Re: devel/check

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:06 PM, Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for >> each pkg command. >> > > Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed. > > Since

Re: devel/check

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for > each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a > POLA violation to not make it clear. It does so on my system in

Re: devel/check

On 12/02/2017 16:43, Kevin Oberman wrote: First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for each pkg command. Yes. Were this the case, this thread wouldn't have existed. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a POLA violation to not make it clear.

Re: devel/check

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". >> >> > My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. > > -andyf First, the pkg(8)

Re: Question on upgrading ports after 9.3->10.3

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 02:05:26PM +1100, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Me again :-) I finally got around to following the notes that David > Wolfskill kindly provided (thanks!) and apart from some oddity about > "httpd" requiring a missing "libdb-4.2.so.2" (which will get rebuilt > anyway), I'm a

Question on upgrading ports after 9.3->10.3

Me again :-) I finally got around to following the notes that David Wolfskill kindly provided (thanks!) and apart from some oddity about "httpd" requiring a missing "libdb-4.2.so.2" (which will get rebuilt anyway), I'm a bit wary of this: 7. Back up any files in /usr/local that you wish to

Firefox build fails

Hi: FreeBSD BSD_12 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #13 r313546: Fri Feb 10 10:04:11 EST 2017 root@BSD_12:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYKERNEL amd64 Trying to install Firefox fails with the following: ../../js/src/jsarray.o: In function `js::NewFullyAllocatedArrayTryReuseGroup(JSContext*,

Re: devel/check

On 12/02/2017 09:24, RW via freebsd-ports wrote: It doesn't, pkg-delete is just the documentation for "pkg delete". My proposal is that the man page for pkg(8) should state this. -andyf ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: devel/check

On Sun, 12 Feb 2017 09:08:29 +1000 Andy Farkas wrote: > On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > >> The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > >> > > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. > > > > To be fair, the pkg(8) man

Re: devel/check

On 12/02/2017 08:59, Matthew Seaman wrote: On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. To be fair, the pkg(8) man page does not mention that pkg(8) calls sub-programmes like pkg-delete(8). The

Re: devel/check

On 11/02/2017 22:57, Andy Farkas wrote: > The -f flag is not mentioned in the man page for pkg(8). > Try reading the pkg-delete(8) man page. Cheers, Matthew signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: devel/check

On 12/02/2017 08:37, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: Andy Farkas skrev: I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to devel/check. (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) But devel/check won't install because: pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs

Re: svn commit: r432323 - branches/2017Q1/print/texlive-texmf

Am 28.01.2017 um 14:28 schrieb Jan Beich: > Jan Beich writes: > >> Author: jbeich >> Date: Tue Jan 24 11:48:07 2017 >> New Revision: 432323 >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/432323 >> >> Log: >> MFH: r432322 >> >> print/texlive-texmf: unbreak on aarch64

Re: devel/check

Andy Farkas skrev: > > I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to > devel/check. > (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) > > But devel/check won't install because: > > pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs files > into the same place).

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On 11/02/2017 15:15, scratch65...@att.net wrote: On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:02:42 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! And is the "keeping up with" working, Mark? Are we regaining share from Linux? No. We're continuing to lose. How do you measure that ? Mostly I compare

Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports?

Am 25.01.2017 um 11:39 schrieb Mathieu Arnold: > Buildworld on a raspberry isn't fun - if it works at all. >> Even if you crossbuild and just copy the binaries, the wear of >> MicroSD cards isn't something you want to test unless you really >> have to. > If you have other computers running

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On 11/02/2017 12:31, scratch65...@att.net wrote: On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:46:15 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: Hi! Moin! On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:26:00 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote Getting the ports/pkg tree moving with the velocity necessary to cope with the fast-changing world,

devel/check

I did a 'portmaster -a' and it seems devel/libcheck has changed to devel/check. (nothing in /usr/ports/UPDATING about this) But devel/check won't install because: pkg-static: check-0.11.0 conflicts with libcheck-0.10.0 (installs files into the same place). Problematic file:

FreeBSD Port: geomWatch-1.3.0_2

Hello, I just found the geomWatch port which you maintain. I have a question about it, but haven't been able to find the answer yet, so I hope you don't mind me asking you: I intentionally do not have a full blown MTA on my box, so I don't have anything listening at localhost:25. Instead,

Re: Averia font port

Am 11.02.2017 um 20:11 schrieb alfix86: > Hi all! > This is my first email. > > I wish to create a port for Averia GWF font family [1], > it comes with 3 .zip > > - AveriaGWF.zip (has 7 .ttf) > - AveriaSansGWF.zip (has 6 .ttf) > - AveriaSerifGWF.zip (has 6.ttf) > > Should I create 3 ports or

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 09:51:41AM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Tell me What is the reason for me upgrading those few production > servers from 9.3 to 10/11?... bearing in mind the following: There isn't any ... oh, except for no new security updates. The flip side is the more

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 10:15:41AM -0500, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > On Sat, 11 Feb 2017 15:02:42 +0100, Kurt Jaeger > wrote: > > >Hi! > > > >> And is the "keeping up with" working, Mark? Are we regaining > >> share from Linux? No. We're continuing to lose. > > > >How do

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

Hi! > >> But it's the velocity that's the problem, Kurt. > >While I very much sympathize with "The world rotates too fast, > >I want to get off", for me it looks like as a project we do > >not have alternatives. > > Why not? What would happen to fBSD that's not already happening? Maybe if

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

Hi! > And is the "keeping up with" working, Mark? Are we regaining > share from Linux? No. We're continuing to lose. How do you measure that ? -- p...@opsec.eu+49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! ___

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:46:15 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >Hi! Moin! > >> On Thu, 9 Feb 2017 17:26:00 +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote >> >Getting the ports/pkg tree moving with the velocity necessary >> >to cope with the fast-changing world, sometimes things break >> >and we all try to

Re: Install of pkg fuse-ntfs fails because of undefined symbol in pkg!?!

Mark Linimon wrote: On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 11:02:41PM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote: Or the last strong hold you have - the server owners - get so p**sed off in reality they can't keep up with the OS updates that they migrate away... So we should give up on EFI, 4k drives, and SSD? Not

FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date

Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated,