Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2010-12-13 Thread ae
Synopsis: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION State-Changed-From-To: suspended-closed State-Changed-By: ae State-Changed-When: Mon Dec 13 11:15:21 UTC 2010 State-Changed-Why: It is my PR. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-07-09 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Paolo Pisati wrote: add packet counter as well. That's all possible with one opcode, though... if anyone post an updated patch, i'll commit it. Hi, Paolo. Any progress in this? I updated patch: http://butcher.heavennet.ru/patches/kernel/ipfw/ipfw_counterlimit.diff -- WBR, Andrey V.

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-19 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Andrey V. Elsukov! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 10:43:31 +0300; Andrey V. Elsukov wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642 Yes, this is useful, but some minor changes are needed, I think. First, rename

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-19 Thread Vadim Goncharov
Hi Andrey V. Elsukov! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:48:15 +0300; Andrey V. Elsukov wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we should extend our

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-19 Thread Julian Elischer
Vadim Goncharov wrote: Hi Julian Elischer! On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 01:09:19 -0700; Julian Elischer wrote about 'Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION': About Vadim's prepositions: 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in tables, but counterlimits

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-18 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Paolo Pisati wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:21:11AM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642 Yes, this is useful, but some minor changes are needed, I think. First, rename it to bytelimit or somewhat. Second, allow this to use tablearg and possibly

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-18 Thread Julian Elischer
Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: Paolo Pisati wrote: On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 09:21:11AM +, Vadim Goncharov wrote: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80642 Yes, this is useful, but some minor changes are needed, I think. First, rename it to bytelimit or somewhat. Second, allow this to use

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-18 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
Julian Elischer wrote: About Vadim's prepositions: 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we should extend our current table argument to 64 bit. tables should be expanded to have different types of values.. 32 but ints

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2008-03-12 Thread vwe
Synopsis: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION State-Changed-From-To: open-suspended State-Changed-By: vwe State-Changed-When: Wed Mar 12 20:58:32 UTC 2008 State-Changed-Why: Awaiting maintainer interest. This may be useful for one, so we're not just closing this silently.

Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION

2006-06-27 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
The following reply was made to PR kern/80642; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Andrey V. Elsukov [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 16:39:21 +0400 I think this PR can be closed. I