On Mon, 29 Nov 1999, Dan Moschuk wrote:
| I'm fairly certain that rpc.lockd is included with Darwin from Apple,
| I've not closely compared it to what we have in -STABLE or -CURRENT
| to see if it actually works.
|
| It doesn't, sorry... if someone gets a *BSD version of NFS locking
| I reviewed the NFSv4 specs recently and came to the same conclusion. To do
| it right will be quite a bit of work and would include a decent kernel
| side implementation of rpc and gssapi.
Cool! I can take that "I volunteer" ? :-)
--
Dan Moschuk ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
"Cure for global
On Tue, 30 Nov 1999, Dan Moschuk wrote:
| I reviewed the NFSv4 specs recently and came to the same conclusion. To do
| it right will be quite a bit of work and would include a decent kernel
| side implementation of rpc and gssapi.
Cool! I can take that "I volunteer" ? :-)
Not with my
At 1:36 PM -0800 11/25/99, C. Stephen Gunn wrote:
On Mon, Nov 22, 1999 at 02:07:58PM -0800, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
Does NetBSD have a working rpc.lockd... that would make this much easier.
at a glance at http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/... no.
I'm fairly certain that rpc.lockd is included with
:Well, I am starting to get pretty seriously involved. It looks pretty
:easy, just a lot of small details (this is the kind of coding I like :)
:
:A couple of issues need to be worked out. First I need to backport
:the FH open/stat/etc. calls to -STABLE. The main reason for this is that
:...
| I'm fairly certain that rpc.lockd is included with Darwin from Apple,
| I've not closely compared it to what we have in -STABLE or -CURRENT
| to see if it actually works.
|
| It doesn't, sorry... if someone gets a *BSD version of NFS locking operating
| I'd help see it into Darwin.
|
| BTW,
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
Ok... I have *had* it with the meta, but not really, lockd. Are there any
kernel issues with correctly implimenting rpc.lockd?
I can't help with the code, but put me down as both very interested,
and willing
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "David E. Cross" writes:
: Ok... I have *had* it with the meta, but not really, lockd. Are there any
: kernel issues with correctly implimenting rpc.lockd?How can I take a
: filehandle and map it into a filename, with path, so I may open it and lock
: it on the
: Ok... I have *had* it with the meta, but not really, lockd. Are there any
: kernel issues with correctly implimenting rpc.lockd?How can I take a
: filehandle and map it into a filename, with path, so I may open it and lock
: it on the server? Are there any protocol specs? I
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
Ok... I have *had* it with the meta, but not really, lockd. Are there any
kernel issues with correctly implimenting rpc.lockd?How can I take a
filehandle and map it into a filename, with path, so I may open it and lock
it on the server? Are
Actually I wrote a system call for opening a file given a file handle for
freebsd a while back (oh, gee, has it really been 5 years ...), as part of
mnfs i'll try to find it. You don't need to map it to a filename to
make it go.
ron
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Ronald G. Minnich wrote:
Actually I wrote a system call for opening a file given a file handle for
freebsd a while back (oh, gee, has it really been 5 years ...), as part of
mnfs i'll try to find it. You don't need to map it to a filename to
make it go.
i forgot to
Does NetBSD have a working rpc.lockd... that would make this much easier.
--
David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acting Lab Director | NYSLP: FREEBSD
Systems Administrator/Research Programmer | Web: http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~crossd
Rensselaer
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, David E. Cross wrote:
Does NetBSD have a working rpc.lockd... that would make this much easier.
at a glance at http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/... no.
Linux may have one, a temporary GPL'd port would be interesting perhaps.
-Alfred
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
14 matches
Mail list logo
