On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 at 20:50, w.schwarzenfeld wrote:
>
> see:
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242053
Thank you. CCed myself.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mail
FWIW I still have this problem. Is this a known issue or should I be
properly debugging this?
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 23:56, Eitan Adler wrote:
>
> When compiling devel/binutils I get the following error. What am I
> missing or is it a known bug?
>
> [00:00:34] ld: error: u
ASE_801/final 366581) (based on
LLVM 8.0.1)
Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd12.1
Thread model: posix
InstalledDir: /usr/bin
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
sd.org
COMMENT= gem5 Simulator System
BUILD_DEPENDS= swig3.0:devel/swig30 \
[4813 02:40:59.449 eax@fasteagle .../svn/ports/emulators/gem5]∴svn ci
-F log -- Makefile
SendingMakefile
Transmitting file data .done
Committing transaction...
Committed revision 481594.
@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > # MAINTAINER= cr...@freebsd.org
> > #
> >
> >+EDITOR=${EDITOR:-vi}
> > PORTSDIR=${PORTSDIR:-/usr/ports}
> > INDEX=${PORTSDIR}/`make -C ${PORTSDIR} -V INDEXFILE`
>
> Thanks both.
>
> Feel free to commit, but please use the absolute path to
ping?
On 3 June 2018 at 17:43, Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 16 May 2018 at 22:28, Christopher Hall
> wrote:
>> Hello Eitan,
>>
>> On Wed, 16 May 2018 21:32:20 -0700, Eitan Adler
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ping?
>>>
>>> On 12 May 2018 at 06
On 9 June 2018 at 11:47, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Java,
>
> I've prepared three ports for Linux Oracle Java 10.
>
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228848
>
> If nobody objects, I'll commit this.
Thank yo
On 16 May 2018 at 22:28, Christopher Hall wrote:
> Hello Eitan,
>
> On Wed, 16 May 2018 21:32:20 -0700, Eitan Adler
> wrote:
>
>> ping?
>>
>> On 12 May 2018 at 06:06, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> > Can anyone explain why pkg wants to both install and autoremo
mplate a bit?
>
> What change would be needed ? There's already a Sponsored by field ?
My point is that the custom patch pre-fills the field, which is why
submitters often see it filled when they don't expect it: the
committer doesn't do it by hand.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 18 May 2018 at 04:40, John W. O'Brien <j...@saltant.com> wrote:
> On 2018/05/18 00:43, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 17 May 2018 at 21:15, Kurt Jaeger <li...@opsec.eu> wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>>> The FreeBSD project could help by asking committers to
ATION_NAME" and automatically append it to the default
template. This is likely why its getting added in unexpected places.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ping?
On 12 May 2018 at 06:06, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote:
> Can anyone explain why pkg wants to both install and autoremove the
> same packages?
>
> [8212 11:56:42.045 eax@fasteagle ~]∴sudo pkg autoremove
> Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
>
libepoxy-1.4.3...
[4/4] Extracting libepoxy-1.4.3: 100%
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 22 April 2018 at 13:20, Pete Wright <p...@nomadlogic.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Apr 22, 2018 12:57 PM, Eitan Adler <li...@eitanadler.com> wrote:
>
> On 25 November 2017 at 10:50, Stefan Lambrev <che...@freebsd-bg.org> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've got
On 25 November 2017 at 10:50, Stefan Lambrev <che...@freebsd-bg.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've got the port to a working state (
> https://github.com/cheffo/FreeBSD-Ports/tree/master/net-mgmt/chronograf)
What happened to this effort? I'd love to see a chronograf port.
n behalf of portmgr but I'd like to echo this
request on behalf of ports-secteam. Maintainers rarely verify the
hashes that makesum generates.
I wish we can go further and filter out non-HTTPS sites during makesum.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
hat it not even consider
> updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again
> supported.
FYI: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/tab-groups-panorama/
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On 4 October 2016 at 00:25, Mathieu Arnold <m...@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Le 04/10/2016 à 03:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen a écrit :
>> On 10/03/2016 07:34 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>>> On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>>> <step...@missouri.edu
On 3 October 2016 at 05:31, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
<step...@missouri.edu> wrote:
> On 10/02/2016 05:27 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
>> On 2 October 2016 at 14:44, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen
>> <step...@missouri.edu> wrote:
>>> So I have a couple of ports, science
If the license is standard (listed
here: https://spdx.org/licenses/) we should add it to the main
database.
> An even tougher one is math/octave-forge-optim, where each individual
> file has its own license.
A "custom" license that merely states to check the distfiles should be
On 5 February 2016 at 15:33, jungle Boogie <jungleboog...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Any other ideas knowing I have a more recent version of ports tree now?
What is PORTSDIR set to? Where is your ports tree?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@fr
s, my attempt isn't working well.
Do you have a complete ports tree somewhere on your system? If so,
make sure to set PORTSDIR correctly. If not you'll want to check out
a copy from subversion.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing lis
a) check my work before I submit it to the
> docs@ team and b) answer any questions I might stumble across in the
> process.
I am willing to do (a) and help with any aspect of (b) that I can.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/freebsd-update-server/
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/administration.html page
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
unchanged upstream ports provided they have an
active downstream maintainer. The only concern is patches: the ports
tree must not become a repo by which the upstream port is continued to
be developed. If you just want to make sure that the port remains
available this is perfectly fine.
--
Eitan
On 29 June 2014 19:37, Gea-Suan Lin gs...@gslin.org wrote:
Hello sir,
I would like to drop all ports maintainship, please reset to ports@
and perl@ (or other alias).
I will take of this. Thank you for all the effort you have put in to
helping our community.
--
Eitan Adler
a
single upstream location. Larger ports with better upstream
infrastructure typically already have multiple MASTER_SITES.
It adds noise when looking for ports with portlint issues.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
their maintainership reset if they actually did their job.
Agreed.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
testing ok. (also uses lmdb)
www/phpbb3 - Changing PORTVERSION=3.0.11 to 3.0.12 and building is ok too.
portscout is supposed to take this role.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
...@vmeta.jp wrote:
I'm not a perl specialist but I'd like to help something I can do.
It looks someone already works on auto assignment. I'll wait for that
and help something else as much as I can do.
Thanks,
On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 10:23:17PM -0700, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 10 June 2014
that knows perl needs to volunteer to help :)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 3 June 2014 16:13, Michelle Sullivan miche...@sorbs.net wrote:
Eitan Adler wrote:
On 3 June 2014 10:11, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.st wrote:
... it's doubtful most folks unwilling to register are
about to make a meaningful report...
This is *not* the reason for registation
happens. And even after
offering help it is closed with timeout and the bug still exists.
Before we couldn't track this. Now we can. Lets hope we can solve
this problem. We still need more people to go through the bugs and
fix things.
--
Eitan Adler
be supported for a
bit as we get used to bugzilla. It certainly on the cards to support
in the future.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd
we have
meta-data to track the source of an account (anon-report, or not) but
we will soon.
I don't concede killing anonymous means killing trivial bug reporting,
but if that was the case: Oh well, I guess we have to focus on
non-trivial bugs.
Trivial bugs are important too.
--
Eitan Adler
question: why don't we allow users to submit via
email but verify with a token? That system isn't possible with how
the gateway is set up now. Its a long term possability. If someone
wants to help set that up please contact me offline (at bugmeister@).
===
--
Eitan Adler
via send-pr involves a
manual step).
===
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
). We'll
consider this as time goes on.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
to engage bug reporters.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
. Could that hurt for building ports?
Or do I worry needlessly?
It only matters if you build ports that interact with private system
internals. For example, anything that builds a kernel module and
lsof. Generally, you should be fine.
--
Eitan Adler
.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 11 March 2014 08:22, John Marino freebsd.cont...@marino.st wrote:
On 3/11/2014 13:16, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 11 March 2014 07:05, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi all,
To be able to migrate most of the zip files to use bsdtar when they case we
have
added USES=zip[:infozip
acceptance of license agreement
+NO_PACKAGE=${NO_CDROM}
Works for me. Make sure /usr/ports/LEGAL says the same thing.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
?
The last adobe security report I see was issued on 2014-02-04:
http://helpx.adobe.com/security/products/flash-player/apsb14-04.html
I'll update flash to .336. Thanks for the email.
--
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Chad Perrin c...@apotheon.net wrote:
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 12:30:09PM +, Thomas Mueller wrote:
I think train wreck applies more to sendmail than send-pr. Sendmail
dates back to long-ago pre-Internet days where computer users didn't
send email to other
can't give a definite timeline but it should be 'soon'.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/ administrative work. A lot of
this will have to be repeated once the bugs are re-imported, but at
least it should take a lot less time now that I've done it once.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Ping. After 2 weeks.
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 12:14 AM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote:
Hi all,
At the moment WITH_DEBUG is treated specially by the ports system. I
propose to turn the old WITH_DEBUG into a port option 'DEBUG' which is
understood by the port system as a whole
please feel to email ports@.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports-announce@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-announce
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-ports-announce-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
please feel to email ports@ and cc me.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
.
what to Do?
Please run the following as the *user* (not root) and paste the output
from them:
nspluginwrapper -a -v -i
nspluginwrapper -a -v -u
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
+= ${DEBUG_CXXFLAGS}
+CPPFLAGS+= ${DEBUG_CPPFLAGS}
.endif
+.endif
.if defined(WITH_SSP) || defined(WITH_SSP_PORTS)
.include ${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.ssp.mk
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
/ -:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
- x11-wm/icewm (marked as IGNORE)
--- Packages processed: 0 done, 1 ignored, 0 skipped and 0 failed
--- Session ended at: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:59:59 +0200 (consumed 00:00:03)
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Dominic Fandrey kamik...@bsdforen.de wrote:
# make DESTDIR=/root/tmpdest install
=== Creating some important subdirectories
Are you sure you don't mean make PREFIX=/root/tmpdest/ ?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports
. We should use an existing format. (I don't care
which one: YAML, JSON, ...) ?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Darren Pilgrim
list_free...@bluerosetech.com wrote:
On 11/16/2013 8:25 AM, Eitan Adler wrote:
That's parseable using the regex or literal matching built into every
scripting language, most programming languages, and your average human.
Sure, but it requires
)
+.if defined(WITH_DEBUG_PORTS) ${WITH_DEBUG_PORTS:M${PKGORIGIN}}
+WITH_DEBUG=yes
+.endif
+
# Reset value from bsd.own.mk.
.if defined(WITH_DEBUG) !defined(WITHOUT_DEBUG)
STRIP= #none
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Jung-uk Kim j...@freebsd.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2013-11-14 14:53:29 -0500, Greg Rivers wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Sergey V. Dyatko wrote:
run `nspluginwrapper -a -v -i` now.
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Mike Jakubik wrote:
place to have such information), why have the Makefile double up
as a database?
pkg_descr is free form. Makefiles are parsable (make -V).
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
consumer would be PC-BSD or other package management
tools which would you prefer?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports
it.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Please do not top post: it makes it impossible to follow a conversation.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Aryeh Friedman aryeh.fried...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is this documented? (I am making a port that needs do similar stuff
but want to understand all the possible directives)
It is documented
) for the
porters-handbook document to address this problem. Note that some of
the contents have been already updated by Eitan Adler, this is just a
continuation of the work.
[1]
http://people.freebsd.org/~pgj/patches/2013/10/29/porters-handbook.staging.diff
[2]
http://people.freebsd.org
investigating at that point :|
Maybe my English is poor, I do not understand your message. Please
clarify. Thx
Translation:
bmake and portconf are not compatible. Once you fix the couldn't read
shell's output error, there are others.
--
Eitan Adler
On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 4:39 AM, Rodrigo OSORIO rodr...@bebik.net wrote:
I'm interested by x11/tilda
- regads
Done!
Note that this port needs some work done: in particular it needs
STAGEDIR support
See here for more details: https://wiki.freebsd.org/ports/StageDir
--
Eitan Adler
?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
will probably be distributed as proper patches.
Thanks!
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
features.
This is really good work. Thanks!
--
Eitan Adler
Source, Ports, Doc committer
Bugmeister, Ports Security teams
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
it should be removed now.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
to the ports/x11/xinit/Makefile (at line
7) seem to let it build:
GNU_CONFIGURE=yes
CONFIGURE_ARGS= --without-launchd
Any chance you could give us a copy of the 'config.log' file left in
the ports directory and a list of ports you have installed. It seems
odd that this should be required.
--
Eitan
does mention it, but this is a developer's file not a user's file.
I just modified the ports man page in HEAD and will MFC it shortly.
However, because the ports system is decoupled from base the man page
tends to get out of date fairly easily. :(
--
Eitan Adler
like
.if ${OSVERSION} ${WHEREEVERITBROKE}
BROKEN= Unit tests fail
.endif
to the port's Makefile.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
that when it crashes, so that it can
generate a crash report of some kind and possibly submit it somewhere.
Even so, it should be listed as a depends.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd
bug
system and this is where most of the focus lies now.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
options, then
they certainly can take the time to fully document them.
support for this file, called pkg-help, is on the way.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
and effort on
your part.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
etc.
I'm also not sure about the lang_FILES=. Applying the sed (assuming
it can be made specific enough) to the entire tree would be nice, but
may take too long, especially on large work directories. I guess it
isn't too bad.
--
Eitan Adler
, that is why I ended with I guess it isn't too bad., although I
guess it wasn't clear I meant needing lang_FILES.
I'd prefer shebangfix_FILES and have all the language fixes apply
without needing to specify which one.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports
On 30 April 2013 13:41, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 01:38:03PM -0400, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 30 April 2013 13:35, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
All of this will be damn slow operations, we want to keep this as fast as
possible, even if per
On 30 April 2013 13:52, Chris Rees utis...@gmail.com wrote:
This proposes running each regex over each file in turn.
or some variant thereof - if that is really a big deal the regex
could be modified to do all of them at once.
We could even run the regex on just the first line.
--
Eitan
: note that if refers to a command, not to
file's existence. You were missing [ -e $file ].
As others of had said, this is uneeded though.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On 25 March 2013 09:36, Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Eitan Adler ha scritto:
I have been trying to capture the differences between LEGAL and the ports
tree.
At this point I am convinced we need a new variable to capture in a
machine usable way issues such as special permission granted
On 25 March 2013 10:08, Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Eitan Adler ha scritto:
RESTRICTED does not cover special permission granted to distribute
and other not-a-restriction things.
And why do we need them? RESTRICTED is for !distributable, exactly as
the LEGAL file. We can improve
On 25 March 2013 10:37, Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Eitan Adler ha scritto:
The LEGAL file is for a broader set of things than just RESTRICTED.
It covers no commercial use which is NO_CDROM but not RESTRICTED
Yup, LEGAL is both NO_CDROM and RESTRICTED, and RESTRICTED_FILES already
On 25 March 2013 10:49, Alex Dupre a...@freebsd.org wrote:
Eitan Adler ha scritto:
This is insufficient to include, say, line 212:
raknet-*devel/raknetOriginal license is
Indy license, special authorization granted to provide RakNet under
GPL v3
Ehmm, I could
.
I'm following up and will act as needed. Thanks for the heads up.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
: ${MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD}
clean:
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
the Makefile as an attachment
so we can see what it is doing.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, and
then flip the switch? This may have to be done recursively, but most
of the major blockers have already been marked.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe
:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} without also setting
BUILD_DEPENDS, not using RUN_DEPENDS:= ${BUILD_DEPENDS} in general.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
RUN_DEPENDS.
This also reduces the chance of making an error should BUILD_DEPENDS
change to be inconsistent with BUILD_DEPENDS.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
Can you please sanity check the following?
commit 687519c34ad3423752268a0a20d079fda9cea8b2
Author: Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com
Date: Fri Feb 22 18:43:30 2013 -0500
Using CONFIGURE_ENV for CPPFLAGS and
LDFLAGS is not needed since r282433.
PR: docs/174827
Submitted
On 6 February 2013 07:41, Frederic Culot cu...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
FEATURES. It is likely to be easy to grep (as opposed to USE).
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
On 6 February 2013 08:21, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:13:54AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 6 February 2013 07:41, Frederic Culot cu...@freebsd.org wrote:
...
FEATURES. It is likely to be easy to grep (as opposed to USE).
--
Eitan Adler
What's
On 6 February 2013 15:03, Armin Pirkovitsch sper...@freebsd.org wrote:
On 02/06/13 14:26, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 6 February 2013 08:21, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 08:13:54AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
On 6 February 2013 07:41, Frederic Culot cu
thing you want :)
IMHO this is pointless extra processing. I'd prefer to see
FEATURE_foo be manually inserted.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
does more than just stopping the dialog. It changes how
patch(1) behaves, it adds BATCH=yes to the environment, disables some
ports, etc.
Instead define NO_DIALOG in /etc/make.conf
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
.
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
:patch here, to get the patched version.
Thanks. The target :patch was corect.
Actually writing it in PATCH_DEPENDS went well.
Is xorg's source required to patch this port?
--
Eitan Adler
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
1 - 100 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
