https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217391
Mark Linimon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-b...@freebsd.org
On 1/3/17 1:54 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 1/3/17 1:46 am, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer
wrote:
In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the
port number
are lost.
before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see
On 1/3/17 1:46 am, Luigi Rizzo wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number
are lost.
before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything
wrong?
I'm not
On 1/3/17 1:27 am, Julian Elischer wrote:
In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port
number are lost.
before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing
anything wrong?
just realised I'm using wrong syntax need "mask dst-port"
fooled by the fact
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:27 AM, Julian Elischer wrote:
> In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port number
> are lost.
> before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing anything
> wrong?
>
> I'm not sure what the q131053 stuff is
In the following example it appears that the mask bits for the port
number are lost.
before I raise a bug.. is there anyone who can see that I am doing
anything wrong?
I'm not sure what the q131053 stuff is about either, but..
--
FreeBSD
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216719
smi...@nimnet.asn.au changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||smi...@nimnet.asn.au
---
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216719
--- Comment #1 from b...@kobyla.org ---
Adding the "not layer2" to ipfw nat rule helps to avoid this problem
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___