Re: Of LSOF
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 6:59 PM, Dave Horsfallwrote: > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > fstat(1) does much of what lsof does. >> > > I'll be damned; so it does... Thanks! > As well as procstat -f -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Setting system user home directory
On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Dmytro Bilokhawrote: > Guys, thanks for your help. I've managed to adjust user's homedir > using pkg-install script. Now I'll try to move everything writable > from /usr/local to /var (as Miroslav suggested), test and submit the new > port version. I think you should do what makes sense for your application. The /var/db stuff is not a hard fast rule and it doesn't work well for many situations. Also it's mostly system related DB's that live there. It's not only some java related ports that live mostly under /usr but also things like postgres(at least used to). IMO, as long as you're not flagrantly violating hier(7), do what is best for your port. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Procmail got updated!
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:47 AM, Roger Marquiswrote: > As one of the "irresponsible" people who is still using procmail on our >> systems and has built an number of scripts and customer infrastructure >> around it I take exception to the term irresponsible. Perhaps the better >> word is overworked. If I had the time to move to dovecot/sieve or maildrop >> as a local delivery agent I would have done so by now. >> > > Can certainly sympathize depending on the threat model, but how is that > any different from Equifax' not having time to patch Struts or not > having time to change the oil in your car or to brush your teeth ... > That's a non-sequitur if I understand the response correctly. Procmail IS patched and I assume applied. So yes mom, teeth are brushed. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/mail/procmail/files/patch-src-formisc.c?view=log -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster error
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com> wrote: > --On September 27, 2017 at 10:41:48 AM -0500 Adam Vande More < > amvandem...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Paul Schmehl <pschmehl_li...@tx.rr.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen >> yesterday to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make >> sure everything was updated. >> >> When I did, I got this error: >> >> portmaster -ad >> ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports >> >> ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates >> make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 1462: Cannot open >> /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk >> make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue >> ===>>> All ports are up to date >> >> Sure enough, execinfo.mk is missing. >> >> I ran portsnap fetch and update to see if that would fix it. It did not. >> >> I didn't find anything about this on the web or in /usr/ports/UDPATING. >> Is this something new? Is there something I can do to fix it other than >> wait? >> >> >> >> >> >> A portsnap extract might workaround it. >> > > I did that, but it did not resolve the problem. execinfo.mk is still > missing. Delete your entire ports tree and try again. execinfo.mk is supposed to be missing, you have something else that is not right. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: portmaster now supports FLAVORs
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 2:44 PM, Stefan Esserwrote: > I have just committed the upgrade of portmaster to a version with flavor > support. > > You need to upgrade portmaster on its own (e.g. by "portmaster portmaster") > and it should then be possible to use "portmaster -a" with flavored and > non-flavored ports (and automatically re-install ports, that have been > converted to generic versions with flavors). > > Please let me know, if you notice any deviations from previous behavior. > Simple test works for me, great job! -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Package database problems
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 12:22 PM, Paul Schmehlwrote: > I'm having problems with my package database. It complains about a > conflict with a file that doesn't exist. > > Is there a way to create a new local.sqlite file using the pkg command? > 'pkg which /path/to/file' IIRC should reveal the registered package? Perhaps best to address it that way. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: Portmaster error
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Paul Schmehlwrote: > I'm running a 10.3-RELEASE instance. I ran portmaster -ad in screen > yesterday to get all the ports up to date. Today I ran it again, to make > sure everything was updated. > > When I did, I got this error: > > portmaster -ad > ===>>> Gathering distinfo list for installed ports > > ===>>> Starting check of installed ports for available updates > make: "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk" line 1462: Cannot open > /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/execinfo.mk > make: Fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > ===>>> All ports are up to date > > Sure enough, execinfo.mk is missing. > > I ran portsnap fetch and update to see if that would fix it. It did not. > > I didn't find anything about this on the web or in /usr/ports/UDPATING. Is > this something new? Is there something I can do to fix it other than wait? > > > A portsnap extract might workaround it. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: x11/kde4 pkg not present in repository
On Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 10:12 PM, Patrick Powellwrote: > This was not quite what I was expecting. Is there a site where you can > do a search for the status of a build > for a package? This site shows statistics about the numbers of packages, > etc., but not what was built, > when, etc. > > Perhaps I am asking the wrong question... > You can do that on the previously given URL by drilling down as needed or here: http://beefy9.nyi.freebsd.org/build.html?mastername=110amd64-default=449469 There is no such package as x11/kde. Perhaps you are seeking x11/kde4. You should also specify your arch when asking this type of question. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: standard locations for port files
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:41 PM,wrote: > Why wouldn't logs be in /usr/local/var/...? Given that all > other port "stuff" is under /usr/local, what advantage is there > in making logs an exception? > Because logs shouldn't be under /usr. man hier -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: devel/check
On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 12:43 AM, Kevin Obermanwrote: > First, the pkg(8) page should explicitly state that there are man pages for > each pkg command. Since this is NOT a typical FreeBSD practice, it is a > POLA violation to not make it clear. It does so on my system in the same manner other modular software does eg openssl. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Re: 118sysctl: unknown oid 'sysctl compat.linux.osrelease' at line 11: No such file or directory
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: By virtue of the fact that kldstat(8) returns nvidia. You can be assured that linux has already been loaded, or rather, that linux is already available. Which suggests to me that it is already part of your kernel. dmesg(8) (/var.run/dmesg.boot) might well reveal that, for you. Perhaps even in /var/log/messages. $ grep -i linux /var/run/dmesg.boot $ What does this tell me? That the string linux doesn't appear in /var/run/dmesg.boot I don't understand the fixation on this module. It's clearly loaded. Your problem lies elsewhere. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: flash does not work: firefox-35.0.1_1,1, nspluginwrapper-1.4.4_4
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.uk wrote: Anything else I can try to narrow down the issue? Disable other extensions eg ad blockers, restart browser. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: gnomehier
On Fri, Dec 26, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: On Fri, 26 Dec 2014, Matthias Andree wrote: Am 26.12.2014 um 20:22 schrieb Jos Chrispijn: With portmanager I got this line: === The misc/gnomehier port has been deleted: Not needed anymore But I still have it active. How can I remove it when the port itself is nog existing anymore as gnomehier deinstall won't work anymore as its portfolder is gone... pkg delete -f gnomehier should do the trick. Well, yes, but won't that leave the package database with missing dependencies on it? 'pkg info -r gnomehier' will show the list of ports that require it. Rebuild those ports and gnomehier can be deleted without problems. (Untested): portmaster `pkg info -qr gnomehier` pkg delete gnomehier yes it would, but a 'pkg update' after it would re-install those pkg's to avoid compiling and other possible interdependence issues. Or do the pkg update first then delete which shouldn't need the force flag at that point. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HHVM
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:05 AM, Michał Jędrzejczak jedrzejczak.mic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi It is possible porting to FreeBSD this fork of php ? https://github.com/facebook/hhvm/wiki/Getting-Started In my opinion FreeBSD without this software may a lot of losing. There was a port of this which was removed due to lack of maintainer duties. Are you volunteering to fulfill this? https://github.com/facebook/hhvm/wiki/Building%20and%20installing%20HHVM%20on%20FreeBSD%20from%20ports http://www.freshports.org/lang/hiphop-php/ -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Deleting ports distfiles
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 7:12 AM, RW rwmailli...@googlemail.com wrote: portmaster removes any files not associated with currently installed packages, the other two do can do that, but also have the option to leave any files that are still up-to-date with respect to the ports tree. This is a misleading statement. portmaster also has that option. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Deleting ports distfiles
On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt pvo...@uos.de wrote: I have just seen that /usr/ports/distfiles has grown up to 12 GiB. My hopefully not too stupid question is: Can I safely delete all files under /usr/ports/distfiles, e.g. # rm -rf /usr/ports/distfiles/* I strongly suppose so but I am not sure. Thanks for any feedback. It is not necessarily a safe operation to preform depending on the details. The downloads in that location may be the last known copy of that particular port/version at least as a copy available to you. Deleting those files could prevent you from rebuilding a certain port/version if needed. Nearly all the time this isn't a problem or easily worked around, but not universally so IME. After doing a ports upgrade, and ensuring fully correct operation of the system it's generally safe to run something like portmaster -t--clean-distfiles to remove stale distfiles. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Reducing the size of the ports tree (brainstorm v2)
On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Matthias Andree matthias.and...@gmx.de wrote: Am 03.11.2014 um 21:24 schrieb Tijl Coosemans: Other tools won't change anything. It's the file system that would have to change which is not going to happen. When the ports tree was created disks were much smaller and file systems were better (still not good) at storing small files. Today disks are much bigger and file systems have adapted to that. Now it's time for the ports tree to adapt. So you're saying the only answer we've had to growing storage capacities was growing block sizes, without adding support for many small files back in. What is this 'support for many small files' you are referring to? That's still the fault of the tool (here: tool == file system) and not of the ports tree. It's a problem with disk's themselves, not an svn or fs problem. Tail packing is already a part of UFS, and disks for the purposes here basically only read one block at a time. If you have a method of overcoming the inherent seek slowness of reading many small files scattered across the spinning media then please share it so progress can be made. This is definitely a problem with the ports system considering the underlying hw and fs has changed characteristics and ports hasn't accounted for them. -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: building sysutils/dd_rescue on FreeBSD 8.x?
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Torfinn Ingolfsen tin...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, Does anyone know how to build sysutils/dd_rescue on FreeBSD 8.4-stable? Specifically this one: tingo@kg-core1$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-core1.kg4.no 8.4-STABLE FreeBSD 8.4-STABLE #1 r266590: Fri May 23 20:23:35 CEST 2014 r...@kg-core1.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Latest ports tree (updated today). I added MAKE_ARGS+= CFLAGS_OPT=-D__WORDSIZE=64 CFLAGS+=-D__WORDSIZE=64 to the ports Makefile but the port still bombs out: === Building for dd_rescue-1.45 cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -c frandom.c cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -c fmt_no.c cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -c find_nonzero.c cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -msse2 -c find_nonzero_sse2.c cc -O2 -pipe -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu89 -DNO_SSE42 -DNO_AVX2 -fPIC -o libddr_MD5.po -c libddr_MD5.c cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fPIC -o md5.po -c md5.c libddr_MD5.c:417:1: warning: feof_unlocked redefined In file included from ddr_plugin.h:14, from libddr_MD5.c:17: /usr/include/stdio.h:502:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fPIC -o sha256.po -c sha256.c cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fPIC -o sha512.po -c sha512.c cc -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fPIC -o sha1.po -c sha1.c cc -O2 -pipe -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu89 -DNO_SSE42 -DNO_AVX2 -fPIC -o libddr_null.po -c libddr_null.c cc -O2 -pipe -D__WORDSIZE=64 -fno-strict-aliasing -std=gnu89 -DNO_SSE42 -DNO_AVX2 -DVERSION=\1.45\ -D__COMPILER__=\cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]\ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H dd_rescue.c -o dd_rescue frandom.o fmt_no.o find_nonzero.o find_nonzero_sse2.o dd_rescue.c:165:3: warning: #warning No support for copying extended attributes / ACLs dd_rescue.c:175:3: warning: #warning We lack stat64, may not handle 2GB files correctly dd_rescue.c:180:3: warning: #warning We lack lseek64, may not handle 2GB files correctly cc -shared -o libddr_null.so libddr_null.po cc -shared -o libddr_hash.so libddr_MD5.po md5.po sha256.po sha512.po sha1.po ln -sf libddr_hash.so libddr_MD5.so find_nonzero.o(.text+0x210): In function `detect_cpu_cap': : undefined reference to `probe_avx2' find_nonzero.o(.text+0x271): In function `detect_cpu_cap': : undefined reference to `probe_sse42' find_nonzero_sse2.o(.text+0x1fe): In function `find_nonzero_sse2o': : undefined reference to `myffs_sse42' find_nonzero_sse2.o(.text+0x21c): In function `find_nonzero_sse2o': : undefined reference to `myffs_c' find_nonzero_sse2.o(.text+0x3bc): In function `find_nonzero_sse2': : undefined reference to `myffs_sse42' find_nonzero_sse2.o(.text+0x3d7): In function `find_nonzero_sse2': : undefined reference to `myffs_c' gmake: *** [dd_rescue] Error 1 === Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the failure to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/dd_rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/dd_rescue. Any pointers? HAND Why not just use recoverdisk(1)? -- Adam ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Citrix Ica Port Permissions Problem
On May 28, 2014 5:51 PM, Aric Gregson aorc...@mac.com wrote: Hello, I just updated my ports for 10.0-RELEASE and redid the linux base to include the newer https://github.com/xmj/linux-ports. I seem to have installed net/citrix_ica just fine, but it will not run. I have had this port running with prior additions without any problems. I see that the port files have been moved around a bit. I now have this error: % wfica exec: /usr/local/ICAClient/wfica: Permission denied % /usr/local/ICAClient/setupwfc Citrix does not test or support this client on the FreeBSD operating system. exec: /usr/local/ICAClient/util/hinst: Permission denied % sudo /usr/local/ICAClient/setupwfc Citrix does not test or support this client on the FreeBSD operating system. exec: /usr/local/ICAClient/util/hinst: Permission denied It seems that the file in /usr/local/bin is just calling the wfica in /usr/local/ICAClient directory: $ cat /usr/local/bin/wfica #!/bin/sh export ICAROOT=/usr/local/ICAClient exec $ICAROOT/wfica $@ I'm not sure how to go about fixing this. There is no listed maintainer for this port. All I can say is the error messages seem quite informative. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Searching the port tree with portmaster?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 1:44 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: Am I missing a search feature in postmaster? If not, how are people finding where a port is to install it (I had a heck of a time finding sudo, for example) whereis sudo locate sudo [| grep xyz] -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Searching the port tree with portmaster?
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 10:45 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote: On 15 Aug 2013, at 06:33 , Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: whereis sudo Sure, if sudo is installed. Sudo was not installed, so I had to search the ports tree for it. Same with openssl No you are wrong. galacticdominator% whereis sudo sudo: /usr/ports/security/sudo -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Problem with portmaster and /or QT3
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 10:58 AM, Rod Person rodper...@rodperson.com wrote: On 8/1/2013 8:17 PM, Edwin L. Culp W. wrote: # portmaster -L === kdehier-1.0_11 === The misc/kdehier port has been deleted: Has expired: Depends on QT3 My machine only has the following kdehier files, no more # locate kdehier /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4 /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/**Makefile /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/files /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/**files/dirlist /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/**files/make-plist.sh /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/**files/mtree-dirlist /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/**files/session-kde4.conf.in /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/**files/system-kde4.conf.in /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/pkg-**descr /usr/ports/misc/kdehier4/pkg-**plist === kdehier-1.0_11 === The misc/kdehier port has been deleted: Has expired: Depends on QT3 This is driving me up a wall even though it isn't that important. Thanks again for your patience. Have you tried 'pkg delete' or 'pkg_delete' or if you still have the port directory for kdehier3 make deinstall? or --check-depends or whatever the portmaster man page cites. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Proposal: do not show up the dialog(1) by default?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 12:45 AM, Baptiste Daroussin b...@freebsd.org wrote: hi, A lot of people seems to be complaining about the configuration dialog popping up all the time. What if we change the default behaviour to not pop up the dialog each time there is a changed option but only when the user explicitly type make config? Just a proposal, please give your opinion. Of course make config-recursive behaviour won't change. regards, Bapt I would rather the current behavior remained or even better would be if there was a native way to queue up all the config screen like portupgrade does(at least it did when I last used it, it's been awhile). It's not nearly as painful to answer them in bulk even if queue generation takes awhile. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Proposal: do not show up the dialog(1) by default?
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: There are already two native ways to do this: make config-recursive use a ports management tool like portmaster/portupgrade portmaster certainly does not do this, nor make config-recursive(although it faster than the portmaster dialog). As I already mentioned, portupgrade used to give them to you all at once, no interruptions between IIRC. As it stands right now, 'portmaster x11/kde4' on a clean install pretty much guarantees you'll be console baby sitting for 1/2 hr or more unless you use the accept defaults option. To put it another, I think the default make behavior should be more akin 'make config-recursive' rather than take each OPTION as it comes. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: png problem with tar on 8.x
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Albert Shih albert.s...@obspm.fr wrote: On 8.2 : [root ~]# tar jtvf libpng-1.5.15.tar.xz tar: Unrecognized archive format tar: Error exit delayed from previous errors. [root ~]# 8.2 is unsupported. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Where has all the groupware gone.....
http://wiki.zimbra.com/wiki/Zimbra_on_FreeBSD#Downloads_.28stable.29 Haven't used this. Also Horde is as hard as you make it. Personally, I think dealing with all XML and internal tools stuff on Zimbra is worse than Horde and it's config files and dependencies. That being said, I haven't used the new Horde stuff in ports, my install is still a couple of years old. On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 2:46 PM, Paul Pathiakis pathia...@yahoo.com wrote: Hi, I have tried building many pieces of groupware so that I can replace MS at various client sites. However: zimbra? No port. (Hardcoded /opt/zimbra) kolab? No port.(Hardcoded /kolab - This could work if they got rid of the idiocy of OpenPKG) (A kolab port could easily be done if all the dependencies their rpms were made into a port for it. - It should work fairly easily with ZFS) Citadel? No port. Got it working and seems pretty decent. SimpleGroupware - Not DB independent, MySQL only Tine? Not DB independent, MySQL only (Who does that in this day and age?) Horde? Port is cumbersome and very few tips anywhere to get it up and running quickly on FreeBSD (Is there a doc I can't find?) Horde Web? Same as Horde Egroupware? Sweet... Works nice and seems very useful. Many compliments from people on how well it works. Phpgroupware? Not really groupware in the form of the others above. I'm just evaluating. I have no affiliation with any. However, the lack thereof when we could be inserting groupware FreeBSD servers in clients... :-) Thank you for checking into this and creating real ports and/or documentation. P. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Mikhail T. mi+t...@aldan.algebra.comwrote: Worse, KDE4 is not only much heavier (which could've been acceptable). This is simply not true, or at least easily remediable. A few clicks leads to nice UI experience with roughly the same amount of overheard as the 3.x series. There are a number of quasi-legit investigations into the matter. Regardless of those methodologies, at the end of the day KDE4 requires only slightly more memory than 3 if at all. It is also not compatible -- people like myself, who customized their desktops with additional menus, who created knotes, etc. will have to redo all of their settings. KDE4, as built, is not even going to look under the ~/.kde. Though it can be compiled to consider the old directory, the format/syntax for many of the config-files has changed -- and there is no upgrade path. I don't use knotes, but have you tried the solution here? http://forum.kde.org/viewtopic.php?f=22t=84823 This can all be handled, but meanwhile, until there ARE actual problems, leave the ports alone, please. Actual problems have already been cited for it. Fighting change can often lead much more wasted effort than simply adjusting to modern offerings. It's easy enough to pull the port out of archive for the small amount of users who will insist on using a deprecated DE with known security issues. I don't think it reflects well on the project to continue to offer this as an option, and IMO at the very least needs to come with a blinking red light disclaimer if the port continues to exist. Jakub Lach: In spite of not having 'proper' maintainer both kdelibs3/ and kdebas3/ saw substantial interest in form of patches Not recently, unless you mean bulk patches for patches to options framework, clang, or some other general change such as http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revisionrevision=297915 -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Why delete KDE3 ports?
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:53 PM, John Marino freebs...@marino.st wrote: Here's the issue I think some folks have: Outdated: debatable. If outdated means a newer release is available, then yes. If outdated means it outlived its usefulness, I'd say no. This term seems subjectively used here. prone to break: Perhaps, but it's not broken now. possibly insecure: I think this needs to be known insecure rather than holding it's last release date against it. http://www.kde.org/info/security/advisory-20100413-1.txt Probably other security issues as well. I didn't have to look very long. In a codebase as large as KDE's, it seems a very slim chance indeed years could go by without maintenance and still maintain security. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
finance/sql-ledger
This port is quite out of date. I believe changing the version to 3.0.2 allows the port to become current. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Lousy timekeeping in VirtualBox 4.0.14
On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Larry Rosenman l...@lerctr.org wrote: I've set up VirtualBox 4.0.14 on my FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT (r228498) box, and have a FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT VM running underneath it. While the VM is running, it doesn't keep time worth a flip. This is even with the VirtualBox-Additions in it. 1) is this expected/known? 2) What can we do to fix it? What diagnostics do you need? I *CAN* provide ssh access to both the host and the guest. There is a bunch of tuning you can do with Virtualbox to try and alleviate such issues: http://www.virtualbox.org/manual/ch09.html#idp13756960 However no combination has worked for me. The only stable config I've been able to find is to setup NTP on host and guest and keep vboxservice running. Running vboxservice alone results in very erratic timekeeping and the service core dumps every few days. Running NTP alone results in the difference going too high and out of NTP's allowable range. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Port: multimedia/handbrake
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Kevin Oberman kob6...@gmail.com wrote: I have been working on getting Handbrake 0.9.5 to build on FreeBSD for some time. I had resolved a number of issues, but had no luck with some assembler issues in the ffmpeg portion. Yes, I got stuck at the same spot. Then I found this: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2011-July/068940.html It's been working for me, but it's a bit out of date now. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: multimedia/handbrake 0.9.5
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 5:55 AM, ben wilber b...@desync.com wrote: Hi, I was unhappy that the HandBrake port was outdated and didn't work on amd64, so I updated it to the best of my ability. Hopefully it's acceptable, or will at least give someone a head start. http://desync.com/~bw/handbrake.tar.gz Only tested on -CURRENT amd64 and RELENG_8 i386. This port is much better than the existing one even though it doesn't fetch properly anymore. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports system quality
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Micheas Herman m...@micheas.com wrote: This is just a brainstorm, but considering the pain that debian QA causes debian developers, and the orders of magnitude larger task that QAing the FreeBSD ports tree would be makes me wonder if self reporting wouldn't be a direction to go in. What about a utility to list all installed packages built with non-default options? This might be helpful in identifying edge cases. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Ports system quality
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Michel Talon ta...@lpthe.jussieu.frwrote: Any discussion on such subjects should begin by switching off the reality distortion field. For *my own experience* Ubuntu works perfectly OK, in particular all the hardware on my laptop works, suspend works, i have zero problem keeping the ports updated, etc. It is the completely no fuss solution. Wether FreeBSD needs to go in a direction or another is a different subject, but *please* be objective in your descriptions. I can cite more anecdotal evidence to the contrary but that will just perpetuate this infinite regression. is a sentence you can easily apply to any modern system. And most users could not care less that there is *bloat* on their hard disk. Anyways you can find a functional and installable desktop Ubuntu system on a simple CDROM, show me the same for FreeBSD and i will happily conclude it is less bloated. ftp://mirrors.isc.org/pub/pcbsd/9.0-BETA1.5/i386/PCBSD9.0-BETA1.5-x86-CD.iso Your other concerns are just as easily answered if you look. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Sponsoring ports
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Eitan Adler li...@eitanadler.com wrote: Agree. For contract/long term tasks sure.. jobs is the right place, but we should have a place where people can sponsor short, specific, features in FreeBSD. It may be more than just ports, it may also be functionally changes to the OS. This often results in people offering very low sums of money for very large amounts of work. IMHO the comitters should set the price for the work and we should have a system to pool individual donations for such work. One such example is Doug Barton's portmaster work (see http://dougbarton.us/portmaster-proposal.html). I don't know the deep details, but I've heard that the FreeBSD Foundation cannot take escrow deposits like this for legal reasons. I wonder if there has been any thought by the Foundation to use some of it's funding to spin off some type of legal and technical infrastructure that could handle such a system. If the barrier to entry isn't too high, I suspect something like this would be a great boon to base, ports, and freelance devs. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Call for Testers: VirtualBox 4.0.6
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:01 AM, Bernhard Froehlich de...@freebsd.orgwrote: It's about two months since the last call for testers and a lot of bugfixing has happened since then. Not all of the reported problems were FreeBSD related which is a good indication that we're not too far behind the stability of the other hosts. So let's get it one once again. Probably not a FreeBSD specific issue, but my legacy XP VM had an issue. When viewing the Settings screen, a warning came up saying invalid VM name. Checking that field revealed a blank name. Reentering the correct one allowed me to proceed with settings changes, but after closing and reopening the main Vbox GUI, then Settings tab again the VM name was again blank. I then created a new XP VM with an identical name which took. At first this seemed odd, but I see Virtualbox changed it's configuration directory location to perhaps a more Windows friendly. I ended up deleting the old configuration and it seems to be working correctly with the new one. Thanks for the work, -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: saving a few ports from death
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:41 PM, Robert Huff roberth...@rcn.com wrote: Garance A Drosehn writes: Speaking of which, I haven't noticed the old lists of FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently marked broken and FreeBSD ports which are currently scheduled for deletion show up recently. I did have some mixup in my email account for a short period, so I assume I just missed an announcement on how that is handled now. I get regular e-mails for marked as broken. Last one I have is from Jan 21, prior to that it was twice monthly. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: HPLIP 3.10.9 problems on FreeBSD 8.1
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Rolf Nielsen listrea...@lazlarlyricon.com wrote: I am trying to make my HP LaserJet P1102 work on FreeBSD 8.1 and towards that goal I installed HPLIP 3.10.9 from the Ports Collection. But there are two problems: 1.First, when I try to run HPLIP in the GUI (GNOME), it closes once it's opened. It remains open for less than a second. 2.Second, it does not recognize my printer. When I use the command-line tools it just simply does not recognize my printer. This is while the printer is recognized on the USB bus, I confirm it by using usbconfig. It seems to me hplip is in a lot of ways just an extension of CUPS. I've had mixed luck with hplip although not with your specific issue. I would try to run the hplip utility you're using from the command line to see where it is failing but you should be able to administer most functions from the cups web interface. I had one printer that was said to be supported which I spend approximately 6 months on and off trying to get to work and never did(the printer did work on a Mac, just not FreeBSD). After replacing it with a different model, it worked immediately and very smoothly. I have hplip installed at other locations and it works well. If not, try one of them. Hm. I just checked the output of my usbconfig, and it also shows no ulpt, though I do have it. And I also checked the GENERIC config file, and it does include ulpt, at least for 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64. So, you may actually have it. But that's still the first thing I'd look for if I were you. Easy way to check if module is in kernel is kldstat -v -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Virtualbox UI and remote X clients
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Ade Lovett a...@freebsd.org wrote: On Oct 22, 2010, at 16:21 , Bernhard Froehlich wrote: Could you please post that errors? freebsd% setenv DISPLAY remote:0 freebsd% VirtualBox Wait for UI to pop up, click on 'Settings' for any virtual host, VirtualBox crashes with: Qt WARNING: QGLContext::makeCurrent(): Cannot make invalid context current. Segmentation fault (remote) in this case has been (so far): MacOSX 10.6 with Apple's X11.app MacOSX 10.6 with XQuartz.app Windows XP with cygwin/X Windows 7 with cygwin/X Xvnc on the FreeBSD box, then using either the Mac or Windows box to fire up a vnc client to get to the Xvnc. It sounds like an upstream bug so it would be good to collect a few details like why it happens on your system bug I cannot reproduce it here with Intel graphics. Please re-read what I said. The host machine (running the virtualboxes) has NO graphics of any kind. It's FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE/amd64 hooked up to a VT320 terminal as a serial console. It has X11 libraries and the various toolkits (QT etc) installed, but no Xorg server (other than Xvnc), no X11 drivers (graphics/keyboard/mouse). 3.2.8 was fine 3.2.8_1 broke things 3.2.10 (unsurprisingly) hasn't changed I can confirm this issue, I reported it on the emulation mailing list a few days ago. Thanks for finding the exact breakage point. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Idea: entries in UPDATING for each release
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Warren Block wbl...@wonkity.com wrote: Right now, people who install ports from a -release CD and then start upgrading don't have a clear marker for how far back to go in UPDATING. A simple entry would be enough: 20100703: AFFECTS: AUTHOR: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE Not sure what AFFECTS should say. There might be other useful information that could be included in the note. Comments? I like the idea, it would make looking that info up easier for anyone running anything other than the default GENERIC kernel. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: As I understand it, what is being suggested is the adoption of a new code base for a significant piece of infrastructure. I think the proposal is at less risk of being summarily rejected if it can viably be based on BSD-licensed code rather than on GPL'd code. This dvcs is BSD licensed: http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/doc/tip/www/index.wiki I believe it was originally GPL'd, and the author converted it BSD based license on request. The requests came from multiple people who didn't want to to incorporate GPL into their project(s). There is an interview about it here: http://bsdtalk.blogspot.com/2010/07/bsdtalk194-fossil-scm-with-d-richard.html Anyways, IMO license is quite a large deal when you're making this sort of decision. OS code infrastructure has a way of expanding around what's used(eg csup in base) and you'd want to ensure any potential development paths are not hindered by LICENSE. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: Distributed Version Control for ports(7) ( was: Re: autoconf update )
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 4:10 AM, Jeremy Chadwick free...@jdc.parodius.comwrote: Given the amount of GPL'd software in the base system, why are we already fighting over licensing? What is it with the open-source world and obsessing with licensing? It should be up for discussion after alternatives have been determined as viable candidates (see below). Probably rhetorical, but not all licenses are created equal. BSD license has a particular advantage in embedded/black box systems, so not polluting base with more viral licensing is pretty important to project as whole I think. There's a reason things like IronPort aren't Linux based. Take for example the way ZFS was implemented. It was done that way to keep the CDDL out of the kernel. That's part of the reason booting of ZFS is the way it is as a separate loader, not integrated. Licenses are a big deal, our world is not laissez-faire regarding them. Yes there are still some GPL tools in base but the number is really quite small and shrinking, however what's there is pretty big and quite essential. There has long been active if not frequently vigorous work to remove those bits. It seems GNU grep is nearing it's end, and man page stuff is being worked on, CLANG over GCC, etc. Anyway, my point was not to advocate fossil for this task, but to point out BSD license is a concern. Perhaps if you are able to find consensus, requesting a license change might be an option. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: VirtualBox FreeBSD 8.1 AMD 64 intsall 32 bit lib
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Gholam Mostafa Faridi mostafafar...@gmail.com wrote: Stop in /usr/src. ldconfig: warning: /usr/lib32: No such file or directory I make post about this error in freebsdforums but they can not help me please see link http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=17607 they said problem is ccache and I disable and remove ccache ,but still I have that probelm please help me It looks like you are missing 32 bit libraries. Make sure src.conf and make.conf aren't preventing them from being built, then rebuild your world and they should be installed. After that you should be able to compile vbox. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: graphics/sane-backends: fails to build due to the collision in user group id number
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Yuri y...@rawbw.com wrote: Here is the message I get: === Creating users and/or groups. Creating group `saned' with gid `194'. pw: gid `194' has already been allocated *** Error code 65 My /etc/group file has this line: apache:*:194: Obviously there is a conflict. Do you know what installed that group? apache should not be there. apache uses group www, GID 80 /usr/ports/GIDs -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: i keep *trying* to move from portupgrade to portmaster
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Freddie Cash fjwc...@gmail.com wrote: If you absolutely do not want to see the OPTIONS screens, no matter what, then add -G (see man page for details). No, that's not what -G does. -G makes portmaster handle the options screen similar to portupgrade eg waiting to ask you until it runs into it. Setting BATCH=yes in make.conf does work, maybe BATCH?=yes breaks it, my make.conf fu is only sightly better than it documentation which isn't much. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ccache 3.0 port
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:23 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.comwrote: On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org wrote: PORTVERSION= 3.0.p1 DISTNAME=${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:S/.p/pre/} DISTVERSION=3.0pre1 is shorter and cleaner That's longer, and cleaner is debatable. Opps, I notice the diff now. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ccache 3.0 port
On Mon, May 10, 2010 at 9:08 PM, Alberto Villa avi...@freebsd.org wrote: PORTVERSION= 3.0.p1 DISTNAME=${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION:S/.p/pre/} DISTVERSION=3.0pre1 is shorter and cleaner That's longer, and cleaner is debatable. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: ports and PBIs
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@elischer.org wrote: Alfred Perlstein , Matt at ix systems Kris (Mr PBI), some others and I, felt that these ideas seemed to make some sense and so I put them here for comment. FWIW, when I see these discussions I'm always left wondering what's the bad part? I do think there are problems, but there doesn't seem to be a clear defined set of what is wrong. IMO, there should be a defined set of goals to judge possible implementations against. In manys ways, simply having a Lastest package archive for RELEASE that is rebuilt say weekly which would resolve most of the problems I run into and address some the non-power users desires as well. Anyways, I'm sure this will be an entertaining thread. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: python and HUGE_STACK_SIZE
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 3:03 PM, Steven Kreuzer skreu...@exit2shell.comwrote: To me, it seems like the best behavior would be to default to compiling with that set. I'll create a patch over the weekend and open a PR Django and twisted don't need it. If the only app which does is zope, defaulting to on seems to be overkill. No offense to zope users, but I imagine freebsd zope installs aren't on every corner. It would be interesting to hear more feedback from other sources, and your coworker with the original experience. Within python, stack size(in regards to sockets) errors are made quite evident. What zope does to it I have no idea, maybe there is some abstraction going on. My main objection that I use python a lot, especially for quick network apps. One example is that I have written a python based NMS, and if every thread is going to start using more memory, then I will have to do things differently. That's okay too, but if others are doing anything similar there could be more ripples down the road. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: python and HUGE_STACK_SIZE
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Chuck Swiger cswi...@mac.com wrote: I've run and written quite a bit of Python (including Trac, Mailman, the Python IDE, our own custom stuff [like some log munging and web processing stuff], and even a few graphical Python games) without ever turning HUGE_STACK_SIZE on. I don't have any objection to turning it on, but it's not needed by default for most things. YMMV. Yes, I've had the same experience. When doing socket level python stuff, I've had to increase the buffer size, which seems to be at least indirectly related to stack size but setting it manually has been easy enough. Are there any negative repercussions to turning on huge ie like would scripts start using more memory, or is just giving them the ability to use it without explicitly setting it? -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: lang/guile fails to build on amd64 / 9-CURRENT
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com wrote: CC'ing port maintainer Here is the commit for timeb.h being deprecated and adding the #warning http://www.mail-archive.com/svn-src-...@freebsd.org/msg20965.html Solutions are to either use a replacement for timeb.h (unknown by me at this point), quit using timeb.h (not sure how guile depends on this), or omit the -Werror from /usr/ports/lang/guile/work/guile-1.8.6/Makefile and /usr/ports/lang/guile-1.8.6/libguile/Makefile. Maintainer, please direct on how to proceed. As it sits without modification the port is broken, even with -Wno-error set in /etc/make.conf. I'm not sure about that. The no-error stuff I believe is a CURRENT thing, at least when running betas and stuff you'll run into the warnings as errors thing. The port builds fine on other branches and I suspect would continue to build on CURRENT if you got rid of whatever controlling the compile setting. Nevertheless, it seems the port should be fixed to use sys/time.h and gettimeofday(2) instead. Just the way it looks to me, I'm no expert here. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: lang/guile fails to build on amd64 / 9-CURRENT
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Scot Hetzel swhet...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Adam Vande More amvandem...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Jason Garrett kinged...@gmail.com wrote: CC'ing port maintainer Here is the commit for timeb.h being deprecated and adding the #warning http://www.mail-archive.com/svn-src-...@freebsd.org/msg20965.html Solutions are to either use a replacement for timeb.h (unknown by me at this point), quit using timeb.h (not sure how guile depends on this), or omit the -Werror from /usr/ports/lang/guile/work/guile-1.8.6/Makefile and /usr/ports/lang/guile-1.8.6/libguile/Makefile. Maintainer, please direct on how to proceed. As it sits without modification the port is broken, even with -Wno-error set in /etc/make.conf. I'm not sure about that. The no-error stuff I believe is a CURRENT thing, at least when running betas and stuff you'll run into the warnings as errors thing. The port builds fine on other branches and I suspect would continue to build on CURRENT if you got rid of whatever controlling the compile setting. Nevertheless, it seems the port should be fixed to use sys/time.h and gettimeofday(2) instead. Just the way it looks to me, I'm no expert here. The port only uses sys/timeb.h in libguile/stime.c, and only to include the header when HAVE_SYS_TIMEB_H is defined, removing sys/timeb.h from the header include check in configure.in allows the port to build on a recent CURRENT. Scot -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
/usr/ports/print/hplip3
/usr/ports/print/hplip3 The message in this port indicates you must recompile your kernel for it to work. The printer MUST attach as a ugen(4) device. This means that you must NOT have device ulpt in your kernel and ulpt must NOT be loaded as a kernel module. That is not the experience that I have had with the port, although I had to bork with the permissions to get it working. The devfs.rules instructions were not adequate to make it work. lrwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups 9 Mar 9 20:40 ugen0.1 - usb/0.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups 9 Mar 9 20:40 ugen0.2 - usb/0.2.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups 9 Mar 9 20:40 ugen0.3 - usb/0.3.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups 9 Mar 9 20:40 ugen1.1 - usb/1.1.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups 9 Mar 9 20:40 ugen1.2 - usb/1.2.0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups 9 Mar 9 20:40 ugen1.3 - usb/1.3.0 crwxrwxrwx 1 joe cups0, 76 Mar 9 20:45 ulpt0 usbconfig list ugen0.1: OHCI root HUB nVidia at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON ugen1.1: EHCI root HUB nVidia at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON ugen1.2: Deskjet D1600 series HP at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON ugen0.2: USB AUDIO vendor 0x1130 at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=FULL (12Mbps) pwr=ON ugen1.3: USB2.0-CRW Generic at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON ugen0.3: USB Receiver Logitech at usbus0, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=LOW (1.5Mbps) pwr=ON I under the permissions here are excessive, but it's unclear from the cups log as how exactly cups is communicating with the printer. It states the connection is made to hp:/usb/Deskjet_D1600_series?serial=CN012C90C405CT -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde4/python26 and pth help.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jimmie James jimmie...@gmail.com wrote: On a freshly installed 8-STABLE box (4 days old) and up to date ports, KDE4 will not install for me, always the same errors. I've even removed all ports and reinstalled from scratch and hit the same errors. I have no /etc/make.conf. I'm at a loss here, I have no idea why this is happening. I even did a portupgrade -fRru python26 and tried portmaster, and plain old make in the ports that fail. My script to install from a clean install is portsnap fetch update cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make install clean rehash portmaster -d x11-servers/xorg-server x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard x11-drivers/{YOUR VIDEO DRIVER PORT} echo 'dbus_enable=YES\nhald_enable=YES\n' /etc/rc.conf then you'll have to do whatever is necessary for video driver install eg kldload nvidia and make it permanent /boot/loader.conf Once your driver is live, you create xorg.conf file by Xorg -config xorg.conf.new cp xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf then I manually add in this line to /etc/ttys ttyv8 /usr/local/kde4/bin/kdm -nodaemon xterm on secure and comment ttyv8 /usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon xterm off secure Provided you don't have to do anything special for say the nvidia driver, all's that's do this the hal guys maybe didn't do such a back job after all As for you error, I don't know what happened. I used to see those happen on a massive upgrade when using portupgrade. I recommend portmaster. Somehow python didn't get installed correctly because /usr/local/include/python2.6/Python.h should exist if python is correctly installed. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: kde4/python26 and pth help.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:47 PM, Jimmie James jimmie...@gmail.com wrote: On 02/24/10 23:28, Adam Vande More wrote: On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jimmie James jimmie...@gmail.com mailto:jimmie...@gmail.com wrote: On a freshly installed 8-STABLE box (4 days old) and up to date ports, KDE4 will not install for me, always the same errors. I've even removed all ports and reinstalled from scratch and hit the same errors. I have no /etc/make.conf. I'm at a loss here, I have no idea why this is happening. I even did a portupgrade -fRru python26 and tried portmaster, and plain old make in the ports that fail. My script to install from a clean install is portsnap fetch update cd /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/portmaster make install clean rehash portmaster -d x11-servers/xorg-server x11-drivers/xf86-input-mouse x11-drivers/xf86-input-keyboard x11-drivers/{YOUR VIDEO DRIVER PORT} echo 'dbus_enable=YES\nhald_enable=YES\n' /etc/rc.conf then you'll have to do whatever is necessary for video driver install eg kldload nvidia and make it permanent /boot/loader.conf Once your driver is live, you create xorg.conf file by Xorg -config xorg.conf.new cp xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf then I manually add in this line to /etc/ttys ttyv8 /usr/local/kde4/bin/kdm -nodaemon xterm on secure and comment ttyv8 /usr/local/bin/xdm -nodaemon xterm off secure Provided you don't have to do anything special for say the nvidia driver, all's that's do this the hal guys maybe didn't do such a back job after all As for you error, I don't know what happened. I used to see those happen on a massive upgrade when using portupgrade. I recommend portmaster. Somehow python didn't get installed correctly because /usr/local/include/python2.6/Python.h should exist if python is correctly installed. -- Adam Vande More Thanks for the reply, Haven't got around to testing X yet, but on 7.2-STABLE it works fine, so I'm not too worried about that. It's the python and pth errors that are killing me. /usr/local/include/python2.6/Python.h is there, seems correctly installed. Even installing with portmaster and plain old make install it _still_ hits those errors of not finding the headers. checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 version... 2.6 checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 platform... freebsd8 checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2. 6/site-packages checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 extension module directory... ${exec_prefix}/lib/python2.6/site-packages checking for headers required to compile python extensions... not found configure: error: Python headers not found As well as /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lpth it would be looking for /usr/ports/devel/pth. Is it installed? if not, then there would appear to with a dependency issue. -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: FreeBSD Port: libX11-1.2.1_1,1
2009/9/27 Webdeal AS - Jørn Skjerven j...@webdealhosting.com Hi! I have some problems after upgrading our system from 7.0-RELEASE to 7.2-RELEASE. libX11 will not build any more, and throws the following to me: configure.ac:22: the top level configure.ac:22: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:1455: AC_LIBTOOL_COMPILER_OPTION is expanded from... aclocal.m4:5421: AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC is expanded from... configure.ac:22: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_CXX, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:3483: _LT_AC_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:3482: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_CXX_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:2533: _LT_AC_TAGCONFIG is expanded from... configure.ac:22: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_F77, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:4546: _LT_AC_LANG_F77_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:4545: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_F77_CONFIG is expanded from... configure.ac:22: warning: AC_CACHE_VAL(lt_prog_compiler_pic_works_GCJ, ...): suspicious cache-id, must contain _cv_ to be cached aclocal.m4:4646: _LT_AC_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG is expanded from... aclocal.m4:4645: AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_GCJ_CONFIG is expanded from... checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no checking if xorg-macros used to generate configure is at least 1.2... yes, 1.2.1 ./configure: 2763: Syntax error: word unexpected (expecting )) === Script configure failed unexpectedly. Please report the problem to x...@freebsd.org [maintainer] and attach the /usr/ports/x11/libX11/work/libX11-1.2/config.log including the output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/libX11. These packages are installed: Usually this is the result of an outdated dependency. Have you done anything like a portmaster x11/libX11 ? -- Adam Vande More ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org