https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #22 from commit-h...@freebsd.org ---
A commit references this bug:
Author: tobik
Date: Wed Dec 6 19:46:53 UTC 2017
New revision: 455676
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/455676
Log:
math/py-matplotlib: Allow bu
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
Tobias Kortkamp changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. |to...@freebsd.org
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
Tobias Kortkamp changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||to...@freebsd.org
--- Comment #2
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
rsm...@xs4all.nl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #185105|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #19 from Kurt Jaeger ---
Portlint is unhappy:
make: "/home/pi/m/math/py-matplotlib/Makefile" line 36: Malformed conditional
(${PYTHON_MAJOR_VER} == 2)
make: "/home/pi/m/math/py-matplotlib/Makefile" line 72: Malformed conditiona
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #18 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
Created attachment 185337
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=185337&action=edit
Updated patch using option helpers and just using bsd.port.mk.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #17 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Richard Gallamore from comment #16)
The usage info in /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.options.mk led me to believe that
using the three different includes was necessary. I'll update the patch.
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
Richard Gallamore changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ult...@freebsd.org
--- Comment
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #15 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
Created attachment 185105
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=185105&action=edit
Patch to make the port work with both Python 2 and 3.
With regard to Koobs' comments, I'd like
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #14 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #13)
And independently to all that, the current (global) version-spec is still
incorrect, see comment 11 point (1)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #13 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #12)
It's possible (and I believe there are existing cases in the tree), but that
may or may not be the correct, right or best way to address the issue, say
versus sla
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #12 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #11)
1) Yes.
2) No. As far as I know, OPTIONS_DEFAULT should only include TKAGGBACKEND for
it to work with both Python 2 and 3, since GTKBACKEND and GTKAGGBA
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #11 from Kubilay Kocak ---
To explicitly separate the issues here:
1) Does matplotlib 1.5.3 support (bugs and build environments aside) Python
3.x? If so, USES=python: should reflect that (upstream intended)
version support as
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #10 from Kubilay Kocak ---
(In reply to rsmith from comment #9)
The word 'work' was specifically and intentionally not used, to focus just on
whether or not the USES=python: is incorrect as it relates to
what matplotlib is supp
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
--- Comment #9 from rsm...@xs4all.nl ---
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #8)
It depends on what you consider "work"?
If the Python 2.7 restriction is removed and *only* the TKAGGBACKEND option is
used, then the port builds and work
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213636
Kubilay Kocak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-qa
Status|New
16 matches
Mail list logo
