On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote:
>
> fstat(1) does much of what lsof does.
>>
>
> I'll be damned; so it does... Thanks!
>
As well as procstat -f
--
Adam
___
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Dmytro Bilokha wrote:
> Guys, thanks for your help. I've managed to adjust user's homedir
> using pkg-install script. Now I'll try to move everything writable
> from /usr/local to /var (as Miroslav suggested), test and submit the new
> port
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Roger Marquis wrote:
> As one of the "irresponsible" people who is still using procmail on our
>> systems and has built an number of scripts and customer infrastructure
>> around it I take exception to the term irresponsible. Perhaps the
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com>
wrote:
> --On September 27, 2017 at 10:41:48 AM -0500 Adam Vande More <
> amvandem...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com&g
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Esser wrote:
> I have just committed the upgrade of portmaster to a version with flavor
> support.
>
> You need to upgrade portmaster on its own (e.g. by "portmaster portmaster")
> and it should then be possible to use "portmaster -a"
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
> I'm having problems with my package database. It complains about a
> conflict with a file that doesn't exist.
>
> Is there a way to create a new local.sqlite file using the pkg command?
>
'pkg which /path/to/file'
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Paul Schmehl
wrote:
> I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen
> yesterday to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make
> sure everything was updated.
>
> When I did, I got this error:
>
>
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Patrick Powell wrote:
> This was not quite what I was expecting. Is there a site where you can
> do a search for the status of a build
> for a package? This site shows statistics about the numbers of packages,
> etc., but not what was
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM, wrote:
> Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all
> other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there
> in making logs an exception?
>
Because logs shouldn't be under /usr.
man hier
--
Adam
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for
> each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a
> POLA violation to not make it clear.
It does so on my system in
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk
wrote:
By virtue of the fact that kldstat(8) returns nvidia. You
can be assured that linux has already been loaded, or
rather, that linux is already available. Which suggests to
me that it is already part of your kernel.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk
wrote:
Anything else I can try to narrow down
the issue?
Disable other extensions eg ad blockers, restart browser.
--
Adam
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote:
On Fri, 26 Dec 2014, Matthias Andree wrote:
Am 26.12.2014 um 20:22 schrieb Jos Chrispijn:
With portmanager I got this line:
=== The misc/gnomehier port has been deleted: Not needed anymore
But I still have it
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Michał Jędrzejczak
jedrzejczak.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
It is possible porting to FreeBSD this fork of php ?
https://github.com/facebook/hhvm/wiki/Getting-Started
In my opinion FreeBSD without this software may a lot of losing.
There was a port of this
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:12 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote:
portmaster removes any files not associated with currently installed
packages, the other two do can do that, but also have the option to
leave any files that are still up-to-date with respect to the ports
tree.
This is a
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de wrote:
I have just seen that /usr/ports/distfiles has grown up to 12 GiB. My
hopefully not too stupid question is: Can I safely delete all files
under /usr/ports/distfiles, e.g.
# rm -rf /usr/ports/distfiles/*
I strongly
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de
wrote:
Am 03.11.2014 um 21:24 schrieb Tijl Coosemans:
Other tools won't change anything. It's the file system that would
have to change which is not going to happen. When the ports tree was
created disks were much
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Does anyone know how to build sysutils/dd_rescue on FreeBSD 8.4-stable?
Specifically this one:
tingo@kg-core1$ uname -a
FreeBSD kg-core1.kg4.no 8.4-STABLE FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #1 r266590: Fri
May 23 20:23:35
On May 28, 2014 5:51 PM, Aric Gregson aorc...@mac.com wrote:
Hello,
I just updated my ports for 10.0-RELEASE and redid the linux base to
include the newer https://github.com/xmj/linux-ports. I seem to have
installed net/citrix_ica just fine, but it will not run. I have had this
port running
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:44 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
Am I missing a search feature in postmaster?
If not, how are people finding where a port is to install it (I had a heck
of a time finding sudo, for example)
whereis sudo
locate sudo [| grep xyz]
--
Adam Vande More
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:45 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:
On 15 Aug 2013, at 06:33 , Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote:
whereis sudo
Sure, if sudo is installed. Sudo was not installed, so I had to search the
ports tree for it. Same with openssl
No you are wrong
that important. Thanks
again for your patience.
Have you tried 'pkg delete' or 'pkg_delete' or if you still have the port
directory for kdehier3
make deinstall?
or --check-depends or whatever the portmaster man page cites.
--
Adam Vande More
portupgrade does(at least it did when I last used it, it's been
awhile). It's not nearly as painful to answer them in bulk even if
queue generation takes awhile.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
option. To put it another, I think the default make behavior should
be more akin 'make config-recursive' rather than take each OPTION as
it comes.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote:
On 8.2 :
[root ~]# tar jtvf libpng-1.5.15.tar.xz
tar: Unrecognized archive format
tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors.
[root ~]#
8.2 is unsupported.
--
Adam Vande More
, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
, or some other general change such as
http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=297915
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail
long.
In a codebase as large as KDE's, it seems a very slim chance indeed years
could go by without maintenance and still maintain security.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
This port is quite out of date. I believe changing the version to 3.0.2
allows the port to become current.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any
results in the
difference going too high and out of NTP's allowable range.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr
. Then I found this:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068940.html
It's been working for me, but it's a bit out of date now.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
/handbrake.tar.gz
Only tested on -CURRENT amd64 and RELENG_8 i386.
This port is much better than the existing one even though it doesn't fetch
properly anymore.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
be a direction to go in.
What about a utility to list all installed packages built with non-default
options?
This might be helpful in identifying edge cases.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
conclude it is less bloated.
ftp://mirrors.isc.org/pub/pcbsd/9.0-BETA1.5/i386/PCBSD9.0-BETA1.5-x86-CD.iso
Your other concerns are just as easily answered if you look.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
of legal and technical infrastructure that could handle such a
system. If the barrier to entry isn't too high, I suspect something like
this would be a great boon to base, ports, and freelance devs.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing
a more Windows friendly. I ended up deleting the old
configuration and it seems to be working correctly with the new one.
Thanks for the work,
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo
Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
have
it. But that's still the first thing I'd look for if I were you.
Easy way to check if module is in kernel is kldstat -v
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
was fine
3.2.8_1 broke things
3.2.10 (unsurprisingly) hasn't changed
I can confirm this issue, I reported it on the emulation mailing list a few
days ago. Thanks for finding the exact breakage point.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
:
FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE
Not sure what AFFECTS should say. There might be other useful information
that could be included in the note. Comments?
I like the idea, it would make looking that info up easier for anyone
running anything other than the default GENERIC kernel.
--
Adam Vande More
in base) and you'd want to ensure any potential development
paths are not hindered by LICENSE.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports
, and man page
stuff is being worked on, CLANG over GCC, etc.
Anyway, my point was not to advocate fossil for this task, but to point out
BSD license is a concern. Perhaps if you are able to find consensus,
requesting a license change might be an option.
--
Adam Vande More
. After that you should be able to compile vbox.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
there is a conflict.
Do you know what installed that group? apache should not be there. apache
uses group www, GID 80
/usr/ports/GIDs
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
waiting to ask you until it runs into it.
Setting BATCH=yes in make.conf does work, maybe BATCH?=yes breaks it, my
make.conf fu is only sightly better than it documentation which isn't much.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org wrote:
PORTVERSION= 3.0.p1
DISTNAME=${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:S/.p/pre/}
DISTVERSION=3.0pre1
is shorter and cleaner
That's longer
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org wrote:
PORTVERSION= 3.0.p1
DISTNAME=${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:S/.p/pre/}
DISTVERSION=3.0pre1
is shorter and cleaner
That's longer, and cleaner is debatable.
--
Adam Vande More
weekly which would resolve most of the problems I run into and
address some the non-power users desires as well. Anyways, I'm sure this
will be an entertaining thread.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
will have to do things
differently. That's okay too, but if others are doing anything similar
there could be more ripples down the road.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
but setting it manually has been easy enough. Are
there any negative repercussions to turning on huge ie like would scripts
start using more memory, or is just giving them the ability to use it
without explicitly setting it?
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports
on CURRENT if you got rid of whatever controlling the compile
setting. Nevertheless, it seems the port should be fixed to use sys/time.h
and gettimeofday(2) instead. Just the way it looks to me, I'm no expert
here.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com
wrote:
CC'ing port maintainer
Here is the commit for timeb.h
, but it's unclear from the cups
log as how exactly cups is communicating with the printer.
It states the connection is made to
hp:/usb/Deskjet_D1600_series?serial=CN012C90C405CT
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http
recommend portmaster. Somehow
python didn't get installed correctly because
/usr/local/include/python2.6/Python.h should exist if python is correctly
installed.
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jimmie James jimmie...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/24/10 23:28, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jimmie James jimmie...@gmail.com
mailto:jimmie...@gmail.com wrote:
On a freshly installed 8-STABLE box (4 days old) and up to date
a
portmaster x11/libX11
?
--
Adam Vande More
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
56 matches
Mail list logo