On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:12:06 +0530, USM Bish wrote:
snip
...(lots snipped) ...
checking for CRYPTO_free in -lcrypto... yes checking for snmp_timeout in
-lnetsnmp... no checking for snmp_timeout in -lsnmp... no configure:
error: cannot find net/ucd-snmp support (or --disable-network-build)
Package for openjdk6 located at:
ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/All/openjdk6-b17_2.tbz
is truncated:
pkg_info openjdk6-b17_2.tbz
tar: Truncated input file (needed 3475456 bytes, only -30 available)
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
pkg_info: tar
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
fetch -o INDEX-xx.bz2
http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/INDEX.bz2
fetch -o INDEX-fr.bz2
http://ftp.fr.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-8-stable/INDEX.bz2
ls -l
total
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors:
...
yet it does not have those packages.
How could something like this happen ?
By being examined
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 13:15:42 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
Yeah that was it, but it is really, really bad. Mirroring must be atomic
(mirror to temporary directory then rename). Otherwise there is a large
window of time every couple of days when upgrading packages will at best
fail or leave
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 15:43:43 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Mirroring must be atomic (mirror to temporary directory then rename).
That could double disc requirement, reduce mirror sites willing to
provide space ?
Indeed it would. But there is no other way to solve it.
Alternatively it
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:39:17 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 15:15, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:03:21 -0700, perryh wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
At this very moment, french package mirror has INDEX newer than in
other mirrors
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 17:11:25 +0200, Julian H. Stacey wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
Alternatively it could be prevented with no disk cost by putting
MIRROR-IN-PROGRESS file and making all package utilities check for
its existence and fail with explanation to try again later.
Perhaps
On Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:02:40 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 17:58, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
I think you could also detect inconsistent mirror by comparing
modification time of package against mtime of INDEX. If pkg is newer
than INDEX then it's a sign of incomplete sync.
True
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:18:01 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 23:24, Andrew W. Nosenko wrote:
Excuse me? The ports check downloaded source tarball against SHA
checksum. Just for nay case like downloading error or malicious
inject. Did you try to say that binary package have no
On Thu, 29 Jul 2010 00:23:58 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
On 28/07/2010 23:36, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
What do you mean by master ? If you think about ftp-master then it's
password protected. AFAIK there is no publicly available ftp site that
is an authoritative source, ftp.freebsd.org
Some metaports (like print/cups) use NO_INSTALL.
This will prevent such port from registering its installation in /var/db/
pkg, which is different behaviour from installing it from prebuilt
package (where it registers just fine).
IMHO not registering installation makes no sense and serves only
On Sun, 10 May 2009 13:08:56 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
I'm not sure if this is the 'right answer', but NO_INSTALL allows the
proper installation of numerous ports from one location (the meta-port).
An example of this is the misc/instant-server port (though
unmaintained, IIRC).
If you
On Sun, 10 May 2009 15:22:04 -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
They will be installed since they are run dependencies.
From what I can tell (from several metaports) -- they, themselves, are
not installed. The ports
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:52:31 +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
The portmgr team has enhanced the pointyhead scripts to publish MOVED
and UPDATING files together with the INDEX files that kports and
pkg_upgrade use for binary package updating.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=135024
On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 17:31:57 +0200, Eitan Adler wrote:
I was hoping to get a bit more of a response to a recent posting of mine
with regard to using svn to fetch files for ports My proposal:
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-ports@freebsd.org/msg23776.html A
summary of what has been going
On Thu, 01 Nov 2007 22:02:38 -0500, Josh Paetzel wrote:
On Thursday 01 November 2007 04:04:35 pm lemon wrote:
[0] http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-
January/019352.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2006-
March/030691.html
If it's any consolation,
You will need this patch:
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/patch/series/view/mail-notification/5.4.dfsg.1-8/disable-werror.patch
from which you have to strip first directory in file name.
Unfortunately I don't have the time to test it right now or in the near future.
On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 3:29
BTW there are no build errors on build cluster. Is there anything
non-standard about your build environment ?
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough to `killall -HUP gconfd-2`
at package post-install when
/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/gnome2-utils.eclass?diff_format=srevision=1.31view=markup
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 4, 2013 at 8:42 PM, Marcin Wisnicki
mwisnicki+free...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess bsd.gnome.mk should be smart enough
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:48:56 +0200, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
Quoting myself,
I'll hold my upgrade-request for cups 1.3.0-1.3.2 until this is fixed
:)
If anyone's bold enough to test, here's the port:
http://www.burggraben.net/hacks/ports/cups_cups-base.tar.gz (containing
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a
FreeBSD vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE
FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE #4: Wed Jun 25 09:16:13 EDT 2008
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/
sys/VANQUISH
i386 #
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0100, RW wrote:
I think Bill probably understands that. The issue, as I see it, is that
the warning will just be a warning if you build manually, but if you
build through portupgrade it causes it to fail.
If the intent was to stop the build then IGNORE should
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:45:10 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
In response to Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 08:51:23 -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
cvsupped my ports tree just this morning. #uname -a FreeBSD
vanquish.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com 7.0-RELEASE FreeBSD
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:33 -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:11 -0500, Marcin Wisnicki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If .warning breaks portupgrade I can change it to IGNORE.
I prefer remove .warning and IGNORE. If user wants to enable keyring
then the WITH_KEYRING
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:25:27 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Hi,
I apologize in advance if what I'm trying to do seems stupid or it has
already existed since the Dawn of Time (i.e. when McKusick was in
diapers) but I'd like your comments on this idea:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:33:43 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:25:27 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
It will install gnome2 along with it's dependencies but in some way
mark gnome2 package as installed by user, say, by creating /var/db/pkg/
gnome2-2.22
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 16:51:02 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 17:33:43 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 06:25:27 +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
It will install gnome2 along with it's dependencies but in some way
mark gnome2 package
On Sat, 27 Sep 2008 21:11:27 -0700, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Sat, Sep 27, 2008 at 7:02 AM, Michel Talon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Marin Atanasov wrote:
So what do you think - is it worth improving upon it or it's a waste
of time?
Thanks for any suggestions.
INDEX is made available via to
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 04:08, Garrett Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Marcin Wisnicki [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would be nice if there was also INDEX.bz2.
You'd need to talk to the release team about that if you don't agree
Indeed
with that fact; INDEX.bz2
Is there a simple way to test port without building its dependencies,
instead fetching them from package repository.
I've tried `poudriere testport` but it wants to build everything.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Sat, 28 Jun 2014 19:18:25 +, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
Is there a simple way to test port without building its dependencies,
instead fetching them from package repository.
I've tried `poudriere testport` but it wants to build everything.
Please ignore first without in subject
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 13:25:13 +0100, Anders F Björklund wrote:
Chris Rees wrote:
For PackageKit's app-install, I wanted to list all ports/packages
that had a .desktop file (= an app).
I may be misunderstanding you here, but you could just:
[ch...@amnesiac]~% echo
On Fri, 25 Mar 2011 11:11:11 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
pkgng is a binary package manager written from scratch for FreeBSD.
Fantastic!
I know it is quite too early but I already have one feature request ;)
Perhaps it could be added to the TODO as a post-1.0 goal.
= Generic extraction
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 10:22:50 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
This can still be discussed but I don't really like the idea that users
may alter packages an installation/extraction time, that would lead to
lots of potential buggy installation and report.
That's why list of alterations have to
I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is no
up-to-date repository I want to remove it.
What would be the correct procedure to achieve that ?
Invoking `pkg delete -a` still leaves some files including /usr/sbin/pkg.
___
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Jason Hellenthal jhellent...@dataix.net wrote:
On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 07:03:23PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
On 09/06/2012 18:46, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is no
up-to-date repository I want
On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 19:56:56 +0200, Julien Laffaye wrote:
On 6/9/2012 7:46 PM, Marcin Wisnicki wrote:
I've made a mistake of installing pkgng on 9.0-amd64 but since there is
no up-to-date repository I want to remove it.
Have you looked at http://pkgbeta.freebsd.org/freebsd-9-amd64/latest
38 matches
Mail list logo
