I'm definitely interested in both StrongARM and PPC. (and so are very
many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM,
but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an
official decision on the above by someone (hint hint -core :)) though.
I don't think
On Monday, 8 January 2001 at 0:22:01 +0800, Kathy Quinlan wrote:
Hi all
Is their a group of FreeBSD Enthusiasts that are working on porting
free to embedded controllers that are not x86 I am in the process of
developing a security / access / building management system, and am
looking at
the freebsd-arm mailing list is now ready for use.
jmb
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Wed, Dec 20, 2000 at 08:59:11AM +0100, Thomas Runge scribbled:
| On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Michael C . Wu wrote:
|
| many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM,
| but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an
|
| There is a german saying "Schuster,
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 10:26:01PM -0800, Devin Butterfield wrote:
I don't think that "everyone" had reached any such agreement. It would
seem to me that there is sufficient interest in FreeBSD/StrongARM that
There is more than sufficient *interest* in FreeBSD/sparc, but that
hasn't gotten
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C
. Wu" writes:
: It was my understanding from BSDCon2000 that we are targeting
: more platforms.
It is my sense of core that core would support new architectures if
they make sense. To make sense, the architecutre must be widely
deployed (or about to be
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield scribbled:
| "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
| The most important decision now would be:
| Should we concentrate on the PPC port first? Or should we go at each
| port simultaneously?
|
| Well, if there are enough people with PCC's that are
I have been working for several months to port NetBSD to a new StrongArm
platform. I currently am using the Intel Assabet as my development
platform. Based on my experience with NetBSD, I think that I could be of
assistance in initiating a FreeBSD port. I actually do most of my
development
"Michael C . Wu" wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield scribbled:
| "Michael C . Wu" wrote:
| The most important decision now would be:
| Should we concentrate on the PPC port first? Or should we go at each
| port simultaneously?
|
| Well, if there are
Paul Becke wrote:
What does it take to start up a new mailing list for proting to the Arm? (Who do I
need to contact?)
Jonathan Bressler is our postmaster ([EMAIL PROTECTED]). I've added him
to this message in hopes that he sees this. I haven't seen much of him
lately...
Course, it's
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:12:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
I would be quite interested. But do we have the resouces and the man-hours
to handle IA-64/KA-64/PPC/Alpha/StrongARM at the same time?
Agreed.
Perhaps the first step would be to start a [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list?
Then
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 04:14:10PM -0800, Devin Butterfield wrote:
Well, if there are enough people with PCC's that are interested in
helping with the effort then perhaps pursuing the PPC port first would
make more sense. I don't have a PPC so I couldn't help out there...
There is a PowerPC
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 12:56:58PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM,
but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an
official decision on the above by someone (hint hint -core :)) though.
Why are you looking to
David O'Brien wrote:
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 03:12:35PM -0600, Michael C . Wu wrote:
I would be quite interested. But do we have the resouces and the man-hours
to handle IA-64/KA-64/PPC/Alpha/StrongARM at the same time?
Agreed.
Perhaps the first step would be to start a [EMAIL
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Michael C . Wu wrote:
many people) My understanding is that FreeBSD *wants* a FreeBSD/ARM,
but lack the resources/man-power to do so. I'd prefer to see an
There is a german saying "Schuster, bleib bei Deinen Leisten", which
means something like "Only do, what you are
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C
. Wu" writes:
: IIRC, NetBSD doesn't have the newer StrongARM SA-11xx ports.
: And that's why we have to work from ARM/Linux.
In conversations that I had with an unnamed vendor a while ago, the
newer parts should be just a few days of casual effort to
Warner Losh wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C
. Wu" writes:
: IIRC, NetBSD doesn't have the newer StrongARM SA-11xx ports.
: And that's why we have to work from ARM/Linux.
In conversations that I had with an unnamed vendor a while ago, the
newer parts should be just a few days of
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 02:19:02PM -0700, Warner Losh scribbled:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C
| . Wu" writes:
| : IIRC, NetBSD doesn't have the newer StrongARM SA-11xx ports.
| : And that's why we have to work from ARM/Linux.
|
| In conversations that I had with an unnamed vendor a
"Michael C . Wu" wrote:
[sent to -small too]
I would be quite interested. But do we have the resouces and the man-hours
to handle IA-64/KA-64/PPC/Alpha/StrongARM at the same time? I am
very interested in the PPC and StrongARM port, but there are so few of
us on -ppc... Perhaps the
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C . Wu" writes:
: Do you use the gcc embedded optimizations?
No. Not directly. My install script assumes that
: | which lets you tweak things to year heart's delight. Every time I go
: | to put this script up, I run into the "oh, but I want it to do X Y
On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 05:21:27PM -0700, Warner Losh scribbled:
| In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C . Wu" writes:
| : Just an idea/question:
| : Can we possibly use crunchgen to generate a big binary for userland tools
| : only? Then we can drop in new binaries with ease.
|
| No. I
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Michael C . Wu" writes:
: Would 20mb be a comfortable target for
: "make buildsmallworld installsmallworld" ? The build would have to
: be interactive. And the interactive build can record all the
: options/choices done by the user for future builds. That
:
Devin Butterfield wrote:
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
There is a project to put NetBSD/arm32
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Robert Swindells writes:
: As far as I can tell, the hpcmips kernel reuses the WinCE MMU
: translations; all the arm32 ones rely on a bootloader to map RAM
: to 0xf000.
The hpcmips kernel doesn't do that. The hpcmips loader does that.
Once the stuff is loaded
Devin Butterfield wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
I know that linux is
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wes Peters writes:
: NetBSD? They have existing ARM and "hpc" ports, this would be a merging
: of the two...
I didn't think that NetBSD had a hpc port. They have an hpcmips port
in the tree, as well as other hpc ports not yet committed (hpcsh3 has
been seen in the
There was somone looking at the NetBSD code with hungry eyes but I
never heard anything more... check the archives.
Pedro.
Devin Butterfield wrote:
Hi all,
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Pedro F. Giffuni" writes:
: There was somone looking at the NetBSD code with hungry eyes but I
: never heard anything more... check the archives.
Last I heard, only the MIPS based PDAs were supported by
NetBSD/hpcmips. I know that there are some efforts to make
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
No work in progress, no plans. Would you be interested in
Jordan Hubbard wrote:
Is there any work in progress to support running FreeBSD on ARM
processors? If not, are there any plans to? I would be very interested
in helping out with such an effort. I would love to have FreeBSD running
on my iPAQ PocketPC. :)
No work in progress, no plans.
30 matches
Mail list logo
