As long as your program isn't overstepping memory boundaries nothing should
happen.
What were you expecting?
-Original Message-
From: Miguel Mendez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2002 8:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Electric fence usage
Hi,
I've
The original Stroustrop ATT C++ complier called cfront was a front-end C
compiler. They may have it available at research.att.com. It's missing some
things, though, like generic container classes.
-Original Message-
From: Rayson Ho [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, July 03,
What on Earth are you talking about?
-Original Message-
From: Rafael Gomez [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2000 07:10
To: FreeBSD Hackers
Subject: kERNEL
Can any of you send me a copy of a text kernel file?
Rafael Gomez
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Pager: [EMAIL
Get a copy of the 4.4BSD book and read the relevant
code along with the various topics.
"Of course you're the Messiah! I say you are and I should know,
I've followed a few!" -- John Cleese in "Life of Brian"
Matthew Alton
Computer Services - UNIX Systems Administration
(314)632-6644
MTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 1999 10:56 AM
To: Alton, Matthew
Subject: Re: BSD XFS Port BSD VFS Rewrite
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Alton, Matthew wrote:
I am currently conducting a thorough study of the VFS subsystem
in preparation for an all-out effort to port
in the
commercial realm. As for licensing issues, I am purely agnostic -- I trust that
any legal issues can be worked out after the fact by the proper people.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Cattelan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 12:41 AM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc
e AIX sort and that it is desirable, if
not necessary, for the realtime throughput guarantee policy. Nes pas?
-Original Message-
From: Russell Cattelan [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 1:01 AM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject:
in the
commercial realm. As for licensing issues, I am purely agnostic -- I trust that
any legal issues can be worked out after the fact by the proper people.
-Original Message-
From: Russell Cattelan [SMTP:catte...@thebarn.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 12:41 AM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc
and that it is desirable, if
not necessary, for the realtime throughput guarantee policy. Nes pas?
-Original Message-
From: Russell Cattelan [SMTP:catte...@thebarn.com]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 1999 1:01 AM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: 'hack...@freebsd.org'; 'f...@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: BSD
As I parse the SGI PR-speak, IRIX is to be folded into Linux over time in
one massive penguin love-in. This will take place at some point after
IRIX has been disencunbered of it's ATT/Univel/SCO whatever... It
really is a good time to be alive.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Lambert
As I parse the SGI PR-speak, IRIX is to be folded into Linux over time in
one massive penguin love-in. This will take place at some point after
IRIX has been disencunbered of it's ATT/Univel/SCO whatever... It
really is a good time to be alive.
-Original Message-
From: Terry Lambert
SGI has released a portion of the XFS source code under the GPL:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/
the source file is xfs_log.tar.gz.
Of greater interest at this stage are the documents in:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/design_docs/
I am currently researching methods for
is mostly done.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 5:36 PM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: BSD-XFS Update
stat, fstat, lseek are all already 64 bits in freebsd
SGI has released a portion of the XFS source code under the GPL:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/download/
the source file is xfs_log.tar.gz.
Of greater interest at this stage are the documents in:
http://oss.sgi.com/projects/xfs/design_docs/
I am currently researching methods for
is mostly done.
-Original Message-
From: Julian Elischer [SMTP:jul...@whistle.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 1999 5:36 PM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: 'hack...@freebsd.org'; 'f...@freebsd.org'
Subject: Re: BSD-XFS Update
stat, fstat, lseek are all already 64 bits in freebsd
be done so long as the modules
constitute a discrete product. I will have my lawyer confirm this
when the details of the SGI license become public.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Csanady [SMTP:ccsan...@scl.ameslab.gov]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 12:38 PM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc
What is the approved method for getting ahold of 64 clean bits? I've
been using the GNU/c9x "unsigned long long" and #ifdef-ing all over
the place but this strikes me as substantially less than elegant.
Once we have the bits, what is the Right Way to get them into
network order?
-Original
What is the approved method for getting ahold of 64 clean bits? I've
been using the GNU/c9x unsigned long long and #ifdef-ing all over
the place but this strikes me as substantially less than elegant.
Once we have the bits, what is the Right Way to get them into
network order?
-Original
I am currently conducting a thorough study of the VFS subsystem
in preparation for an all-out effort to port SGI's XFS filesystem to
FreeBSD 4.x at such time as SGI gives up the code. Matt Dillon
has written in hackers- that the VFS subsystem is presently not
well understood by any of the active
I am currently conducting a thorough study of the VFS subsystem
in preparation for an all-out effort to port SGI's XFS filesystem to
FreeBSD 4.x at such time as SGI gives up the code. Matt Dillon
has written in hackers- that the VFS subsystem is presently not
well understood by any of the active
is here.
What are the perceived shortcomings of the current VFS? What suggestions
are being considered for the new design? What are the principal design
objectives?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Dillon [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 9:20 PM
To: Alton, Matthew
I'll follow these guidelines. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Nik Clayton [SMTP:n...@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 6:47 PM
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: 'Nik Clayton'; 'Matthew Dillon'; David E. Cross;
freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG; d...@freebsd.org
is here.
What are the perceived shortcomings of the current VFS? What suggestions
are being considered for the new design? What are the principal design
objectives?
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Dillon [SMTP:dil...@apollo.backplane.com]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 9:20 PM
To: Alton
and drop right into the new model and build like the very wind.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Nik Clayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 05:09
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: 'Matthew Dillon'; David E. Cross; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DOC volunteer WAS:RE: userfs help
and drop right into the new model and build like the very wind.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: Nik Clayton [mailto:n...@nothing-going-on.demon.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, July 30, 1999 05:09
To: Alton, Matthew
Cc: 'Matthew Dillon'; David E. Cross; freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: DOC
I ran screaming into the woods last year from trying to grok VOP_foo. The
prospect of a rewrite fills me with warmth and fuzziness. I hereby volunteer
to maintain the VOP(9) man pages and to flesh out my notes into a big, beefy
FS-implementer's Guide to the new VOP_foo. All the coders have to
I ran screaming into the woods last year from trying to grok VOP_foo. The
prospect of a rewrite fills me with warmth and fuzziness. I hereby volunteer
to maintain the VOP(9) man pages and to flesh out my notes into a big, beefy
FS-implementer's Guide to the new VOP_foo. All the coders have to do
If someone in the FS dept. would draw up a broad outline for FS implementation
I hereby volunteer to flesh it out thoroughly and donate the end-product docs to
the FreeBSD project. I am a professional UNIX (AIX/SOLARIS) programmer and
fairly clueful kernel source peruser and tweaker, fully
If someone in the FS dept. would draw up a broad outline for FS implementation
I hereby volunteer to flesh it out thoroughly and donate the end-product docs to
the FreeBSD project. I am a professional UNIX (AIX/SOLARIS) programmer and
fairly clueful kernel source peruser and tweaker, fully
Yes, quite.
-Original Message-
From: Christoph Kukulies [SMTP:k...@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de]
Sent: Monday, June 07, 1999 10:59 AM
To: hack...@freebsd.org
Subject: linux and freebsd kernels conceptually different?
Could one say that Linux vs. FreeBSD kernels are
Well, the serial devices are not typically used for TCP traffic, but you should
look at ioctl(3), read(3), write(3), socket(3), bind(3),
listen(3), send(3), recv(3) for starters. The tty devices are treated as files.
Remember, in UNIX everything is a file unless it isn't.
The ethernet cards,
31 matches
Mail list logo
