Valentin Nechayev wrote:
Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read
as unsupported.
Non-native English speaking. Specifically:
DESThey are retained because of their widespread use,
DESbut their use in new implementations (for
On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of
code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole bunch of fixes for the
sake of a compiler upgrade isn't acceptable. Sounds like
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
May I remind you that KR-style declarations have been deprecated for
the last 14 years?
Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were
still supported.
6.11.5
Wes Peters wrote:
On Thursday 29 May 2003 00:12, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
May I remind you that KR-style declarations have been deprecated for
the last 14 years?
Funny, the last time I looked at a C language specification they were
still supported.
Give it up.
You and I learned C when
Valentin Nechayev [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read
as unsupported.
I didn't use the word unsupported, I said deprecated.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL
Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:19:06, des (Dag-Erling Smorgrav) wrote about Re: gcc bug?
Openoffice port impossibel to compile on 4.8:
Essential words are understriked. I can't imagine how it can be read
as unsupported.
DES I didn't use the word unsupported, I said deprecated.
Yes. But your
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Bruce M Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of
code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole bunch of fixes for the
sake of a compiler upgrade isn't acceptable. Sounds like the GCC
guys have been
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2003-05-28 at 14:12:34 Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
have you tried -traditional?
gcc 3.1 release notes:
The -traditional C compiler option has been deprecated and will be
removed in GCC 3.3. (It remains possible to preprocess non-C code
with
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 05:12 am, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GCC 3.2 is broken by design. It insists, amongst other stupidities,
on type-checking arguments using old style declarations like:
int foo(bar)
char *bar;
{}
rendering
On Wednesday 28 May 2003 04:11 pm, Bruce M Simpson wrote:
I remember having to convert all my Lattice C code to use ANSI style
declarations after upgrading to SAS/C on the Amiga.
However, we're dealing with something a bit more stable in terms of
code base, anyway. Having to commit a whole
On Thursday 22 May 2003 10:23 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
I have rebuilt my system several times and rebuilt all ports..
/usr/ports/editors/openoffice always ends up with:
GCC 3.2 is broken by design. It insists, amongst other stupidities, on
type-checking arguments using old style
Wes Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
GCC 3.2 is broken by design. It insists, amongst other stupidities, on
type-checking arguments using old style declarations like:
int foo(bar)
char *bar;
{}
rendering most UNIX software from before 1996 uncompilable.
have you tried
12 matches
Mail list logo
