Re: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread Elias Athanasopoulos
On Sun, Aug 27, 2000 at 12:10:46PM -0400, Clarence Brown wrote: Problem: If I do a "shutdown -h now" and then press any key to reboot, the system ALWAYS hangs after displaying the line.. isa0: ISA bus on motherboard I can confirm this for my 486 machine, running -CURRENT. It comes

Re: fbsd box acting as a wavelan BS

2000-08-28 Thread Theo PAGTZIS
Wes Peters wrote: Jim Flowers wrote: Last I checked the wi driver will not do IBSS and says so in the documentation. I also tried it and couldn't get anywhere. Would be nice. You must've last checked a long time ago: DESCRIPTION The wicontrol command controls the operation of

Re: fbsd box acting as a wavelan BS

2000-08-28 Thread Jim Flowers
My point was only that the fbsd wi driver does not appear to allow the creation of a service set as the original poster wanted to do, therefore to use IBSS mode you have to have a WavePointII. From the current wicontrol man page: snip- Allow the station to create a

Re: fbsd box acting as a wavelan BS

2000-08-28 Thread Jim Flowers
Seems to work ok on 4.0-RELEASE #0. Jim Flowers [EMAIL PROTECTED] #4 ranked ISP on C|NET #1 in Ohio On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Theo PAGTZIS wrote: Wes, quite correct. I considered revisiting the matter non-important since anyone that would use fbsd 3.4 or later should have such features by

Does le(4) have a maintainer?

2000-08-28 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Hi folks, Does the le(4) device have a maintainer? I ask because 3 different people have reported that it's unuseable since 4.0-RELEASE (see PR misc/18641). If there's nobody to step forward and maintain the driver, we should probably add an entry about it to the release notes for 4.0-RELEASE

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problems reported earlier)

2000-08-28 Thread Brook Milligan
The Hermit Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Okay, I just checked out Solaris 8/x86, and it confirms what HP/ux thinks: _SC_OPEN_MAXOPEN_MAX Max open files per process I'm curious as to

RE: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread Clarence Brown
-Original Message- From: 'Alfred Perlstein' Sent: Sunday, August 27, 2000 2:36 PM * Clarence Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000827 10:59] wrote: -Original Message- Behalf Of Alfred Perlstein * Blaz Zupan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000827 09:13] wrote: Looks like I might have

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Too many open files (was Re: spinlock problemsreported earlier)

2000-08-28 Thread The Hermit Hacker
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Tom Lane wrote: Brook Milligan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: In any case, if this really follows the POSIX standard, perhaps PostgreSQL code should assume these semantics and work around other cases that don't follow the standard (instead of work around the POSIX

Re: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread 'Alfred Perlstein'
* Clarence Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000828 10:56] wrote: OK, I think I configured a debug kernel. I used the config, make depend, make, make install procedure. make depend took about 20 min, make took about 1 hr 20 min. I did a soft reboot: shutdown -h now, hit any key to reboot, hit space

RE: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread Clarence Brown
-Original Message- From: 'Alfred Perlstein' Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 2:09 PM * Clarence Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000828 10:56] wrote: OK, I think I configured a debug kernel. I used the config, make depend, make, make install procedure. make depend took about 20 min, make

Re: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread 'Alfred Perlstein'
* Clarence Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000828 12:29] wrote: Now the warm boot lockup still occurs at isa0: BUT boot -v has a few more lines after isa0: which WERE NOT there when the splash screen stuff was in loader.conf. Included below is dmesg.boot from a successful cold boot. The failed

Re: Does le(4) have a maintainer?

2000-08-28 Thread Warner Losh
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sheldon Hearn writes: : Does the le(4) device have a maintainer? I ask because 3 different : people have reported that it's unuseable since 4.0-RELEASE (see PR : misc/18641). If there's nobody to step forward and maintain the driver, : we should probably add an

PCI BIOS

2000-08-28 Thread Warner Losh
Anybody have a good interface to pcibios for kernel devices to use? I think I have a need for it with the TI-1225 based pci cardbus bridge card that I have. I need to be able to assign interrupt numbers (or at least get them) for the slot. NetBSD has this functionality and we need it to be

RE: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread Clarence Brown
-Original Message- From: 'Alfred Perlstein' [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, August 28, 2000 4:34 PM snip like your patch just comments out the whole for loop, right? Yes I must admit that being a C coder I just couldn't resist modifying pnp.c a little differently instead

Portability and warnings tweaks for byacc(1)'s skeleton file

2000-08-28 Thread Zack Weinberg
I have noticed and corrected a number of portability problems with byacc's generated parser, also adjusted things so that it does not provoke a couple of gcc warnings that are not commonly requested but that my project uses. More specifically: - stdlib.h is not available in pre-C89

Re: Portability and warnings tweaks for byacc(1)'s skeleton file

2000-08-28 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Zack Weinberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000828 15:28] wrote: I have noticed and corrected a number of portability problems with byacc's generated parser, also adjusted things so that it does not provoke a couple of gcc warnings that are not commonly requested but that my project uses. More

RE: 4.1 lockup at isa0: on reboot

2000-08-28 Thread Clarence Brown
I modified the for line to stop after 383 and before 3c3 by changing the comparison in the for statement from " 0xff" to " 0xf0". This did indeed do what I expected, stopping the for loop at 383 instead of 3c3, but the machine still locked up and the last line displayed was "Trying Read_Port

Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Jaye Mathisen
I would love to be able to filter ipfw traffic based on more than just IP. Anybody done anything like this? To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Simon
What else do you want to filter by? did you read man ipfw? it should tell you all about it. you can filter by uid, type of packets, source, origin, etc.. -Simon On Mon, 28 Aug 2000 18:03:58 -0700 (PDT), Jaye Mathisen wrote: I would love to be able to filter ipfw traffic based on more than

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Jaye Mathisen
Just exactly what I said in the Subject. I want to filter on the ethernet MAC address. My firewall works fine filtering on IP, now I want to make sure no new nodes come up. I guess I could play some games with arp, but just blocking MAC addresses would suffice. On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Simon

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread FengYue
Also, be able to filter packets based on TTL and SYN Seq value would be useful in some cases too -- quiet a few SYN flood programs had those values hard coded and script kids don't change them. On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Jaye Mathisen wrote: Just exactly what I said in the Subject. I want to

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Robert Sexton
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 06:03:58PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote: I would love to be able to filter ipfw traffic based on more than just IP. Anybody done anything like this? How about turning off arp on the network interface, (ifconfig), and using static arp? -- Robert Sexton - [EMAIL

remote gdb debugging

2000-08-28 Thread Christopher Stein
Hello, I have been trying to connect to a remote gdb debug session via a serial port (null modem cable) and can't seem to get the device right. I've tried the devices: /dev/ttyd* /dev/cuaa0 (as suggested by the freebsd handbook). hhmmm.. any suggestions? /dev/ttyd1 worked for a 3.3/4.0-pre

Re: remote gdb debugging

2000-08-28 Thread Greg Lehey
On Monday, 28 August 2000 at 22:28:29 -0400, Christopher Stein wrote: Hello, I have been trying to connect to a remote gdb debug session via a serial port (null modem cable) and can't seem to get the device right. I've tried the devices: /dev/ttyd* /dev/cuaa0 (as suggested by the freebsd

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Bill Fumerola
On Mon, Aug 28, 2000 at 07:02:03PM -0700, Jaye Mathisen wrote: Just exactly what I said in the Subject. I want to filter on the ethernet MAC address. I guess the "ip" in "ipfw" just wasn't obvious enough that it is an IP firewall tool. You're one layer too low. -- Bill Fumerola - Network

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Jaye Mathisen
I can appreciate the sarcasm... However, given today's generally IP-only connected networks, ipfw does not seem to be a necessarily bad place to do this kind of filtering... I only mention it because dummynet could be useful bandwidth limiting to MAC addresses as well. And it never hurts to

Re: Anyway to ipfw filter based on MAC address?

2000-08-28 Thread Robert Watson
On Mon, 28 Aug 2000, Jaye Mathisen wrote: I would love to be able to filter ipfw traffic based on more than just IP. Anybody done anything like this? The OpenBSD bridge filtering code can do this, allowing you to map MAC addresses to specific interfaces, and prevent spoofing, among other