never heard anything
-- so am trying it here.
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 1999 03:24:38 -0400 (EDT)
From: Mike Nowlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: I2C/SMBus/LPBB
OK -- I give up I'm
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David E. Cross" writes:
: I have been writing a nasty kludge to treat a CardBus bridge as a standard
: PCI bridge (with static config) you may start throwing rocks now.
Ewe. Yuck. Wouldn't it be better to help the pccard/cardbus efforts :-)
: I have
: it to the
I'd like help too.
/Jakob Alvermark
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Mark Huizer writes:
Hi there,
I had a look recently at the code for one of the kernel modules that VMWare
requires (driver-only.tar), and it looks like something that should be
portable to FreeBSD, although
It was given about a year ago and is now out of date. XiG promised
to update their web site, but evidently this just hasn't happened
yet.
- Jordan
on Xinside site (www.xig.com) it says...
FreeBSD 3.x is not yet supported on the advice of some members of the FreeBSD
core team.
Why was
I sent an inquiry to Xinside about FreeBSD 3.x and the desktop X
server, and the reply was that 3.x will be supported by year's end in
version 5.1. The only issue the reply mentioned was aout vs. elf. The
replier also said that I could run the current version under 3.x using
compat22.
--Archit
On Thu, 19 Aug 1999, jin biao wrote:
Could you tell me where is the code of the functions(sendto,
recvfrom,socket,bind...) located at FreeBSD source tree.
narcissus% pwd
/sys
narcissus% find . | xargs grep -a ^sendto
./kern/uipc_syscalls.c:sendto(p, uap)
narcissus%
Well, I know of at least someone who is using XiG on 3.2-STABLE. And he
says it works without a problem.
Nick
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
It was given about a year ago and is now out of date. XiG promised
to update their web site, but evidently this just hasn't happened
Hi,
My name is estee, i am new in Freebsd. Can anyone help me to solve this
problem? I want to add a new domain name in domain name server(freebsd),
how i do it? Thanks in advance, please help, this is urgent...
Warmest regards,
Estee
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
My name is estee, i am new in Freebsd. Can anyone help me to solve
this
problem? I want to add a new domain name in domain name server(freebsd),
how i do it? Thanks in advance, please help, this is urgent...
Well no doubt the FreeBSD box is running BIND...so the configuration
file
Brian McGovern bmcgo...@cisco.com wrote:
However, when I start running data, I get silo overflows.
At which end? What else is the box getting SILO overflows doing? PIO
access to disks or network cards is good for disrupting interrupt
latencies. PLIP is virtually guaranteed to disrupt anything
Hi,
change to /sys/net/if.c which will print out
xxN: promiscuous mode disabled msg to match its
equiv. xxN: promiscuous mode enabled msg
works on all my interfaces even if tcpdump is run
multiple times etc. However it does not print out
the disabled msg for tun0 interface for some mysterious
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
+ log(LOG_INFO, %s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n,
+ ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match
+ log(LOG_INFO, %s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n,
+ ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
You're the second person other than me to request this. :-)
Yes, i've seen it suggested before alright..
So are there any _objections_ to having the kernel match promiscuous
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:29:45PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:09:59 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
+ log(LOG_INFO, %s%d: promiscuous mode disabled\n,
+ ifp-if_name, ifp-if_unit);
You're the second person other than me to request
I think, the disabled messages output should be put under `if (verbose)'.
Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?)
about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps
we should wait until this has been decided.. ?
- Cillian
To Unsubscribe: send mail
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:55:45 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?)
about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps
we should wait until this has been decided.. ?
This has nothing to do with the boot messages,
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:55:45 +0100, Cillian Sharkey wrote:
Maybe..there was a lot of talk on another mailing list (-current I think?)
about boot messages, level of verbosity etc. etc. so perhaps
we should wait until this has been decided.. ?
This has nothing to
A topic that Mark and I have been discussing a little, is the
algorithms that FreeBSD uses for generating initial TCP sequence
numbers - that being with reference to the predictability of
these numbers. (Work on this has been somewhere in Mark's
todo list for a while.)
This topic raises a few
Another question that comes in to this is - how good a tool is nmap
for evaluating the predictability of the sequence numbers we generate?
Ideally, I would like to do some improvements to our sequence number
generation.
Thoughts?
What is OpenBSD like in this regard ?
AFAIR it has various
It is just as well that I did not know that - I am running it on 3.2, and
have run it on all the 3.0-series.
A word to the wise, if you want to run it on 3.2 install from the 3.1 CD
and then upgrade by source. When I installed straight from the 3.2 cd it
did not work because I needed to install
As Estee Goh wrote ...
Hi,
My name is estee, i am new in Freebsd. Can anyone help me to solve this
problem? I want to add a new domain name in domain name server(freebsd),
how i do it? Thanks in advance, please help, this is urgent...
Suggest you buy the book DNS BIND by Albitz
This is a call for testers for a new device driver for yet another PCI
fast ethernet controller: the Sundance Technologies ST201. This chipset
is currently being used on the D-Link DFE-550TX. The chip on the D-Link
is labeled DL10050, but it's actually an ST201. I don't know what other
cards use
I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
partition (that is exportable) as
I sent an inquiry to Xinside about FreeBSD 3.x and the desktop X
server, and the reply was that 3.x will be supported by year's end in
version 5.1. The only issue the reply mentioned was aout vs. elf. The
replier also said that I could run the current version under 3.x using
compat22.
I am
Hi
As the subject says i'm waiting for suggestions how to make a stable box
very secure :)
I would like to know how to change login screen and make it difficult to
guess what operating system is running, etc.
TIA
_
Lauri
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe
It seems Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Mark Huizer writes:
Hi there,
I had a look recently at the code for one of the kernel modules that VMWare
requires (driver-only.tar), and it looks like something that should be
portable to FreeBSD, although there is some messy stuff in it (assembly
that seems
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Lauri Laupmaa wrote:
I would like to know how to change login screen and make it difficult to
guess what operating system is running, etc.
Change the default entry in /etc/gettytab.
On a 3.2-STABLEsustem (from the 19990812 snapshot), the default line looks
like:
it is possible to detect operating systems from their behaviours
of replying to packets.
see the program queso from ports/packages.
but anyway you can change the login prompt from /etc/gettytab file
Evren Yurtesen
yurte...@ispro.net.tr
Lauri Laupmaa wrote:
Hi
As the subject says i'm
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
This is the wrong place to put it - see the pam_radius module.
Hi, Rich:
Can you find a serial cable for me? I need to connect two PCs together
via RS232 ports.
Thanks.
--
Zhihui Zhang. Please visit http://www.freebsd.org
--
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
I completely missed that radius was working with pam. A check of radius
related stuff in the man pages didn't show anything related to PAM, and
the pam.conf page doesn't show anything related to radius.
Should've checked the libs though.
Thanks.
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
While whatever happens with PAM and LDAP, and all those great things, I
would like to validate passwords via Radius...
It would be most convenient if it was just in getpwent()...
I beg to differ. It's extremely easy to use pam_radius module. No
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Jaye Mathisen wrote:
I completely missed that radius was working with pam. A check of radius
related stuff in the man pages didn't show anything related to PAM, and
...they are on their way - check RELENG_3, i.e. STABLE.
Andrzej Bialecki
// ab...@webgiro.com WebGiro
[ Caveat: I'm making this up as I go along ]
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 01:13:06PM -0500, a little birdie told me
that Steve Ames remarked
I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
Would my soul be
For the record, I'd love to see this made official, and under normal (not
just verbose) logging.
-Dave
Lo and behold, Cillian Sharkey once said:
Hi,
change to /sys/net/if.c which will print out
xxN: promiscuous mode disabled msg to match its
equiv. xxN: promiscuous mode enabled msg
:I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
:performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
:
:Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
:
:Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
:partition (that is
: Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
: partition (that is exportable) as async will have any performance
: benefits to the NFS clients?
:
:As a first guess, probably not unless you have a large number of active
:clients. Any modern hard disc will outperform
I'll cc: hackers and see if this rings a bell for anyone :| ..
Andrew
Btw, can you explain why this happens?
$ partitionsize=256
$ sects=`/bin/expr $partitionsize '*' 64 '-' 1`
$ vnconfig -e -s labels -S $partitionsizem /dev/vn0
$ disklabel -w -r vn0 auto
disklabel:
Hi all,
I have a problem with a server running a FreeBSD 3.2.
My Server has a L440GX+ Serber Board (intel), with network card 10/100,
SCSI AIC 7896 (80MB/s), 2 SCSI disk with 9GB (80MB/s), 2 pentium III
450Mhz (not overclocked). The NIC and SCSI are onboard.
I recompiled a kernel to SMP, and
On Fri, 20 Aug 1999, Steve Ames wrote:
I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS
On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 03:12:48PM -0400, Zhihui Zhang wrote:
Hi, Rich:
Can you find a serial cable for me? I need to connect two PCs together
via RS232 ports.
Aha! Remote Kernel Debugging aren't we?
Probably you did not intend this mail to go to the mailing list :)
Regards,
-Oscar
:I asked this on stable but didn't get a response... Would I get any
:performance increases by mounting NFS exported partition as Async?
:
:Would my soul be tormented in purgatory for doing it?
:
:Just to be clear... I am wondering if mounting (on the NFS _server_) a
:partition (that is
:Ok, I've run some more tests. Basically you want to run NFSv3 under
:CURRENT and you want to run at least 3 nfsiod's. On a 100BaseTX network
Oh, let me be a bit more clear: Run 3 nfsiod's on the client. Run
4 nfsd's on the server. e.g. 'nfsiod -n 3' on the client and 'nfsd
The reason is due to the way NFSv3 issues writes. NFSv3 issues a
write but no longer assumes that the write has been synced to the
server's disk as of when the reply comes back. Instead it keeps the
buffer around and does a later commit rpc to do the sync, presumably
Brian McGovern bmcgo...@cisco.com wrote:
My short term punt is to use a desktop system. If I keep seeing the problem
there, I'll debug it some more. If it goes away, I'll know it was the laptop
being quirky.
The other possibility is that the laptop's APM is putting it into some
sort of sleep
Emm, I guess that answers my earlier question/mail:
Why?---
basil# uname -a
FreeBSD basil.dympna.com 3.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 3.2-RELEASE #7: Thu Aug 19
23:59:50 CDT 1999
rs...@basil.dympna.com:/export/current/src/sys/compile/Basil-SMP
[Dual PPro-233's]
basil# cd /stripe
basil# df -k .
Filesystem
Christopher Seiwald writes:
But as I'm proposing a change to a fairly sensitive piece of code, I'd
like to keep the change as modest as possible.
How about this?
Index: qsort.c
===
RCS file:
:Emm, I guess that answers my earlier question/mail:
:
:Why?---
:
:/dev/vinum/stripe 1719751186511 15735200 1%/stripe
:basil# Bonnie -s 256
: ---Sequential Output ---Sequential Input--
: -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block---
Hello there, so it seems that pthread_set_concurrency() has not been
implemented at least up to 3.2-stable. How could one ensure that their
threads in an application can be equally distributed to all the
processors in FreeBSD? Are there any documents on FreeBSD 3.*'s thread
support(both kernel
Terry Lambert wrote:
That's kind of the point. No other VFS stacking system out there
plays by FreeBSD's revamped rules.
I look around and I see no standards. It is still time to be
experimental.
--
Daniel C. Sobral(8-DCS)
d...@newsguy.com
d...@freebsd.org
-
: The reason is due to the way NFSv3 issues writes. NFSv3 issues a
: write but no longer assumes that the write has been synced to the
: server's disk as of when the reply comes back. Instead it keeps the
:..
:
:If you are looking for more optimizations, you can delay NFS write
implemented at least up to 3.2-stable. How could one ensure that their
threads in an application can be equally distributed to all the
processors in FreeBSD?
You can't.
Are there any documents on FreeBSD 3.*'s thread
support(both kernel and user level)?
FreeBSD has no kernel 'thread'
I have been writing a nasty kludge to treat a CardBus bridge as a standard
PCI bridge (with static config) you may start throwing rocks now. I have
it to the point where I can (after the system is booted) 'pciconf -r
pci5:0:0 0' and get scan information (neat, huh :). Welll, I thought it would
91 matches
Mail list logo
