code and binaries are found at:
Source -
http://people.freebsd.org/~hosokawa/boot-ja/4.2-RELEASE/release-20001128-1/release-20001128-1.tar.gz
Binaries -
http://people.freebsd.org/~hosokawa/boot-ja/4.2-RELEASE/release-20001128-1/boot_cjk.flp
http://people.freebsd.org/~hosokawa/boot-ja/4.2-RELEASE
http://www.icq.com/groupware/
That is ICQ's free server version. It will allow you to setup a local ICQ
network for your users to communicate. From what I read (rather quickly) it
gives a few special features, but downloads and uploads will be fast across
the network, as well as just regular
hi, there!
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Mike Nowlin wrote:
Anyone know of a program out there that can act as a central server for
ICQ? (I know there's some AIM clones out there, but I'd rather avoid that
one...) A quick look in ports and some digging around on Google and
Freshmeat didn't return
* Mike Nowlin [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001127 23:54] wrote:
This really isn't a (directly) FBSD-related question, but since I'm trying
to get everyone at work off MS products over to FBSD workstations, I
figure it's appropriate enough to ask here... :)
The new guy who came in to start running
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:07:05 +0900
Tatsumi Hosokawa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TH Latest code is based on 4.2-RELEASE and I'm porting porting it to
TH -current (maybe it's easy).
TH
TH It currently supports Japanese, Korean, Traditional Chinese
TH (translation is incomplete, but no problem about
"Chuck Rock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to get syslog to put time and date into the dmesg file?
What dmesg file? The dmesg command prints the contents of a kernel
buffer that contains messages generated by the kernel. The syslog
daemon logs these and other messages, with
There seem to be a problem setting up bridge + ipfw using the fxp Intel Pro
100 cards. The problem doesn't exist on NE2000 cards. The same set of ipfw
rules and same configuration work on NE2000 cards. Does anybody know if there
is a problem with 100Mbit cards, the intel pro in particular or
Who do I prod to get someone to take a look at bin/12939 and bin/6183?
I've been using both patches now since FreeBSD 4.0 and they make life
a lot more pleasant when using quota on a machine with NFS mounts.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
The above doesn't explain why everything work under ne2000 cards but not intel
etherexpress pro 100. Same set of rules allow arp entries through ne2000 cards
but not intel. Also from /etc/rc.firewall that came with FreeBSD 4.2:
# If you're using 'options BRIDGE', uncomment the following line
* Peter Pentchev [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001128 09:49] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 09:43:17AM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
* Matthew West [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001128 05:35] wrote:
Who do I prod to get someone to take a look at bin/12939 and bin/6183?
I've been using both patches now
Hi,
Is there a man page or some sort of reference to what all of the
priority values mean as reported in 'top' or 'ps -o pri'? I've seen
-6, -18, -22, etc, and am trying to figure out what seeing a lot of
each of them would mean for server performance.
- dpk
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, David Kirchner wrote:
Hi,
Is there a man page or some sort of reference to what all of the
priority values mean as reported in 'top' or 'ps -o pri'? I've seen
-6, -18, -22, etc, and am trying to figure out what seeing a lot of
each of them would mean for server
Hey gang,
One of my favorite tools to use during the SMPng stuff is top(1) as I get to
see all the Happy Little Processes bouncing around on CPU's and getting stuck
in SMTX, etc. One annoyance is that even if the window is wider than 80 chars,
top(1) will only use 80 chars of data. Notably, if
Wouldnt putting up a compressed tarball of the releases reduce bandwidth
usage (and download time)?
I know I've asked this before, but it seems logical enough.
dennis
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In the last episode (Nov 28), John Baldwin said:
Hey gang,
One of my favorite tools to use during the SMPng stuff is top(1) as I
get to see all the Happy Little Processes bouncing around on CPU's
and getting stuck in SMTX, etc.
On a related note, here's a little patch to top that digs
On 28-Nov-00 Dan Nelson wrote:
In the last episode (Nov 28), John Baldwin said:
Hey gang,
One of my favorite tools to use during the SMPng stuff is top(1) as I
get to see all the Happy Little Processes bouncing around on CPU's
and getting stuck in SMTX, etc.
On a related note, here's a
On Thu, 23 Nov 2000, FengYue wrote:
-dmesg: kvm_read:
-#6 0xc01882dd in fr_makefrip (hlen=20, ip=0xc0a48fe4, fin=0xd892fb0c)
-at ../../netinet/fil.c:258
-#7 0xc018e20c in fr_checkicmpmatchingstate (ip=0xc0a48fc8,
-fin=0xd892fc1c)
-at ../../netinet/ip_state.c:1081
Hi, I'm
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 11:54:29AM +0100, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
"Chuck Rock" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is there a way to get syslog to put time and date into the dmesg file?
What dmesg file?
Maybe /var/log/dmesg.boot? But the filesystem timestamp on this should
be sufficient, I'd
On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
- I thought it's preemptive purely at user-level since the threads are
- scheduled by thread lib at user-level only. No?
-
-What are you asking? Give a scenario and I'll explain what should
-happen.
-
Hmm, actually I don't know in which case it'd
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, FengYue wrote:
-Did I find the bug causing the panic or did I miss something?
Also, if it's the bug that causes the panic, the fix should be
pretty simple i guess, like do something like this before the IP
version check:
fin_fin_v = ip-ip_v;
right?
To Unsubscribe: send
I am new to this list and was wondering if anyone could offer some insight
to a problem I am having. This involves apache-php and nfs mounts.
We are apparently getting timeouts occasionally on the nfs mount the
apache deamon reads from ...some forum cache images we have, they are on
an nfs
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
- Hmm, actually I don't know in which case it'd be considered as "preemptive
- at kernel level"... In the case where a thread calls a syscall and gets
- blocked, the entire process gets blocked not just that thread. In
- the case where the syscalls
* FengYue [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001128 18:31] wrote:
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, FengYue wrote:
--No it wouldn't. The async nature of the call would prevent the
--process from blocking therefore the threads wouldn't block either
--blocking.
--
-
-Sorry for being unclear. I actually meant "Would
Sorry that one is for linux and solaris.
You can try ln -s /usr/libexec/ /lib
that should fix your problem :)
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Eric Melville wrote:
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 18:45:23 -0800 (PST)
From: Eric Melville [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Say I have a cvs tree all nicely unpacked et cetera. How do I find out what
tags are available - I ask this becuase I want to check out a second source
tree (for 4.2 stable) in addition to current.
Stephen
--
The views expressed above are not those of PGS Tensor.
"We've heard
In the last episode (Nov 28), Stephen Hocking said:
Say I have a cvs tree all nicely unpacked et cetera. How do I find out what
tags are available - I ask this becuase I want to check out a second source
tree (for 4.2 stable) in addition to current.
Tags are assigned individually to each
On 29-Nov-00 Stephen Hocking wrote:
Say I have a cvs tree all nicely unpacked et cetera. How do I find out what
tags are available - I ask this becuase I want to check out a second source
tree (for 4.2 stable) in addition to current.
Go find a file that is on all the branches
John Baldwin wrote:
On 29-Nov-00 Stephen Hocking wrote:
Say I have a cvs tree all nicely unpacked et cetera. How do I find out what
tags are available - I ask this becuase I want to check out a second source
tree (for 4.2 stable) in addition to current.
Go find a file that is on all
Hey... I have tried everything I know and no one has any idea why I get this
error.
I decided to forward you this email which I sent to the XFree86 dev team (or
whoever xfree86@ goes to). As you can see they didn't know how to fix it.
You guys have any idea?
Thanks in advance.
-data-
When can we expect the 4.2 release to start shipping?
Josef
--
Josef Grosch | Another day closer to a | FreeBSD 4.2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Micro$oft free world | www.bafug.org
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the
When can we expect the 4.2 release to start shipping?
It's gone to replication and should be just a week or so away
from being shippable.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Andrew Otwell wrote:
same problem. I'm trying though
bash-2.03$ gcc -static -nostdlib -L/usr/lib \
-lalias -lalias_p -lc -lc_p -lc_pic -lcalendar -lcalendar_p -lcom_err -lcom_err_p \
-lcompat -lcompat_p -lcrypt -lcrypt_p -lcurses -lcurses_p \
-ldialog -ldialog_p -ldisk -ledit
[Posted this to questions too, but no one appeared to know.. maybe someone
here does?]
Hi,
I've installed FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE on a server here (AMD K6-2 333MHz, 64MB
RAM), which does gatewaying, firewalling, NATd and finally, samba, samba for
printing.
The box works like a charm, but printing
After adding couple of printf() to fil.c and ip_state.c, I'm now pretty
sure that ofin with initialized fin_v in ip_state.c is causing the
crash. I could see that by doing a traceroute to ipv4 IP on the machine,
the fin_v sometimes gets a value of 6 that makes the IPV6 code gets executed
in
34 matches
Mail list logo
