Bill Fumerola writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
Bill Fumerola writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
It was very annoying that the person who wrote the local News
Observer article seemed disappointed that we were not running linux
probably because of that, didn't mention the OS at all in her article.
It's sad it has to be that way. I can't think
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
It was very annoying that the person who wrote the local News
Observer article seemed disappointed that we were not running linux
probably because of that, didn't mention the OS at all in her article.
%Unmodified FreeBSD TCP at 1Gb/s.
%
%http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
That is so very cool.
There is a separate war going on optimizing bandwidth,
latency, and QoS for IIOP, i.e. CORBA's usual protocol.
Against all of the heavyweights, RTOS's etc. etc., linux is
Bill Fumerola writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
Bill Fumerola writes:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
It was very annoying that the person who wrote the local News
Observer article seemed disappointed that we were not running linux
probably because of that, didn't mention the OS at all in her article.
It's sad it has to be that way. I can't think
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Thu, 5 Aug 1999, Andrew Gallatin wrote:
It was very annoying that the person who wrote the local News
Observer article seemed disappointed that we were not running linux
probably because of that, didn't mention the OS at all in her article.
%Unmodified FreeBSD TCP at 1Gb/s.
%
%http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
That is so very cool.
There is a separate war going on optimizing bandwidth,
latency, and QoS for IIOP, i.e. CORBA's usual protocol.
Against all of the heavyweights, RTOS's etc. etc., linux is
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 07:52:26PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own
On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 07:52:26PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote:
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unmodified FreeBSD TCP at 1Gb/s.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unmodified FreeBSD TCP at 1Gb/s.
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0i for non-commercial use
Charset: noconv
On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ted Faber wrote:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1999/08/990802072727.htm
The Duke release credits one Andrew Gallatin for a couple quotes.
Not only FreeBSD in the news, but one of our own committers. Cool.
http://www.dukenews.duke.edu/Research/GIGABIT.HTM
--
- bill
15 matches
Mail list logo
