Jason A. Spiro wrote:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
And yet there is ZERO interest in changing this in FreeBSD.
As you can see elsewhere in this thread, I am discussing it with Xin.
So far, both he and the Linux killall maintainer have said no, but I
of the touchpad?
I have a similar model on my Dell laptop and it works fine with moused
for basic features. It's old enough though that it doesn't have any
features that are not basic. :)
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http
can look at re-implementing
wait_for_pids with this. I think this is a very nice addition, thanks
for taking it on.
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com
would be to see first how many things will need
overrides (WARNS != 6) before deciding whether it's worth setting a
default.
hth,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com
think that the style-compliance issue is a valid one, and
I personally would be in favor of that happening after the
8.0-release, FWIW.
hth,
Doug
--
Improve the effectiveness of your Internet presence with
a domain name makeover!http://SupersetSolutions.com
'not running' which
arguably it should not do since that script is not for starting a
persistent service, it's just a 'run at boot' thing. In any case, if
you find what you think are bugs in rc.d related stuff feel free to
report them to freebsd...@freebsd.org.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature
that 'ps -ax' didn't have, and I agree. As a
matter of personal preference I find the current defaults to be just
lovely, and occasionally use -w or -ww if I need to see more. If you
want the default to be something different, that's what aliases are for.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your
width)
rather than to focus on functionality)?
If you're developing your own app to display running processes
implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
question at hand.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Ivan Radovanovic wrote:
Doug Barton napisa:
If you're developing your own app to display running processes
implement it any way you wish. That's totally unrelated to the
question at hand.
Doug
I totally disagree with you - being against change means that you
believe it is done the best
As terribly clever as you all are, can you please restrict the
political commentary/humor/whatever to -chat?
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Doug, good day.
Thu, Aug 06, 2009 at 11:15:12AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
I came across this problem during a recent portmaster update. When
trying to strip off the * character using variable expansion in bin/sh
it doesn't work. Other special characters do work
ahead and file a PR on this?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
var='foo\*'
echo var before stripping: $var
var=${var%\*}
echo var after stripping: $var
echo ''
var='foo\$'
echo var before stripping: $var
var=${var%\$}
echo var after stripping: $var
exit 0
wrong. :) If this were a FreeBSD question then
-questions would indeed have been the right list, but it's actually a BIND
question which means it belongs on bind-us...@isc.org.
Good luck,
Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
John Baldwin writes:
| On Thursday 23 July 2009 2:08:35 am Andre Albsmeier wrote:
| On Wed, 22-Jul-2009 at 09:48:56 -0700, Doug Ambrisko wrote:
| Andre Albsmeier writes:
| | On Sat, 18-Jul-2009 at 10:25:06 +0100, Rui Paulo wrote:
| | On 18 Jul 2009, at 09:10, Andre Albsmeier wrote
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav d...@des.no writes:
Great, now mergemaster blew away my ntp.conf and installed this one
instead. Apparently, it thinks AUTO_UPGRADE means it's fine to
overwrite an existing file with a new one...
Yes
John Hay wrote:
Is it not possible to change the logic of -U a little. Only auto install
if it is in mtree and has not changed. So if it has changed or is not in
mtree, skip the auto install.
Apparently you didn't read the whole thread, but the answer is no.
Doug
--
This .signature
Alexander Leidinger writes:
| Quoting Doug Ambrisko ambri...@ambrisko.com (from Thu, 2 Apr 2009
| 16:16:34 -0700 (PDT)):
|
| This worked well for us so I think it is a good idea. Also some HW
| watchdogs can be told to generate an NMI which can also produce a kernel
| dump/ddb prompt. I've
in-case a disk or disk
I/O sub-system died.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Oliver Fromme wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Oliver Fromme wrote:
I assume, with this you mean my solution to the slow
shell loop problem (not quoted above), not Yoshihiro Ota's
awk proposal?
I meant the solution using comm, sorry. (I forgot to mention that I
would probably
that it is also more prone to
introduce errors.
I agree, but I have only passing familiarity with awk, so to someone
who knows awk this might look like hello world. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
, but this looks good at first
blush. That said, the generation of the hash list file is just a drop
in the bucket. The real inefficiency in this function is the test -f
for 64k files, one at a time.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Sheldon Givens wrote:
Hello everyone,
It occurs to me that FreeBSD ps lacks the ability to disable header.
Why is this necessary?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
I've committed it.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
CANONICALOBJDIR:=/usr/obj${.CURDIR}
.endif
However I would be happy with any solution that makes it work. It's
trivial to test with 'mergemaster -i -D/temp/dir/for/root -A arm'
Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
On 9 Dec 2008, at 23:54, Paul Wootton wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Pegasus Mc
Cleaft
Sent: 07 December 2008 12:17
To: Doug Rabson
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Problems with zfsboot loader if raidz
On 7 Dec 2008, at 03:19, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
Hello Hackers,
Recently and friend and I have been trying to get the new
gptzfsboot working
on our machines and ran into a interesting problem.
Initially I was building the world without the environment variable
On 20 Nov 2008, at 19:41, Olivier SMEDTS wrote:
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/20 Olivier SMEDTS [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/11/20 Pascal Hofstee [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 20 Nov 2008 01:46:31 -
Pegasus Mc Cleaft [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone,
I am having
good resource is to read through
the comments in /etc/rc.subr.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
#!/bin/sh
#
# PROVIDE: ntlmaps
# REQUIRE: LOGIN
# KEYWORD: shutdown
# Add the following lines to /etc/rc.conf.local or /etc/rc.conf
# to enable this service
.
The version of dialog we have in the system is prehistoric. The newer
version is a lot better in the POLA department, and $SOMEONE was
working on an update, but I don't know what happened to that effort.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
different UIs (see above).
2. At least one of those UIs should be functional over a standard
serial console.
3. It should be scriptable.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
if you can do that for the second level and above
it's pretty easy to do it for TLDs. The more interesting problem there
is a lot of ancient software, web scripts, etc. with hard-coded rules
about how TLDs only have 3 characters
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Andrey Chernov [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please note that BSD grep is not localized (and can't be per design)
and works only with standard C locale. It may not affect ports
system processing but shurely affects real texts
.
egrep -l DEPORIGIN:($origin|$ro_opd)$ $pdb/*/+CONTENTS
Obviously this works in portmaster with the gnu grep, but if ro_opd is
unset with the bsd grep I get:
egrep: empty (sub)expression
If I set ro_opd to something, it works.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
opinion.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ivan Voras wrote:
On 20/03/2008, Doug Poland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:02:42AM +0300, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
* Ivan Voras ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Is there a utility that would do that, and if not, does anyone have the
time to write one
I'd recommend one,
but IMO BIND is it right now. There are a couple others in development
right now, but they are not yet ready for prime time (again, IMO).
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers
Doug Barton wrote:
Why don't you post that diff? Sounds like a good idea to me.
Oh, duh. Never mind. :)
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
)
DIST_SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=${DIST_SUBDIR}/
.else
DIST_SUBDIR_OVERRIDE=
.endif
MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE=ftp://ftp5.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/${DIST_SUBDIR_OVERRIDE}
IMO it would be a lot more intuitive if the ports infrastructure did
exactly this for the user.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized
You could also create a release, burn it to CD, and install from scratch.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
' and then wipe out what you had and
check it out again. Then you can apply your diff as needed.
You should also spend some time thoroughly reading the cvs man page.
It's a fairly complex system, and it's easy to accidentally add a knob
that will have hard to diagnose long-term effects.
Doug
Yuri wrote:
I tried to make a backup copy of one DVD that I own and 'dvdbackup'
always fails at a particular point.
Would the dvds in question happen to be Sony movies? If so a web search
might be useful to you.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
;;
esac
done
sleep 1
kldunload $kmod
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
If you don't like the license, don't use the software.
If you want to complain/explain/debate about the license, find another
forum. This subject is not on topic for the FreeBSD mailing lists.
Thanks,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
interested in getting
fuse-ntfs set up here.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
If you need any help with the DNS side of the equation feel free to
contact me directly.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
most of the time.. ie.
multi-threading kernel wont help much ;)
It has an indirect benefit by (presumably) not being in contention
with the userland process, and not needing slap Giant on the whole
system every few milliseconds.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Running out of memory and having to continually swap things in and out
of ram degrades performance, yes. Page faults are simply how the
virtual memory subsystem gets things done, like pulling things out of
swap.
--Doug
On Nov 7, 2007 7:48 PM, binto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Btw
Even page fault
more ram by reducing paging.
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
someone who is local to do the
installation for you, which all things considered would probably be easier
all around.
hope this helps,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 10/17/07, Doug Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you also send the output of ps -auxl?
Also - do you notice this performance drop when running something like
one of the network performance tools? I'd like to isolate the disk
activity from the network activity for a clean test
the machine springs back to life. I'm not sure how this will
affect measurements.
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/sysctl-a
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/psauxl
http://toric.loungenet.org/~doug/systat-vm
My real confusion lies in why there are still em interrupts at all, with
polling on.
Thanks
scopeid 0x3
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
Anyone have any clue about what might be going on?
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
scopeid 0x3
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff00
Anyone have any clue about what might be going on?
--Doug
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 14:20 -0700, Jin Guojun wrote:
By looking through _pthread_create() code and find it uses a magic
cookie -- TLS -- created
by rtld_allocate_tls(), and passed into kernel by sysarch() via
_tcb_set() / _kcb_set().
The information seems to be set by rtld (ld-elf.so.1)
the other direction, what would be the benefit to
having plain stop act in the absence of an _enable variable for that
service?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
of FreeBSD users.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Sean Bruno wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Assuming that lack of an affirmative _enable variable is a constant, the
only way that a service can be started is with either onestart or
forcestart. The symmetry here would be to stop it the same way.
This may be symmetrical, but I
for you. We've given you
the code, do what you will with it.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
that's
worth.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
they are
supposed to support Serial Over Lan (SOL) via the standard :-)
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be a bit messed up for the
package. This is because the creation of other ports might disturb
_LIB_RUN_DEPENDS and might put in some extra entries in +CONTENTS.
Doctor, it hurts when I do THIS.
Well, don't do that. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
, and didn't have the problems you're seeing. What
I don't have though is zfs, so that may be a place to look. One way to
check is if you're not doing it already, use an mfs /tmp and see if
that helps.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Alex Dupre wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
(Over 2GBs of RAM + Swap being used). It does this consistently when it
tries to compile xf86PciScan.c (hope thats the right file).
May not be the answer you want to hear, but I built all the xorg stuff
multiple times on -current systems both pre and post
Alex Dupre wrote:
Doug Barton ha scritto:
Not disputing your answer, but I'm curious. Why would it cause
problems on some systems but not others? I haven't done anything with
my cflags ...
It depends on how much RAM + Swap do you have. I know people with 1.5Gb
that have such problem
MFC'ed David Xu's libthr to 6.X at work and it's working. libkse
will be a lot harder IMHO. David's stuff in -current just works.
I routinely run 32bit thread stuff on 64bit hosts using the
libmap32.conf trick to switch from kse to libthr.
Thanks to David for making it work in -current.
Doug
=90863 for an interesting
related discussion.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
Steven Hartland wrote:
Given that it sounds like a potential workaround is to use the machines
IP instead of name until this is fixed, thanks for the info guys.
For as long as I can remember, it's been a Best Practice to have
entries for critical NFS servers in /etc/hosts.
Doug
[ For future reference, please don't cross post to -questions and any
other list. Thanks. ]
Konrad Heuer wrote:
Hello everyone,
after upgrading from 4.11 to 6.1
Step one would be to upgrade again to either 6.2-RELEASE or -stable.
Lots of good stuff happened between releases.
hth,
Doug
with the
latest HEAD, and run 'make universe' with the latest HEAD?
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail
,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suggested
above, speak up. :)
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
for the PR
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
It's not documented, but the code is there in /etc/rc.subr:
grep 'rc.conf\.d' /etc/rc.subr
if [ -f /etc/rc.conf.d/$_name ]; then
debug Sourcing /etc/rc.conf.d/${_name}
. /etc/rc.conf.d
), and the
/etc/periodic functionality is not flexible enough to cover all cases.
That's not a bad idea, but you'll have to find some other huckleberry
to address it, I've got my hands full at the moment.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
at
boot time, so all you have to do is make a port of your project and
you're good to go.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
Lamont Granquist wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Doug Barton wrote:
And if you're looking specifically at the /etc/rc.conf config file, what
would be more useful would be an /etc/rc.conf.d/ directory.
Good news for you, we already support that. :) I agree that it makes a
great tool
Vulpes Velox wrote:
On Sun, 07 Jan 2007 22:02:30 -0800
Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vulpes Velox wrote:
I was just wondering. How many people here have given lots of
though about integrating FreeBSD configuration with LDAP. I've
just begun looking at it a lot more and was curious
of
the change.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and this sounds like an
interesting problem.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
suggestion of putting the box back to the
last known good 5.x release is a good one. At least that can help rule
out hardware _failure_, as opposed to hardware-used-differently issues.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
it via the web management
| console, I just can not get the kernel driver to work with it. Any help
| and/or references would be greatly appreciated.
Could you try it static in the kernel and then with and without ACPI
enabled?
Doug A.
___
freebsd
suggestion would be to change warnx() to errx(), and drop the
return(1); from that patch. If there are no objections I'll do it
myself if no one gets to it first.
In any case I think that this is a good addition to the code, and I'm
glad that this issue was raised.
Doug
--
This .signature
to post them for review and send the
URL to the list.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL
-recent-patch
behavior (overwriting the actual file when using -P on a hard link) is
the expected outcome.
It's all well and good to say, tough luck, but I don't think that's
what our users expect.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
Personally I think rm should do what you ask it to do - if you ask it
to overwrite a file which has multiple links, well... though luck.
It's all well and good to say, tough luck, but I
Yuan, Jue wrote:
Hi all.
Could I change the kernel version tag manually?
/sys/conf/newvers.sh
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Niclas Zeising wrote:
The periodic.conf in 7-CURRENT is still set to use the INDEX-6 ports
index file, instead of INDEX-7 which is the default on 7-CURRENT. This
should, I think, be changed.
Done. Next time please consider using send-pr for this type of thing.
Doug
--
This .signature
) driver. It gets the IPMI HW info via SMBIOS.
There is also and smbios driver as well.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. The Unix way of doing things is small programs
that do their jobs well, tied together to accomplish bigger things.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
. Restarting Apache
was usually all it took to set things right again.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send
John Von Essen wrote:
Doug,
Did some googling and I did find a connection between excessive
CLOSED_WAITS, and hanging apache, and webbots. Some of the IP's I saw in
my netstat were bots too. The problem has something to do with the bot
no longer accepting data, but apache will continue
implemented, so at best I would deem your
characterization to be slanted. You may wish to consider if perhaps it is
not also inaccurate.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Kip Macy writes:
| IIRC lack of per instance cdevs also limits Freebsd to one vmware instance.
Really? Don't tell my vmware multiple instances! I used to run 10 on
one FreeBSD host.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http
Kip Macy writes:
| WOW THATS GREAT DOUG! \0/ - it didn't work for me.
This was with the last patched driver for vmware 2. I'm not sure if
it every made it into the port.
http://www.mindspring.com/~vsilyaev/vmware/files/changes
28 Jan 01 Version 0.99-1-0.22
Support for multiple vmware
not) causes troubles:
okey# make clean
=== Cleaning for m4-1.4_1
rm: /usr/ports/devel/m4/work: Directory not empty
*** Error code 1
Try rebooting to single user mode and running 'fsck -y'. That may help.
Good luck,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
that you're ready for a wider review on,
please submit it first to freebsd-rc@, then [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
Vitaliy Skakun writes:
| thanks, but I see this patch is against recent HEAD
|
| I've got the yesterdays RELENG_6 sources and can't simply update to HEAD (
| it is a server )
Give this a shot against RELENG_6:
Index: rp.c
===
RCS
Vitaliy Skakun writes:
| Hi everybody!
|
| One problem arised:
|
| when doing in the shell
| echo ~WS /dev/cuaR00
|
| for several times as quick as I can, I get panic with the following message:
| panic: device_unbusy: called for non-busy device rp0
|
| same thing when trying to send data to
done but
good enough to do a bunch of stuff and Tom Rhodes started a man
page for it. I work on it as I get time or have new needs for it.
Doug A.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
201 - 300 of 1133 matches
Mail list logo