On Fri, May 21, 2021, at 10:29 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Thu, May 20, 2021, at 7:18 PM, Simon Wright wrote:
> > Thanks Kubs, I'm travelling at the moment and will check further when I'm
> > back home. The original build log was with libressl and ccache. I'll
> > repeat wi
OPTIONS_SET+=NO-X11
> >>>> CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=YES
> >>>> WITH_VIM_OPTIONS=yes
> >>>> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=ssl=libressl bdb=5
> >>>> VALID_CATEGORIES+=local
> >>>> SVN=svnlite
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Poudriere ports l
So does rclint :(
> On Apr 17, 2021, at 10:15 PM, Junho Choi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> portlint -A complains about $FreeBSD$ is missing but it's moved in git I
> believe.
>
> Is it a safe guess not to have $FreeBSD$ in port Makefile?
>
> --
> Junho Choi | https://saturnsoft.net
>
All,
Could we pretty please get:
a) The dma port unbroken? (https://portsfallout.com/fallout/277280/ — but the
fix seems to be here:
https://github.com/corecode/dma/commit/c3a04c866881d43a71f6d005f3a5006ba83151af)
and if you’re feeling nice...
b) dma in base MFU’s (moved from upstream) to
t fix it."
-Dan
--
----Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
At present, the home page for audio/faac is set to a domain which is no longer
relevant to the port.
Should we set that to https://github.com/knik0/faac in pkg-descr?
--
Dan Langille
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
thankless, and users can complain loudly when their
process is interrupted or altered. I see the time and effort you’re putting in
to this.
That’s all.
Keep on fighting the good fight, and stay safe.
-Dan Mahoney
Sysadmin, port maintainer, BSD fan
be a GSOC project to
fix it. Maybe. Other changes can happen with greater use, but clearly there’s
a first-mover disadvantage here.
-Dan
> On Mar 26, 2021, at 9:06 AM, Chris wrote:
>
> On 2021-03-26 08:44, RW via freebsd-ports wrote:
>> On Fri, 26 Mar 2021 13:55:33 +1100 (ES
this is of interest both for personal reasons as well as
community.
If anyone else is currently maintaining a mailman3 port, please get in touch!
-Dan
> On Mar 24, 2021, at 2:45 PM, Bob Eager wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2021 13:
Hey there all,
Two things.
1) There’s an old PR to update the base version of DMA to include recent
changes (to 0.13 and beyond)
2) I notice dma is no longer in pkg, due to build failures.
The day job uses this port. Can the build failures be fixed?
-Dan
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021, at 4:14 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> Joe,
>
> I updated my mosquitto a few days ago and today it was restarted, but
> won't start. I think it's related to the update.
>
> Mar 14 01:47:40 supernews pkg[40249]: mosquitto upgraded: 1.6.7_1 -> 2.0.8
>
c.d/mosquitto
pidfile=$(grep pid_file ${mosquitto_config} | awk '{print($2)}')
echo "pidfile = '$pidfile'"
rm -f $pidfile
$ sudo service mosquitto start
pidfile = '/var/run/mosquitto.pid'
Starting mosquitto.
$ ps auwwx | grep mos
dan20215 0.0 0.0 11404 2260 1 S+
test?
Anyway, more on topic, it seems that if one is on -CURRENT (or possibly
-STABLE), you’re building from source, and should be expected to read UPDATING.
That much is on the site. (But that would be /usr/src, not /usr/ports).
Did this happen mid-line in a stable? That…shouldn’t.
-Dan
&g
If this isn’t at least in /usr/ports/UPDATING it sure should be.
-Dan
> On Mar 13, 2021, at 12:58 PM, Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>
> On 13/03/21 20:17, Hartmann, O. wrote:
>> Since I moved on to 14-CURRENT, I face a very strange behaviour when trying
>&g
like (dayjob allowing), I'm going to be
joining the trusted domain project (i.e. "Upstream") to do patch
management and testing, so will be able to put out much more regular
versions of a -devel port, which would have much higher change delta.
What would others do in this situat
from
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201799, drop it in your
ports tree, and make install.
Feedback quite welcome.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http
I see it on the ports wanted page, but don't see a bug to add a port.
If not, I can start it (I have opendmarc, they're similar in structure,
albeit now on Github).
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI
les verbatim from another port.
Despite having the porter's handbook open lots, there were many things I
had to just go read the files in /usr/ports/Mk to figure out.
There could definitely be more recipes. One example: how to correctly
handle a port that uses an RPM. Or multiple R
://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=201799, and I note some
of my progress there.
My broader question for the group is: Racadm's license, accoring to the
RPM is "Dell Proprietary" but I cannot find the actual text of this
license on their site.
How should a porter approach this situat
All,
Is anyone working on a mailman 3 port?
(I'm guessing it would be several ports, actually, as mailman 3 is several
different moving parts).
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com
lly install bind916?
Is your OS current enough to handle a current ports tree? (uname -a
please?)
If so, "pkg install bind916"
or
portsnap fetch update; cd
/usr/ports/dns/bind916; make
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IR
All,
Dayjob's deploy scripts were burned in production by
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=252339
It seems pragmatic to fix this and add rubygem-ruby-augeas back to the
dependencies. Puppet without augeas is pretty much a non-starter.
Would the one-line patch help?
-Dan
On Tue, 29 Dec 2020, Ronald Klop wrote:
Some questions below.
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:12:02 +0100, Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
wrote:
Hey there,
At the day job we've been using mail/dma port for a number of years now,
and the rollout and config of files
to do this,
or is it best to work outside the ports system at that point?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
_
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020, Ronald Klop wrote:
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 12:12:02 +0100, Dan Mahoney (Gushi)
wrote:
Hey there,
At the day job we've been using mail/dma port for a number of years now,
and the rollout and config of files in /usr/local/etc/dma is part of our
deploy process.
It only
ure comparison.
Is it worth mentioning this in the pkg-message for mail/dma?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
___
the 'duplicates' from INDEX-12, the count is 28,759 which is much
closer to what FreshPorts believes the count it.
It is also close to this count:
[dan@pkg01:~/ports/head] $ grep -h SUBDIR */Makefile | wc -l
28756
I put more information than you wished to read in this blog post:
https://news
> On Nov 17, 2020, at 8:12 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> The removal of net-mgmt/cnagios4 needs to reflected in net-mgmt/Makefile
> The line:
>SUBDIR += cnagios4
> needs to be removed.
Thank you.
Fixed.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan /
uch a script if someone writes it.
In the meantime, FreshPorts has a 'Watch ports I maintain' report under 'Watch
ports I maintain'
re https://github.com/FreshPorts/freshports/issues/138
--
Dan Langille
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-por
to keep them from going abandoned), so getting better at
this workflow is useful to me.
Best,
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 11:20 AM Bob Eager wrote:
> The port doesn't get updated every time there is a new drive database;
> that would be unworkable.
>
Just a thought, but perhaps something similar to what ntp does with:
service ntpd fetch
But of course using smartd, so that it can
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020, at 9:32 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> > On Apr 24, 2020, at 9:04 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> >> With mail/mailman being Python 2.7 (which is end-of-life), and mailman 3
> >> being Python 3 compatible:
> >&g
s.freebsd.org uses mailman2, we need this!
>
> postmaster@ has not yet decided if we really want to move to mailman3,
> so we are open to other options. The mail archive is the biggest hurdle 8-(
Yes, we can't lose those. I have my own archives to support.
—
Dan Langille
htt
Hello Matthias,
With mail/mailman being Python 2.7 (which is end-of-life), and mailman 3 being
Python 3 compatible:
Do you know of any plans to port Mailman 3?
If you were planning to do that, I can help.
Thank you.
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, at 2:09 PM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> Thursday, April 23, 2020, 7:03:10 PM, you wrote:
>
> Huh. There are no problems, as we now have "current" subversion and "lts"
> one, version 1.9 was removed. And 1.14.x will be LTS,
This sounds like two ports are required new & legacy, instead of flavors.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020, at 11:37 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> On 23.04.2020 17:43, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> subversion 1.14.0 which is RC2 now will be python3 only.
>
> But we are used to have old ver
/poudriere/data/121amd64-dvl/2020-04-23_14h34m22s/logs/errors/py37-subversion-1.13.0.log
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'libsvn._core'
Ideas?
Thank you.
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https
On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 7:43 PM Robert Huff wrote:
> I understand there are folks for whom poudriere or synth are The
> Right Tool(tm). But I am one of a number of folks for whom it is like
> carpet-bombing the neighborhood to get rid of one miscreant squirrel.
>
I swear, you find that
Hi,
Just a heads up that I also had bug report #243609 [1] open on this that I
guess can/should be closed now.
Dan
[1] https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=243609
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 3:57 AM Guido Falsi via freebsd-ports <
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 15/03
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020, at 10:43 AM, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
> On 2020-02-28 16:37, Chris wrote:
>
>
> > What revision is your ports(7) tree at? I mention this, because according
> > the site that maintainer of bacula runs:
> >
> >
for the FreeBSD port?
>
> Just to decide whether to wait for it or go ahead with 9.4 in the meantime.
9.6.2 was announced about 48 hours ago. It may take me a few more days to
get it ported and tested. If all goes well..
Hope that helps.
--
Dan L
wtf is with those build times?! heh
Anyway, thanks for clarifying!
Cheers,
Dan McGrath
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ildworld and building ports by hand
has made me start to look at more practical approaches, such as pkg's and
freebsd-update. Unless you have trust issues with upstream binaries, or
require unusual build options, I think it may not be worth using poudriere,
and perhaps bett
Hi,
Just a bit of a heads up that poudriere will require you to be on the new
version of FreeBSD before you can build for it on the current system. For
example, if you are running 12.1, and you upgrade poudriere's jail to 13.0,
it will complain that you have to be running that version on the host
Hi,
Was just noticing that the 2020Q1 port for OpenSSL was still showing up
with 11 different CVE's, yet I noticed that the commit [1] in r511808 says
it fixed 9e0c6f7a-d46d-11e9-a1c7-b499baebfeaf, yet it still shows up in pkg
audit for CVE-2019-1549 and CVE-2019-1547.
Any idea what the story is
/Makefile:MAINTAINER= tr...@freebsd.org
textproc/syck/Makefile:MAINTAINER= po...@freebsd.org
www/ach/Makefile:MAINTAINER=dan...@freebsd.org
www/mod_xsendfile/Makefile:MAINTAINER= potatosal...@gmail.com
www/p5-Ark/Makefile:MAINTAINER= kuriy...@freebsd.org
www/tinytinyhttpd/Makefile:MAINTAINER
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 12:26 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 8:36 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> > This appears to be a DNS issue.
> >
> > [dan@pkg01:/usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/sysutils/zfs-stats] $
> > sudo make makesum
> > ===> Lic
On Wed, Nov 27, 2019, at 8:36 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 15, 2019, at 10:44 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > On 15/11/2019 15:25, Nick Rogers wrote:
> > > For me the affected ports were sysutils/pftop, sysutils/zfs-stats, and
> > > sysutils/stress, which worked j
R with patches is preferred,
> but any reasonable mechanism for bringing it to the attention of
> developers is acceptable.
This appears to be a DNS issue.
[dan@pkg01:/usr/local/poudriere/ports/default/sysutils/zfs-stats] $ sudo make
makesum
===> License BSD2CLAUSE accepted by the user
=
Hello,
I think the port no longer requires dulwich:
The release nodes mention dulwich:
https://github.com/iocage/iocage/releases/tag/1.2
and references this commit:
https://github.com/iocage/iocage/commit/c7110e195261430dbdbd41dfa935ab706fe13c7b
--
Dan Langille
d...@langille.org
On Sun
mer:
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}GitPython>=2.1.10:devel/py-gitpython@${PY_FLAVOR} \
git-lite>0:devel/git-lite
Also, I am sure that this is no longer required:
${PYTHON_PKGNAMEPREFIX}dulwich>0:devel/dulwich@${PY_FLAVOR} \
--
Dan Lan
ATADBDIR= privatebin' for example?
—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
> On Apr 8, 2019, at 4:38 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2019 at 01:55:19PM -0400, Dan Langille wrote:
>> re: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D19562
>>
>> I understand the purpose of the blacklist is to restrict the use of certain
>> meta ports to e
hardcoded and no way for the end user to
configure.
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
t 9:20 AM the next day.
This is the FreshPorts status page: https://freshports.wordpress.com/
This is the Twitter account: https://twitter.com/freshports
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - Freshp\Ports & BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-port
/Makefile?r1=487685=487686;
This affects me, and probably others.
I have multiple hosts with perl5-5.26.3, some deprecated, some not, depending
on when perl was built.
[dan@pg11:~] $ pkg annotate -a -S expiration_date
perl5-5.26.3: Tag: expiration_date Value: 2020-05-31
[dan@pg10:~] $ pkg annotate
All,
Rancid3 has been updated to 3.9, upstream. I've contacted the maintainer,
but it might be stuck. Would a patch be helpful?
-Dan Mahoney
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 5:42 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 07:50:45PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Mat,
>>
>> I encountered an odd situation where my stats file kept changing
>> permissions. With every reinstall of bind911,
>>
> On Jan 20, 2019, at 5:42 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 07:50:45PM -0500, Dan Langille wrote:
>> Mat,
>>
>> I encountered an odd situation where my stats file kept changing
>> permissions. With every reinstall of bind911,
>>
zone-statistics yes;
When researching this tonight, I noticed the sample configuration uses
/var/run/named.stats. Perhaps I'm doing this wrong.
I am happy to change my configuration, but first I write in case the script is
doing something unexpected.
Ideas welcome.
Thank you.
--
Dan Lan
rs "lifecycle" (./files) patches, and not "bugreport" patches:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/slow-patch.html
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linked
> On Oct 5, 2018, at 10:56 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> A short while ago I added CONFLICTS to FreshPorts (see
> https://news.freshports.org/2018/09/26/adding-and-populating-conflicts/).
>
> Tonight I added conflict matches to https://dev.freshports.org so if you
> know
/security/openssl/ conflicts with
* libressl
* libressl-devel
* openssl-devel
* openssl111
https://dev.freshports.org/sysutils/bacula-server conflicts with:
* bacula5-server
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
tls13 are going to be building
ports/packages against the non-base version until at least FreeBSD 13.
At least tls13 and freebsd13 would coincide nicely, linguistally speaking.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com
> On Aug 29, 2018, at 10:59 AM, Jason E. Hale wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 7:42 PM Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:26 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
>>>
>>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> Why would Bacula 9.2.1 compile on 11.2 bu
1) Got the version wrong. I'm on 10.4.
2) Forgot a subject. Whoops.
3) Forgot to cc maintainer. Doh!
-Dan
On Tue, 28 Aug 2018, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
Hey all,
Funny question. I'm on FreeBSD 11.4, and would like to use the latest
version of NTP, which is in pkg.
The version
s it breaks freebsd-update in various ways. I.e. should the
port print a message stating that you should chmod 000 the original
binaries? Should the ports versions be named something different? Should
the port just warn you that you need to call these things by absolute
path, always?
-Dan
> On Aug 27, 2018, at 7:26 PM, Yuri Pankov wrote:
>
> Dan Langille wrote:
>> Why would Bacula 9.2.1 compile on 11.2 but fail on 10.4?
>> The error is:
>> bsock.c:439:20: error: use of undeclared identifier 'ENODATA'
>> The complete build logs are at the foll
-27_21h15m53s/logs/bacula9-client-9.2.1.log
10.4:
https://services.unixathome.org/poudriere/data/104amd64-default/2018-08-27_21h43m31s/logs/errors/bacula9-client-9.2.1.log
It doesn't make any sense to me. Thanks.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 5:56 PM, Tobias Kortkamp wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2018, at 22:49, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On Jul 29, 2018, at 6:51 AM, Jochen Neumeister wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: joneum
>>> Date: Sun Jul 29 10:51:37 2018
>>> Ne
opic.php?p=66190#p66190>) indicate we should
be using Sourceforge downloads, not GitHub
The vendor directory is present in the SF tarball at
https://sourceforge.net/projects/mantisbt/files/mantis-stable/2.16.0/
<https://sourceforge.net/projects/mantisbt/files/mantis-stable/2.16.0/>
I tried
> On Aug 19, 2018, at 9:40 PM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> On Aug 19, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 12:38:03 -0400
>> Dan Langille wrote:
>>
>>> There is no vendor directory in the pkg-plist for this port.
>>&g
> On Aug 19, 2018, at 5:13 PM, Rozhuk Ivan wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Aug 2018 12:38:03 -0400
> Dan Langille wrote:
>
>> There is no vendor directory in the pkg-plist for this port.
>>
>> What are other mantis users doing?
>
> IMHO makefile must be switch
... etc
There is no vendor directory in the pkg-plist for this port.
What are other mantis users doing?
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 8:46 AM, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> On 15/08/2018 00:35, Dan Langille wrote:
>>> On Aug 14, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Dan Langille dan at langille.org wrote on
>>&g
> On Aug 15, 2018, at 9:17 AM, Rodrigo Osorio wrote:
>
> On 08/15/18 14:46, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 15/08/2018 00:35, Dan Langille wrote:
>>>> On Aug 14, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Mark Millard via freebsd-ports
> wrote:
>
>
> Dan Langille dan at langille.org wrote on
> Tue Aug 14 17:54:01 UTC 2018 :
>
>> . . .
>> At https://dev.freshports.org/www/p5-CGI/ you can see:
>>
>> CONFLICTS: p5-CGI
> On Aug 14, 2018, at 3:15 PM, Adam Weinberger wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 1:13 PM Adam Weinberger wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 11:54 AM Dan Langille wrote:
>>>
>>> I am in the process of adding FreshPorts support for CONFLICTS[1].
>&
/FreshPorts/freshports/issues/84
[2] - https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.port.mk?view=markup#l436
[3] - https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/conflicts.html
[4] -
https://dev.freshports.org/search.php?stype=package=prefix=p5-CGI.pm=10=category=asc=Search=html=head
--
Dan
use.
Is there anything in ports that can do this? Is there a better mailing
list to be asking on?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
heard rumors that 1.42 is not far away, but I reckon that will be easier
to port.
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
> On Jul 27, 2018, at 10:53 AM, Muhammad Moinur Rahman wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
> I have already started upgrading my outdated ports. Ho
done such composer magic for other PHP packages?
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
oing to receive mail from cron and periodic. I'd opt
to also email this, on by default, but turn-offable.
FWIW, I believe this is also what Debian does.
Best,
-Dan
--
"It would be bad."
-Egon Spengler, "Ghostbusters"
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi
On Mon, 21 May 2018, Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2018 at 04:49:34PM -0700, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote:
On Sun, 20 May 2018, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
On 05/20/18 21:15, Eugene Grosbein wrote:
21.05.2018 2:02, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:
OK, I'll try to explain a bit more.
Firstly
her that's included with the normal .tar.gz or
requires the github copy, I can't say.
I don't know if there's a *canonical* naming that universally means this
is what '-devel' means.
-Dan
--
----Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMa
re a thing).
Worse, since it's python, I think this would result in two different
flavors.
How does one specify that flavor as a dependency?
Meta-question: Is it worth creating multiple flavors for this?
-Dan
--
----Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/under
it with *installed* packages, but not *all packages
total*, so I know who to reach out to for having them update. Can someone
clue me in?
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http
ebsd.org/base/stable/11
Relative URL: ^/stable/11
Repository Root: https://svn0.us-west.freebsd.org/base
Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f
Revision: 331873
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: mav
Last Changed Rev: 331870
Last Changed Date: 2018-04-01 22:59
?
Specifically, my needs are for a custom kernel for -RELEASE -- but it
looks like there's no easy way to *just* build that, it looks like the
kernel package needs to track with the entire rest of the OS. Is this the
case?
Best,
-Dan
--
___
freebsd
ors" so we can turn off the language specific options.
-Dan
--
Dan Mahoney
Techie, Sysadmin, WebGeek
Gushi on efnet/undernet IRC
FB: fb.com/DanielMahoneyIV
LI: linkedin.com/in/gushi
Site: http://www.gushi.org
---
ed as part of
deleting the port :)
My $dayjob is with a company that makes open-source software which we
redistribute under the MPL. I've shared that link with our team as an
example of the absolute wrong way to go about engaging with the communi
nd version used at compilation time.
This feels a lot like what I was just asking about, as well. Are there
plans for this dependency to be addressed in the future? My brief combing
of the wiki didn't find any kind of a roadmap or anything like that.
-Dan
--
"Check it out, it's just
On Mon, 5 Feb 2018, Zach Leslie wrote:
On Feb 5, 2018 5:51 PM, "Dan Mahoney (Gushi)" <free...@gushi.org> wrote:
All,
I've lost the better part of an afternoon to this issue. These questions
are not just specific to the above ports, but also as to how ports
ut don't deinstall puppet", or "install facter but
don't deinstall rubygem-facter". It seems the only actual file they
conflict on is /usr/local/bin/facter, and I can manage that with symlinks.
Is there a way to force it?
Best,
-Dan
ot;
Given the port will need to be redone when this new feature is released, I
would like to proceed, with your approval, with the two slave ports as an
interim measure.
This will all be redundant once ruby FLAVORs are in.
Thank you.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
> On
be done.
How do you suggest we proceed with the work?
Thank you
--
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/
> On Jan 12, 2018, at 7:33 PM, Sergey A. Osokin <o...@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> I don't see any reason to create two separate ports in this case and support
> On Jan 12, 2018, at 11:48 AM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
>
>
>> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
>>> On Jan 12, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
>>>
>>&
> On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 7:23 AM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
> > On Jan 12, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
> >
> > Sergey,
> >
> > We have a need to use rubygem-passenger with both Nginx and with Apache (
> On Jan 12, 2018, at 10:18 AM, Dan Langille <d...@langille.org> wrote:
>
> Sergey,
>
> We have a need to use rubygem-passenger with both Nginx and with Apache (on
> different servers).
>
> I propose to create two new slave ports:
>
> * www/rubygem-passe
.
--
Dan Langille - BSDCan / PGCon
d...@langille.org
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
