On 2/7/21 2:52 AM, Alex V. Petrov wrote:
I have problem with bison.
During build some ports.
during doxygen build:
/usr/bin/make -f src/CMakeFiles/doxymain.dir/build.make
src/CMakeFiles/doxymain.dir/depend
[ 31%] [BISON][constexp] Building parser with bison 3.7.5
cd
"make -C /usr/ports/any/origin/ install clean" registers an incomplete
origin ("any/" instead of "any/origin") in the package database for most
ports or fails completely for ports-mgmt/pkg (on 11.1-RELEASE/amd64).
"make -C /usr/ports/any/origin install clean" works fine.
I am not sure, if the
Now that autogen is at 5.18.10, it really does not build with guile
anymore and I cannot cheat and revert the change to guile2.
Anyhow, lilypond still has a library dependency on guile and from the
discussion on the lilypond mailing list (and other lists), I do not
think this is likely going to
# pkg info -r ffmpeg
ffmpeg-2.1.1_1,1:
libxine-1.2.4_5
vlc-2.1.2_2,4
libstreamanalyzer-0.7.8_3
x264-0.136.2358_3
# pkg info -r x264
x264-0.136.2358_3:
ffmpeg-2.1.1_1,1
ffmpeg0-0.7.16_1,1
opal-3.10.10_2
vlc-2.1.2_2,4
Not good. Since
In December, I fixed a few ports to compile on 10.0:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185032
submitted: 2013-12-20 (mail to maintainer: 2013-12-06)
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/185033
submitted: 2013-12-20 (mail to maintainer: 2013-12-06)
Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it
does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this
line in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf:
sysutils/testdisk: WITH_NTFS3G
I thought the new options framework was backwards compatible and
ports-mgmt/portconf does
On 10/27/2012 21:32, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 09:26:17PM +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Since you converted sysutils/testdisk to the new options framework, it
does not depend on sysutils/fusefs-ntfs anymore, although I have this
line in /usr/local/etc/ports.conf
On 07/23/2012 10:04, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.
As you already know, it works! Thanks!
Specifically, I added 24.1 to bsd.emacs.mk, made it the default, and
removed all ports depending on emacs-23.4.
I installed print/auctex and java/jde (from the attic)
On 07/23/2012 13:39, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:32:34 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de said:
Arabic, which is finally displayed from right-to-left, works in
windowed mode, but for me, it does not work correctly with -nw:
While it is displayed correctly in a LANG
On 07/23/2012 16:26, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:20:43 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de said:
On 07/23/2012 13:39, Ashish SHUKLA wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 13:32:34 +0200, Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de said:
Arabic, which is finally displayed from right-to-left
Hi Doug!
You just removed java/jde, but you forgot to look at prs for a fix.
There is one (author Cced) with an update to a version that does fetch:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158204
Since the new version is called jdee, maybe java/jde is really obsolete,
but not
On 02/11/2011 18:27, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 02:34:02PM +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
I am trying to build all ports that I have installed in an i386 chroot
environment on an amd64 machine. All work except for sysutils/cdrtools.
I have installed an i386 system to some
I am trying to build all ports that I have installed in an i386 chroot
environment on an amd64 machine. All work except for sysutils/cdrtools.
I have installed an i386 system to some directory, mounted a devfs to
the devfs subdirectory, set MACHINE=i386 ; UNAME_p=i386 ; UNAME_m=i386
and
I just tried to reinstall editors/openoffice.org-3 after recently
installing editors/libreoffice that pulled in devel/cppunit -- I could
not, since editors/openoffice.org-3 conflicts with devel/cppunit.
Why is there a one-sided conflict? If editors/openoffice.org-3 and
devel/cppunit really
I just did a portupgrade to libreoffice-3.3.0_3 (amd64) -- with a
package created on another machine that I did the portupgrade on before
and that also had libreoffice-3.3.0_1 installed during make.
In contrast to portrevisions 0 and 1, I cannot open MS Word files
anymore. I get a window with
On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote:
Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at
the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but
Just a question about what you did so far: Why the
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--prefix=${PREFIX}? I have tested with a
On 01/23/2011 17:35, Chris Rees wrote:
On 23 January 2011 16:24, Jan Henrik Sylvesterm...@janh.de wrote:
On 01/23/2011 11:42, Chris Rees wrote:
Take a look at the new patch so far; I'm still working on Busybox at
the moment, so I'm afraid I can't step too much more through it, but
Just a
Thanks for all your suggestions!
Cheers,
Jan Henrik
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
On 01/22/2011 14:04, Chris Rees wrote:
On 22 January 2011 12:53, Chris Reesutis...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 January 2011 21:46, Jan Henrik Sylvesterm...@janh.de wrote:
Finally, I found an application worse having that is not in ports and looked
simple enough to try: Xournal is my first attempt
.tar.gz) = 425062
dbdf531c5f805ea1b755f1dff0d9beb7
echo x - graphics/xournal/Makefile
sed 's/^X//' graphics/xournal/Makefile '7b6ea3301597bf7d5161b3f76878ae21'
X# New ports collection makefile for: xournal
X# Date created:21 Jan 2011
X# Whom:Jan Henrik
As you are working on ntfsprogs, are you able to use ntfsresize at all?
For me, ntfsresize never worked in ntfsprogs-2.0.0, but it did in
ntfsprogs-1.13.1. We had a discussion about ntfsprogs on
freebsd-questions almost a year ago:
Boris Samorodov wrote:
here is a patch to switch to Emacs 23 as a default. There are
50 affected ports. Tests were done at tinderbox. Please give
this patch a try. I'm going to fire up an exp run after some
testing. The patch is relative to PORTSDIR:
You already know that I have been running
Guy Brand wrote:
Am I the only one having severe issue with inkscape from the ports?
I'm using 0.46_6, without a config option and its 129 dependancies
(see attached output of pkg_info) on a FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r198491.
Adding a layer is simply impossible, inkscape freezes and there is
no other
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2009-September/057182.html
I wonder why I got no reply to my posting and the new 8.0-RELEASE
package set on FTP still contains RESTRICTED packages... not a problem
or overlooked?
For example:
Comparing the INDEX of the 8.0-release package set from Sep-23 to my
installed packages, I found some oddities.
Many RESTRICTED packages are included, for example: print/acroread8,
net/skype, www/linux-flashplugin9, astro/google-earth,
multimedia/win32-codecs, audio/lame, print/pdflib,
Maho NAKATA wrote:
From: Jan Henrik Sylvester m...@janh.de
Maho NAKATA wrote:
From: Joey Mingrone joey at mingrone.org
I'm having some trouble upgrading this port.
% uname -a
FreeBSD ... 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: Wed May 6 12:48:08 ...
i386
Here's the error in the build:
making
Maho NAKATA wrote:
From: Joey Mingrone joey at mingrone.org
I'm having some trouble upgrading this port.
% uname -a
FreeBSD ... 7.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE #1: Wed May 6 12:48:08 ... i386
Here's the error in the build:
making gendoc.cc
g++44 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
Troy wrote:
I was just upgrading from kdeedu-4.2.4 to 4.2.4_1 and the following error
occurred.
[ 12%] Generating solver.o
File _none_, line 1, characters 0-1:
Error: Files /usr/local/lib/ocaml/facile/facile.cmxa
and /usr/local/lib/ocaml/stdlib.cmxa
make inconsistent
As I wrote two weeks ago, the aqbanking-2.3.3 to 3.8.1 update took away
the command line banking client I use. Thus, I am eager to get 4.0.0,
which includes a new one.
I made a patch: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135161
I need someone using gnucash with aqbanking to check the
math/libqalculate and print/lilypond both link libgmp.so.X, but have not
been bumped with the libgmp.so.7-libgmp.so.8 update as they do not list
the dependency.
math/libqalculate pulls in libgmp via libcln and print/lilypond via
libguile, thus the default package will always depend on libgmp.
After ports/129598, finance/aqbanking was recently updated from 2.3.3 to
3.8.1. This caused a major regression for me, as I was using the command
line aqbanking-tool (and some shell scripts around it) as the banking
client. In the 3.X series, that is not included anymore.
There is
Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
Did you run portupgrade -rf libxcb?
On a related note: I ran above command _before_ doing a full
portupgrade -a. A whole bunch of ports failed to upgrade because
A mixture of -rf and a -a upgrade is always problematic, unless you were
up-to-date before the
I know that some people do not agree with the PORTREVISION bumping at
all. Anyhow, after the libtasn1 shlib bump there were some ports bumped,
but many got missed that have files linking against libtasn1.so.3
according to 'libchk -v'.
I found these:
cups-pstoraster-8.15.4_2
ekiga-2.0.11_5
Max Brazhnikov wrote:
On Sat, 03 Jan 2009 17:28:35 +0100, Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
Guill. Moreno-Socias wrote:
I am trying to install x11/kde3 using portupgrade, but it fails
when making devel/kdesdk3 (kdesdk-3.5.10).
kdesdk3 cannot be build with textproc/flex installed (since
I just face many large ports requiring updates, although mine depend on
openldap23-client, which have not been updated. Thus, I decided to
investigate changing openldap23-client to openldap24-client.
According to 'libchk -v', only 10 of 29 of my ports bumped actually link
to one of the
Playing a little with /var/db/pkg/*/+CONTENTS, I found some CONFLICTS,
for example:
pkg_info: both coreutils-6.9_3 and firebird-server-2.0.3_2 claim to have
installed /usr/local/bin/gstat
pkg_info: both teTeX-base-3.0_14 and texinfo-4.11 claim to have
installed /usr/local/bin/texi2dvi
At 2008/08/18, audio/akode went from 2.0.2_1,1 to 2.0.2,1 and it is
still there. (2.0.2_1,1 had existed since 2008/05/27.)
No change with default OPTIONS, though.
Cheers,
Jan Henrik
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Mitja wrote:
kdesdk3 doesn't want to update:
pofiles.cc:450:5: warning: YY_STACK_USED is not defined
pofiles.cc:1518:5: warning: YY_MAIN is not defined
In file included from pofiles.cc:249:
/usr/local/include/FlexLexer.h:130: error: expected unqualified-id
before numeric constant
Is there a particular reason our ntfsprogs port did not get updated for
a year but now it has?
So far I did use ntfs-3g for mounting and ntfsprogs for resizing etc.
with very few problems. Once on copying many files, two of them were
only partially written with error messages Bad address and
Trying to build kde4, I got stuck at redland:
mkdir .libs
cc -DLIBRDF_INTERNAL=1 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-DLIBRDF_INTERNAL=1 -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -rpath=/usr/local/lib
-o .libs/redland-db-upgrade db_upgrade.o -rpath=/usr/local/lib
-L/usr/local/lib ../librdf/.libs/librdf.so
D. J. Berstein has put his work into public domain:
http://cr.yp.to/distributors.html
qmail, djbdns, and ucspi-tcp already have their RESTRICTED removed.
djbfft, daemontools, and ezmlm are still RESTRICTED:
multimedia/djbfft RESTRICTED= Forbidden to redistribute - we have
patches to the
Trying to clean lib/compat/pkg from old portupgrade leftovers, I used
libchk to check which are still needed.
I thought with regular portupgrades for all ports, none of them should
be needed, since recompiles due to PORTREVISION bumps should have taken
care of these.
Quite a few were
ImageMagick fails to build for me. I guess it is because I do the build
as root while a different user owns the display. (I do use kdm for
login and start the build after su in a Konsole.)
Although it sounds like interactive building, IMHO, building a port with
default options should not fail
Matthew Donovan wrote:
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 03:47:51PM -0400, Kitche wrote:
As you can see from my original log, X is used.
X is not required, since it is not used, if I build with 'su -' instead
of 'su' (and thus have a clear environment without DISPLAY being set).
If the build tries to
After refreshing all packages in /usr/ports/packages/All, I tried to
upgrade all ports on a machine that had the last 'portupgrade -a' a few
month (?) ago. I got:
# portupgrade --batch -PP -x openoffice.org -a
** Port marked as IGNORE: devel/apr-svn:
at line 1115 (evaluated to
%%PORTDOCS%%share/doc/libnjb-%%PORTVERSION%%/html/dir_d03f56ed3ef2c0e11ac283c787a57d7a.html
is in pkg-plist of libnjb, but I got this file:
dir_517a6f2c7427bc36231829858e370602.html
Therefore package creation fails.
Does this weird filename have something to do with my configuration? Is
Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 18:32:22 -0600
Stephen Montgomery-Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My bets are on noschg flag.
Pav, you are exactly right. I have experienced this many times myself.
After installing the compat5x package you need to do chflags -R
noschg
Installing the 7.0-RELEASE package of graphics/xnview, I got some weird
messages that seem to come from the misc/compat5x dependency:
rm: /var/tmp/instmp.qdjoSl/lib/compat/libc.so.5: Operation not permitted
rm: /var/tmp/instmp.qdjoSl/lib/compat/libc_r.so.5: Operation not permitted
rm:
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
After a 'portupgrade -f fusefs-kmod' (to make sure the port is installed
correctly), I have created a package that now fails.
# pkg_create -b fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1
# pkg_delete -f fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1
pkg_delete: package 'fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1' is required
After a 'portupgrade -f fusefs-kmod' (to make sure the port is installed
correctly), I have created a package that now fails.
# pkg_create -b fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1
# pkg_delete -f fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1
pkg_delete: package 'fusefs-kmod-0.3.9.p1_1' is required by these other
packages
and may
How is the effort bringing the aqbanking port up to date going?
Thanks,
Jan Henrik
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
portupgrade kmastermind-2.2_1 to kmastermind-2.2_2 failed:
*** AUTOCONF NOT FOUND!.
*** KDE requires autoconf 2.53 or newer
What should I do about it?
Moreover, portupgrade does not deal with this:
autoconf-2.53_4 needs updating (port has 2.61_2)
autoconf-2.59_3
I just tried to portupgrade libmtp, but it runs into a syntax error:
Making all in examples
cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I..-I/usr/local/include -I../src -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -MT connect.o -MD
-MP -MF .deps/connect.Tpo -c -o connect.o connect.c
connect.c:
=== autoconf-2.61_1 is already installed
You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly.
If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/autoconf261
without deleting it first, set the variable
Alex Dupre wrote:
Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
=== autoconf-2.61_1 is already installed
You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again
by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly.
If you really wish to overwrite the old port of devel/autoconf261
Ade wrote:
On Jul 28, 2007, at 03:03 , Jan Henrik Sylvester wrote:
I think, there should be a '-' in front of every ${BUILD_VERSION}.
Additionally to the one at --program-suffix, there are three more
missing.
The appropriate fix has already been committed. Given the very small
window
56 matches
Mail list logo
