On Fri, Aug 18, 2006 at 10:37:43AM +0400, Jean-Michel Hiver wrote:
Hi,
FreeBSD's SER port core dumps when I start it with 'fork=yes' in the
config file. The OS is freebsd 6.1, the platform is:
Typically this is something to take up with the software authors.
Kris
On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 09:01:13PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
I realized today that this one was possible. I suspect it would be
useful to lots of people working on ports, as well as for the sysadmin
stuff I do with it. I'm just not sure where it should goes.
checkdeps.sh
On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 03:56:54PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote:
Daichi GOTO wrote:
Patchset-16:
For 7-current
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p16.diff
For 6.x
http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p16.diff
I'm sorry, how silly of me. I
On Wed, Sep 06, 2006 at 07:18:18PM +, Edward B. DREGER wrote:
Greetings all,
I'd been going nuts trying to determine why I couldn't link against
libdb-4.4.so and a few other libraries. The ones in question didn't
show up via
ldconfig -r
although their respective
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 06:27:31PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
The config.
We are running ftp, web, email, postgresql services mostly on this
box. We have 6 jails on it with the pf packet filter.
options ALTQ
options ALTQ_CBQ
options ALTQ_RED
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:57:47PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
OK, seems weird to go through all the disruption of changing to a new
OS instead of a few minutes work at a console to give us what we need
to resolve the matter -- but whatever works for you.
already done some stuff like
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 08:13:22PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 02:02:46PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 07:57:47PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
OK, seems weird to go through all the disruption of changing to a new
OS instead of a few
On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 08:24:06PM +0100, Gergely CZUCZY wrote:
You can't even break to the debugger?
well, no.
currently the serial line is not configured nor connected, and the system
console
is not accessable.
i'd like to solve this, but the technical opportunities are limited
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 12:35:06PM +0530, Aditya Godbole wrote:
Hi,
Is there any ramdisk support in freebsd, as there is in netbsd? If
there is no such functionality right now, is anyone working on it?
What are the alternatives if I want to mount a root filesytem from ram?
man mdconfig
Kris
On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 01:35:14PM +0530, Aditya Godbole wrote:
On 11/15/06, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are the alternatives if I want to mount a root filesytem from ram?
man mdconfig
I'm sorry, I couldn't quite get what I was looking for from the
manpage. How do I
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 02:30:41PM -0800, Kevin Sanders wrote:
I'm trying to use KASSERT in my own kernel module and I can't get it
to assert even with a KASSERT(0, test panic). Is there something
else I need to do besides add options INVARIANTS to my kernel config
file. Any clues would be
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 08:24:12PM -0500, Jan Knepper wrote:
Tried that and started
dd if=/dev/ad4 if=/dev/ad6 bs=1m
Kernel went in panic and automatic reboot in about an hour... sigh
It gets worse... when it does reboot the disk drive will not show in the
BIOS, nor does FreeBSD
On Mon, Dec 25, 2006 at 11:17:21PM +0200, Erik Udo wrote:
I'm making a live cd and i just hit a wall with uzip.
I started by creating a null 1GB file, which i filled with FreeBSD.
After that i compressed the file with mkuzip.
Any attempts to mount this compressed image has failed, here is
On Sun, Jan 07, 2007 at 12:44:39PM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
On 2007.01.07. 1:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sounds as if the caller of ufs_rename() is confused. You could
try setting a breakpoint on the printf(), or change it to a panic()
to get a dump, and try to figure out who the caller
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 04:37:05PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
Pyun YongHyeon schreef:
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 12:14:34PM +0100, Rene Ladan wrote:
Pietro Cerutti schreef:
Hi lists,
FreeBSD gahrtop.localhost 6.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 6.2-PRERELEASE #1:
Tue Jan 9 19:34:13 CET
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 07:28:12AM +0200, Erik Udo wrote:
Hi,
I just updated my livecd to 6.2-RELEASE. The kernel source is clean, i
haven't patched it in any way.
Then you're using the ancient useless unionfs and this panic isn't
interesting, sorry. You already seem to know about the
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 10:27:07AM -0800, Daniel Rudy wrote:
At about the time of 2/9/2007 3:05 AM, Peter Jeremy stated the following:
I'm not on the core team but I'm not sure why you believe that
this has anything to do with core.
This very much does involve core because I plan on
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor workloads, and looking for performance
bottlenecks to be optimized.
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do those stand up against the Linux SMP scheduler for
scalability. It would be nice to see the comparison displayed to see what
the
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 05:47:55AM +, Coleman Kane wrote:
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 12:41:20AM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote, and it was
proclaimed:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT tree
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:05:53AM -0500, Andre Guibert de Bruet wrote:
On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:41 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 10:00:35PM -0700, Coleman Kane wrote:
What does the performance curve look like for the in-CVS 7-CURRENT
tree with
4BSD or ULE ? How do
On Sun, Feb 25, 2007 at 01:54:20PM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
It would be really great if we could find workload owners who would
maintain easy-to-run benchmark configurations and also run them regularly
on a fixed hardware configuration over a long time publishing results and
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 12:27:01AM +0100, Martin Blapp wrote:
Hi,
If you can package up some kind of test or analogous workload that I
can run, I'd be happy to take a look at profiling it on MP hardware.
Should be possible. Btw. Has setting kern.threads.virtual_cpu to a different
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 07:08:37PM +1100, Peter Jeremy wrote:
On 2007-Feb-24 16:31:11 -0500, Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have recently made significant progress on optimizing for MySQL
running on an 8-core amd64 system. The graph of results may be found
here:
http
On Mon, Feb 26, 2007 at 11:15:27PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
I wonder if anyone measured what effect superpages has on mysql performance...
this should not help scaling but I can imagine it has some effect.
I have thought about trying this but have not found the time. I am
currently very
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 12:25:11PM -0600, Jim C. Nasby wrote:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2007 at 04:31:11PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Now that the goals of the SMPng project are complete, for the past
year or more several of us have been working hard on profiling FreeBSD
in various multiprocessor
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 12:15:56AM +, Robert Watson wrote:
On Sun, 4 Mar 2007, Divacky Roman wrote:
I looked at where Giant is held in the kernel and I found these
interesting things:
1) in fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c we lock Giant when calling
sorecieve()/sosend() this is a bandaid for
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 03:11:36PM +0100, Divacky Roman wrote:
hi
I looked at where Giant is held in the kernel and I found these interesting
things:
1) in fs/fifofs/fifo_vnops.c we lock Giant when calling sorecieve()/sosend()
this is a bandaid for fixing a race that doesnt have to exist
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 06:55:50PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
Hello,
I took a grep on the kernel source and took a look to Giant usage as
well. I too have a question about locking in uipc_domain.c:
The file has a mutex, dom_mtx, which protects the 'domain list lock',
which could be
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 11:55:10AM +0300, Danny Braniss wrote:
I stumbled on this in -current, but it's also true for 6.2.
/(root) is mounted diskless, doing rm of a file in /, even as a lowly mortal
will hang the network, and hence everything.
on a 6.1 system, it works as expected.
badwolf
On Mon, Apr 09, 2007 at 08:38:22AM -0700, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Tim Kientzle wrote:
Does anyone understand the semantics of the 'opaque' flag?
I'm trying to understand an issue with packages built
on union file systems. It appears the 'opaque' flag
is set on some symlinks, which the package
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 12:17:19PM -0700, Subhash Gopinath wrote:
Hello folks,
Does anyone know if FreeBSD 4.x or 5.x is affected by the Ipv6 mbuf
vulnerability
just like OpenBSD?
http://www.coresecurity.com/index.php5?module=ContentModaction=itemid=1703
As discussed on the security@
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:49PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I cannot currently actively participate in implementing proposed things,
but I can give advice on sqlite, database and xml schemas if anyone
wants to...
One of the things
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:03:22PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:49PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ivan Voras [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I cannot currently actively participate
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 11:15:37PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 10:03:22PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:49PM -0400, Mike
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 09:47:49PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
Personally, I'd still like LOCALBASE to move out of /usr/local. Maybe
it's time to reconsider that.
Not gonna happen
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:33:29AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:19:46AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
Not if you want to use pre-built packages. You made sure of that when
you decided (against my objections
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 10:35:41AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
There are a few ways you can go. The simplest is to install a
complete i386 world in e.g. /compat/ia32 and have i386 packages
installed there, and change the kernel
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 03:07:27PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
The point is that the real problem is: how do you arrange the bits on
disk, not how do you wrap that in a package system. Until you
figure out a workable on-disk
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:02:31PM +0200, David Naylor wrote:
Hi,
Thank you all for your responses, it has given me much to think about. I
guess there is consenses that there is room for improvement in the current
pkg system. Attached are some of my initial ideas about what is required
On Fri, May 11, 2007 at 11:29:24PM -0300, Duane Whitty wrote:
Is it hoped / planned that storing the metadata in a berkeley DB
database will help with the parallelization of package building?
That's somewhat orthogonal: the problem there is mutual exclusion and
job ordering.
In your opinion
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 12:55:44AM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
There are clearly other workable ideas - as I said, the linux folks
managed to make it work. But it's not an easy problem. I certainly
wouldn't suggest rebuilding
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
Seriously, the FreeBSD package
system is in great need of a profound overhaul, pretending it works well
is complete denial of reality. I hope that young people working on
summer code projects will infuse *new* ideas, and not spend
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:25:58PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
First figure out what specific problems need to be solved, then figure
out how to solve them, not the other way around. So far I have seen
little discussion of how SQLite is necessary and sufficient
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:44:22PM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:33:02PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 11:09:35AM +0200, Michel Talon wrote:
Seriously, the FreeBSD package
system is in great need of a profound overhaul, pretending it works
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:46:17AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
The problem is that maintaining the INDEX is expensive and/or tricky.
p5-FreeBSD-Portindex comes close but seems to have some wrinkles.
If you'ld just tell me what you perceive the wrinkles
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 06:25:19PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
Extra whitespace I can fix for you -- it's just the COMMENT field which
is affected IIRC. I just copy the string exactly as shown in the port's
Makefile. make index collapses multiple whitespace to
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:21:56PM +0100, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
Well - Naturally if the only index format was based upon XML it would not be
very practical -
However XML currently seems to take the lead when the talk is on portability
as a data format
and it is very easy to convert to
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:00:46PM +0100, Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
The answer is another INDEX/storage structure
Great, I look forward to your detailed proposal.
Kris
pgpx7V5GHDm4B.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:39:46PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
Matthew Seaman wrote:
I can certainly add a check for duplicate PKGNAME and emit warnings. In
order to be sure of getting the canonical INDEX-N you'ld need a system
with no ports installed. Well, other than
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:52:47PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:25:12AM +0200, 'Michel Talon' wrote:
niobe% sqlite3 index.db
sqlite CREATE TABLE index6 (
pkgname varchar(1),
path varchar(1),
prefix varchar(1),
comment varchar(1),
descr varchar(1),
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:26:45PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:06:37PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Some of the fields can (and do) have unbounded length.
Kris
Where is that specified in the SQL spec? Or are you just saying that
SQLite provides
On Tue, May 29, 2007 at 12:07:44AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
Alex Dupre wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
(Over 2GBs of RAM + Swap being used). It does this consistently when it
tries to compile xf86PciScan.c (hope thats the right file).
May not be the answer you want to hear, but I built all the
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 04:15:29PM -0700, Jeff Anton wrote:
I'm very surprised and upset that running pkgdb -F has started a whole
upgrade of my stable machine.
Well, it didn't.
I'm sure hacker's isn't the right list for this
Correct.
but it is so amazing that I don't know what the right
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 07:59:14PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jeff Anton [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
I'm very surprised and upset that running pkgdb -F has started a whole
upgrade of my stable machine. I'm sure hacker's isn't the right list
for this but it is so amazing
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 08:15:33PM -0400, Mike Meyer wrote:
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
--- Checking the package registry database
Stale dependency: Xaw3d-1.5E_1 - xf86dgaproto-2.0.2 (x11/xf86dgaproto):
Install stale dependency? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [yes
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:15:30PM -0400, Martin Turgeon wrote:
2007/6/18, Jeremy Chadwick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 01:03:44PM -0400, Martin Turgeon wrote:
I just receive 2 PowerEdge servers (a 1950 and a 860) both with 4G of
RAM. I
installed FreeBSD 6.2 Release i386
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 03:10:22PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 05:15:30PM -0400, Martin Turgeon wrote:
My setup is fairly standard (as I described), should I expect problem with
64 bit version of these programs?
Like I said, I don't run 64-bit OSes because I
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 11:28:59AM +0200, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 16:43:29 +0200
Pietro Cerutti [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
gahr Hi list,
gahr here is a patch to allow powerd(8) accept a -t tval option to set a
gahr temperature limit above
On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 08:49:21AM +1000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robert McKenzie wrote:
Has anyone noted that the Australian cvs repository seems to be so
hopelessly out of sink that you cannot do a clean build using a clean
cvsup.
Because we are so far away it is hard to keep things
Borja Marcos wrote:
On 22 Sep 2007, at 00:26, Benjie Chen wrote:
FreeBSD 6.2 on PowerEdge 1950, RAID1 setup with mfi driver (PERC5i). 4GB
RAM. I am currently running i386, and not amd64, due to various reasons.
Kernel panic is at 0xC066C731, which from nm shows it's in mtx_lock_spin
Benjie Chen wrote:
Hi FreeBSD hackers and engineers,
I am experiencing a kernel panic that comes on when my new PowerEdge 1950
FreeBSD 6.2 setup is under a certain stress load. I've emailed a few people
on the list who have given me useful comments, some of which I am still
following up. But I
Borja Marcos wrote:
On 24 Sep 2007, at 11:33, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Borja Marcos wrote:
I don't have the exact IP address involved, but we experienced
consistent panics in two heavily loaded mail servers (same hardware
models, Dell Powereedge) runnning Postfix and FreeBSD 6.2.
Suspecting
Ivan Voras wrote:
Benjie Chen wrote:
Kernel panic is at 0xC066C731, which from nm shows it's in mtx_lock_spin
c066c7b4 T _mtx_lock_spin
c066c85c T _mtx_unlock_sleep
So this could mean that independent stress tests will not result in
panic if
there aren't enough concurrency to cause the
Benjie Chen wrote:
Ivan and Kris,
I will try to get a kernel trace -- it may not happen for awhile since I am
not in the office and working remotely for awhile so it may not be easy to
get a trace... but I will check.
It looks like the problem reported by that link, and some of the links from
Benjie Chen wrote:
You are right, they may not be the same. From first look it seems like
they are similar based on the description of the problems -- system
stable, then under load related to network, get panic after different
time intervals. I just assumed that kernel is typically stable
Ivan Voras wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Does it really? i.e. did you compare the function names in detail and
find that they match precisely, or do you just mean they are both
panics of some description and I dunno what it all means? :) I ask
because the linked trace does not involve
Vladimir Terziev wrote:
Hi Hackers,
i have found the following very interesting link:
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Use_memory_on_video_card_as_swap
It's a howto for Video memory utilization as a swap.
Could someone point me whether the same is possible
Alexey Popov wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the system workload more.
Disks amrd0
KB/t 85.39
tps 5
MB/s 0.38
% busy
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:
After some time of running under high load disk performance become
expremely poor. At that periods 'systat -vm 1' shows something like
this:
What does high load mean? You need to explain the system workload
more.
This web service is similiar
Alexey Popov wrote:
This is very unlikely, because I have 5 another video storage servers
of the same hardware and software configurations and they feel good.
Clearly something is different about them, though. If you can
characterize exactly what that is then it will help.
I can't see any
Kris Kennaway wrote:
What else can i try?
Still waiting on the vmstat -z output.
Also can you please obtain vmstat -i, netstat -m and 10 seconds of
representative vmstat -w output when the problem is and is not occurring?
Kris
___
freebsd
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only applies
to large files like mp3 or video
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi
Kris Kennaway wrote:
So I can conclude that FreeBSD has a long standing bug in VM that
could be triggered when serving large amount of static data (much
bigger than memory size) on high rates. Possibly this only
applies to large files like mp3 or video
Atanas Gendov wrote:
Hi all FreeBSD Hackers! :)
My FreeBSD auto reboot itself and I got this report by kgdb, but
actually I'm not a programmer. I don't know how to debug this error.
Could someone helps with fixing?
Thanx in advanced!
FreeBSD .com 6.2-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8 #0:
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Kris Kennaway wrote:te:
In the good case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the good and bad times, since
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
In the good case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the good and bad times, since it
Kris Kennaway wrote:
Alexey Popov wrote:
Hi.
Panagiotis Christias wrote:
In the good case you are getting a much higher interrupt rate but
with the data you provided I can't tell where from. You need to run
vmstat -i at regular intervals (e.g. every 10 seconds for a minute)
during the good
Alexey Popov wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
what is your RAID controller configuration (read ahead/cache/write
policy)? I have seen weird/bogus numbers (~100% busy) reported by
systat -v when read ahead was enabled on LSI/amr controllers.
I tried to run with disabled Read-ahead, but it didn't
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Quoting Robert Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
No problem -- just to be clear: in 7, users can still choose between
libpthread (m:n) and libthr (1:1), but the default is now libthr rather than
libpthread, as libthr seemed to perform better in most if not all
Yuri wrote:
I tried to compile firefox-2.0.0.10 on 7.0-BETA3.
And one linking command failed seeking for malloc_lock symbol required by
/lib/pthread.so.2. Obviously it tried to link obsolete /lib/pthread.so.2 with
the new /lib/libc.so.7.
By reading /usr/src/UPDATING I learn that the default
Yuri wrote:
Sorry about that.
Please find the logs below.
My system is upgraded from 6.3. And /lib/libpthread.so.2 is not a symlink.
But when I make it a symlink (ln -s /lib/libthr.so.3 /lib/libpthread.so.2)
I get another error, see log below.
Some requisite libs are compiled with
Yuri wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So do I have to rebuild all ports to be able to run on 7.0?
Yes. You have to do this whenever you upgrade to a new branch of
FreeBSD. The old ports will work until you start upgrading them to new
versions, at which point you will end up
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi , freebsd-hackers.
I found this reference
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=372365+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2006/freebsd-hackers/20060226.freebsd-hackers
how is it correct to conduct this procedure ?
beforehand thank you !!
tmpfs is included in
Yuri wrote:
Quoting Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, that's what I am doing.
portupgrade -af
That is what you are doing now, or what you were doing when you found
the problem? It should not occur during a portupgrade -af unless there
is a port that is missing registration on some
On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Mark wrote:
For now, I'm looking for an explanation of what is error is and where it
may be coming from. I found one question very similar to this in the
archive, but alas, there was no reply.
You didn't post any information which might help a developer track down your
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
Could you elaborate some more about the SMB patches? I've been to
www.samba.org but it's not obvious to me what's in there for FreeBSD
(except for samba itself).
It makes tcpdump understand SMB packets (header structure, etc). See the
tcpdump-smb
On Wed, 30 Jun 1999, Matthew N. Dodd wrote:
It would make sense except that the last time someone tried, some people
complained that it made it too easy to sniff passwords etc.
Thats such a bogus issue.
The argument (to me) is not one of capability, but expediency. If you're
running a
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Greg Lehey wrote:
In fact, the most interesting thing about this (rather large) document
is that it's the best documentation I've seen on klds. I don't know
why anybody would want to use it for compromising security, since it's
a *lot* of work, and to even get as far as
On Tue, 13 Jul 1999, Stephen Hocking-Senior Programmer PGS Tensor Perth wrote:
I was checking out the firewall setup in /etc/rc.firewall, and noticed that
the simple example relied on a fixed IP address for the external interface. I
don't know ahead of time what IP address is going to be
On Mon, 19 Jul 1999, Wes Peters wrote:
Given that this is a PAM module, wouldn't /etc/pam.conf be more appropriate?
/etc/pam.conf would be appropriate for configuring the behavior of PAM
modules. /etc/auth.conf would be appropriate for configuring WHICH
authentication method to use.
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
PAM is also "using masses of weird shared objects" but nevertheless it's
quite usable
By statically linked binaries?
This is also an issue for a modularized libcrypt(). Peter Wemm suggested
having the library fork and exec a static helper
On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Oscar Bonilla wrote:
Ok, here goes my understanding of how things should be, please correct me
if i'm wrong.
There are three parts to the problem:
1. Where do we get the databases from? I mean, where do we get passwd, group,
hosts, ethers, etc from.
This
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Dominic Mitchell wrote:
This is starting to get icky. This is also where the earlier idea of a
userspace filesystem would probably fare better, in terms of both
performance and simplicity.
Maybe I don't get how this userspace filesystem is going to be set out
(for the
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
what if you're not root, and you want to add your own file system to your
file system name space? It seems a lot of these systems assume root
access, which seems unrealistic to me.
Well, if you're running it as a kernel module then obviously you
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Tiny Non Cats wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 1999 at 10:06:04AM -0400 David E. Cross said:
Since I am planning on writing userfs in order to impliment 'nsd' (and
This may be completely useless, because I've not been following what you want
to do with 'nsd', but you may find
On Thu, 22 Jul 1999, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 1999, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Well, if you're running it as a kernel module then obviously you need root
permissions to load it. If it's running as a userland process, then
there's no reason why you can't run it as a user. mount
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Mark Murray wrote:
What is needed to make this support a more sensible number of IRQs?
Mainly changing the ioctl and its clients (rndcontrol only?) to supply
more bits.
I am currently rewriting /dev/random (and rndcontrol).
When you say rewriting, do you mean
On Sat, 24 Jul 1999, Mark Murray wrote:
When you say rewriting, do you mean syncing with the version of the code
in Linux (1.04, instead of our 0.95) or actually rewriting? If the latter,
I'm curious as to what your aims are.
I want to implement Bruce Schneier's Yarrow.
Ah - I had this
1 - 100 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
