Hi,
You can find many old images here:
http://www.freebsdmirrors.org/FBSDsites.php3?showi386ISO=do
(I don't have checked the links yet :p)
-- dak
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 12:03:39AM -0600, John Nielsen wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jefferson Harlough [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 05:14:58PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Paul Herman, and lo! it spake thus:
Clearly, at the root of our disagreement is what we both perceive
the problem to be.
Oh, certainly; that's what makes it fun :)
I don't see problems in the current implementation, aside
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 05:07:40PM -0700 I heard the voice of
Terry Lambert, and lo! it spake thus:
The problem with your proposed patch is that it breaks the
ability to allow authentication against the database while
it is undergoing modification, which may be a prolonged period.
Would it?
Hello,
there already is some code for smbalert# handling on intpm
(ENABLE_ALART), but there is no support for handling it in a driver. O2
AudioDJ (OZ162) chips use this signal to indicate that a button was
pressed. So I need a way for a driver to be notified when smbalert#
occurs.
Of course I
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Lai Yiu Fai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone get the Broadcom BCM5701 gigibit ethernet working on new Dell 2650?
I noted it has been fixed in latest STABLE branch from freebsd-hacker list.
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John.
Thanks for the tip.
I changed ETHER_ALIGN to 0 and the driver started to work.
I'm glad to hear it. Thanks for the report.
I am not sure about the performance since I seem to get
only 50 Mbit over a 100 Mbit line. However
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
So we either need to have a compelling solution or get a
committer to step in and make up our minds for us.
I think the best thing to do is file a PR for this.
-Paul.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe
At 9:45 AM -0700 6/24/02, John Polstra wrote:
I agree with you about the noise. I think I'd rather spend the day
in a room with a swarm of hornets than with the Dell 2650. When I
was working with that machine I wore a pair of industrial-strength
ear-protecting headphones, and my ears were still
--On Saturday, June 22, 2002 02:36:44 PM +0200 Neil Blakey-Milner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is always the option
to use SSL, which is my preference, but unfortunately neither SSL nor
SASL have widespread IMAP client support yet.
Most IMAP clients I know of support SSL. Outlook,
Terry,
I made an initial change to the kernel of reducing maxusers from 512 to
256 - you said that 3gig is right on the border of needing extra KVA or
not, so I thought maybe this unnecessarily high maxusers might be puching
me over the top. However, as long as I was changing the kernel, I
John Polstra writes:
On the i386, living with the misalignment is probably the best
solution, unfortunately. The only alternatives I can think of are:
- bcopy the packet up by 2 bytes after reception to align the
payload, or
- disable PCI-X mode on the bus
If
Well, it should be noted that there are two things going on with swap.
What I adjusted was the size of the swap_zone, which holds swblocks.
These structures hold the VM-SWAP block mappings for things that are
swapped out. The swap zone eats a lot more KVA then the radix tree
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Andrew Gallatin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the bge's API allows it, you could setup a receive descriptor with
a length of 14 bytes (size of ethernet header), and start the next
descripter 2 bytes after it (at a 16 byte offset from the front of the
mbuf).
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Paul Herman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
So we either need to have a compelling solution or get a
committer to step in and make up our minds for us.
I think the best thing to do is file a PR for this.
With or without a patch?
Geoff
To
LINT says that the portal filesystem is 'known to buggy'. I'm having a
look at it, but can't get it to break ! Could someone give me an idea
of the status of it, or where I could look ?
Cheers,
- Harry, who apologises if this isn't the right list.
--
Harry Newton
harry_newton at telinco . co
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
Terry Lambert, and lo! it spake thus:
The problem with your proposed patch is that it breaks the
ability to allow authentication against the database while
it is undergoing modification, which may be a prolonged period.
Would it?
For starters, this locks
A few items that deserve mention, and two questions:
a) this problem occurred back when the machine had 2gigs in it - I
actually (naively) added the third gig of physical ram to try to fix the
problem.
b) another machine of mine is now exhibiting the same bahavior - it has
far fewer processes
Patrick Thomas wrote:
I made an initial change to the kernel of reducing maxusers from 512 to
256 - you said that 3gig is right on the border of needing extra KVA or
not, so I thought maybe this unnecessarily high maxusers might be puching
me over the top. However, as long as I was changing
:questions:
:
:1) How do I give you an entire `ps` output from DDB ? Is there a way to
:output it to a floppy or something ? Or are you suggesting to copy down
:by hand ~1000 lines of ps output ?
If you have a couple of machines you can use a null-modem cable and
make the target
Patrick Thomas wrote:
1) How do I give you an entire `ps` output from DDB ? Is there a way to
output it to a floppy or something ? Or are you suggesting to copy down
by hand ~1000 lines of ps output ?
Serial console + terminal program with capture.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: send mail to
Harry Newton wrote:
LINT says that the portal filesystem is 'known to buggy'. I'm having a
look at it, but can't get it to break ! Could someone give me an idea
of the status of it, or where I could look ?
From the man page of mount_portal:
The portal daemon provides an open service.
As a splinter to the ongoing KVA/crash/memory discussion, I am wondering:
- given a machine that will run 250+ httpds and another ~800 misc.
processes, what system tunings would any of you suggest other than the
ones I have done:
In my kernel: maxusers=256 (was 512, change to 256
subscribe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with unsubscribe freebsd-hackers in the body of the message
It's obvious that you are running a large number of httpd's; the
Yes, we are running a lot of httpd's:
ps auxw | grep httpd | wc -l = 288
The way to cross-check this would be to run a continuous netstat -m,
e.g.:
Funny you should ask :) I was already doing that. Here is the
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Patrick Thomas wrote:
Two things about this interested me:
a) watching `top` output anytime of the day, i see several httpd processes
in sbwait - granted I can only see 40 lines of processes or so in `top`,
but usually at least two show sbwait. Worrisome ?
sbwait is
hi!
i´ve an interjetII and i´ve heard, that it´s possible toget root-access via
telnet on the freebsd operating system by pressing a special combination of
keys.
i´m just a student and i can´t spend my money on a special corporation to get
this hepl. and i was just a lucky
Actually Terry is wrong here :-) Sorry Terry. The portal filesystem
is not really a filesystem. All it can do is intercept open()s and
return descriptors. It isn't like NULLFS. The portal filesystem
does not do any layering at all. open() does not return a portalfs
u if you have an IJ-II then
you must be leasing it from IBM. And IMB is ending all teh leases and
recalling them.
They never sold them as far as I know.. no wait you are in .de..
hmmm that may be different..
the best way is to take out the disk.
put it on a freeBSD system
edit /etc/tty to
hi!
ok, that may helps a little...
i want the root access, because i´ve a dsl-internet-connection, and i isn´t
supported by the ij-package at now. so i hope, that i can activate the
dsl-feature with root access. i hope, you are not rolling over the floor
laughing ;-)
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, KitCat wrote:
hi!
ok, that may helps a little...
i want the root access, because i´ve a dsl-internet-connection, and i isn´t
supported by the ij-package at now. so i hope, that i can activate the
dsl-feature with root access. i hope, you are
By the way..
IJ-II's in .de were leased from IBM via Deutche Telecom so theoretically
it's stolen property..
IBM is recalling them and destroying them however..
pitty...
nice product.
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, KitCat wrote:
hi!
ok, that may helps a little...
i want the root access,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
I have a bunch of 8 floppies I need to try to recover contents
from, is there anybody out there who has a 8 drive they'd be willing
to part with for $$ ?
If it comes with the magic SA800-PC cable it would be just perfect.
I work in the TV
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Yahel Zamir wrote:
Hi,
During development of networking code in FreeBSD kernel,
we noticed that m_cat(p1, p2) does NOT do some necessary things:
p1-m_pkthdr.len += p2-m_pkthdr.len;
p2-m_flags = ~M_PKTHDR;
Thanks,
Yahel.
Please notify Luigi or Bosko. See the -net
Patrick Thomas wrote:
As a splinter to the ongoing KVA/crash/memory discussion, I am wondering:
- given a machine that will run 250+ httpds and another ~800 misc.
processes, what system tunings would any of you suggest other than the
ones I have done:
Can't comment. Best guess: whatever
Julian Elischer wrote:
u if you have an IJ-II then
you must be leasing it from IBM. And IMB is ending all teh leases and
recalling them.
They never sold them as far as I know.. no wait you are in .de..
hmmm that may be different..
They sold them in Japan. They may have sold them
KitCat wrote:
i want the root access, because i´ve a dsl-internet-connection, and i isn´t
supported by the ij-package at now. so i hope, that i can activate the
dsl-feature with root access. i hope, you are not rolling over the floor
laughing ;-) perhaps, you know a
Matthew Dillon wrote:
Actually Terry is wrong here :-) Sorry Terry. The portal filesystem
is not really a filesystem. All it can do is intercept open()s and
return descriptors. It isn't like NULLFS. The portal filesystem
does not do any layering at all. open() does
Terry == Terry Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually I was thinking more of ReGet and Godzilla-style software
used by some users to play unfair and suck more bandwidth out of an
FTP server, by opening a zillion sockets and downloading a single
file in chunks.
Terry What a clever hack!
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Paul Herman wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
So we either need to have a compelling solution or get a
committer to step in and make up our minds for us.
I think the best thing to do is file a PR for this.
More than one person has already
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:56:31AM -0700 I heard the voice of
Paul Herman, and lo! it spake thus:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Geoffrey C. Speicher wrote:
So we either need to have a compelling solution or get a
committer to step in and make up our minds for us.
I think the best thing to do is
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:15:09PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jun 2002, Yahel Zamir wrote:
Hi,
During development of networking code in FreeBSD kernel,
we noticed that m_cat(p1, p2) does NOT do some necessary things:
p1-m_pkthdr.len += p2-m_pkthdr.len;
p2-m_flags =
41 matches
Mail list logo
