On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:02:31 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
There are 400 ports installed, so I'm still missing
something else.
You didn't run
On 02/10/2012 10:24 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:02:31 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
There are400 ports installed, so I'm still
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:02:31 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
There are 400
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:07:02AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bristol.ac.uk
wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 09
Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 09:07:02AM -0500, Eitan Adler wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 4:24 AM, Anton Shterenlikhtme...@bristol.ac.uk wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:20:47AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:32:27PM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 16:07:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I applied the portmaster patch from git,
then running portmaster -a, I get:
How did you apply the patch?
# patch portmaster.patch
Hmm... Looks like a unified
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 04:08:14AM +0400, Yuri Pankov wrote:
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:07:16 +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:21:12PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
usergroup.c: In function 'pkg_add_user_group':
usergroup.c:75:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:02:31 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
There are 400 ports installed, so I'm still missing
something else.
You didn't run pkg2ng.
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer avi...@freebsd.org
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
The eyes of taxes are upon you.
signature.asc
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:02:31 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
There are 400 ports installed, so I'm still missing
something else.
You didn't run pkg2ng.
thanks again. I missed that too. Is this somewhere
in pkg man pages? I
On 02/09/2012 11:20 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 10:17:10AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 09 February 2012 10:02:31 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
There are400 ports installed, so I'm still missing
something else.
You didn't run pkg2ng.
thanks again. I missed
On Thursday 09 February 2012 13:51:08 Robert Huff wrote:
Is it documented - even mentioned - someplace $GENERIC_USER is
going to find it? If not now, then before launch?
In bapt@'s CFT e-mail.
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer avi...@freebsd.org
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
I
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 07:51:08AM -0500, Robert Huff wrote:
Julien Laffaye writes:
You didn't run pkg2ng.
thanks again. I missed that too. Is this somewhere
in pkg man pages? I didn't see it.
It is a one time operation when you are coming from the old
pkg_install, so it
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
to use pkgng:
echo WITH_PKGNG=yes /etc/make.conf
make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
On ia64 9.9-CURRENT:
Script started on Wed Feb 8 10:03:18 2012
make
=== Patching for pkg-1.0.b1
=== Configuring for
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 10:08:46AM +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
to use pkgng:
echo WITH_PKGNG=yes /etc/make.conf
make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
On ia64 9.9-CURRENT:
Script started on Wed Feb
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:21:12PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
usergroup.c: In function 'pkg_add_user_group':
usergroup.c:75: warning: implicit declaration of function 'gr_init'
usergroup.c:75: warning: nested extern declaration of 'gr_init'
On Wednesday 08 February 2012 16:07:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
I applied the portmaster patch from git,
then running portmaster -a, I get:
How did you apply the patch?
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer avi...@freebsd.org
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
The Marines:
The few, the
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 15:07:16 +, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 01:21:12PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
usergroup.c: In function 'pkg_add_user_group':
usergroup.c:75: warning: implicit declaration of function 'gr_init'
Hi Baptiste,
On Jan 30, 2012, at 7:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to
the
ports tree (disabled by default).
snip everything down
I'll file an issue on github as well, but wanted to note it here,
too. Seems pkgng
On Thursday 02 February 2012 09:02:03 Matthew Seaman wrote:
That seems to work pretty well, but the portmaster feature for deleting
build-only dependencies doesn't seem to be doing anything.
For everyone's information, my repository now contains an updated patch that
fixes the issue.
--
On 01/02/2012 21:26, Alberto Villa wrote:
Can you test my latest version and report, submitting a log if you get an
error? Thanks.
That seems to work pretty well, but the portmaster feature for deleting
build-only dependencies doesn't seem to be doing anything. I'll need to
rerun the tests to
On Thursday 02 February 2012 09:02:03 Matthew Seaman wrote:
That seems to work pretty well, but the portmaster feature for deleting
build-only dependencies doesn't seem to be doing anything. I'll need to
rerun the tests to confirm that though.
It has worked fine for me so far...
--
Alberto
On 02/02/2012 10:22, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Thursday 02 February 2012 09:02:03 Matthew Seaman wrote:
That seems to work pretty well, but the portmaster feature for deleting
build-only dependencies doesn't seem to be doing anything. I'll need to
rerun the tests to confirm that though.
It
On Thursday 02 February 2012 13:11:58 Matthew Seaman wrote:
I think I see what the problem here is:
=== Deleting installed build-only dependencies
The following packages will be deinstalled:
pkg-1.0.b1
The deinstallation will require 0 B more space
Deinstalling pkg-1.0.b1... done
On 02/02/2012 13:13, Alberto Villa wrote:
This means you didn't have pkgng installed prior to running portmaster? How
could it work from start, then (by the way, in the future this will have a
solution directly in base)?
No, pkgng was definitely installed at the start. I grabbed the
On 02/02/2012 13:29, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 02/02/2012 13:13, Alberto Villa wrote:
This means you didn't have pkgng installed prior to running portmaster? How
could it work from start, then (by the way, in the future this will have a
solution directly in base)?
No, pkgng was
On Thursday 02 February 2012 14:29:27 Matthew Seaman wrote:
No, pkgng was definitely installed at the start. I grabbed the updated
patch when you mentioned it in an earlier e-mail in this thread. Have
there been any significant changes since then?
The history is here:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 13:39:30 +0100
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to
the ports tree (disabled by default).
[remainder of announcement snipped for brevity]
A feature request:
I've long wished that pkg_info -g
On 31/01/2012 02:27, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote:
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote:
The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):
https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L514
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 12:30:25 Matthew Seaman wrote:
So, is there a way to do anything like portmaster's +IGNOREME trick with
the new pkg stuff?
In the portmaster patch I have currently disabled this feature, but I think
I'll try to re-enable it, even if the solution sounds a bit
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 13:19:51 Alberto Villa wrote:
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 12:30:25 Matthew Seaman wrote:
So, is there a way to do anything like portmaster's +IGNOREME trick
with
the new pkg stuff?
In the portmaster patch I have currently disabled this feature, but I think
On Wednesday 01 February 2012 22:26:50 Alberto Villa wrote:
At the moment I'm trying to do 'portmaster -fa' using your patches and
pkgng and telling portmaster to make packages of everything it
installs.
Unfortunately portmaster gets understandably confused when it tries
to
On 01/02/2012 21:31, Alberto Villa wrote:
By the way, you should avoid rebuilding portmaster itself, or a non patched
version will be installed.
Oh, I just made some local hacks to add your patches automatically when
building the portmaster port. No worries there.
Cheers,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
Are there any i386 remote repos setup yet?
I was all gung ho to start testing this, but I only see amd64 repos
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:34:42PM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote:
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
Are there any i386 remote repos setup yet?
On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
This question is probably not related to this announcement, but I
wonder if this change (pkg_* -- pkgng) will result in increased
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 08:39:30AM +0100, n j wrote:
This question is probably not related to this announcement, but I
wonder if this change (pkg_* -- pkgng) will result in increased
number of available binary packages in the repositories
Absolute number, no. Speed of availability, possibly.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 09:09:47PM +0100, Marco Steinbach wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
[...]
cd /usr/ports/
touch abc
touch: abc: Permission
On Mon, 30 Jan 2012, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
[...]
cd /usr/ports/
touch abc
touch: abc: Permission denied
pkg create net/ifstat
Creating package for ifstat-1.1_5
Segmentation
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
wrote:
No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something
On 30.01.2012 16:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Hi,
What about pkgng support in tinderbox?
--
Andrey Zonov
___
On Jan 31, 2012 2:27 PM, rfl...@acsalaska.net wrote:
Why not stick this in query? Humans ask for information, computers query
for parseable stuff. The separation is there already, keep it consistent.
In fact, it makes a lot of sense to have a '-f format' option for query
and pluggable
On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 09:23:35AM +0400, Andrey Zonov wrote:
On 30.01.2012 16:39, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Hi,
What about pkgng support in
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain,
and they lack features:
- missing metadata
- no upgrade support
- no repository
Cool !
wen
2012/1/30 Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
Our current pkg_install tools are showing their age, are hard to maintain,
and they lack
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 08:43:58AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
Hi Baptiste,
This looks great!
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
Sample output of pkg info:
$ pkg info -f libreoffice:
Name : libreoffice
Version: 3.4.4
Hi Baptiste,
This looks great!
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
Sample output of pkg info:
$ pkg info -f libreoffice:
Name : libreoffice
Version: 3.4.4
Origin : editors/libreoffice
Prefix : /usr/local
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something
like
raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please create an issue
on the
github :))
regards,
Bapt
I just created issue #128,
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something
like
raw output for info or query) I do like the idea, please create an issue
on
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 01:39:30PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
[...]
to use pkgng:
echo WITH_PKGNG=yes /etc/make.conf
make -C /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/pkg install clean
Some links:
http://wiki.FreeBSD.org/pkgng
http://github.com/pkgng/pkgng
Note that on github you can find a
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote:
The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):
https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L514
https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L528
Please, take the patch from here:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote:
Set use_pkgng=yes in /usr/local/etc/portmaster.conf.
Sorry, portmaster.rc.
--
Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer avi...@freebsd.org
http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla
The government of the United States is not in any sense founded on the
Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org writes:
[...]
It has been done with scripting features in mind: 'pkg query' will allow
you to query almost everything from the pkgng database in a script friendly
way.
How to query the date a package was installed? I often manually remove
my packages based
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote:
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote:
The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):
https://github.com/pkgng/pkgng/blob/master/ports/portmaster.patch#L514
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.orgwrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:21:37AM -0800, Jos Backus wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org
wrote:
No pkg query can't do this, but this would be a nice addition (something
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:16:00PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
the name sucks though
it would be
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 03:27:20AM +0100, Alberto Villa wrote:
On Tuesday 31 January 2012 00:52:25 Alberto Villa wrote:
On Monday 30 January 2012 23:34:59 Yuri Pankov wrote:
The patch seems to have typos in it (usr_pkgng):
On 1/30/12 4:39 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
pkgng has just reached the beta phase, and has now found its way to the
ports tree (disabled by default).
1/ Why pkgng?
the name sucks though
it would be good to fix it before it's built in everywhere.
like windows NT, which it
57 matches
Mail list logo
