Re: Pause pkg install messages

On 2018-05-24 11:21, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Johannes Lundberg wrote on 2018/05/24 11:03: >> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 9:27 AM Bob Eager wrote: >> >>> On Thu, 24 May 2018 09:08:17 +0100 >>> Johannes Lundberg wrote: >>> In addition to that it would be nice (if it's not already done) to s

Re: 6100 subdirectories in /usr/ports/devel!

On 2018-02-19 17:25, Dan Mahoney (Gushi) wrote: > On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, blubee blubeeme wrote: ... > > For those of us requiring a perl module on a bunch of machines, we don't have > a good mechanism (outside of ports/pkg/poudriere) to build those modules and > get them out.  One of the things

Re: unable to build java in poudriere

On 2017-01-26 19:21, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 26/1/17 7:32 am, Ultima wrote: >> I just finished building openjdk8 with a fresh repo and it built just fine. >> >> poudriere bulk -p git -j 103amd64 java/openjdk8 >> ref: >> https://poudriere.ultimasbox.com/build.html?mastername=103amd64-git&build

Re: portsnap temporary files

On 2017-01-06 20:51, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean up /var/db/portsnap/files? > I've just had to remove a zillion of them, a bunch at a time because "rm" > choked on the arg list. > > Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised that there isn't one

Re: private ports and pkgs versioning

On 2016-10-18 14:54, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 08:49:06AM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Yes, there is a lot of useful stuff in the ports tree to support local >> ports or even whole local categories of ports. I can't recall now how I >> learned about all this stuff -- it may

Re: harder and harder to avoid pkg

On 2016-10-11 20:59, Julian Elischer wrote: > As the number of dependencies between packages get ever higher, it becomes > more and more difficult to compile packages and the dependence on binary > precompiled packages is increased. However binary packages are unsuitable for > some situations.

Re: [maintainer change] net-mgmt/cnagios

On 2016-09-17 19:40, Alexander wrote: > Hi, I want to transfer net-mgmt/cnagios maintainership to dannywarren > (da...@dannywarren.com). He has already gave an approve, see comments here at > 212102 (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212102) > done; Thanks for maintaining cna

Re: Checking port option descriptions

On 2016-09-17 10:47, Mike Clarke wrote: > On Friday 16 Sep 2016 20:09:06 Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> Even when the meaning is clear in global sense, what are the implications >> for an application. E.g. "RTC=on: Add support for kernel real time clock" >> in mplayer. I know exactly what the RTC is,

Re: n00b problem installing postfix package

On 2016-09-14 19:11, Bryan C. Everly wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to set up a new 10.3 server that includes postfix and > majordomo for a BUG I'm trying to get off the ground. I'm normally an > OpenBSD guy but I thought I'd give it a try on FreeBSD. > > Anyhow, I'm wanting to follow this guide: >

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

On 2016-08-31 17:30, Stanislaw Halik wrote: > On 2016-08-31 Wed 17:21, olli hauer wrote: >> I think this will work for you. >> >> The update interval can be adjusted (default is 30 days). >> In the patch example I've chosen half of the interval, so there is time

Re: FreeBSD Port: noip-2.1.9_3

On 2016-08-31 13:17, James A. McGuire wrote: > Hi there, > > Since no-ip introduced their policy to remove non-updated subdomains every > 30 days. I have to manually go to the no-ip website and confirm that I > wish to keep my subdomain. I believe the reason for this is that my ISP is > only upd

Re: [HEADSUP] extracting LoadModule out of httpd.conf

On 2016-08-12 16:32, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 08/10/16 14:07, Miroslav Lachman wrote: >> Mathieu Arnold wrote on 08/10/2016 17:42: >>> Hi, >>> >>> It is coming. >>> >>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D7460 >>> >>> constructive comments welcome. >>> ... > > I plead with the people making this change

Re: [HEADSUP] change in default openssl coming

On 2016-07-08 08:26, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > Hi, > > During this summer (sometime in August I think) I will be changing the > default OpenSSL for the ports tree from the base system version to > security/openssl. > > I will also, because it goes with it, change the default GSSAPI from base > to s

Re: Maintainer for dovecot

On 2016-04-29 16:32, aki.tu...@dovecot.fi wrote: > Hi! > > Do you happen to know who is responsible for Dovecot package in FreeBSD? We > would like to keep in touch occasionally and see if we can do co-operation > with the packages. > > Aki Tuomi > Dovecot Oy Hi Aki, see the list of maintaine

Re: compiling ports with --sysroot= and -isystem

On 2016-04-22 04:04, Julian Elischer wrote: > How can I add entries (like the above) to a port compile? > I want to ADD things to CFLAGS. > If I add 'CFLAGS=...' to the build (for example, of lsof) it actually > replaces all the CFLAGS already there. > lsof (as the example) uses configure, so I w

Re: UPDATING entry has no AFFECTS clause

On 2016-04-17 23:48, Dan Langille wrote: > re revision 383476 to UPDATING > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/UPDATING?r1=383474&r2=383476 > > > This entry has no AFFECTS clause. Should it? I ask because I encounter this

Re: FreeBSD Port: apache24-2.4.20

On 2016-04-14 05:22, Ken J. wrote: > Is it possible to update/patch Apache24 with the latest backport? > > As it stands now, mod_status is completely useless without this patch. > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1739008 > > Ken Hi Ken, I have to investigate the patch. Ho

Re: Post-install messages

On 2016-04-08 20:37, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote: > > I am bringing up a new 10.3-RELEASE system from scratch. > > While doing so, I unfortunately rushed ahead and installed > several packages I knew I needed using the "pkg install" > command, but I neglected to look carefully at all of the > helpf

Re: fix mail address as maintainer

On 2016-03-25 11:34, Tsurutani Naoki wrote: > please someone fix my e-mail address as maintainer of these ports: > > audio/id3ed > games/xbat > games/xgalaga > games/xshisen > japanese/dvi2tty > japanese/kon2-14dot > japanese/kon2-16dot > japanese/font-mikachan > japanese/plain2 > textproc/tex2im

Re: mail/postfix with Dovecot SASL

On 2016-03-23 13:22, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Hi, > the older version of Postfix had options for Cyrus SASL, Dovecot SASL and > Dovecot 2 SASL. I made 3 local meta ports do postfix-sals2 (cyrus library) > postfix-dovecot and postfix-dovecot2. I know mail/postfix has SASL built in > on Dovecot,

Re: mail/postfix and mail/postfix-current need upgrading

On 2016-02-26 14:45, Carmel wrote: > On Fri, 26 Feb 2016 14:26:56 +0100, Guido Falsi stated: > >> On 02/26/16 14:16, Mark Martinec wrote: >>> In ports we have: >>> mail/postfix-current 2.11.7 >>> mail/postfix 2.8.0 >> >> Your information is outdated: >> >>> grep PORTVERSION /usr/ports/mail/p

Re: mail/postfix and mail/postfix-current need upgrading

On 2016-02-26 14:16, Mark Martinec wrote: > In ports we have: > mail/postfix-current 2.11.7 > mail/postfix 2.8.0 > > The version in mail/postfix-current is just barely still supported, > the version in mail/postfix is no longer supported upstream. > > Upstream versions are labeled as: > - Pos

Re: postfix-current is marked broken w.r.t SPF support, why?

On 2016-02-08 20:13, Michael Grimm wrote: > Hi — > > I am wondering why postfix-current is still marked broken regarding SPF > support: > > | poudriere build log file excerpt: > | Finished build of mail/postfix-current: Ignored: is marked as broken: > At the moment, SPF support is unavailab

Re: Cannot build www/mod_dnssd with poudriere

On 2016-01-26 20:47, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Oh, scrap should be >> #if MODULE_MAGIC_COOKIE >= 0x41503234UL /* "AP24" */ >> >> I've uploaded a new patch (with the same name) > > Testbuilds all fine with ap24 and ap22 on 9.3. I'll commit the fix, > if this is OK with you ? > Sure, absolute

Re: Cannot build www/mod_dnssd with poudriere

On 2016-01-26 19:27, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> the module should build on apache22, but it seems upstream is >> missing a test for the apache version and includes mod_unixd.h per >> default >> >> Can you test the following patch: >> >> $ cd www/mod_dnssd >> $ fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~o

Re: Cannot build www/mod_dnssd with poudriere

On 2016-01-26 12:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I cannot build www/mod_dnssd with poudriere. >> The complete build log is attached. > > The list strips attachments. Can you put it up somewhere ? > > I tried it on current-amd64 with apache 24, builds fine. > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/lo

Re: dns-terror (fastresolve-2.10_5) doesn't work on FreeBSD 10.x

On 2016-01-01 16:35, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Miroslav Lachman wrote on 10/18/2015 15:45: >> Hi, >> >> I am using dns-terror to resolve IP addresses in Apache logs for many >> years on FreeBSD but it doesn't work on newly upgraded machines. It >> works fine on 8.4 but core dump on 10.1 and 10.2 am

Re: Unable to make install for p5 ports

On 2015-12-20 21:26, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >> Am 20.12.2015 um 21:15 schrieb Stefan Bethke : >> >> For many perl ports, I’m getting errors similar to this: >> >> ... >> Installing >> /usr/obj/ports/freebsd/checkout/ports/net/p5-Net-Server/stage/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/man/man1/net-server.1

Re: Using pkg updating without /usr/ports

On 2015-12-19 17:54, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > David Wolfskill wrote on 12/19/2015 14:46: >> On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 02:26:47PM +0100, Miroslav Lachman wrote: ... > pkg update and pkg upgrade works fine for me too, but pkg updating not. pkg > updating is intended to read /usr/ports/UPDATING file a

Re: [Bug 205242] editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255) does not build in poudriere on 11.0-CURRENT r276659

On 2015-12-13 17:20, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El día Friday, December 11, 2015 a las 10:46:18AM +, > bugzilla-nore...@freebsd.org escribió: > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205242 >> >> Bug ID: 205242 >>Summary: editors/libreoffice (5.0.3, r403255)

Re: Can we bring back sysutils/cronolog?

On 2015-11-29 23:24, Chris H wrote: > On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 11:13:08 -0500 kpn...@pobox.com wrote > >> I still use sysutils/cronolog but lately it's been disabled due to >> the web site vanishing. >> >> I still have the distribution files. Can we put them up somewhere on >> FreeBSD.org to keep the

Re: Can we bring back sysutils/cronolog?

On 2015-11-27 20:53, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I still use sysutils/cronolog but lately it's been disabled due to >> the web site vanishing. >> >> I still have the distribution files. Can we put them up somewhere on >> FreeBSD.org to keep the port alive? > > Using freebsd.org to distribute 3

Re: pkg-message variable -> value replacements ?

On 2015-10-24 13:23, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > Is there a generic way in the ports framework to replace variables > in a port pkg-message, e.g. ${PREFIX} ? > Hi Kurt, yes, there is. $ mv pkg-message files/pkg-message.in and in the $port/Makefile use SUB_FILES and SUB_LIST SUB_FILES = pkg-

Re: Why oh why am I getting all thes extras with Postfix

___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: Migrating from perl5-5.20 to perl5.22 using custom packages?

On 2015-09-06 15:33, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:26:22PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >> ... > > Well, as I pointed out in the original note, I use portmaster on my > "development" systems (which I update daily), and poudriere/pkg on the > "

Re: Migrating from perl5-5.20 to perl5.22 using custom packages?

On 2015-09-05 18:29, David Wolfskill wrote: > For my "development machines (laptop & build machine), I track stable/10 > & head daily, and update ports (also daily) under stable/10 using > portmaster. There's been a bit of turbulence now and then, but overall, > the process generally works. > > I

Re: Running ''portmaster ghostscript9-9.06_10'' takes a lot of time

On 2015-08-20 09:32, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 20 août 2015 08:24:25 +0100 Anton Shterenlikht > wrote: > |> OTOH I do not want to use ghostscript ! > | > | In my view ghost is a critically important port. > | I will not be able to use FreeBSD productively withouth it. > | Since I have no t

Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL

On 2015-08-06 05:44, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > > This still leaves the issue of requiring SASL support in subversion. A note > in the handbook section on ports would help, though I'll admit that I > probably would not have found it in this case. Perhaps a note in > ports/UPDATING might be in o

Re: bsd.port.mk reduce error to warning for UNAME_r OSVERSION mismatch

On 2015-06-16 17:06, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > bsd.port.mk test below is too agressive, let's have it just Warn, not Fail. > Also prefix text "Error: " or "Warning: " make it obvious which is happening. > > It seems likely people may have different opinions if it should > just Warn or Error, so ke

Re: Re: Fwd: Re: svn commit: r386904 - in head/www/apache22: . files

One case wher this can happen is the dh generation was interrupted during the build. The upcomming apache2.2 will no.longer require such a hack because mod_ssl has undergone a huge rewrite. -- Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Bryan Drewery w

Re: Apache 2.4 must become default NOW

On 2015-05-27 16:18, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 07/13/14 17:46, Michelle Sullivan wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 12:27:48AM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >>> >>>> On 2014-07-05 19:09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >>>>

Re: Wrong security audit for mail/postfix ?

On May 11, 2015 9:38:46 AM CEST, Cristiano Deana wrote: > Hi, > > this morning I got for my mailservers > > # pkg audit > postfix-2.11.4,1 is vulnerable: > postfix -- plaintext command injection with SMTP over TLS > CVE: CVE-2011-0411 > WWW: > http://vuxml.FreeBSD.org/freebsd/14a6f516-502f-11e

Re: Re: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT documentation

Hi Mathieu, what is the target timeframe for."soon",.e.g. for.8.x and.9.x having an older openssl in base. Is there wip. to hide the base ssl libs ? -- Sent from my Android phone with GMX Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Mathieu Arnold wrote: +--On 8 mars 2015 13:24:09 -

Re: portsnap didn't properly update www/neon

On 2015-02-22 19:38, Daniel Morante wrote: > I have a system that started as FreeBSD 5.x. Throughout the years it has > been updated and upgraded. Today's it's currently at 9.3-RELEASE. > > Recently: > > "The port www/neon29 was renamed to www/neon and updated to version 0.30.1" > > Back in 2

Re: Is pkg-install the best solution?

On 2015-02-09 03:05, Chris H wrote: > Greetings, > I'm working with a port that [conditionally] requires > creating/setting a UID && GID. Following is my approach > for a pkg-install. But would simply setting them as > USERS= > GROUPS= > in Makefile be a better approach? > pkg-install: > #!/bin/sh

Re: libiconv.la issues

On 2015-01-25 05:46, LuKreme wrote: > On Jan 24, 2015, at 9:17 PM, LuKreme wrote: >> sed: /usr/local/lib/libiconv.la: No such file or directory >> libtool: link: `/usr/local/lib/libiconv.la' is not a valid libtool archive >> *** [libarchive.la] Error code 1 ... > # uname -v > FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE-p

Re: Poudriere Timeout

On 2015-01-19 20:18, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > Yes, i have. I've solved this problem by moving the build-jails of poudriere to an memory disk. This make poudriere no longer io-bund and incredibly fast. And solve this issue ;) > >>> How did you do this ? I want to try this myself 8

Re: net-mgmt/rancid and cisco ssh kexagorhitms

On 2015-01-14 15:35, Marko Cupać wrote: > Hi, > > as of FreeBSD 9.3, it is not possible to ssh into some cisco routers > (namely 1921 and 3925 in my case), unless option -o KexAlgorithms= > diffie-hellman-group14-sha1 is specified. Probably, as a consequence, > rancid stopped working for these rou

Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

On 2014-12-29 17:19, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > olli hauer wrote Sat, 27 Dec 2014 08:25:09 +0100: > >> On 2014-12-27 03:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: >>> Hi ports@ >>> What URL(s) do I need under >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ >>> to get to

Re: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ Attic URLs, eg for ports/mail/demime ?

On 2014-12-27 03:30, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi ports@ > What URL(s) do I need under > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ > to get to the Attic for last copy of eg ports/mail/demime ? > > How is one supposed to find URLs /svn rev nos ? > (I have a local svn if it helps, but was looking on web) > > de

Re: Ports changing permissions on directories

On 2014-12-08 20:37, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Hello. > > There are some ports that insist on changing permissions on some directories. > An example is clamav, which will always change /var/db/clamav mask to 755. > > Since I always need to "chmod 775 /var/db/clamav" after an upgrade, I'm > askin

Re: pkg: /var/cache/pkg and pkg upgrade, how does this work ?

On 2014-11-30 15:39, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > I have a host with a up2date /var/cache/pkg/ and a jail with a > not so up2date pkg collection. > > Now I want to mount /var/cache/pkg into the jail at the same > location and hope that I do not have to re-fetch all the files. > > Testing this, t

Re: postfix catch-22...

On 2014-11-10 11:01, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Dear maintainer, > > Had an issue with updating from 2.11.1_4,1 to 2.11.3_1,1: it looks like > you can't win with the ownership of /var/spool/postfix: > > On restart after updating the package: > > {{{ > smtp-2:/var/spool/postfix:# service postfix

Re: SSP now default for ports/packages, ssp/new_xorg repository EOL

On 2014-11-02 21:01, Bryan Drewery wrote: > Ports and Package users, > > Ports now have SSP enabled by default. The package repository will now build > SSP by default as well. SSP is "Stack Smashing Protection" and can be read > about at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buffer_overflow_protection.

Re: Re: postgresql-server depends on client. Why?

In case the dependency on thr client will be removed all ports depending on the server alone at the moment should be checked if they also require the client part. Additional clients should not define a conflict with server versions < client version -- Sent from my Android phone

Re: PKG not quite ready for prime time

On 2014-10-10 19:43, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > > On Fri, 10 Oct 2014 19:30:18 +0200, you wrote: > >> On 2014-10-10 19:13, scratch65...@att.net wrote: >>> I'm having quite a lot of trouble converting to pkg due to there >>> being no obvious source of accurate documentation. I got this >>> af

Re: PKG not quite ready for prime time

On 2014-10-10 19:13, scratch65...@att.net wrote: > I'm having quite a lot of trouble converting to pkg due to there > being no obvious source of accurate documentation. I got this > after I thought I had it solved and could install something: > > 11:36 Fri, 10 Oct [momcat:root]~> pkg install fir

Re: pkg-static: pkg-1.4.0.p.a11 conflicts with pkg-1.3.7 (installs files into the same place).

cribed in the first reply // hth. olli > > 2014-09-17 15:11 GMT-03:00 olli hauer : >> On 2014-09-17 16:15, Lucas Willian Bocchi wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have the same problem on my FreeBSD 10. >>> >>> My server are in production environmen

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

On 2014-09-16 18:05, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > < snip very long conversation> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2014-September/095521.html > I've made a third version of the patch that chases some recent updates to the > ports tree and can be found at: > http://people.freebsd.or

Re: pkg-static: pkg-1.4.0.p.a11 conflicts with pkg-1.3.7 (installs files into the same place).

On 2014-09-17 16:15, Lucas Willian Bocchi wrote: > Hi > > I have the same problem on my FreeBSD 10. > > My server are in production environment and now packages such as PHP > and others won't work anymore because the packages have updates to do > but with this conflict the server won't complete t

Re: mod_auth_xradius fails with apache-2.4

On 2014-09-12 21:20, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 03:47:28PM +0200, Andreas Nilsson wrote: >>Hello, >>since they changed apache default from 2.2 to 2.4 in ports >>mod_auth_xradius has been failing� to build over here. Should it >>perhaps just have >>USE_APA

Re: Splitting devel/subversion into SEVERAL ports -- how fine-grained do we want to see it?

On 2014-09-04 17:10, James R. Van Artsdalen wrote: > So how does port subversion work now? I don't get mod_dav_svn installed > and I don't see a knob for it. > > There is port www/mod_dav_svn but devel/subversion doesn't seem to > reference it, and www/mod_dav_svn just gives errors when apache24

Re: I want to upgrade an old (8.3-RC2) FReeBSD installation, but can't install subversion

On 2014-08-31 22:38, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 8:37 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> >> Hm, do you mean update with subversion to 8.4-stable or 8.4-current? > > Yes, and 8.4-stable. There is no 8.4-current. > >> Unless you have a non default kern

Re: I want to upgrade an old (8.3-RC2) FReeBSD installation, but can't install subversion

On 2014-08-31 19:43, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Erich Dollansky > wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I did not got through the full thread to see if you found a solution. > > Yes, I did. In fact, freebsd-update provided the solution; I used it > to upgrade to FreeBSD 8.4-release

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

On 2014-08-26 18:01, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > On 08/18/14 15:02, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2014-08-18 18:15, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> On 08/14/14 13:40, olli hauer wrote: >>>> On 2014-08-14 21:42, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>>>> On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM,

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

On 2014-08-24 14:37, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 14:30:06 +0200 > Kurt Jaeger wrote: > >> Hi! >> Hm, using USE_BDB=$numble looks wrong to me in devel/ice. Can you test the following patch. Index: Makefile

Re: HEADS UP: Berkeley DB 4...4.7 port removals/upgrades may require manual preparation

On 2014-08-24 13:11, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >>> For devel/ice: > [...] >> Is this exclusive to portupgrade (does "make install" work)? Ice >> only supports bdb 5, so the Makefile should be correct. > > No, it's not exclusive. Same behaviour with > > # make > ===> Ice-3.5.1_1 cannot install:

Re: Fwd: building java/eclipse in HEAD w/ poudriere: java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space

On 2014-08-23 20:16, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/23/2014 8:51 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: >> >> Hello ljboi...@gmail.com, >> >> Can you as the MAINTAINER of the port please clarify how one can build >> this port on >> >> FreeBSD vm-tiny-r269739 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r269739M: >> Fri Au

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

On 2014-08-18 18:15, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 08/14/14 13:40, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2014-08-14 21:42, Bryan Drewery wrote: >>> On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM, olli hauer wrote: >>>> On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >> ... >> >>> So

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

... > > Something I've mentioned to Bapt a few times is that pkg needs a way to > have a list of accepted ABI strings. Then we could add both the old and > the new style as accepted (internally) so that old and new repositories > will continue to work. Yes, this would help. I tried as workaround

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

On 2014-08-14 21:42, Bryan Drewery wrote: > On 8/14/2014 2:38 PM, olli hauer wrote: >> On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> ... > > Something I've mentioned to Bapt a few times is that pkg needs a way to > have a list of accepted ABI strings. Then we

Re: [Patch] Using MACHINE_ARCH identifiers in pkg

On 2014-08-14 17:35, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 08/14/14 08:02, Bryan Drewery wrote: >> On 5/28/2014 11:54 AM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: >>> The current/previous values are also kept so >>> that the patched pkg can install a package marked either with an x86:64 >>> or amd64-type architecture ID

Re: FreeBSD unmaintained ports which are currently scheduled for deletion

On 2014-08-13 18:37, Dennis Glatting wrote: > On Tue, 2014-08-12 at 23:42 -0500, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:31:08PM -0700 I heard the voice of >> Dennis Glatting, and lo! it spake thus: >>> >>> do_install in the Makefile does the chown. >> >> Generally you'd want to do s

Re: vendir distfile has no top level directory

On 2014-08-07 05:18, Dan Langille wrote: > I’m having a problem upgrading www/bacula-web to the latest version (see > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191583). > > The problem: the vendor tarball has no top level directory. > > e.g. > > [root@testing ~/tmp/distfiles]# tar -xf

Re: Apache 24 + mod_perl

On 2014-08-06 22:45, Patrick Powell wrote: > On 08/06/14 00:19, Steve Hay wrote: >> On 3 August 2014 22:13, Patrick Powell wrote: >>> On 08/03/14 08:25, olli hauer wrote: >>>> On 2014-08-01 23:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >>>>> Hi! >>>>> >

issue pkg-plist @exec lines and pkg-install scripts

Hi, haven't found the culprit but it seems during package building the @exec lines from pkg-plist are running. I found this the hard way since many ports where failing on my local pd system. E.g from viewvc pkg-plist @unexec if cmp -s %D/viewvc/cvsgraph.conf %D/viewvc/cvsgraph.conf.dist; then

Re: Apache 24 + mod_perl

On 2014-08-01 23:34, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Question: when will mod_perl be available for Apache 24? > > There's a PR where people are discussing this: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191471 > > This PR needs more testers etc. > I've updated the PR with a patch a

Re: net/openldap24-server: lstat(/usr/ports/net/openldap24-server/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/openldap/smbk5pwd.so.0.0.0): No such file or directory

On 2014-07-28 17:18, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am Mon, 28 Jul 2014 17:01:23 +0200 > olli hauer schrieb: > >> On 2014-07-28 15:54, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> The port net/openldap24-server fails to register/install with this error: >>> >>> pkg-static: >>>

Re: net/openldap24-server: lstat(/usr/ports/net/openldap24-server/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/openldap/smbk5pwd.so.0.0.0): No such file or directory

On 2014-07-28 15:54, O. Hartmann wrote: > The port net/openldap24-server fails to register/install with this error: > > pkg-static: > lstat(/usr/ports/net/openldap24-server/work/stage/usr/local/libexec/openldap/smbk5pwd.so.0.0.0): > No such file or directory > > The port/installation is corrupted

Re: PKG 3.1.0 update - Segmentation fault: 11

On 2014-07-27 12:02, Jos Chrispijn wrote: >Hi Bapt, >I just found another issue with the port update failure: >> pkg info >Child process pid=2126 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 >> pkg2ng >Child process pid=2147 terminated abnormally: Segmentation fault: 11 >

Re: Merging several branches with ports tree

On 2014-07-25 16:13, Beeblebrox wrote: > I have several ports branches that get merged to the ports tree. The > structure is such that a pristine (un-merged) copy of each branch is located > under: /asp/git/ports, /asp/git/marcuscom, /asp/git/linux-c6, /asp/git/my-pc > > I then want to copy all fi

Re: mass commit needed: python breakage in pkgng repo

>>>On 2014-07-22 17:34, Nick Hilliard wrote:> sysutils/py-salt has been broken >>>for the last couple of weeks. The resulting package didn't include the python egg info directory and as a result, py-salt crashed on startup. There a PR in bugzilla for this: https://bugs.freeb

Re: marking vulnerable ports forbidden?

On 2014-07-15 14:45, René Ladan wrote: > Hi, > > according to Freshports [1] there are currently 24 vulnerable ports not > marked as forbidden. > How about checking this list on a regular basis and marking such ports and > forbidden and optionally as deprecated? This would inform users not using >

Re: svn commit: r360871 - head/security/pam-pgsql

On 2014-07-06 12:18, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Author: tijl > Date: Sun Jul 6 10:18:36 2014 > New Revision: 360871 > URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/360871 > QAT: https://qat.redports.org/buildarchive/r360871/ > > Log: > The old pkg_install is buggy with @cwd. Just install the mod

Re: Apache 2.4 must become default NOW

On 2014-07-05 19:09, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > Hi, > > given ports@ ist listed as maintainer, you get the email. The Subject says > it. The world has moved on; in March I had a hard time arguing, in July I > just cannot anymore. We must switch to 2.4; whatever breaks needs fixing, > but some

Re: What is the preferred method for updating ports now?

On 2014-06-11 18:20, Paul Schmehl wrote: > I used to use cvsup. Then I switched to portsnap. Do I now need to switch > to svn? Hi Paul, portsnap is fine and I haven't heard any rant it will go away. cvsup was a different part, with the switch to SVN every commit was also staged in the back

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 2014-06-11 00:02, Simon Wright wrote: > On 10/06/2014 22:35, olli hauer wrote: ... >>>>> >>>>> poudriere bulk -j freebsd:9:x86:64 -C ports-mgmt/portdowngrade >>>>> >>>>> portdowngrade is removed from the repo and then the rebuild

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 2014-06-10 22:01, Simon Wright wrote: > On 10/06/2014 19:45, Scot Hetzel wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Simon Wright wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> I've recently set up poudriere and pkg on a 9.2 amd64 box. This has worked >>> well for the last month or so. However I have just tried to

Re: pkg aparently not respecting subversion make.conf settings

On 2014-06-10 19:08, Simon Wright wrote: > On 10/06/2014 18:36, Olli Hauer wrote: >> in case you are running pkg on the client run there the command >> $ pkg set -o devel/subversion:devel/subversion17 > > Thanks Olli. I had sone this but did it again "just to be sure&qu

Re: How are ports built now

On 2014-06-08 17:20, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On June 7, 2014 at 11:16:04 PM +0200 olli hauer wrote: > >> On 2014-06-07 22:40, Paul Schmehl wrote: >>> --On June 7, 2014 at 10:22:41 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" >>> wrote: >>>

Re: how to support STAGEDIR with GNU autoconf

On 2014-06-07 22:41, Dirk Jagdmann wrote: > I'm looking at changing the devel/quilt port to support stageing. I've read > the manual and know that there will be a variable STAGEDIR defined somewhere. > But where exactly? It seems it is defined in the environment of the FreeBSD > ports Makefile,

Re: splitting subversion port?

On 2014-06-07 19:10, Lev Serebryakov wrote: > Hello, Vick. > You wrote 22 мая 2014 г., 22:18:10: > > VK> I was wondering if you would be open to peeling off the mod_dav_svn > VK> from being an option in the subversion port to being its own port that > VK> depends on this one, or making a sub-port

Re: How are ports built now

On 2014-06-07 22:40, Paul Schmehl wrote: > --On June 7, 2014 at 10:22:41 PM +0200 "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" > wrote: > >> Paul Schmehl wrote: >> >>> Recently I upgraded two servers to 8.4 and implemented the pkgng system. >> [snip] >>> Is portmaster not the appropriate method for updating ports w

Re: Creating new port

y changes needed or if something is wrong in above > steps. > > Now I would say I will create a package for my new application > "finalpackage.tbz". > I would like to know if I can ship the "finalpackage.tbz" file to customer > to use the package on their sys

Re: Creating new port

On 2014-05-28 12:01, Raghu HB wrote: > Thanks Michelle for quick response. > > > First I would like to explain what is the application and how I am trying > to create port. > > We have some command line utilities to run on FreeBSD (Storage controller > software). > The installer should contain f

Re: postfix-policyd-weight broken with p5-Net-DNS 0.75

On 2014-05-23 23:57, Herbert J. Skuhra wrote: > Hi, > > after updating p5-Net-DNS from version 0.74 to 0.75 > postfix-policyd-weight (0.1.15.2) stopped working. > > I get the below error on two systems: > > May 23 13:31:35 mx postfix/policyd-weight[1037]: child: spawned > May 23 13:31:35 mx pos

Re: mail/dovecot2-pigeonhole does not fetch

On 2014-05-19 08:44, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > This is still the case. It looks like Dovecot updated to 2.2.13 and > pigeonhole to 0.4.3, and they took down the 0.4.2 distfile. Can we get the > 0.4.2 distfile hosted on ftp.freebsd.org until the maintainer updates the > ports? > > On 5/15/2014 8

Re: A child Postfix port with TLS enabled by default

On 2014-04-29 03:21, Sahil Tandon wrote: > Thanks to Olli and Matthias, I amended the original patch; revised > version attached. > > PS: I could not think of a less hack-ish way to accomplish the warning > suppression aside from adding those flags to CCARGS. > Hi Sahil, I have some addition.

Re: Upgrade to dovecot 2.2.12 failed - libldap not found

On 2014-04-28 19:41, olli hauer wrote: > On 2014-04-28 19:18, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: >> I am runing 10.0-RELEASE-p1 with dovecot 2.2.10 and LDAP support. >> The issue should be fixed with commit r352584. Sorry for breakage. --

Re: Upgrade to dovecot 2.2.12 failed - libldap not found

On 2014-04-28 19:18, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > I am runing 10.0-RELEASE-p1 with dovecot 2.2.10 and LDAP support. > > > The today upgrade to dovecot 2.2.12 fails: > > # portmaster --no-confirm --no-term-title -D -G dovecot > ... > checking for auth_userokay... no > checking for ldap_init in -lldap

  1   2   3   4   >