of it.
I want to make a freebsd port of JFS2. The source code is available at
http://jfs.sourceforge.net/
The reasons are academic and I have no reason to suggest that people
stop using ufs.
So, of course support for new filesystem support is good, but my
personal
opinion is that JFS2 isn't
On Fri, 09.09.2005 at 12:28:39 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
There has been recent work to port several of the newer Linux file systems to
FreeBSD,
including:
What about the Google SoC project
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005, Ulrich Spoerlein wrote:
On Fri, 09.09.2005 at 12:28:39 +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
There has been recent work to port several of the newer Linux file systems to
FreeBSD
[snip]
I think this is a useful approach for occasional file access, but I think
the general interest in the more interesting Linux file systems is for
less than occasional use. I.e., not just migration of data from Linux to
FreeBSD, but for daily use in production on high performance
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
thanks
-kamal
On 9/9/05, Greg 'groggy' Lehey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday, 8 September 2005 at 20:41:49 +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Hello,
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
A little, but it never got
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
thanks
-kamal
There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but
that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only
because you think others desire your
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:31:15PM +0530, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
To add to Mike's comments, if you're really keen on playing with
journalling, adding journalling support to UFS2 is something that
probably would be widely appreciated. AFAIK,
On Friday 09 September 2005 16:31, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
Core doesn't decide what stuff gets committed into FreeBSD.
Core doesn't control who writes things, or what they write, for FreeBSD.
If you write it, and it works well enough and you
On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
There has been recent work to port several of the newer Linux file systems
to FreeBSD, including:
- Pretty old work to get the basic JFS userland tools working (status
unknown, likely very
From: Mike Silbersack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
would a port of JFS2 be of interest to freebsd core?
thanks
-kamal
There are many things that would be of interest to FreeBSD users, but
that's not a good reason to start a project. If you're motivated only
On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 12:28:39PM +0100 I heard the voice of
Robert Watson, and lo! it spake thus:
- Pretty recent work to get read-only reiserfs working (committed and in
the CVS repository).
Which, by the way, I just used earlier this week to pull data and
configs and such off an old and
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005, Sergey Babkin wrote:
OTOH, updating our ext2 code, or ntfs code (if that's even possible) would
be something of use to many people, I suspect.
Why not go for ext3 instead of JFS then? It has
journaling in it.
-SB
I was thinking that as I wrote it as well, I'm not sure
Hello,
Has there been any work on porting JFS2 onto Freebsd?
thanks
-kamal
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
