On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:18:25 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> Is there a simple way to test port without building its dependencies,
> instead fetching them from package repository.
>
> I've tried `poudriere testport` but it wants to build everything.
>
Please ignore first
Is there a simple way to test port without building its dependencies,
instead fetching them from package repository.
I've tried `poudriere testport` but it wants to build everything.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/m
portupgrade -p invokes make with DEPENDS_TARGET=package[1] but this no
longer installs dependencies. Which target or option should be used
instead ?
[1] https://github.com/freebsd/portupgrade/issues/58
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/gnome2-utils.eclass?diff_format=s&revision=1.31&view=markup
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
> wrote:
>> I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough to `ki
BTW there are no build errors on build cluster. Is there anything
non-standard about your build environment ?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
wrote:
> I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough to `killall -HUP gconfd-2`
> at package post-install when port uses gcon
I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough to `killall -HUP gconfd-2`
at package post-install when port uses gconf (has GCONF_SCHEMAS).
Please file a PR against gnome ports.
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 7:32 PM, Marcin
You will need this patch:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/mail-notification/5.4.dfsg.1-8/disable-werror.patch
from which you have to strip first directory in file name.
Unfortunately I don't have the time to test it right now or in the near future.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:29 PM
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
> On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is
>> no up-to-date repository I want to remove it.
> Have you looked at http://pkgbeta.free
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:03:23PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>> On 09/06/2012 18:46, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> > I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is no
>> >
I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is no
up-to-date repository I want to remove it.
What would be the correct procedure to achieve that ?
Invoking `pkg delete -a` still leaves some files including /usr/sbin/pkg.
___
f
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:22:50 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> This can still be discussed but I don't really like the idea that users
> may alter packages an installation/extraction time, that would lead to
> lots of potential buggy installation and report.
That's why list of alterations have t
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:11:11 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
>
Fantastic!
I know it is quite too early but I already have one feature request ;)
Perhaps it could be added to the TODO as a post-1.0 goal.
= Generic extraction
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:25:13 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote:
> Chris Rees wrote:
>
>>> For PackageKit's "app-install", I wanted to list all ports/packages
>>> that had a .desktop file (= an "app").
>
>> I may be misunderstanding you here, but you could just:
>>
>> [ch...@amnesiac]~% echo /usr/
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:23:58 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 23:36, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean by master ? If you think about ftp-master then it's
>> password protected. AFAIK there is no publicly available ftp site that
>
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:18:01 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
>>
>> Excuse me? The ports check downloaded source tarball against SHA
>> checksum. Just for nay case like downloading error or malicious
>> inject. Did you try to say that binary package
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:40 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>
>> I think you could also detect inconsistent mirror by comparing
>> modification time of package against mtime of INDEX. If pkg is newer
>> than INDEX then it&
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:11:25 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>
>> Alternatively it could be prevented with no disk cost by putting
>> "MIRROR-IN-PROGRESS" file and making all package utilities check for
>> its existence and fai
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
>>
>>> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>>> At this very moment, french package mirror has IN
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
>> Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
>
> That could double disc requirement, & reduce mirror sites willing to
> provide space ?
>
Indeed it would. But there is no other way to solve it.
Alternative
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:15:42 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>
> Yeah that was it, but it is really, really bad. Mirroring must be atomic
> (mirror to temporary directory then rename). Otherwise there is a large
> window of time every couple of days when upgrading packages will at be
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
>> other mirrors:
>>
> ...
>>
>> yet it does not have those packages.
>>
>> How could something l
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
> fetch -o INDEX-xx.bz2
> http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/INDEX.bz2
> fetch -o INDEX-fr.bz2
> http://ftp.fr.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/INDEX.bz2
> ls -l
tot
Package for openjdk6 located at:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/All/openjdk6-b17_2.tbz
is truncated:
> pkg_info openjdk6-b17_2.tbz
tar: Truncated input file (needed 3475456 bytes, only -30 available)
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
pkg_info: tar extra
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:12:06 +0530, USM Bish wrote:
>
>
> ...(lots snipped) ...
> checking for CRYPTO_free in -lcrypto... yes checking for snmp_timeout in
> -lnetsnmp... no checking for snmp_timeout in -lsnmp... no configure:
> error: cannot find net/ucd-snmp support (or --disable-network-build)
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:31:57 +0200, Eitan Adler wrote:
> I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of mine
> with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports My proposal:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg23776.html A
> summary of what has been goin
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:31 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> The portmgr team has enhanced the pointyhead scripts to publish MOVED
> and UPDATING files together with the INDEX files that kports and
> pkg_upgrade use for binary package updating.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=13502
On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
> wrote:
>> They will be installed since they are run dependencies.
>>
>>From what I can tell (from several metaports) -- they, themselves, are
> not installed
On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:08:56 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is the 'right answer', but NO_INSTALL allows the
> proper installation of numerous ports from one location (the meta-port).
> An example of this is the misc/instant-server port (though
> unmaintained, IIRC).
>
> If you
Some metaports (like print/cups) use NO_INSTALL.
This will prevent such port from registering its installation in /var/db/
pkg, which is different behaviour from installing it from prebuilt
package (where it registers just fine).
IMHO not registering installation makes no sense and serves only t
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:08, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Marcin Wisnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Would be nice if there was also INDEX.bz2.
>
> You'd need to talk to the release team about that if you don&
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:11:27 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Michel Talon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Marin Atanasov wrote:
>>
>>> So what do you think - is it worth improving upon it or it's a waste
>>> of time?
>>> Thanks for any suggestions.
>
> INDEX is mad
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:51:02 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:33:43 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:25:27 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>
>>> It will install gnome2 along with it's dep
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:33:43 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:25:27 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
>> It will install gnome2 along with it's dependencies but in some way
>> mark gnome2 package as installed by user, say, by cr
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:25:27 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I apologize in advance if what I'm trying to do seems stupid or it has
> already existed since the Dawn of Time (i.e. when McKusick was in
> diapers) but I'd like your comments on this idea:
>
> http://wiki.freebsd.org/IvanVoras/Pkg
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:33 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:11 -0500, Marcin Wisnicki
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> If .warning breaks portupgrade I can change it to IGNORE.
>
> I prefer remove .warning and IGNORE. If user wants t
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Marcin Wisnicki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
>>
>> > cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD
>> > vanquish.w
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0100, RW wrote:
> I think Bill probably understands that. The issue, as I see it, is that
> the warning will just be a warning if you build manually, but if you
> build through portupgrade it causes it to fail.
>
> If the intent was to stop the build then IGNORE shou
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a
> FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE
> FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/
sys/VANQUISH
> i386 #
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:02:38 -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> On Thursday 01 November 2007 04:04:35 pm lemon wrote:
>> [0] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-
January/019352.html
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-
March/030691.html
>>
> If it's any consolat
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:48:56 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> Quoting myself,
>
>> I'll hold my upgrade-request for cups 1.3.0->1.3.2 until this is fixed
>> :)
>
> If anyone's bold enough to test, here's the port:
> http://www.burggraben.net/hacks/ports/cups_cups-base.tar.gz (containing
40 matches
Mail list logo
