On Fr, 25.03.2011 at 07:11:42 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the
Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org wrote:
This would be a good time to include ports-mgmt/pkg_search into
the base system...
It would be a better idea to put the pkg_* tools IN the ports tree
where they belong. :)
Wouldn't this lead to a chicken-egg problem for those who use
packages? How
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:34:35 -, Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org
wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
directory tree of symlinks for the secondary categories.
I'm sure that something like this has been mentioned before. But
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
directory tree of symlinks for the secondary categories.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 04:41:33PM +, Anton Shterenlikht thus spake:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 09:23:22AM -0700, Jason Helfman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 10:38:48AM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on
When this change goes in, it may be a good idea to commit a documentation
change, as well, that cleans up and adds the new categories here:
Is the attached patch sufficient?
--
Eitan Adler
www-category-porters-handbook.diff
Description: Binary data
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:38, lists@ wrote:
you can then build category based directories with symlinks to the main
location based on what categories
My ports-mgmt/symports does something like this. It builds a full
directory tree of symlinks for the secondary categories.
I'm sure that
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 01:12:49PM -0500, Eitan Adler thus spake:
When this change goes in, it may be a good idea to commit a documentation
change, as well, that cleans up and adds the new categories here:
Is the attached patch sufficient?
--
Eitan Adler
Looks good. I was going to create
On 03/24/2011 01:22, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote:
Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org wrote:
This would be a good time to include ports-mgmt/pkg_search into
the base system...
It would be a better idea to put the pkg_* tools IN the ports tree
where they belong. :)
Wouldn't this lead to a
On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other side,
so can u guys please come back to the review of the ports for the categorie
move?
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Ulrich Spörlein u...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, 19.03.2011 at 09:49:39 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some
On Sun, 20 Mar 2011 07:26:45 -, Zhihao Yuan lich...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote:
From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ make search name=opera
hth,
Doug
--
Nothin' ever doesn't
2011/3/23 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ make search name=opera
Or
On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd
2011/3/23 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be
Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ make search name=opera
This would be a good
On 03/23/2011 12:04, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd /usr/ports/ make
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX file
cd
2011/3/23 Olivier Smedts oliv...@gid0.org:
2011/3/23 Doug Barton do...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 11:34, Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/23 Doug Bartondo...@freebsd.org:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 07:04:26PM +, Helmut Schneider wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
On 03/23/2011 03:48, Peter Jeffery wrote:
If I was looking for the Opera port, I'd look in www-clients and if
it wasn't in there then the next thing that I would be doing is hand
searching the INDEX
Henk van Oers píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 23:29 +0100:
From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
the other hand http servers ... everything related to apache? IOW,
On 03/19/2011 11:52 PM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
C/S model can not
clarify the developing web technology these years.
+1
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote:
From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
the other hand http servers ... everything related
devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into :
devel
devel-perl
devel-python
wen
2011/3/19 Martin Wilke m...@freebsd.org:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:34:17PM +0800, wen heping wrote:
devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into :
devel
devel-perl
devel-python
My own view is that naming the categories by language (e.g. java)
is not a good idea. I'd rather divide things up by what they do,
rather
Philip M. Gollucci píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 00:51 -0400:
If might be useful to coordinate this with the default switch from 1.3
No. Let's keep things simple, one thing at a time.
--
--
Pav Lucistnik p...@oook.cz
p...@freebsd.org
The use of the lavatory is restricted to the
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 08:52 +0100:
Martin Wilke ha scritto:
www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
benchmarks
www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
www (rest, not
devel category is the largest one, how about divide it into :
devel
devel-perl
devel-python
wen
Is that not partially why we have the virtual categories to provide language
divisions (not to mention port name prefixes)? I think were devel to be
split 'broad' functionality would be the
Am 19.03.2011 02:49, schrieb Martin Wilke:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers
Martin Wilke wrote:
[...]
www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines ..
http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/cat/www-client.txt
Miroslav Lachman ha scritto:
Maybe I misunderstand something, but where is Apache or Lighttpd server?
I can't find them on the www-server list or www.
Good catch, they aren't in any category :-) but should be in www-server.
--
Alex Dupre
___
Pav Lucistnik ha scritto:
I was wondering where you put httpcore and httpclient, two java
libraries. Even if they are not webapp, from this categorization I'd
say they should go there, but I found one in www and one in www-clients.
Both will be moved to -clients, thanks.
So -clients is the
On 3/19/2011 6:09 AM, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Philip M. Gollucci píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 00:51 -0400:
If might be useful to coordinate this with the default switch from 1.3
No. Let's keep things simple, one thing at a time.
Okay w/ me.
--
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:29 +0100:
Pav Lucistnik ha scritto:
I was wondering where you put httpcore and httpclient, two java
libraries. Even if they are not webapp, from this categorization I'd
say they should go there, but I found one in www and one in
www-clients.
2011/3/19 Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com:
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
key to the new categories is as follows:
[...]
On Sat 19 Mar 2011 at 12:18:42 PDT Olivier Smedts wrote:
2011/3/19 Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com:
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The
Alex Dupre píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:24 +0100:
Miroslav Lachman ha scritto:
Maybe I misunderstand something, but where is Apache or Lighttpd server?
I can't find them on the www-server list or www.
Good catch, they aren't in any category :-) but should be in www-server.
Good God, they
Thomas Sandford píše v so 19. 03. 2011 v 14:12 +:
On 19/03/2011 01:49, Martin Wilke wrote:
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
the other hand http servers ... everything related to apache? IOW,
how do I decide if I put a new port into www-webapps or
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Henk van Oers h...@signature.nl wrote:
From: Pav Lucistnik p...@freebsd.org
Matthias Andree pí¹e v so 19. 03. 2011 v 09:52 +0100:
[...]
Where do you see the dividing line between web apps on one hand and on
the other hand http servers ... everything related
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 09:49:39AM +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other
www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
benchmarks
www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring tools, search engines ..
IMHO html editors
On 3/19/2011 8:48 PM, Eitan Adler wrote:
www-clients - browsers, rss clients, wget-alike, webapi/soap clients,
benchmarks
www-servers - http servers, proxy servers, everything related to apache
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
www (rest, not moved) - html editors, authoring
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
key to the new categories is as follows:
[...]
www-webapps - web apps, frameworks, libraries
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Michal Varga varga.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-03-19 at 09:49 +0800, Martin Wilke wrote:
Attached is a proposed list of ports being moved from the www category.
Please review, discuss and report ommissions and mistakes. The general
key to the new
On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers
On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
spinned out. On the other side, x11-servers
On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci
pgollu...@p6m7g8.comwrote:
On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual
On 3/19/2011 12:51 AM, Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
On 3/18/2011 9:49 PM, Martin Wilke wrote:
Hey,
as the Ports Collection continue to grow, we have decided to
do some changes to the category layout. The www category, second
largest with over 2000 individual ports, will have three subcategories
52 matches
Mail list logo
