On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
fetching, and
Doug Barton wrote:
The other is to not use bash as your login shell, but rather to use
sh, then have a .profile that starts bash if it's available:
if [ -x /usr/local/bin/bash ]; then
exec /usr/local/bin/bash --login
fi
Hrrm, my actual .profile entry is more complicated than that,
i was wondering if it would be possible to make --enable-versioning
an optional config parameter? zend platform will not install when
php is compiled with it, and it looks like xdebug has problems as well.
i looked for awhile for a way to bypass this option with a command
line switch, but
--- Chuck Swiger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 26, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Kurt Abahar wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with that from which the latest
packages
in packages-6-stable were built.
Is there a way to accomplish this?
Sure, you probably
Hi everyone,
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with that from which the latest packages
in packages-6-stable were built.
Is there a way to accomplish this?
Thank you
Be a
Henrik Brix Andersen píše v čt 26. 07. 2007 v 19:56 +0200:
It's not just you. I have posted the following patch to the
ports/114876 PR [1], which fixes the issue:
Could you test the fix from ports/114924 ? Looks like a cleaner fix to
me.
--
Pav Lucistnik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Does anyone know when the latest samba will hit the ports tree?
Dude, it just came out today. Try giving people a little bit of a
chance to work on it first.
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
Khaled Hussein wrote:
Last week i upgraded our servers when there was vulnerability on php,
clamav etc, but when i finished my upgrades i faced many problems, one
of it was i cannot login to some of my servers, it was bash issue
after upgrading gettext port, and i see in the
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 07:18:37PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
Is anyone else seeing broken modifier keys (specifically the Win key)
with the new xkeyboard-config in ports, or is it just me?
It's not just you. I have posted the following patch to the
ports/114876 PR [1], which fixes the issue:
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:34:08AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
one **
For many
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:34:08AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming
Hi,
I didn't seem to notice any problems in 227, but did upgrade to
228. Having a cut/paste issue though, but not sure if its X, window
manager, or xterm (Since I did the Xorg upgrade). What part of the whole
system actually does cut/pastes?
Thanks, Tuc
I
I noticed this too but it was followed by an upgrade to 228 which
seems to fix it
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 02:11:18PM -0700, Chris Timmons wrote:
Greetings,
When I upgraded to x11/xterm-227, I noticed that rows and columns as
reported to the terminal device by xterm were set to 0:
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming
Does anyone know when the latest samba will hit the ports tree?
Or is the maintainer busy with the samba, zfs issue on current.
Just curious.
Regards,
Johan
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.19/918 - Release
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve dependencies,
I came up with yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports system. Unlink
other tools, it tries to maximize existing resource to maximize its
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming
Kurt Abahar wrote:
--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're
trying to
accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just
describe what your
goal is.
I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
time to compile them. Therefore, I'm
Kurt Abahar wrote:
I have tried the portupgrade way, but unfortunately
the packages lag behind ports the majority of the
time.
It's actually 100% of the time, and always will be.
This led me to think that keeping the ports tree
a little behind HEAD would be a better solution.
However, I
On Jul 26, 2007, at 4:14 PM, Kurt Abahar wrote:
I'm trying to find a way to keep the ports tree
synchronized with that from which the latest packages
in packages-6-stable were built.
Is there a way to accomplish this?
Sure, you probably want something like portupgrade -P or
portupgrade -PP
Doug Barton ha scritto:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Does anyone know when the latest samba will hit the ports tree?
Dude, it just came out today. Try giving people a little bit of a
chance to work on it first.
Nope. It came out on the 26 of *June*, exactly a month ago.
(Not complaining, just
Yes - all fixed now. Thanks krion!
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007, Adam McDougall wrote:
I noticed this too but it was followed by an upgrade to 228 which
seems to fix it
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
Hello, I use the Ruby language for work and pleasure and recently
decided to test Intel C 8.1 as per the lang/icc port for the ruby
interpreter, which has been shown to be quite sluggish sometimes.
I have run a test on my workstation which showed a significant
improvement which I wanted to
It seems that installation action of uppc-kmod port (do-install target)
uses incorrect tool to put uppc.ko in its destination. It seems that the
tool (${INSTALL_PROGRAM}) corrupts the .ko, so that it is not a valid
kernel module anymore. If I put uppc.ko into /boot/kernel and do kldxref
then
Hello Janos,
I installed Multicast Beacon on FreeBSD 6.2, but after startup I've got
something like this:
beacon
Getting configuration information from file /usr/local/etc/beacon.conf.
/libexec/ld-elf.so.1:
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/mach/auto/Net/Multicast/Beacon/Beacon.so:
Dear Sirs;
Hello.
When I tried to install gnome-commaner from
/usr/ports/x11-fm/gnome-commander,
instllation failed.
But after installing /usr/ports/graphics/gdk-pixbuf manually,
that was succeeded.
Thank you.
川田昌弥 / Mr. Masaya Kawada
[EMAIL
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007 23:38:25 -0700
Predrag Punosevac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Victor,
Hi Predrag,
( My name is @ end of this email...the quote was from Victor Hugo :) )
I apologize if I offended anybody. I had best of intentions when I send
the first mail.
all good :)
I wish, I had
On Wed, 25 Jul 2007, David Southwell wrote:
On Wednesday 25 July 2007 08:34:47 David Southwell wrote:
Following the recent upgrade I am getting errors with samba
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr]# smbclient //localhost/test -U sambap
Password:
Domain=[DNS1] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 3.0.25a]
tree connect
Last week i upgraded our servers when there was vulnerability on php,
clamav etc, but when i finished my upgrades i faced many problems, one
of it was i cannot login to some of my servers, it was bash issue
after upgrading gettext port, and i see in the UPDATING file that i
have to
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Tue, 24 Jul 2007 22:05:52 -0700
Predrag Punosevac [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I hope that they are aware but it seems that nobody is acting on
these issues(or at least not fast enough).
Predrag,
as good as your intentions seem to be, the results would
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Does anyone know when the latest samba will hit the ports tree?
Dude, it just came out today. Try giving people a little bit of a
chance to work on it first.
Doug
Dude, it came out 26 of JUNE not July ;-)
Umm, ok, that's a good point.
In
In response to Kris Kennaway [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:20:53AM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Kent Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
Even better would be for make
On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 12:07:48PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:34:08AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
one **
For many
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 02:17:50 -0700
Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yoshihiro Ota wrote:
To Whom Slowness of Portupgrade Concerns a Lot:
As I got tired of long waiting of portupgrade trying to resolve
dependencies, I came up with
yet another tool for upgrading FreeBSD ports
Johan Hendriks wrote:
Does anyone know when the latest samba will hit the ports tree?
Dude, it just came out today. Try giving people a little bit of a
chance to work on it first.
Doug
Dude, it came out 26 of JUNE not July ;-)
I just asked because most of the time it only takes a week or 3 and
Hi,
At Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:56:01 +0900,
Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote:
Perhaps, the following patch fixes your problem. This patch changes
to obey default EMACS_PORT_NAME defined in bsd.emacs.mk, as well.
Index: databases/lsdb/Makefile
diff -u databases/lsdb/Makefile.orig databases/lsdb/Makefile
--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No such facility
exists, and I don't imagine anyone creating one any
time soon because
it would be VERY hard to accomplish for a large
number of reasons.
If you don't mind, could you please elaborate on this?
Side note: I'm asking because I would
--- Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maybe you can describe in more detail what you're
trying to
accomplish. Leave out potential solutions, just
describe what your
goal is.
I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
time to compile them. Therefore, I'm trying to use
packages
Le Ven 27 jul 07 à 3:44:32 +0200, Doug Barton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
écrivait :
Kurt Abahar wrote:
I have a lot of ports installed and it takes a lot of
time to compile them. Therefore, I'm trying to use
packages as much as possible. After updating the ports
tree using portsnap, portupgrade
41 matches
Mail list logo
