Re: dummynet loses ports mask bits

2017-02-28 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/3/17 1:54 am, Julian Elischer wrote: On 1/3/17 1:46 am, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number are lost. before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see

Re: dummynet loses ports mask bits

2017-02-28 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/3/17 1:46 am, Luigi Rizzo wrote: On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number are lost. before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything wrong? I'm not

Re: dummynet loses ports mask bits

2017-02-28 Thread Julian Elischer
On 1/3/17 1:27 am, Julian Elischer wrote: In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number are lost. before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything wrong? just realised I'm using wrong syntax need "mask dst-port" fooled by the fact

Re: dummynet loses ports mask bits

2017-02-28 Thread Luigi Rizzo
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number > are lost. > before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything > wrong? > > I'm not sure what the q131053 stuff is