Re: New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-16 Thread Michaël Grünewald
Hi, Warren Block wrote: A suggestion: USE_FAKE is not descriptive. It doesn't tell what is fake or what happens. I'm not sure fake is the even the right word. USE_FAKEROOT is better, but still ambiguous: it's not really fake, and root can mean too many things. I guess what I'm trying to

Re: New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-16 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 3:13 PM, Baptiste Daroussin baptiste.darous...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I have updated the fakeroot patch, it now can apply on an uptodate version of the ports. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/133815 For information the fakeroot patch is a port of

Re: New version of the fakeroot patch

2009-12-16 Thread Baptiste Daroussin
I don't know if this should be a port setting. I think this should be a user setting. So, I think WITH_FAKE / WITH_FAKEROOT is a better choice. Obviously ports not working with fakeroot would have to define something like IGNORE_FAKEROOT, the same kind of variable we have for MAKE_JOBS. I

Re: net-im/ejabberd 2.0.5 to 2.1.0

2009-12-16 Thread Guy Brand
Kamigishi Rei (spam...@haruhiism.net) on 15/12/2009 at 22:18 wrote: Hello, http://media.fujibayashi.jp/software/ejabberd2-port.tar.gz (available as a hyperlink in that post, too) for the port directory. Please also check if you get any warning from pkg_info after the installation, too -

trying to fix a sed line

2009-12-16 Thread Chuck Robey
I don't do enough in sed if I could figure out what it is that the broken line is TRYING to do, I think maybe I could fix it, I HAVE used sed before, and I know about the s command, and how it sets it's delimiters. Anyhow, here's the broken line, and I hope my mailer doesn't decide to break

Re: trying to fix a sed line

2009-12-16 Thread Sean McAfee
Chuck Robey wrote: I don't do enough in sed if I could figure out what it is that the broken line is TRYING to do, I think maybe I could fix it, I HAVE used sed before, and I know about the s command, and how it sets it's delimiters. Anyhow, here's the broken line, and I hope my mailer

FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Simon Shapiro
Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the trigger (an extensions.ini with only mhash causes failure, all others minus mhash: no failure). Same outcome on various machines, running 7.1

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Raphael Becker
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote: Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the trigger (an extensions.ini with only mhash causes failure, all others minus

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread David N
2009/12/17 Raphael Becker r...@uugrn.org: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote: Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the trigger (an extensions.ini with only mhash

Re: net-im/ejabberd 2.0.5 to 2.1.0

2009-12-16 Thread Kamigishi Rei
On 16.12.2009 15:44, Guy Brand wrote: The port builds and installs properly under 7.1-RELEASE/amd64/R13B02 and 9-CURRENT/amd64/R13B03. pkg_info does not complain at all. That said portlint shows a few warnings which certainly need to be fixed. I've corrected some errors it found, however:

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Raphael Becker
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote: Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the trigger (an extensions.ini with only mhash causes failure, all others minus

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread David N
2009/12/17 Raphael Becker r...@uugrn.org: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote: Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the trigger (an extensions.ini with only mhash

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, Raphael Becker wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote: Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The mhash module appears to be the

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Janky Jay, III
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi List, Janky Jay, III wrote: Hi List, Raphael Becker wrote: On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 02:29:08PM -0800, Simon Shapiro wrote: Hey, I just updated ports on a few machines and the CLI version of php dumps its core rather than end nicely. The

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Matt
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Raphael Becker r...@uugrn.org wrote: I disabled those: #extension=openssl.so #extension=pdo_mysql.so #extension=ldap.so #extension=imap.so #extension=mhash.so #extension=ftp.so #extension=curl.so #extension=mysqli.so If i enable any of those php will

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Raphael Becker
Hello David, On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 01:06:28PM +1100, David N wrote: Thats a long list of extensions, try adding one of them to the end of extensions.ini one by one. The ordering of it matters, you need to re-arrange the order in which the extensions are loaded. You may need to play

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Raphael Becker
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 07:40:17PM -0700, Janky Jay, III wrote: I take this back. Removing extension=mhash.so from my /usr/local/etc/php/extensions.ini file does, in fact, exit without a core dump. However, mhash is required by SquirrelMail along with some of its plugins. I'm unsure how

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-mhash-5.2.11_1

2009-12-16 Thread Raphael Becker
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 08:15:40PM -0600, Matt wrote:   7 libcrypto.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.5   7 libssl.so.5 = /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.5 7 out of 8 disabled extensions depend on libcrypto.so.5 and libssl.so.5 which come from openssl-0.9.8l You might want to check out this

Re: [Call for help] identify and fix libraries linked (erroneously) with libthr (that break php)

2009-12-16 Thread Raphael Becker
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 12:30:35PM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: have patches). To fix coredumps we need to identify the ports that install libraries erroneously linked with libthr, that are dependencies of php extensions. To do this task you can run the following command: # ldd -av

Need help with a port

2009-12-16 Thread Paul Schmehl
I'm the port maintainer for security/barnyard2. I submitted a port upgrade a while ago, but the committer asked me to make a change before he would approve it. I'm not sure what to do. The source code, when it's extracted, sets the perms on install-sh to r--r--r. This causes an error

Re: [REMOVE-PORT] net/plb

2009-12-16 Thread Mark Linimon
ok, I've marked it for deprecation early next year. In general it's best to file PRs for things like this, so it doesn't just get overlooked in all the mailing list traffic. Thanks. mcl ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

portupgrade failure

2009-12-16 Thread Robert Huff
Kevin writes: I've been having this problem for a couple of months now, but I just recently decided to try to fix it. I'm running FreeBSD 6.4, and if I try to use portupgrade to upgrade something, I get an error (seems to be the same for other ports): portupgrade (and -devel)

Re: portupgrade failure

2009-12-16 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 11:13:36PM -0500, Robert Huff wrote: The maintainer, ruby@, is aware of this; a check of the PR database shows multiple open PRs, none critical but many serious going back six months and more. As an aside, the Severity and Priority fields have been so often abused as to

Re: trying to fix a sed line

2009-12-16 Thread Troels Kofoed Jacobsen
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 04:54:09PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote: I don't do enough in sed if I could figure out what it is that the broken line is TRYING to do, I think maybe I could fix it, I HAVE used sed before, and I know about the s command, and how it sets it's delimiters. Anyhow,